网联环境下基于多驾驶人风险评价的不良行为主动干预研究

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.04.032

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 283-292.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.04.032

• 智能车联网技术与应用 • 上一篇下一篇

网联环境下基于多驾驶人风险评价的不良行为主动干预研究

鲍琼，屈琦凯，唐涵润，陈建明，沈永俊^*

东南大学，交通学院，南京 211189

收稿日期:2022-05-17 修回日期:2022-06-02 接受日期:2022-06-06 出版日期:2022-08-25 发布日期:2022-08-22
作者简介:鲍琼(1981- )，女，山东人，讲师，博士。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划；国家自然科学基金青年科学基金；江苏省自然科学基金

Multi-drivers Risk Evaluation Based Proactive Intervention of Drivers' Risky Behavior Under Connected Transportation Contexts

BAO Qiong, QU Qi-kai, TANG Han-run, CHEN Jian-ming, SHEN Yong-jun^*

School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China

Received:2022-05-17 Revised:2022-06-02 Accepted:2022-06-06 Online:2022-08-25 Published:2022-08-22
Supported by:
National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFE0102700)；Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China(52002063)；Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China(BK20190371）。

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 依托智能网联技术背景，本文提出基于多驾驶人综合风险评价的不良行为主动干预框架。选取驾驶场景中多驾驶人行为表征参数，基于行车数据定义并辨识驾驶人的各类不良行为；利用面积法实现对不良驾驶行为发生频次、持续时间以及幅值的综合计算，并以可变权重构建其与事故风险的关联关系；借鉴数据包络分析思想，提出考虑可变权重的不良驾驶行为综合评价方法；利用Simulation of Urban Mobility(SUMO)搭建智能网联环境下驾驶仿真平台，以时间窗方式抽取场景中多驾驶人的历史行车数据，利用不良驾驶行为综合评价方法辨识风险驾驶人，提出基于累加窗口与滑动窗口的主动干预方法，每种方法均实现干预单车与干预多车两种策略；分析不同干预手段的效果，探究窗体大小、驾驶人接受率、干预车辆数等对干预结果的影响。研究表明，干预多车策略取得较好的效果，基于累加窗口与滑动窗口的驾驶人不良行为总得分分别下降 22.80%和10.50%；与无干预情况相比，当干预接受率为50%时，驾驶人不良行为总得分仍有所降低；与基于累加窗口方法相比，基于滑动窗口的干预方法更适合实际应用。本文提出的框架可为驾驶行为监测等提供技术支持。

关键词: 交通工程, 不良驾驶行为, 数据包络分析, 主动干预, 智能网联

Abstract: A proactive intervention framework based on a comprehensive evaluation of risky driving behavior among multiple drivers under intelligent and connected transportation contexts is proposed in this study. By selecting driving behavior parameters, different types of drivers' risky behavior are defined and identified based on their driving data. Then, an area method is utilized to obtain an integrated score considering the frequency, duration, and amplitude of each risky driving behavior, and the relationship between this score and crash risk is established by using variable weights. Based on the mechanism of data envelopment analysis (DEA), a modelling approach for risky driving behavior evaluation is proposed. Next, a microsimulation scenario based on Simulation of Urban Mobility(SUMO) is built to simulate the intelligent and connected transportation environment, and the historical driving data of multiple drivers are extracted by a time window. The comprehensive evaluation method of risky driving behavior is applied to identify risky drivers. Two intervention methods based on a cumulative window approach and a sliding window approach are proposed, respectively, and each method implements two strategies, i.e., single-vehicle intervention and multi-vehicle intervention. Finally, based on the micro-simulation experiment, the effect of different intervention methods is analyzed, and the impacts of window size, driver acceptance rate, and the number of intervention vehiclesare discussed. The results showed that the strategy of multi-vehicle intervention has achieved better results. The total scores of drivers' risky behavior under the cumulative window approach and the sliding window method are decreased by 22.80% and 10.50% , respectively. Compared with the situation without intervention, when the intervention acceptance rate is 50% , the total score of drivers' risky behavior in the scenario still decreases. Relative to the cumulative window approach, the sliding window approach appears to be a more reasonable way for practical application. The proposed framework can provide technical support for driving behavior monitoring.

Key words: traffic engineering, risky driving behavior, data envelopment analysis, proactive intervention, intelligent and connected transportation

中图分类号:

U491.254

鲍琼, 屈琦凯, 唐涵润, 陈建明, 沈永俊. 网联环境下基于多驾驶人风险评价的不良行为主动干预研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 283-292.

BAO Qiong, QU Qi-kai, TANG Han-run, CHEN Jian-ming, SHEN Yong-jun. Multi-drivers Risk Evaluation Based Proactive Intervention of Drivers' Risky Behavior Under Connected Transportation Contexts[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(4): 283-292.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.04.032

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V22/I4/283

参考文献

[1] World Health Organization. Global status report on road safety 2018: Summary[R]. World Health Organization, 2018.

[2] PAEFGEN J, STAAKE T, FLEISCH E. Multivariate exposure modeling of accident risk: Insights from pay-asyou-drive insurance data[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2014, 61(3): 27-40.

[3] HARPREET S, ANKIT K. Analyzing driver behavior under naturalistic driving conditions: A review[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2021, 150: 105908.

[4] JUN J, OGLE J, GUENSLER R. Relationships between crash involvement and temporal-spatial driving behavior activity patterns: Use of data for vehicles with global positioning systems[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2007, 2019(1): 246-255.

[5] LI F, ZHANG H, CHE H, et al. Dangerous driving behavior detection using smartphone sensors[C]. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2016: 1902-1907.

[6] ELLISON A B, BLIEMER M C J, GREAVES S P. Evaluating changes in driver behaviour: A risk profiling approach[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2015, 75: 298-309.

[7] CASTIGNANI G, DERRMANN T, FRANK R, et al. Driver behavior profiling using smartphones: A low-cost platform for driver monitoring[J]. Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 2015, 7(1): 91-102.

[8] DUDEK C L, HUCHINGSON R D. Manual on real-time motorist information displays[R]. McLean: Federal Highway Administration, 1986.

[9] 李志斌, 刘攀, 单肖年, 等. 高速公路可变限速控制策略安全性效果仿真[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2013, 48 (5): 942- 948. [LI Z B, LIU P, DAN X N, et al. Safety effect simulation of variable speed limit control strategy for expressway[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 48(5): 942-948.]

[10] 牛世峰, 袁伟, 李海琴, 等. 语音信息对驾驶人超速行为干预效果研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2016, 16(5): 79-84. [NIU S F, YUAN W, LI H Q, et al. Study on the intervention effect of voice information on drivers' speeding behavior[J]. Transportation System Engineering and Information, 2016, 16(5): 79-84.]

[11] 刘金星, 李可民, 付阳. 一种车载疲劳驾驶预警系统设计方案[J]. 电声技术, 2018, 42(9): 61-64. [LIU J X, LI K M, FU Y. Design scheme of vehicle fatigue driving warning system[J]. Electroacoustic Technology, 2018, 42 (9): 61-64.]

[12] FARAH H, KOUTSOPOULOS H N. Do cooperative systems make drivers' car-following behavior safer?[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2014, 41: 61-72.

[13] LI L, LU G, WANG Y, et al. A rear- end collision avoidance system of connected vehicles[C]. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2014: 63-68.

[14] PAYRE W, DIELS C. I want to brake free: The effect of connected vehicle features on driver behaviour, usability and acceptance[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2019, 82: 102932.

[15] HONG Z, CHEN Y, WU Y. A driver behavior assessment and recommendation system for connected vehicles to produce safer driving environments through a "follow the leader" approach[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2020, 139: 105460.

[16] HUSSAIN Q, ALHAJYASEEN W K M, PIRDAVANI A, et al. Do detection-based warning strategies improve vehicle yielding behavior at uncontrolled midblock crosswalks?[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2021, 157: 106166.

[17] Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales. Speed problem definition and countermeasure summary, speed [R]. New Southwales, 2000.

[18] ELLISON A B, GREAVES S P, BLIEMER M C J. Driver behaviour profiles for road safety analysis[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2015, 76: 118-132.

[19] BASTOS J T, SHEN Y, HERMANS E, et al. Traffic fatality indicators in brazil: State diagnosis based on data envelopment analysis research[J]. Accident Analysis andPrevention, 2015, 81: 61-73.

[20] SHEN Y, HERMANS E, BRIJS T, et al. Road safety risk evaluation and target setting using data envelopment analysis and its extensions[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2012, 48: 430-441.

[21] BAO Q, TANG H, SHEN Y. Driving behavior based relative risk evaluation using a nonparametric optimization method[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18: 1-15.

网联环境下基于多驾驶人风险评价的不良行为主动干预研究

Multi-drivers Risk Evaluation Based Proactive Intervention of Drivers' Risky Behavior Under Connected Transportation Contexts

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	覃文文 , 李欢 , 李武 , 谷金晶 , 戢晓峰. 货车驾驶人驾驶行为与行车安全研究进展[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(5): 55-74.
[2]	徐进 , 杨子邈 , 陈钦 , 陈正委. 基于电子不停车收费数据的山区高速公路车速分布与车型分类研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(5): 75-84.
[3]	马庆禄, 牛圣平, 曾皓威, 段学锋. 网联环境下混合交通流偶发拥堵演化机理研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(5): 97-106.
[4]	胡立伟, 吕一帆, 赵雪亭, 薛宇, 张成杰, 雷国庆, 刘凡. 基于数据驱动的交通事故伤害程度影响因素及其耦合关系研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(5): 117-124.
[5]	聂庆慧 , 龙秀江 , 梁程 , 夏井新 , 欧吉顺. 多约束条件下城市道路环卫车优化配置与路径规划[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(5): 273-284.
[6]	林培群 , 曾维嘉, 周楚昊, 庞崇浩. 新冠疫情防控对大湾区高速公路运输的影响分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(5): 318-327.
[7]	焦朋朋 , 李汝鉴, 王健宇, 葛浩菁, 陈越. 考虑潜在类别的老年行人交通事故严重程度致因分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(5): 328-336.
[8]	任其亮, 徐韬, 程龙春. 基于射频数据的道路交通流路径识别优化模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 89-95.
[9]	陈永恒, 李浩楠, 吴场建, 李婉宁. 基于元胞自动机的附加导流岛型出口仿真建模[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 96-105.
[10]	覃文文, 鄢祺阳, 谷金晶, 李武, 戢晓峰. 重载货车驾驶人驾驶风格识别与量化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 137-148.
[11]	田顺, 郑博文, 孙健, 刘晶郁. 基于实车行驶工况的电动公交运营期碳足迹测算[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 149-157.
[12]	冯海霞, 王兴渝, 咸化彩, 刘新华, 李健, 宁二伟. 城市交通运行状况对机动车碳排放的影响研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 167-175.
[13]	陈政, 温惠英. 高速公路隧道临近段车辆换道持续时间生存分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 210-217.
[14]	孙启鹏, 乔佳璐, 张锴琦, 孙佳. 基于社会网络结构特征的网约车平台竞争策略研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 1-6.
[15]	李岩, 曾明哲, 朱才华, 汪帆, 邓亚娟. 基于多点线圈联合数据的高速公路匝道影响范围识别[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 53-62.