考虑资金约束的中欧班列运价与运量决策分析

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.01.004

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (1): 30-36.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.01.004

• 综合交通运输体系论坛 • 上一篇下一篇

考虑资金约束的中欧班列运价与运量决策分析

张晓明¹，徐芳²，江文辉¹，蒋朝哲^*1

1. 西南交通大学，交通运输与物流学院，成都 610031；2. 四川旅游学院，成都 610031

收稿日期:2021-09-17 修回日期:2021-10-27 接受日期:2021-10-29 出版日期:2022-02-25 发布日期:2022-02-22
作者简介:张晓明(1983- )，女，河南太康人，博士生。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金；教育部人文社会科学基金

Pricing and Ordering Decisions of China Railway Express Considering Capital Constraint

ZHANG Xiao-ming¹ , XU Fang² , JIANG Wen-hui¹ , JIANG Chao-zhe^*1

1. School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China; 2. Sichuan Tourism University, Chengdu 610031, China

Received:2021-09-17 Revised:2021-10-27 Accepted:2021-10-29 Online:2022-02-25 Published:2022-02-22
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(71873111)； Foundation of Humanities and Social Sciences from Ministry of Education(18YJAZH024)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对围绕中欧班列业务而产生的中小企业资金约束问题，本文考虑运输价格和运输服务质量双重需求特征，构建由中欧班列和国际货代公司组成的二级物流服务供应链博弈模型，分别求解无资金约束、银行融资、中欧融资及集中决策这4种情景下双方的运价决策和利润函数。以利润函数最大化为目标，探究货代公司自有资金、中欧班列运输服务质量对双方定价与融资决策影响的作用机理，验证不同融资模式选择的可行范围，并进行数值分析。研究表明：资金约束使得中欧班列运输价格升高，但相比银行融资模式，中欧融资模式能够提供更低的运输价格。中欧融资模式下，双方利润受货代公司自有资金的影响，只有当自有资金小于某临界值时，双方才会选择该融资模式，且中欧融资模式下，供应链整体绩效高于银行融资模式。

关键词: 铁路运输, 运输定价, 博弈论, 中欧班列, 资金约束

Abstract: In view of the financial constraints of small and medium-sized enterprises for China Railway Express, this paper considers the demand characteristics of transportation price and service quality, and develops a two-echelon logistics service supply chain game model which considers China Railway Express and an international freight forwarding agent. The pricing solutions and profit functions are analyzed under four scenarios without financial constraints, with bank financing, China Railway Express financing, and centralized decision. With the goal of maximizing the profit function, this study examines the influence of the freight forwarding agent's initial funds and transportation service quality on the pricing and financing decisions for China Railway Express and the freight forwarding agent, verifies the feasible condition of different financing modes selection, and then performs numerical analysis. The research shows that capital constraints would result in an increase of the transportation price of China Railway Express; the China Railway Express financing mode can provide lower transportation price than bank financing. In the China Railway Express financing, the profits of both parties are significantly affected by the freight forwarding agent's initial funds. Only when the initial funds are less than a certain critical value, both parties would choose the mode of China Railway Express financing. The overall performance of the supply chain under China Railway Express financing is higher than the mode of bank financing.

Key words: railway transportation, transportation price, game theory, China Railway Express, constraint of capital

中图分类号:

U268.6

张晓明, 徐芳, 江文辉, 蒋朝哲. 考虑资金约束的中欧班列运价与运量决策分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 30-36.

ZHANG Xiao-ming , XU Fang , JIANG Wen-hui , JIANG Chao-zhe. Pricing and Ordering Decisions of China Railway Express Considering Capital Constraint[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(1): 30-36.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.01.004

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V22/I1/30

参考文献

[1] 戴炜东, 汤银英, 任静茹. 基于货主选择的“蓉欧快铁” 竞争定价研究[J]. 铁道经济研究, 2019(4): 44- 47. [DAI W D, TANG Y Y, REN J R. Competitive pricing of “Chengdu-Europe Express Railway”based on the selection of shippers[J]. Railway Economics Research, 2019(4): 44-47.]

[2] 钟世和. 破解小微企业融资难实践[J]. 中国金融, 2020 (4): 74-75. [ZHONG S H. Solving the difficulty of financing small and medium enterprises[J]. China Finance, 2020(4): 74-75.]

[3] 国家外汇管理局陕西省分局. 跨境金融区块链服务平台新场景上线助力中欧班列高质量发展. [EB/OL]. State Administration of Foreign Exchange-Shaanxi Brach. The launch of a new cross-border financial blockchain service platform has contributed to the high-quantity development of China Railway Express. (2021- 06- 30) [2021-10-26]. http: //www. safe. gov. cn/shaanxi/2021/ 0630/946.html.

[4] 谢雨蓉, 高咏玲, 陈永东, 等. 市场竞争下考虑发车间隔的中欧班列定价与补贴决策研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(4): 7-13, 20. [XIE Y R, GAO Y L, CHEN Y D, et al. Pricing and subsidy decisions of China railway express considering its departure interval under market competition[J]. Journal of Transportation System Engineering and Information Technology, 2020, 20(4): 7-13, 20.]

[5] BUZACOTT J A, ZHANG R Q. Inventory management with asset-based financing[J]. Management Science, 2004, 50(9): 1274-1292.

[6] 于辉, 李西, 王亚文. 电商参与的供应链融资模式: 银行借贷 VS 电商借贷[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(7):134-140. [YU H, LI X, WANG Y W. Electronic commerce platform-joint supply chain financing mode: Bank lending VS. Electronic commercial platform lending [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25 (7): 134-140.]

[7] KOUVELIS P, ZHAO W H. Financing the newsvendor: Supplier VS. Bank, and the structure of optimal trade credit contracts[J]. Operations Research, 2012, 60(3): 566-580.

[8] 李健, 王亚静, 冯耕中, 等. 供应链金融述评: 现状与未来[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2020, 40(8): 1978-1995. [LI J, WANG Y J, FENG G Z, et al. Supply chain finance review: Current situation and future trend[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2020, 40(8): 1978- 1995.]

[9] CHEN X F, WU Y B, JI A B, et al. Offering subsidies to logistics providers and consignors[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2021, 72(1): 35-60.

[10] 李青林, 彭其渊, 郭经玮, 等. 基于BWM的中欧班列客户需求偏好异质性研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(3): 28-32. [LI Q L, PENG Q Y, GUO J W, et al. Customer demand preferences' heterogeneity of China Railway Express based on best worst method[J]. Journal of Transportation System Engineering and Information Technology, 2020, 20(3): 28-32.]

[11] 黄帅, 樊治平. 3PL企业融资服务模式下考虑损失规避零售商的供应链运营和协调策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(11): 149- 157. [HUANG S, FAN Z P. The operational and coordination strategies of supply chain with a loss-averse retailer under 3PL firm financing service[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(11): 149-157.]

[1]	王煜, 苗蕾. 基于离散价格的高铁差异化定价优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 7-14.
[2]	耿庆桥, 贾元华, 陈军团. 基于变权可拓物元的铁路“走出去”公私合营项目风险决策[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 64-71.
[3]	戚建国, 周厚盛, 杨立兴, 周亚茹, 张春田. 灵活编组条件下轨道交通客货协同运输方案优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 197-205.
[4]	张春田, 戚建国, 杨立兴, 高原, 高自友. 基于不确定旅客需求的高速铁路鲁棒列车开行方案研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 115-123.
[5]	周勇, 张杰, 钟祾充, 李文锋, 王国栋. 铁路集装箱中心站多轨道吊柔性协同调度优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 133-141.
[6]	牛惠民. 轨道列车时刻表问题研究综述[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(5): 114-124.
[7]	徐素秀, 谢冰, 秦威, 程会兵. 电动汽车充电与换电模式定价及投资策略[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(5): 183-189.
[8]	刘葛辉, 陈绍宽, 刘爽, 金华, 王丹阳. 资源约束下城市轨道交通基础设施维修任务安排优化模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(3): 163-169.
[9]	徐智勇. 铁路电分相布设及纵断面协同优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(3): 170-175.
[10]	钟明轩，乐逸祥，周磊山. 高铁站列车和调车作业计划一体化编制方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(3): 176-186.
[11]	吕敏, 帅斌, 周照玉, 张士行, 左静, 李林卿. 考虑边境站延误风险的中欧班列运输路径决策[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(3): 254-259.
[12]	张蒙蒙, 许茂增. 考虑政府补贴决策的中欧班列竞合关系研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(2): 16-21.
[13]	李岸隽，王典，彭其渊. 基于个体出行链的区域城际铁路规划方法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(2): 30-36.
[14]	刘晓伟，晏启鹏，倪少权，吕苗苗，吕红霞. 考虑空车调配协调的货物列车开行方案优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(2): 180-188.
[15]	李晓娟，石佳娜，李得伟，闫振英. 考虑定制化列车的运行图与能力协同优化方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(1): 95-100.

考虑资金约束的中欧班列运价与运量决策分析

Pricing and Ordering Decisions of China Railway Express Considering Capital Constraint

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics