中国货运结构优化的碳减排效应测度

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.06.031

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (6): 309-315.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.06.031

所属专题： 2022年英文专栏

• “碳达峰、碳中和”下的交通运输业发展 • 上一篇下一篇

中国货运结构优化的碳减排效应测度

诸立超^*1，刘昭然^2,3，汪瑞琪⁴，熊强¹

1. 浙江财经大学，工商管理学院，杭州 310018；2. 北京交通大学，综合交通运输大数据行业重点实验室，北京 100044； 3. 国家发展和改革委员会综合运输研究所，北京 100038；4. 广东省交通运输规划研究中心，广州 510101

收稿日期:2022-09-05 修回日期:2022-09-19 接受日期:2022-10-10 出版日期:2022-12-25 发布日期:2022-12-24
作者简介:诸立超(1989- )，男，浙江杭州人，讲师，博士。
基金资助:
浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题(21NDQN256YB)；浙江省自然科学基金(LQ21E080023)；国家自然科学基金(72074141)

Measurement of Carbon Emission Reduction Effect of China's Freight Transportation Structure Optimization

ZHU Li-chao^*1, LIU Zhao-ran^2,3, WANG Rui-qi⁴, XIONG Qiang¹

1. School of Business Administration, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Transport Industry of Big Data Application Technologies for Comprehensive Transport, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 3. Institute of Comprehensive Transportation of National Development and Reform Commission, Beijing 100038, China; 4. Guangdong Provincial Transportation Planning Research Center, Guangzhou 510101, China

Received:2022-09-05 Revised:2022-09-19 Accepted:2022-10-10 Online:2022-12-25 Published:2022-12-24
Supported by:
Zhejiang Province Philosophy and Social Sciences Project；Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China；National Natural Science Foundation of China

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 管理部门和学界高度重视货运结构优化问题，因为过高的公路货运量导致货运碳排放居高不下，不利于早日实现“碳达峰、碳中和”目标。除货运结构外，货运碳排放受诸多因素影响，但研究者大多仅关注部分重点因素影响，对于货运结构优化的碳减排效应缺乏准确理解。为解决上述问题，本文利用“自上而下”法测算1999—2019年中国货运碳排放量，并构建综合考虑社会经济变量(如人均GDP)与货运特征变量(如货运分担率)的偏最小二乘回归模型，通过调整不同货运方式使用费用，模拟2030年不同政策刺激情景下货运结构优化的碳减排效应。结果表明：1999— 2019年，社会经济变量对货运碳排放增长的年均贡献度为73%，显著高于货运特征变量；公路、铁路和水路货运分担率变化对货运碳排放增长的年均贡献度分别为1.81%、-0.01%和-0.26%；2030 年公路货运量全部转为铁路或水路货运量的极端情景，难以实现单位GDP货运碳排放较2005年下降65%的标准；增加高碳货运方式使用费用的碳减排效应比降低低碳货运方式使用费用更显著。

关键词: 交通运输经济, 货运碳排放, 影响因素, 货运结构, 情景模拟

Abstract: Management department and academic community attach great importance to the optimization of freight transportation structure because the excessive volume of road freight transportation leads to high CO2 emissions, which is not conducive to early achievement of the "carbon peaking and carbon neutrality". Apart from freight transportation structure, a variety of factors affect CO2 emissions in freight transportation. However, researchers mainly focus on the impacts of other key factors, lacking a precise understanding of the impact of freight transportation structure optimization on reducing CO2 emissions. In this regard, this paper applies the top-down method to calculate the CO2 emissions of freight transportation in China from 1999 to 2019. A partial least square regression (PLSR) model with socio- economic variables (e.g., per capita GDP) and freight transportation characteristic variables (e.g., freight transportation structure) is constructed to quantify the contribution of each factor, which is used to simulate CO2 emissions reduction in 2030 caused by freight transportation structure optimization under different policy scenarios by adjusting usage fee of different freight modes. The results show that socio-economic variables contributed an average rate of 73% to the increase of CO2 emissions in freight transportation in the period of 1999 to 2019, which were significantly higher than freight transportation characteristic variables. The average contribution rate of the changes in the road, rail, and water freight share to the growth of CO2 emissions in freight transportation was 1.81%, -0.01%, and -0.26%, respectively. The extreme case of switching all road freight volume to rail or water in 2030 cannot achieve a reduction of 65% in CO2 emissions per unit GDP compared to 2005. In addition, the benefits of reducing CO2 emissions achieved by increasing the usage fee for high-carbon freight modes are more significant than reducing the usage fee for low-carbon freight modes.

Key words: transportation economy, freight carbon emission, influencing factor, freight transportation structure; simulated scenario

中图分类号:

诸立超, 刘昭然, 汪瑞琪, 熊强. 中国货运结构优化的碳减排效应测度[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(6): 309-315.

ZHU Li-chao, LIU Zhao-ran, WANG Rui-qi, XIONG Qiang. Measurement of Carbon Emission Reduction Effect of China's Freight Transportation Structure Optimization[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(6): 309-315.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.06.031

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V22/I6/309

参考文献

[1] 胡鞍钢. 中国实现 2030 年前碳达峰目标及主要途径[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 21(3): 1-15. [HU A G. China's goal of achieving carbon peak by 2030 and its main approaches[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 21(3): 1-15.]

[2] SHIRAKI H, MATSUMOTO K, SHIGETOMI Y, et al. Factors affecting CO2 emissions from private automobiles in Japan: The impact of vehicle occupancy[J]. Applied Energy, 2019, 259: 114196.

[3] ISIK M, SARICA K, ARI I. Driving forces of Turkey's transportation sector CO2 emissions: An LMDI approach [J]. Transport Policy, 2020, 97: 210-219.

[4] 卞利花, 吉敏全. 青海交通碳排放影响因素及预测研究[J]. 生态经济, 2019, 35(2): 35-39, 100. [BIAN L H, JI M Q. Research on influencing factors and prediction of transportation carbon emissions in Qinghai[J]. Ecological Economy, 2019, 35(2): 35-39.]

[5] 卢升荣, 蒋惠园, 刘瑶. 交通运输业CO2排放区域差异及影响因素[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2017, 17 (1): 32-39. [LU S R, JIANG H Y, LIU Y. Regional disparities and influencing factors of CO2 emission in transportation industry[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2017, 17(1): 32-39.]

[6] ACHOUR H, BELLOUMI M. Decomposing the influencing factors of energy consumption in Tunisian transportation sector using the LMDI method[J]. Transport Policy, 2016, 52: 64-71.

[7] 陈亮, 何涛, 李巧茹, 等. 区域交通碳排放相关指标测算及影响因素分析[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2017, 43 (4): 631-637. [CHEN L, HE T, LI Q R, et al. Index calculation and effect factor study of regional transport carbon emission[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2017, 43(4): 631-637.]

[8] EOM J, SCHIPPER L, THOMPSON L. We keep on truckin': Trends in freight energy use and carbon emissions in 11 IEA countries[J]. Energy Policy, 2012, 45: 327-341.

[9] KIM S. Decomposition analysis of greenhouse gas emissions in Korea's transportation sector[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11: 1986.

[10] 张克勇, 刘县美, 郭丕斌, 等. 京津冀交通部门CO2排放的时空差异及影响因素[J]. 系统工程, 2019, 37(5): 12- 20. [ZHANG K Y, LIU X M, GUO P B, et al. Spatialtemporal differences of CO2 emissions of transport sector in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J]. Systems Engineering, 2019, 37(5): 12-20.]

[11] 许康利, 田野, 王聘玺, 等. 不同货物运输方式的大气污染物排放对比及减排潜力分析[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2021, 43(3): 322-326. [XU K L, TIAN Y, WANG P X, et al. Comparison of air pollutants emissions and reduction potential of different freight transportation modes[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control, 2021, 43 (3): 322-326.]

[12] 李琳, 张小强. 基于运输模式转移的货运碳减排研究综述[J]. 北京交通大学学报, 2021, 45(1): 85-97. [LI L, ZHANG X Q. Review of research on freight carbon emission reduction based on modal shift[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 2021, 45(1): 85-97.]

[13] IPCC. 2019 refinement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventory[R]. Switzerland: IPCC, 2019.

[14] SCHIPPER L, MARIE C. Transportation and CO2 emissions: Flexing the link: A path for the World Bank [R]. Washington, DC: World Bank, 1999.

[15] LI Y, DU Q, LU X, et al. Relationship between the development and CO2 emissions of transport sector in China[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2019, 74: 1-14.

[16] LI H, LU Y, ZHANG J, et al. Trends in road freight transportation carbon dioxide emissions and policies in China[J]. Energy Policy, 2013, 57: 99-106.

[17] YORK R, ROSA E, DIETZ T, et al. STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: Analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts[J]. Ecological Economics, 2003, 46(3): 351-365.

[18] ISIK M, SARICA K, ARI I. Driving forces of Turkey's transportation sector CO2 emissions: An LMDI approach [J]. Transport Policy, 2020, 97: 210-219.

[19] JONKEREN O, FRANCKE J, VISSER J. A shift-share based tool for assessing the contribution of a modal shift to the decarbonization of inland freight transport[J]. European Transport Research Review, 2019, 11: 8.

[20] 黄晗. 中国交通运输业能源回弹效应研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2017, 17(1): 27-31. [HUANG H. Energy rebound effects of transportation sector in China [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2017, 17(1): 27-31.]

[21] WANG T, LI H, ZHANG J, et al. Influencing factors of carbon emission in China's road freight transport[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 43: 54- 64.

中国货运结构优化的碳减排效应测度

Measurement of Carbon Emission Reduction Effect of China's Freight Transportation Structure Optimization

PDF

PDF(English version)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	杨柳, 杨莹, 宋允洲, 张宇. 驾驶压力影响因素与识别方法研究综述[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(6): 40-50.
[2]	刘强, 严修, 谢谦, 解孝民. 基于事故综合强度的公交事故严重程度分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(6): 152-159.
[3]	陈小鸿, 刘涵, 张华, 杨志伟. 重型货运车辆出行时空差异性和影响因素分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(6): 160-171.
[4]	杨星琪, 黄海军. 高铁对城市经济空间结构影响的研究综述[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(5): 7-18.
[5]	姚敏峰, 秦昱晨, 石磊, 詹晓东. 城市设计视角下的市郊铁路站域商业溢价效应研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(5): 37-46.
[6]	胡立伟, 吕一帆, 赵雪亭, 薛宇, 张成杰, 雷国庆, 刘凡. 基于数据驱动的交通事故伤害程度影响因素及其耦合关系研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(5): 117-124.
[7]	靳志宏, 黄颖, 张佳艺, 徐世达. 甩箱模式下考虑多箱型任务组合的集卡调度优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(5): 243-252.
[8]	王健, 王慧, 胡晓伟, 李园园. 高峰期考虑乘客议价的网约车定价与平台收益及社会福利优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 54-63.
[9]	王景鹏, 祝蕊, 王鹏飞. 需求不确定下的网约车司机最优工资水平研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 178-185.
[10]	徐素秀, 谢冰, 秦威, 程会兵. 电动汽车充电与换电模式定价及投资策略[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(5): 183-189.
[11]	鲁皓, 卢鑫, 焦柳丹. 收费公路资产证券化定价及发行方法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(4): 40-46.
[12]	王永, 谭克虎, 张娟. 基础设施公私合营模式融资影响因素及空间溢出效应研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(4): 47-53.
[13]	王福建, 卢一笑, 金盛. 多信号交叉口干线行程时间特性分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(4): 132-139.
[14]	宋栋栋，杨小宝，祖兴水，四兵锋. 基于均值异质性随机参数Logit模型的城市道路事故驾驶员受伤严重程度研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(3): 214-220.
[15]	吴贞瑶，帅斌，左博睿. 通货膨胀下高速公路公私合营项目的收入调节研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(1): 156-161.