交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2011, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (2): 180-186.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

广州市交通方式选择模型构建研究

金安*,周志华,刘明敏   

  1. 广州市交通规划研究所,广州 510030
  • 收稿日期:2010-09-20 修回日期:2010-12-09 出版日期:2011-04-28 发布日期:2011-05-10
  • 通讯作者: 金安
  • 作者简介:金安(1972-),男,浙江省武义县人,工程师,硕士

Module Structure of traffic mode Choice in Guangzhou

JIN An, ZHOU Zhi-hua, LIU Ming-min   

  1. Guangzhou Transport Planning Research Institute, Guangzhou 510030, China
  • Received:2010-09-20 Revised:2010-12-09 Online:2011-04-28 Published:2011-05-10
  • Contact: JIN An

摘要: 基于广州居民出行调查成果,本文从模型架构、效用函数基本形式、参数标定及校核等几个方面对交通方式选择模型的构建进行研究. 提出了方式划分的基本原则,并针对无车家庭、有小汽车家庭和摩托车家庭构建层次划分. 以小汽车家庭为例,阐述方式划分的基本形式. 进而,提出了方式划分参数标定的方法和基本步骤以及系数校核的关键点. 最后将预测结果和实际观测数据进行比较,验证模型的有效性. 本文提出不同层次交通方式划分模型,提高了模型的精度,并在效用函数中引入收入、车辆拥有和吸引量等因素,增强了模型的适用性,为其他类似城市交通方式选择模型的构建提供一定的参考.

关键词: 城市交通, 交通方式选择, 效用函数, 参数标定, 系数校核

Abstract: This paper focuses on module structure of traffic mode choice in terms of model framework, basic form of utility function, and parameter calibration and validation, based on resident trip survey in Guangzhou. The basic principle of mode split is proposed, and hierarchical division through non-car family, car family, and motorcycle family. This basic hierarchy partition is illustrated using an example of car family. Next, the method and basic steps of parameter calibration and key points of parameter validation are presented. In the final section, the forecasting results and field data are compared for validation purposes. The use of these household attributes increases the accuracy of the model, while the introduction of income, car ownership, and travel volume characteristics improve the adaptability of the model. The results will provide guidance for structure of traffic mode choice in similar-type cities.

Key words: urban traffic, traffic modal choice, utility function, parameter calibration, parameter validation

中图分类号: