| [1]曹晟，田大山. 美国科技评估立法实践及其对中国的借鉴意义[J]．自然辩证法通讯.2004(6)：57-61.[CAO S,TIAN D S. The legislation of science & technology evaluation in america and its reference to China[J], Journal of Dialectics of Nature,2004(6):57-61.]
[2]陈宁．美国的科技评价与科研事后评价概况[M].2008.[CHEN N, An overview of evaluation of science & technology and postevaluation of scientific research in USA[M].2008.]
[3]顾海兵，姜杨．法国科技评估体制的研究与借鉴[J]．上饶师范学院学报.2004,24(4):1-5.[GU H B, JIANG Y. To study and use for reference the system of scientific and technological examination and evaluation of france[J], Journal of Shangrao Normal College,2004,24(4):1-5.]
[4]宋海刚，钱万强.973计划管理规范化探讨[J].中国基础科学.2010(1)：46-49.[SONG H G, QIAN W Q, On the management standardization of 973 program[J]. Basic Research Service of MOST,Beijing,2010(1)：46-49.]
[5]欧阳进良,汤娇雯,庞宇,等.国家科技计划及项目管理中的“二八”现象和长尾理论的影响浅析[J]. 科学学研究.2009,27(10):1449-1453.[ OUYANG J L,TANG J W,PANG Y,et al. The exploration and analysis of pareto law and long tail effect on science and technology management system [J], Studies in Science of Science,2009,27(10):1449-1453.]
[6]丁士海， 韩之俊， 陈湘来. 科技基础研究计划项目后评估管理模式研究[J]. 科技管理研究. 2009(6):112-115.[DING S H,HAN Z J,CHEN X L.An investigation of postevaluation and management of science and technology basic research plan [J], Science and Technology Management Research,2009(6):112-115.]
[7]周寄中. 创新的基础和源泉：基础研究的投入、评估和协调[M]. 科学出版社.2010.[ZHOU J Z, Foundation and source of innovations: Input, Evaluation and Coordination of Basic Research Plan［M］. Science Press, 2010.]
[8]王欣，基于信息不对称理论的国家科技计划项目风险管理研究[D]，北京交通大学，2012. [WANG X. Research on risk management of national S&T plan projects based on the asymmetric information theory [D], Beijing Jiaotong University, 2012]. |
