考虑出行者不同理性程度的拥堵交通流分配方法

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2023.01.023

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2023, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 216-223.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2023.01.023

考虑出行者不同理性程度的拥堵交通流分配方法

龙雪琴^*，王瑞璇，王晗

长安大学，运输工程学院，西安 710064

收稿日期:2022-11-17 修回日期:2022-12-05 接受日期:2022-12-07 出版日期:2023-02-25 发布日期:2023-02-16
作者简介:龙雪琴(1982- )，女，陕西西安人，副教授，博士。
基金资助:
陕西省自然科学基础研究项目(2021JQ-276)

Traffic Flow Assignment Method Considering Travelers' Different Rational Degree Under Congestions

LONG Xue-qin^*, WANG Rui-xuan, WANG Han

College of Transportation Engineering, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China

Received:2022-11-17 Revised:2022-12-05 Accepted:2022-12-07 Online:2023-02-25 Published:2023-02-16
Supported by:
Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi (2021JQ-276)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究出行者感知偏好对交通分配结果的影响，本文构建了微观路径选择模型，提出拥堵条件下受路段通行能力限制的交通分配算法。引入出行者决策过程中的后悔和无差别化阈值，考虑出行时间和排队时间的心理感知差异，构建不同理性程度下的路径选择概率模型。在集计水平上，考虑当前路段及其上下游路段通行能力限制、路段车辆空间排队和溢出，提出路段车流量流入、流出的修正方法。采用增量加载分配方法，研究路段车辆的消散特性，再现了从个体路径决策到宏观路网状态的演化过程。基于Nguyen-Dupuis仿真网络，比较不同算法下各路段的拥堵车辆和各路段车辆流入、流出情况。结果表明：出行者个人偏好感知会显著影响拥堵路段的成本函数，是出行者路径选择的关键因素，但是出行者个人偏好对非拥堵路段的车辆流入、流出影响较小；考虑个体偏好的交通分配方法能降低路网的平均饱和度。本文提出的考虑有限理性的拥堵交通分配方法可应用于拥堵路网的交通诱导，有利于促进道路资源的合理利用。

关键词: 交通工程, 交通分配, 有限理性, 交通拥堵, 后悔理论, 无差别化阈值

Abstract: To investigate the influence of traveler' perceptual preference on traffic assignment results, this paper proposes a microscopic route selection model and a traffic assignment algorithm constrained by road capacity under congested conditions. Travelers' regret and indifference threshold are introduced into the decision-making process. The route selection probability model under different rational degree is developedin consideration of the psychological perception difference of normal travel time and queuing time. At the aggregate level, the inflow and outflow correction method is proposed based on the capacity limitation of the current road and its upstream and downstream sections, as well as the space queue and overflow of vehicles. The incremental traffic loading assignment method is adopted to study vehicles' dissipation characteristics, and the evolution process from individual route decisions to macroscopic road network states is reproduced. Based on the Nguyen-Dupuis simulation network, the traffic congestion and inflowoutflow are compared using different algorithms. The results show that travelers' personal preference perception significantly affect the cost function of congested road sections, but has minimum impact on vehicles' inflow and outflow in non-congested sections. The bounded rationality traffic assignment method considering individual preferences can reduce the average saturation of the road network. The proposed traffic assignment method can be applied to the traffic guidance of the congested road network, which is beneficial to the rational utilization of road resources.

Key words: traffic engineering, traffic assignment, bounded rationality, traffic congestion, regret theory, indifference threshold

中图分类号:

U491

龙雪琴, 王瑞璇, 王晗. 考虑出行者不同理性程度的拥堵交通流分配方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 216-223.

LONG Xue-qin, WANG Rui-xuan, WANG Han. Traffic Flow Assignment Method Considering Travelers' Different Rational Degree Under Congestions[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2023, 23(1): 216-223.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2023.01.023

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2023/V23/I1/216

参考文献

[1] 岳昊, 刘晓玲, 孟晓雨, 等. 拥堵道路网的静态交通流非均衡分配方法[J]. 北京交通大学学报, 2017, 41(3): 1-6. [YUE H, LIU X L, MENG X Y, et al. A nonequilibrium method to solve static traffic assignment problem at the congested road network[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 2017, 41(3): 1-6.]

[2] 岳昊, 张鹏, 刘晓玲, 等. 拥堵路网交通流均衡分配模型[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2019, 51(9): 103-109.[YUE H, ZHANG P, LIU X L, et al. The equilibrium model for congested traffic assignment in road networks [J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2019, 51 (9): 103-109.]

[3] 程琳, 王炜. 拥堵交通网络模型和增强拉格朗日乘子算法[J]. 管理科学学报, 2006, 9(5): 18-27. [CHENG L, WANG W. Congested traffic network model and enhanced Lagrange multiplier algorithm[J]. Journal of Management Science in China, 2006, 9(5): 18-27.]

[4] 张雄飞, 李瑞敏, 郭旭明, 等. 带转向延误的拥挤交通网络配流模型及算法[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 52(6): 848-853. [ZHANG X F, LI R M, GUO X M, et al. Traffic assignment problem model with turning delays for congested networks[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Natural Science Edition), 2012, 52(6): 848- 853.]

[5] 刘晓玲. 拥堵交通流分配和道路网络容量计算理论与方法研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2017. [LIU X L. Research on theory and method of congested traffic flow assignment and road network capacity calculation[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2017.]

[6] BELL M G H. Stochastic user equilibrium assignment in networks with queues[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 1995, 29(2): 125-137.

[7] MAHMASSANI H S, CHANG G L. On boundedly rational user equilibrium intransportation systems[J]. Transportation Science, 1987, 21(2): 89-99.

[8] SHEFFI Y, POWELL W B. An algorithm for the equilibrium assignment problem with random link times [J]. Networks, 2010, 12(2): 191-207.

[9] 刘诗序, 陈文思, 阎昊, 等. 有限理性下考虑出发时间选择的网络交通流演化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2017, 17(3): 127-135. [LIU S X, CHEN W S, YAN H, et al. Network traffic flow evolution considering departure time choice based on bounded rationality[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2017, 17(3): 127-135.]

[10] 张新洁, 关宏志, 赵磊, 等. 有限理性视野下出行者出行方式选择分层Logit模型研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18(6): 110-116. [ZHANG X J, GUAN H Z, ZHAO L, et al. Nested Logit model on travel mode choice under boundebly rational view[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2018, 18(6): 110-116.]

[11] ZHANG J, YANG H. Modeling route choice inertia in network equilibrium with heterogeneous prevailing choice sets[J]. Transportation Research Part C, 2015, 57: 42-54.

[12] ROGERS B W, PALFREY T R, CAMERER C F. Heterogeneous quantal response equilibrium and cognitive hierarchies[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 2009, 144(4): 1440-1467.

[13] CHEN H C, FRIEDMAN J W, THISSE J F. Boundedly rational nash equilibrium: Aprobabilisticchoice approach [J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 1997, 18(1): 32-54.

[14] LONG X Q, HOU C X, LIU S S, et al. Sequential route choice modeling based on dynamic reference points and its empirical study[J]. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2020, 8081576: 1-11.

[15] CHORUS C G. A new model of random regret minimization[J]. European Journal of Transportand Infrastructure Research, 2010,10(2): 181-196. [16] DI X, LIU H X, ZHU S, et al. Indifference bands for boundedly rational route switching[J]. Transportation, 2016, 44(5): 1169-1194.

考虑出行者不同理性程度的拥堵交通流分配方法

Traffic Flow Assignment Method Considering Travelers' Different Rational Degree Under Congestions

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	钱国敏, 任璐, 季青原, 冯远静, 章立辉, 王殿海. 考虑车流通行效率的混行交叉口时空资源配置[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(2): 67-73.
[2]	刘志伟, 刘建荣. 数字鸿沟背景下老年人对自动驾驶汽车接受度[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(2): 168-175.
[3]	唐铁桥, 钟静燃, 袁小婷. 考虑社交距离的火车站检票过程建模研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(2): 225-232.
[4]	刘唐志, 毕辉云, 杨卓思, 夏号杰, 尚婷. 基于操纵量指标的合流区危险驾驶行为谱研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(2): 242-251.
[5]	赵雪婷, 贾鹏, 杨彦博, 匡海波. 韧性与公平双视角下公路网灾后修复决策优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(2): 262-274.
[6]	黄赶祥, 张薇, 徐迪. 共享单车对我国主要城市交通拥堵的影响[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(2): 300-306.
[7]	黄意然, 宋国华, 彭飞. 基于实际车重的重型货车比功率分布及排放模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(2): 326-334.
[8]	卢凯, 赵一鸣, 叶志宏, 首艳芳. 适于不等双周期的干道双向绿波协调控制数解法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 86-96.
[9]	丁小兵, 史淦, 洪晨, 刘志钢. 地铁安检客流智能引导及组织优化方法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 123-130.
[10]	汪怡然, 莫鹏里, 别一鸣, 徐志红, 万剑, 刘志远. 考虑行程时间波动的电动公交可变行车计划[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 152-164.
[11]	刘路美, 刘钲可, 马昌喜, 谭二龙, 马晓磊. 共享单车影响下接驳公交线路设计与车辆配置方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 165-175.
[12]	吐尔逊·买买提, 马洁, 刘志成, 陈俊豪. 基于维度规约的快速路全时段排放模型适应性研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 245-253.
[13]	白婧荣, 唐伯明, 刘瑞航, 毕辉云. 桥隧组合复杂场景速度行为特性及线形评价[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 295-304.
[14]	庄稼丰, 李正军, 丁瑞, 熊文磊, 张河山, 徐进. 高速公路车辆轨迹摆动特征与小客车道宽度研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 324-336.
[15]	郭凤香, 曲思柔, 万华森, 陈瑶, 李京阳. 分心驾驶研究文献计量学分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(6): 26-39.