城市轨道交通峰前折扣定价方案编制模型

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (2): 13-19.

城市轨道交通峰前折扣定价方案编制模型

邹庆茹¹，姚向明^*2，赵鹏²

1. 重庆交通大学交通运输学院，重庆 400074；2. 北京交通大学交通运输学院，北京 100044

收稿日期:2019-11-21 修回日期:2020-02-10 出版日期:2020-04-25 发布日期:2020-04-30
作者简介:邹庆茹(1987-)，女，黑龙江齐齐哈尔人，讲师.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年科学基金/ Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71701011)；北京市自然科学基金/ Natural Science Foundation of Beijing, China(9202012)；重庆交通大学校内科学基金/ Science Foundation of Chongqing Jiaotong University (2020019079).

Modelling Pre-peak Discount Price Plan for Urban Rail Transit

ZOU Qing-ru¹, YAO Xiang-ming², ZHAO Peng²

1. School of Traffic and Transportation, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China; 2. School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China

Received:2019-11-21 Revised:2020-02-10 Online:2020-04-25 Published:2020-04-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

构建面向高峰拥挤缓解的峰前折扣定价方案编制模型，为定价方案编制提供决策方法. 基于票价变动对高峰客流的影响分析，考虑运营企业可承担的收益损失，建立以运力运量匹配度最大化为目标的峰前折扣定价方案编制模型，科学确定折扣车站、折扣比例及折扣时段. 对北京地铁八通线进行实证研究，结果表明：相比实际方案，优化方案中折扣截止时间较晚，认为限制当前政策效果的关键在于折扣截止时间设置不合理；在不增加收益损失的前提下，可通过定价方案优化提高客流拥挤疏解效果.

关键词: 交通工程, 峰前折扣定价, 整数规划, 城市轨道交通, 高峰拥挤

Abstract:

An optimization model for establishing a pre-peak discount price plan to relieve peak congestion in urban rail transit is proposed. The optimization objective is to maximize the balance between transport capacities and passenger flows, based on the analysis of peak demand changes due to pre-peak discount price, and acceptable capacities of the operating company for revenue loss. Then, the detailed pricing plan (discount stations, discount rates, and discount deadlines) can be determined scientifically. The model is verified on the BT line of Beijing subway, and the results show that the discount deadline of the optimization scheme is much later than the practical one. The key reason for limiting the effect of the current scheme is unreasonable discount deadlines; The effect of peak congestion relief can be improved by optimizing pricing schemes under the premise of non-increase revenue loss.

Key words: traffic engineering, pre-peak discount pricing, integer programming, urban rail transit, peak congestion

中图分类号:

U239.5

邹庆茹，姚向明，赵鹏. 城市轨道交通峰前折扣定价方案编制模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(2): 13-19.

ZOU Qing-ru, YAO Xiang-ming, ZHAO Peng. Modelling Pre-peak Discount Price Plan for Urban Rail Transit[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2020, 20(2): 13-19.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract20004.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2020/V20/I2/13

参考文献

[1] CURRIE G. Quick and effective solution to rail overcrowding: Free early bird ticket experience in Melbourne, Australia[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2010(2146): 35-42.

[2] LIU Y, CHARLES P. Spreading peak demand for urban rail transit through differential fare policy: A review of empirical evidence[C]. 36th Australasian Transport Research Forum. Australia: Australasian Transport Research Forum, 2013: 1-35.

[3] DOUGLAS N J, HENN L, SLOAN K. Modelling the ability of fare to spread AM peak passenger loads using rooftops[C]. 34th Australasian Transport Research Forum. Australia: Australasian Transport Research Forum, 2011: 34-42.

[4] WHELAN G, JOHNSON D. Modelling the impact of alternative fare structures on train overcrowding[J]. International Journal of Transport Management, 2004, 2 (1): 51-58.

[5] LOVRIC M, RAVEAU S, ADNAN M, et al. Evaluating off-peak pricing strategies in public transportation using an activity-based approach[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2016, (2544): 10-19.

[6] 王静. 地铁分时定价对乘客出行选择影响研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2011. [WANG J. The impacts of variable pricing on boarding choice of subway[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011.]

[7] 张晓晴. 城市轨道交通分时定价模型研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2016. [ZHANG X Q. Study on the time differential pricing model of urban rail transit[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2016.]

[8] ZOU Q R, YAO X M, ZHAO P, et al. Measuring retiming responses of passengers to a pre-peak discount fare by tracing smart card data: A practical experiment in the Beijing Subway[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2019: 6873912.

[9] WANG Z J, LI X H, CHEN F. Impact evaluation of a mass transit fare change on demand and revenue utilizing smart card data[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2015(77): 213-224.

[10] YAO X M, HAN B M, YU D D, et al. Simulation-based dynamic passenger flow assignment modelling for a schedule-based transit network[J]. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2017: 2890814.

[1]	林建新, 刘博, 赵霞, 张蕾. 基于混合约束自编码器的机动车工况智能构建方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 109-116.
[2]	戢晓峰, 耿昭师. 山区双车道公路货车碰撞预测的双变量冲突极值模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 230-238.
[3]	张建波, 孙建平, 徐春玲, 郭镜霞, 温慧敏, 宋国华. 考虑交通运行条件影响的驾驶员特征聚类[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 330-336.
[4]	马景峰, 任刚, 李豪杰, 曹奇, 杜建玮. 电动自行车与机动车事故严重性影响因素分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 337-348.
[5]	宗芳, 王猛, 贺正冰. 考虑多车影响的分子动力学智能网联跟驰模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 37-48.
[6]	马小龙, 余强, 刘建蓓. 基于路侧毫米波雷达的车辆碰撞概率计算方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 57-66.
[7]	谭二龙, 李宏海, 钟厚岳, 霍恩泽, 马晓磊. 基于轨迹数据的货车自发编队节油潜力估计[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 74-84.
[8]	廖鹏, 唐铁桥. 基于车辆动力传动和转向系统的换道轨迹优化策略[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 98-105.
[9]	刘永红, 罗霞, 胡剑鹏. 考虑临时和预约需求的共享泊位动态分配方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 171-181.
[10]	袁振洲, 郭曼泽, 彭泳鑫, 杨洋. 基于梯度关联规则的老年行人交通事故风险识别[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 195-208.
[11]	张玉婷, 陈波佑, 张双焱, 闫学东, 李晓梦. 抵近信控交叉口分心驾驶识别模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 217-224.
[12]	宋浪, 王健, 杨滨毓, 安实. 连续流交叉口左转非机动车交通组织创新设计[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 225-233.
[13]	白婧荣, 唐伯明, 孙宗元, 毕辉云, 向恬君. 毗邻互通立交特长隧道驾驶负荷研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 301-310.
[14]	郭彦茹, 罗志雄, 王家川, 何方. 数据驱动的共享单车停放区规划方法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 9-16.
[15]	李君羡, 沈宙彪, 童文聪, 吴志周. 基于分类车头时距的城市道路大型车影响分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 55-62.