The Urgent Tasks Faced in the ITS Development of China ——ITS Evaluation Methods Studies

Abstract

Abstract: The significance and review of ITS(Intelligent Transportation System)evaluation
are addressed in this paper. Although Cost-Benefit Analysis method is used extensively to evaluate ITS,its obvious deficiencies are also pointed out.A new method,i .e. ，Multicriteria
methods is proposed to assess the impacts of ITS implementation by the authors. Especially,
Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) with examples is used to demonstrate how to evaluate ITS
practically.

Key words: Intelligent transportation system (ITS), Evaluation, Multicriteria method, Analytic hierarchy Proceas(AHP)

摘要： 本文首先论述了在我国开展智能运输系统(ITS)评价的重要意义，以及国内外ITS评价
研究现状综述，然后作者指出在ITS评价中仅采用费用－效益分析法是不足的，进而提出了一种用于ITS评价的新方法，即多目标(多准则)决策方法，之后重点展示了一种最常用的多目标
(多准则)决策方法即层次分析法(AHP)用于ITS评价的流程和实例。

关键词: 智能运输系统, 评价, 多目标(多准则)决策方法, 层次分析法

Shi Qixi. The Urgent Tasks Faced in the ITS Development of China
——ITS Evaluation Methods Studies[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2001, 1(1): 23-29 .

史其信. 发展我国智能运输系统(ITS) 亟待解决的课题
——智能运输系统 (ITS)评价方法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2001, 1(1): 23-29 .

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: http://www.tseit.org.cn/EN/abstract/abstract16908.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/EN/Y2001/V1/I1/23

References

[1]Evaluatory Design. The National ITS Architecture( Version 3.0)[M]. Department of Transportation. US, 2000.
[2]Cost Analysis. The National ITS Architecture (Version 3.0)[M]. Department of Transportation, US, 2000.
[3]Performance, Benefits Study. The National ITS Architecture (Version 3.0)[M]. Department of Transportation, US, 2000.
[4]Risk Analysis. The National ITS Architecture (Version 3.0)[M]. Department of Transportation, US, 2000.
[5]Evaluation Results. The National ITS Architecture( Version 3.0)[M].Department of Transportation. US, 2000.
[6]Jesty P H. Architecture Assessment Guidelines
[M]. Converge System Architeture. February, 1997.

[7] Jesty P . Guidelines for the Developmentn and Assessment of Intelligent Transport System Architectures [M ]. Converge System Architeture .February,1998.
[8]Zhang X, et al. Guidebook for Assessment of Transport Telematics Applications: Updated Version [M ]. CONVERGE Project TR1101.
[9]Shawn M, urner P E . A Proposed ITS Evaluation Framework for Texas[M]. Texas Transportiation Institute.March,1999.
[10] Jonathan Levine.A multiattribute analysis of goals for intelligent transportation system planning [J]. Transpn Res-C,1996,97~111.
[11] Konstantinous G. Zografos. A multicriteria decision making method for evaluating alternative transportation projects[ J]. IFAC Transportation system,Chania,Greece,1997.
[12] TsamboulasD .Use of multicriteria methods for assessment for transportation projects[ J ].Journal of Transportation Engineering, 1999,
407~414
[13]IssaacK Takyi. A multidimensional methodology for evaluating public transportation services[J].Transpn Re. -A, 1993, 395~405.
[14]Intelligent transportation systems benefits; 1999 update[J]. Mitretek System Inc.
[15]http://www.itsa.org
[16]http:/ / www.dot.gov
[17]魏世孝，周献中.多属性决策理论方法及其在C³I系统中的应用[M].北京国防工业出版社，1998.
[18]王莲芬，许树柏。层次分折法引论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版杜，1990.
[19]许树柏.实用决策方法——层次分析法原理[M].天津天律大学出版杜，1988.
[20]卢有杰.建设系统工程[M].北京.清华大学出版社，1997.