基于复杂性的多扇区移交策略优化

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2023.01.030

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2023, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 284-294.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2023.01.030

基于复杂性的多扇区移交策略优化

王红勇^*，张加豪，许平

中国民航大学，空中交通管理学院，天津 300300

收稿日期:2022-10-19 修回日期:2022-12-06 接受日期:2022-12-09 出版日期:2023-02-25 发布日期:2023-02-16
作者简介:王红勇(1979- )，男，山西洪洞人，副研究员，博士。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金 (U1833103)；天津市应用基础多元投入基金重点项目 (21JCZDJC00840)

Optimization of Multi-sector Transfer Strategy Based on Complexity

WANG Hong-yong^*, ZHANG Jia-hao, XU Ping

College of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China

Received:2022-10-19 Revised:2022-12-06 Accepted:2022-12-09 Online:2023-02-25 Published:2023-02-16
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1833103)；Key Program of Tianjin Science and Technology Plan (21JCZDJC00840)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 现有多扇区移交间隔管理研究往往忽视扇区复杂性，可能出现扇区局部复杂性不均衡等问题，对空域造成一定安全隐患。本文充分考虑多个管制扇区复杂程度，提出一种新的管制移交间隔优化方法。首先，基于扇区之间复杂性的相互影响关系，建立大型区域管制中心多扇区网络模型。其次，提出航空器进入多扇区边界时刻调整，航空器进入各个扇区时刻调整以及航空器高度层重新配备等3种策略，建立以多扇区复杂性的均值、均衡程度和航空器总延误为目标的移交策略优化模型，并采用多目标遗传算法进行求解。最后，基于北京区域管制中心(ZBAAAR)的实际运行数据进行仿真分析。结果表明：3种策略可使复杂性均值分别降低2.2%，2.8%，6.0%，可使复杂性均衡程度分别提高1.76%，1.83%，1.38%，基于航空器进入时刻控制的两种策略导致航班平均延误时间分别为-295 s和-214 s，验证了模型及算法的有效性。

关键词: 航空运输, 空中交通复杂性, 多扇区复杂性, 多管制扇区, 移交策略

Abstract: The complexity of the sector is often neglected in the existing research of multi-sector transfer interval management, which may lead to some problems, such as unbalanced local sector complexity, and thereby cause security risks to airspace. This paper fully considers the complexity of multiple control sectors, and proposes a new optimization method of minute-in-trail. First, a multi-sector network model of a large regional control center is established based on the interaction of complexity between sectors. Then, three strategies are put forward, i.e., the time adjustment of aircraft entering multi-sector boundary, the time adjustment of aircraft entering each sector and the reassignment of flight level. A transfer strategy optimization model is established, which take the average of the complexity of multi-sector, the degree of equilibrium, and the aircraft delay as the objective. A multi-objective genetic algorithm is adopted to solve the model. Finally, the simulation analysis is carried out based on the actual operation data of the Beijing Regional Control Center (ZBAAAR). The results showed that: the three strategies can reduce the average complexity by 2.2% , 2.8% , and 6.0% respectively, and the complexity equilibrium is increased by 1.76% , 1.83%, and 1.38%, respectively. The two strategies based on aircraft entry time control result in an average flight delay time of -295 s and -214 s, respectively, which verifies the effectiveness of the model and algorithm.

Key words: air transportation, air traffic complexity, multi-sector complexity, multiple control sector, transfer strategy

中图分类号:

V355

王红勇, 张加豪, 许平. 基于复杂性的多扇区移交策略优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 284-294.

WANG Hong-yong, ZHANG Jia-hao, XU Ping. Optimization of Multi-sector Transfer Strategy Based on Complexity[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2023, 23(1): 284-294.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2023.01.030

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2023/V23/I1/284

参考文献

[1] MUKHERJEE A, GRABBE S, SRIDHAR B. Alleviating airspace restriction through strategic control[J]. Historia Critica, 2013(1): 101-146.

[2] HUANG J L, XU Q C, YAN Y J, et al. Generalized method of modeling minute-in-trail strategy for air traffic flow management[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019(3): 1-12.

[3] 孙浩, 胡明华, 张颖. 基于遗传算法的扇区边界尾随间隔管理方法的研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2010, 10(6): 174-179. [SUN H, HU M H, ZHANG Y. Research of miles-in-trail strategy in sector boundary based on genetic algorithm[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2010, 10(6): 174-179.]

[4] SHETH K, GUTIERREZ-NOLASCO S, PETERSEN J. Analysis and modeling of miles-in-trail restrictions in the national airspace system[J]. Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, 2013(1): 1-12.

[5] 王兴隆, 纪君柔. 基于 MIT 的多扇区流量控制模型研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2019, 41(3): 33-39. [WANG X L, JI J R. Research on multi sector flow control model based on MIT[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2019, 41(3): 33-39.]

[6] 孙樊荣, 杨昱昕, 韩松臣, 等. 基于扇区负荷约束的管制移交间隔多目标优化模型[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2017, 49(3): 434-440. [SUN F R, YANG Y X, HAN S C, et al. Novel multi-objective optimization model for minute-in-trail strategy based on sector workload restriction[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2017, 49(3): 434-440.]

[7] 赵密, 王兴隆. 基于MIT的扇区流量管理决策[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(S1): 136-140. [ZHAO M, WANG X L. Sector or flow management decision-making based on MIT[J]. Acta Aeronautica and Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(S1): 136-140.]

[8] GUO Y C F, HU M H, ZOU B, et al. Air traffic flow management integrating separation management and ground holding: An efficiency-equity bi-objective perspective[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2022, 155: 394-423.

[9] HASSAN M O, SAUCIER A, YACOUT S, et al. A mixed integer linear programming model for multi-sector planning using speed and heading changes[J]. Computers and Operations Research, 2021, 128: 105174.

[10] HONG Y, CHOI B, LEE K, et al. Conflict management considering a smooth transition of aircraft into adjacent airspace[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2016, 17(9): 2490-2501.

[11] WANG H Y, DONG Z Z, DENG T T, et al. En-route sector complexity control strategies in air traffic management[J]. Transactions of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2021, 38(6): 901-913.

[12] YAZGAN E, ERDI S, ŞİMŞEK D. Overview of studies on the cognitive workload of the air traffic controller[J]. International Journal of Aviation Science and Technology, 2021, 2(1): 28-36.

[13] TOMISLAV R, PETAR A, DORIS N, et al. Air traffic complexity as a source of risk in ATM[M]. US: Intechopen, 2020.

[14] SCOT E, NATASHA A, MICHAEL B. An operational strategy for persistent contrail mitigation[C]. Hilton: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2009.

[1]	张勰, 肖恩媛, 刘宏志, 赵嶷飞, 王梦琦. 基于有限穿越可视图的进场航班流量波动特性研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(6): 244-257.
[2]	温瑞英, 刘文瀚, 王红勇. 编队飞行中基于危险区域的后机最优位置研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(5): 300-308.
[3]	唐小卫, 陈祯, 张生润, 丁叶. 繁忙机场机坪空间构型对航班离港滑行时间的影响[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(5): 309-317.
[4]	韩博, 邓志强, 于敬磊, 石依琳, 于剑. 碳达峰目标下中国民航CO₂与NO_x减排协同效益分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 53-62.
[5]	蒋丽, 杨露, 梁昌勇, 董骏峰. 基于无人机的高层住宅最后“一百米”配送优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 236-245.
[6]	钟罡, 励瑾, 张晓玮, 张洪海. 物流无人机对地风险评估方法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 246-254.
[7]	马剑, 廖伟屹, 陈娟, 王巧, 唐铁桥, 原志路. 基于乘客超越行为建模的航空登机效率分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 255-267.
[8]	张洪海, 冯棣坤, 张晓玮, 刘皞, 钟罡, 张连东. 城市物流无人机起降点布局规划研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 207-214.
[9]	张培文, 杜福民, 汪瑜. 基于链路预测的中小机场连接机制研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 298-304.
[10]	王红勇, 郭宇鹏. 基于航空器自主运行的空中交通复杂性建模[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 305-312.
[11]	张洪海, 张连东, 刘皞, 钟罡. 城市低空物流无人机航迹规划模型研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 256-264.
[12]	张魏宁, 胡明华, 杜婧涵, 尹嘉男. 基于条件生成对抗网络的扇区复杂度评估[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 226-233.
[13]	胡荣, 王德芸, 冯慧琳, 刘志昊, 张军峰. 碳达峰视角下的机场航空器碳排放预测[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 257-263.
[14]	李杰, 杨好天, 王兵, 周晓宁, 孙若飞. 民航飞机起飞推力对油耗和排放的影响分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 283-288.
[15]	胡荣, 冯慧琳, 刘博文, 张军峰, 王德芸. 点汇聚系统的航空器污染物减排效应与机理[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(5): 165-173.

基于复杂性的多扇区移交策略优化

Optimization of Multi-sector Transfer Strategy Based on Complexity

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics