基于生命周期评价的氢能重卡排放分析

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2024.04.028

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2024, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 292-299.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2024.04.028

基于生命周期评价的氢能重卡排放分析

李雷^*1，钱思达^1,2，徐黎庆^1,3，焦文玲^4a,4b，张鑫^4a,4b，张承虎^4a,4b

1. 陕西科技大学，经济与管理学院，西安710021；2.西安电子科技大学，经济与管理学院，西安710126； 3. 西北农林科技大学，经济与管理学院，陕西杨凌712100；4.哈尔滨工业大学，a.建筑与设计学院， b. 寒地城乡人居环境科学与技术工业和信息化部重点实验室，哈尔滨150090

收稿日期:2024-03-21 修回日期:2024-06-14 接受日期:2024-06-17 出版日期:2024-08-25 发布日期:2024-08-22
作者简介:李雷(1985- )，男，陕西咸阳人，讲师，博士。
基金资助:
陕西省教育厅重点科学研究计划项目 (23JZ026)；陕西省哲学社会科学研究专项智库项目 (2024ZD442)。

Emission Analysis of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Heavy-duty Vehicles Based on Life Cycle Assessment

LI Lei^*1,QIAN Sida^1,2,XU Liqing^1,3,JIAO Wenling^4a,4b,ZHANG Xin^4a,4b,ZHANG Chenghu^4a,4b

1. School of Economics and Management, Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, Xi'an 710021, China; 2. School of Economics and Management, Xidian University, Xi'an 710126, China; 3. School of Economics and Management, Northwest A& F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China; 4a. School ofArchitecture and Design, 4b. Key Laboratory of Scientific and Technological Innovation for Cold Region Urban-Rural Human Settlement Environment of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China

Received:2024-03-21 Revised:2024-06-14 Accepted:2024-06-17 Online:2024-08-25 Published:2024-08-22
Supported by:
ShaanxiProvincialDepartmentofEducationKeyScientific Research Program Projects (23JZ026)；Shaanxi Provincial Philosophy and Social Science Research Specialized Think Tank Project (2024ZD442)。

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为分析在我国现有能源结构下发展氢燃料电池重卡相比传统能源重卡有何优势，本文基于生命周期评价方法，利用美国阿贡国家实验室研发的GREET(Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Transportation)模型，采用控制变量法对比分析煤制氢和可再生能源制氢路径下的氢燃料电池重卡和柴油重卡的全生命周期空气污染物气体排放情况，并对可能影响车辆排放的因素进行敏感性分析，最后以榆林市重卡车队为例进行车队替换模型分析。模拟结果表明：采用可再生能源制氢路径的氢燃料电池重卡相比柴油重卡平均减少了68.74%的各类空气污染物排放；采用煤制氢路径的氢燃料电池重卡在CO、NOx和CO2这3种气体的排放水平均低于柴油重卡；可再生能源发电制氢比普通电解制氢平均减少氢燃料电池重卡92.41%的空气污染物排放；长途氢燃料电池重卡比短途氢燃料电池重卡减少12.57%的空气污染物排放；采取氢燃料电池重卡替换柴油重卡的策略预计到2030年能减少13.77%的车队整体空气污染物排放。本文在公路运输范畴内对氢能重卡的空气污染物排放水平进行分析，为后续氢能重卡的推广提供依据。

关键词: 公路运输, 气体排放, GREET模型, 重型卡车, 氢能, 生命周期评价

Abstract: To analyze the advantages of hydrogen fuel cell heavy-duty vehicles (FCHDVs) compared to conventional energy heavy-duty vehicles under China's current energy structure, this study employed the life cycle assessment method and the GREET model developed by the Argonne National Laboratory. A controlled variable method was used to compare the full life cycle air pollutant emissions of FCHDVs and diesel heavy-duty vehicles under the coal-to hydrogen and renewable energy-to-hydrogen pathways. A sensitivity analysis was conducted on factors affecting vehicle emissions. Finally, a fleet replacement model analysis was performed using the heavy-duty vehicle fleet in Yulin City as a case study. Simulation results indicate that FCHDVs using the renewable energy-to-hydrogen pathway reduce various air pollutant emissions by an average of 68.74% compared to diesel heavy-duty vehicles. FCHDVs using the coal-to-hydrogen pathway emit lower levels of CO, NOx and CO2 gases on average than diesel heavy-duty vehicles. Hydrogen production from renewable energy generation reduces air pollutant emissions from hydrogen fuel cell heavy-duty vehicles by an average of 92.41% compared to ordinary electrolysis hydrogen production. Long-haul FCHDVs reduce air pollutant emissions by 12.57% compared to short-haul FCHDVs. Replacing diesel heavy-duty vehicles with FCHDVs is expected to reduce the overall fleet's air pollutant emissions by 13.77% by 2030. This paper analyzes the emission levels of air pollutants from FCHDVs in the context of road transportation and provides a basis for the subsequent promotion of FCHDVs.

Key words: highway transportation, gas emissions, GREET model, heavy-duty vehicles, hydrogen energy, life cycle assessment

中图分类号:

U491

李雷, 钱思达, 徐黎庆, 焦文玲, 张鑫, 张承虎. 基于生命周期评价的氢能重卡排放分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(4): 292-299.

LI Lei, QIAN Sida, XU Liqing, JIAO Wenling, ZHANG Xin, ZHANG Chenghu. Emission Analysis of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Heavy-duty Vehicles Based on Life Cycle Assessment[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2024, 24(4): 292-299.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2024.04.028

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2024/V24/I4/292

参考文献

[1] RAWAT A, GARG C P, SINHA P. Analysis of the key hydrogen fuel vehicles adoption barriers to reduce carbon emissions under net zero target in emerging market[J]. Energy Policy, 2024, 184: 113847.

[2]HAN L. Challenges to environmental governance arising from the Russo-Ukrainian conflict: Evidence from carbon emissions[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 349: 119481.

[3]毛保华,卢霞,黄俊生,等.碳中和目标下氢能源在我国运输业中的发展路径[J].交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 234-243. [MAO B H, LU X, HUANG J S, et al. On Development path of hydrogen energy technology in China's transportation system under carbon neutrality goal[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(6): 234-243.]

[4]许晓敏,彭露瑶,纪正森,等.北京市氢燃料电池汽车发展潜力预测分析[J].技术经济,2023, 42(3): 52-63. [XU X M, PENG L Y, JI Z S, et al. Analysis on development potential of hydrogen fuel cell vehicle in Beijing [J]. Journal of Technology Economics, 2023, 42 (3): 52-63.]

[5]付佩,兰利波,陈颖,等.面向2035的节能与新能源汽车全生命周期碳排放预测评价[J].环境科学,2023,44 (4): 2365-2374. [FU P, LAN L B, CHEN Y, et al. Life cycle prediction assessment of energy saving and new energy vehicles for 2035[J]. Environmental Science, 2023, 44(4): 2365-2374.]

[6]刘青山,兰凤崇,陈吉清,等.制氢方法的评价及对氢燃料电池汽车推广的影响研究[J].中国公路学报, 2022, 35(11): 295-309. [LIU Q S, LAN F C, CHEN J Q, et al. Evaluation of hydrogen production methods and their influence on the promotion of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 35(11): 295-309.]

[7] 马菁,郭镇松,杨睿涵,等.不同类型氢燃料电池汽车全生命周期经济性分析及预测研究[J].汽车工程学报, 2023, 13(4): 506-516. [MA J, GUO Z S, YANG R H, et al. Economic analysis and prediction of life-cycle costs for different types of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles[J]. Chinese Journal of Automotive Engineering, 2023, 13(4): 506-516.]

[8]张磊,谢南宏,曹田田,等.氢能在交通领域的应用及燃料电池汽车成本分析[J].石油石化绿色低碳,2022, 7(4): 1-5, 30. [ZHANG L, XIE N H, CAO T T, et al. Application of hydrogen energy in transportation and cost analysis of fuel cell vehicles[J]. Green Petroleum & Petrochemicals, 2022, 7(4): 1-5, 30.]

[9] 王直欢,张文.基于双层规划的氢能重卡车队替换研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息,2023, 23(4): 55-60, 101. [WANG Z H, ZHANG W. Replacement of Hydrogen fuel cell heavy truck fleet study based on bi level programming[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2023, 23(4): 55-60, 101.]

[10] CHI Y, XU W, XIAO M, et al. Fuel-cycle based environmental and economic assessment of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in China[J]. Energy, 2023, 282: 128773.

[11] ZHANG W, FANG X, SUN C. The alternative path for fossil oil: Electric vehicles or hydrogen fuel cell vehicles? [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023, 341: 118019.

[12] TEIMOURI A, ZAYER KABEH K, CHANGIZIAN S, et al. Comparative lifecycle assessment of hydrogen fuel cell, electric, CNG, and gasoline-powered vehicles under real driving conditions[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(89): 37990-38002.

[13] LU Q, ZHANG B, YANG S, et al. Life cycle assessment on energy efficiency of hydrogen fuel cell vehicle in China[J]. Energy, 2022, 257: 124731.

[14] 黄格省, 李锦山,魏寿祥,等.化石原料制氢技术发展现状与经济性分析[J].化工进展,2019,38(12): 5217 5224. [HUANG G S, LI J S, WEI S Y, et al. Status and economic analysis of hydrogen production technology from fossil raw materials[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(12): 5217-5224.]

[15] 谢继东, 李文华,陈亚飞.煤制氢发展现状[J].洁净煤技术, 2007(2): 77-81. [XIE J D, LI W H, CHEN Y F. Development current situation of hydrogen from coal[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2007(2): 77-81.]

[16] 李庆勋, 刘晓彤,刘克峰,等.大规模工业制氢工艺技术及其经济性比较[J].天然气化工(C1化学与化工), 2015, 40(1): 78-82. [LI Q X, LIU X T, LIU K F, et al. Technical and economic analysis for large-scale industrial hydrogen production[J]. Natural Gas Chemistry (C1 Chemistry and Chemical), 2015, 40(1): 78-82.]

[17] 俞红梅, 邵志刚,侯明,等.电解水制氢技术研究进展与发展建议[J]. 中国工程科学,2021, 23(2): 146-152. [YU H M, SHAO Z G, HOU M, et al. Hydrogen production by water electrolysis: Progress and suggestions [J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2021, 23(2): 146-152.]

基于生命周期评价的氢能重卡排放分析

Emission Analysis of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Heavy-duty Vehicles Based on Life Cycle Assessment

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘永红, 张帆, 苗领, 蔡雨锋, 赖雨梦, 吴潇彬 , 曾雪兰, 姚达文. 广东不同区域汽车新能源化的减碳潜力及成本预测[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(1): 299-310.
[2]	郭红霞, 倪少权, 贺裕雁. 网络条件下供需未匹配的公路港多车型甩挂调度优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(5): 290-297.
[3]	王直欢, 张文. 基于双层规划的氢能重卡车队替换研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(4): 55-60.
[4]	马昌喜, 薛凡松, 麻存瑞, 李海军. 时变路网下基于混合调整策略的生鲜品配送路径优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(4): 298-306.
[5]	谢如鹤, 何佳雯, 邹毅峰, 李庆庭, 刘子玲, 廖晶. 冷链零担物流前端集货至末端配送全链条优化模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(3): 204-213.
[6]	王建伟, 刘旭旭, 付鑫, 杨洋, 崔梦妍. 一种“效率-公平-运力”多维权衡的需求可拆分配送方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(5): 285-292.
[7]	王宁, 张佳蕊, 赵姣. 城际零担货运平台车辆路径问题研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 163-177.
[8]	谭二龙, 李宏海, 钟厚岳, 霍恩泽, 马晓磊. 基于轨迹数据的货车自发编队节油潜力估计[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 74-84.
[9]	毛保华, 卢霞, 黄俊生, 何天健, 陈海波. 碳中和目标下氢能源在我国运输业中的发展路径[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 234-243.
[10]	贾术艳, 宋雨童, 杨紫都. 基于生长曲线函数的货车运营环节碳达峰研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 310-318.
[11]	甘蜜, 卿三东, 刘晓波, 李丹丹. 货车轨迹数据在公路货运系统中应用研究综述[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(5): 91-101.
[12]	李根, 翟伟, 朱兴贝, 杨晟, 邬岚. 侧向碰撞风险对交织区汇合行为的影响[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(4): 204-210.
[13]	李桃迎，王婷，张羽琪. 考虑多特征的高速公路交通流预测模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(3): 101-111.
[14]	袁方，杨轸，周雄峰. 双车道公路弯道半径及回旋线长度对转向行为的影响[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(1): 116-123.
[15]	胡立伟，何越人，李耀平，孟玲，殷秀芬. 基于人工免疫机制的营运货车运行风险评价研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(1): 149-155.