Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (2): 72-90.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.02.008
Previous Articles Next Articles
GUO Lie* , XU Lin-li, QIN Zeng-ke, WANG Xu
Received:
2021-10-08
Revised:
2021-12-26
Accepted:
2022-01-06
Online:
2022-04-25
Published:
2022-04-23
Supported by:
郭烈*,胥林立,秦增科,王旭
作者简介:
郭烈(1978- )男,江西分宜人,副教授,博士。
基金资助:
CLC Number:
GUO Lie , XU Lin-li, QIN Zeng-ke, WANG Xu. Analysis and Overview of Influencing Factors on Autonomous Driving Takeover[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(2): 72-90.
郭烈, 胥林立, 秦增科, 王旭. 自动驾驶接管影响因素分析与研究进展[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 72-90.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.tseit.org.cn/EN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.02.008
[1] SAE International. Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles [R]. New York: SAE International, 2021. [2] 秦增科, 郭烈, 马跃, 等. 基于人机协同的车道保持辅助系统研究进展[J]. 工程科学学报, 2021, 43(3): 355- 364. [QIN Z K, GUO L, MA Y, et al. Overview of lane-keeping assist system based on human-machine cooperative control[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2021, 43(3): 355-364.] [3] 吕能超, 段至诚, 吴超仲. 驾驶经验对先进驾驶辅助系统的作用研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2017, 17 (6): 48-55. [LV N C, DUAN Z C, WU C Z. The impact of driving experience on advanced driving assistant systems [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2017, 17(6): 48-55.] [4] DEPNER N, BAVENDIEK J, KNÖß S, et al. HMI concept for safe driving mode transitions[J]. ATZ Worldwide, 2020, 122(4): 26-31. [5] YOON S H, JI Y G. Non-driving-related tasks, workload, and takeover performance in highly automated driving contexts[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2019, 60: 620-631. [6] MAGGI D, ROMANO R, CARSTEN O. Transitions between highly automated and longitudinally assisted driving: The role of the initiator in the fight for authority [J/OL]. California: Human Factors, (2020-8-31)[2021- 10-8], https://journals.sagepub.com. [7] GOLD C, HAPPEE R, BENGLER K. Modeling take-over performance in level 3 conditionally automated vehicles [J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2018, 116: 3-13. [8] ZHANG B, DE WINTER J, VAROTTO S, et al. Determinants of take-over time from automated driving: A meta-analysis of 129 studies[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2019, 64: 285-307. [9] MCDONALD A D, ALAMBEIGI H, ENGSTROM J, et al. Towards computational simulations of behavior during automated driving take-overs: A review of the empirical and modeling literatures[J]. Human Factors, 2019, 61(4): 642-688. [10] WEIGL K, SCHARTMÜLLER C, WINTERSBERGER P, et al. The influence of experienced severe road traffic accidents on take-over reactions and non-driving-relatedtasks in an automated driving simulator study[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2021, 162: 106408. [11] ALREFAIE M T, SUMMERSKILL S, JACKON T W. In a heart beat: Using driver's physiological changes to determine the quality of a takeover in highly automated vehicles[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2019, 131: 180-190. [12] ZHANG T, YANG J, LIANG N, et al. Physiological measurements of situation awareness: A systematic review [J/OL]. California: Human Factors, (2020-11-20)[2021- 10-8], https://journals.sagepub.com. [13] CHARLES R L, NIXON J. Measuring mental workload using physiological measures: A systematic review[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2019, 74: 221-232. [14] 张毅, 姚丹亚, 李力, 等. 智能车路协同系统关键技术与应用[J/OL]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, (2021- 9- 16) [2021- 10- 8]. http://kns.cnki.net. [ZHANG Y, YAO D Y, LI L, et al. Technologies and applications for intelligent vehicle-infrastructure cooperation systems [J/OL]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, (2021-9-16)[2021-10-8]. http://kns.cnki.net.] [15] WARM J S, PARASURAMAN R, MATTHEWS G. Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful[J]. Human Factors, 2008, 50(3): 433-441. [16] 刘卓凡, 吴付威, 张海伦. 平直高速公路路段低交通量下L2自动驾驶对驾驶人心理负荷的影响研究[J/OL]. 中国公路学报, (2020-11-18) [2021-10-8], http://kns. cnki.net. [LIU Z F, WU F W, ZHANG H L. Impact of level-2 autonomous driving mode on drivers' mental workload under low traffic volume of straight motorway [J/OL]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, (2020- 11-18) [2021-10-8], http://kns.cnki.net.] [17] SCHARTMüLLER C, WEIGL K, LöCKEN A, et al. Displays for productive non-driving related tasks: Visual behavior and its impact in conditionally automated driving[J]. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2021, 5(4): 21. [18] 马蓉, 张康康. 自动驾驶驾驶人接管特征研究进展[J]. 汽车实用技术, 2020(12): 18-20. [MA R, ZHANG K K. Research progress on autonomous driver takeover characteristics[J]. Automobile Applied Technology, 2020 (12): 18-20.] [19] FORSTER Y, GEISEL V, HERGETH S, et al. Engagement in non-driving related tasks as a nonintrusive measure for mode awareness: A simulator study [J]. Information, 2020, 11(5): 239. [20] MORALES-ALVAREZ W, SIPELE O, LéBERON R, et al. Automated driving: A literature review of the takeover request in conditional automation[J]. Electronics, 2020, 9(12): 2087. [21] WANDTNER B, SCHÖMIG N, SCHMIDT G. Effects of non-driving related task modalities on takeover performance in highly automated driving[J]. Human Factors, 2018, 60(6): 870-881. [22] ZEEB K, BUCHNER A, SCHRAUF M. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2015, 78: 212-221. [23] SHINAR D, TRACTINSKY N, COMPTON R. Effects of practice, age, and task demands, on interference from a phone task while driving[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2005, 37(2): 315-326. [24] KO S M, JI Y G. How we can measure the non-drivingtask engagement in automated driving: comparing flow experience and workload[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2018, 67: 237-245. [25] PFLEGING B, RANG M, BROY N. Investigating user needs for non-driving-related activities during automated driving[C]. New York: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, 2016. [26] CHOI D, SATO T, ANDO T, et al. Effects of cognitive and visual loads on driving performance after take-over request (TOR) in automated driving[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2020, 85: 103074. [27] 张瑜. 基于用户体验的自动驾驶接管系统人机交互策略设计研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2018. [ZHANG Y. Research on human-computer interaction strategy design of autopilot takeover system based on user experienced[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2018.] [28] 秦华, 李吉涛, 冉令华. 次任务下的驾驶员视觉搜索能力研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(1): 137- 141. [QIN H, Ll J T, RAN L H. Drivers visual search ability in sub-task[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(1): 137-141.] [29] KIM J, KIM W, KIM H S, et al. A study on the correlation between subjective driver readiness and NDRT Type during automated driving[C]. Jeju: 2020 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence, 2020. [30] RAUFFET P, BOTZER A, CHAUVIN C, et al. The relationship between level of engagement in a nondriving task and driver response time when taking control of an automated vehicle[J]. Cognition, Technology & Work, 2020, 22(4): 721-731. [31] WEAVER B W, DELUCIA P R. A systematic review and meta- analysis of takeover performance duringconditionally automated driving[J/OL]. Human Factors, (2020- 12- 14) [2021- 10- 8]. https://journals.sagepub. com. [32] FELDHÜTTER A, HECHT T, KALB L, et al. Effect of prolonged periods of conditionally automated driving on the development of fatigue: With and without non-drivingrelated activities[J]. Cognition, Technology & Work, 2019, 21(1): 33-40. [33] WRLE J, METZ B, OTHERSEN I, et al. Sleep in highly automated driving: Takeover performance after waking up [J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2020, 144: 105617. [34] STAPEL J, MULLAKKAL- BABU F A, HAPPEE R. Driver behavior and workload in an on-road automated vehicle[C]. Hague: Proceedings of the RSS2017 Conference, 2017. [35] BIONDI F N, LOHANI M, HOPMAN R, et al. 80 MPH and out-of-the-loop: Effects of real-world semi-automated driving on driver workload and arousal[C]. California: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2018. [36] SCHÖMIG N, HARGUTT V, NEUKUM A, et al. The interaction between highly automated driving and the development of drowsiness[J]. Procedia Manufacturing, 2015, 3: 6652-6659. [37] WANG W, NA X, CAO D, et al. Decision-making in driver- automation shared control: A review and perspectives[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2020, 7(5): 1-19. [38] LEE S C, YOON S H, GU Y. Effects of non-drivingrelated task attributes on takeover quality in automated vehicles[J]. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 2020, 37(4): 211-219. [39] KIM J, KIM H S, KIM W, et al. Investigation on the effect of mental workload on the time-related take-over performance[C]. Jeju: 2020 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence, 2020. [40] 林庆峰, 王兆杰, 鲁光泉. 城市道路环境下自动驾驶车辆接管绩效分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 2019, 32(6): 240- 247. [LIN Q F, WANG Z J, LU G Q. Analysis of takeover performance for automated vehicles in urban road environments[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2019, 32(6): 240-247.] [41] 鲁光泉, 赵鹏云, 王兆杰, 等. 自动驾驶中视觉次任务对年轻驾驶人接管时间的影响[J]. 中国公路学报, 2018, 31(4): 165-171. [LU G Q, ZHAO P Y, WANG Z J, et al. Effect of visual sub-tasks on young drivers' takeover time in autonomous driving[J]. Journal of China Highway and Transport, 2018, 31(4): 165-171.] [42] ERIKSSON A, STANTON N A. Takeover time in highly automated vehicles: Noncritical transitions to and from manual control[J]. Human Factors, 2017, 59(4): 689-705. [43] ZHOU H, ITOH M, KITAZAKI S. How does explanation-based knowledge influence driver take-over in conditional driving automation?[J]. IEEE Transactions on Human Machine Systems, 2021 (99): 1-10. [44] 徐筱秦, 冯忠祥, 李靖宇. 驾驶员接管自动驾驶车辆研究进展[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2019, 37(5): 1-8. [XU X Q, FENG Z X, LI J Y. A review of progresses on drivers' takeover behaviors of automatic vehicles[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2019, 37(5): 1-8.] [45] SARKER A, SHEN H, RAHMAN M, et al. A review of sensing and communication, human factors, and controller aspects for information-aware connected and automated vehicles[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2019, 21(1): 7-29. [46] DEMMEL S, GRUYER D, BURKHARDT J M, et al. Global risk assessment in an autonomous driving context: Impact on both the car and the driver[J]. IFACPapersOnLine, 2019, 51(34): 390-395. [47] LU Z, ZHANG B, FELDHÜTTER A, et al. Beyond mere take-over requests: The effects of monitoring requests on driver attention, take- over performance, and acceptance [J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2019, 63: 22-37. [48] BRANDENBURG S, ROCHE F. Behavioral changes to repeated takeovers in automated driving: The drivers' ability to transfer knowledge and the effects of takeover request process[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2020, 73: 15-28. [49] FABIENNE, ROCHE, ANNA, et al. Behavioral changes to repeated takeovers in highly automated driving: Effects of the takeover-request design and the nondrivingrelated task modality[J]. Human Factors, 2019, 61(5): 839-849. [50] WINKLER S, KAZAZI J, VOLLRATH M. Practice makes better-Learning effects of driving with a multistage collision warning[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2018, 117: 398-409. [51] BRANDENBURG S, EPPLE S. Drivers' individual design preferences of takeover requests in highly automated driving[J]. I-Com, 2019, 18(2): 167-178. [52] WALCH M, MÜHL K, BAUMANN M, et al. Autonomous driving: Investigating the feasibility of bimodal take-over requests[J]. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction, 2017, 9(2): 58-74. [53] ZHANG W, ZENG Y, YANG Z, et al. Optimal time intervals in two-stage takeover warning systems with insight into the drivers' neuroticism personality[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, 12: 157-169. [54] MA S, ZHANG W, YANG Z, et al. Take over gradually in conditional automated driving: The effect of two-stage warning systems on situation awareness, driving stress, takeover performance, and acceptance[J]. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 2021, 37(4): 352-362. [55] DU N, KIM J, ZHOU F, et al. Evaluating effects of cognitive load, takeover request lead time, and traffic density on drivers' takeover performance in conditionally automated driving[C]. New York: 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 2020. [56] SCHARFE- SCHERF M S L. How are eye tracking patterns in takeover situations related to complexity, takeover quality and cognitive model predictions?[C]. Berlin: International Forum on Advanced Microsystems for Automotive Applications, 2020. [57] DU N, YANG X J, ZHOU F. Psychophysiological responses to takeover requests in conditionally automated driving[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2020, 148: 105804. [58] KÖRBER M, GOLD C, LECHNER D, et al. The influence of age on the take-over of vehicle control in highly automated driving[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2016, 39: 19- 32. [59] RADLMAYR J, GOLD C, LORENZ L, et al. How traffic situations and non- driving related tasks affect the takeover quality in highly automated driving[C]. California: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2014. [60] DOUBEK F, LOOSVELD E, HAPPEE R, et al. Take over quality: Assessing the effects of time budget and traffic density with the help of a trajectory planning method[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2020, 2020(1): 1- 12. [61] GOLD C, KÖRBER M, LECHNER D, et al. Taking over control from highly automated vehicles in complex traffic situations: The role of traffic density[J]. Human Factors, 2016, 58(4): 642-652. [62] MARTENS M H, COMPTE S, KAPTEIN N A. The effects of road design on speed behaviour: A literature review[J]. Institute for Road Safety Research, 1997, 36: 1-27. [63] BRANDENBURG S, CHUANG L. Take-over requests during highly automated driving: How should they be presented and under what conditions?[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2019, 66: 214-225. [64] NAUJOKS F, MAI C, NEUKUM A. The effect of urgency of take-over requests during highly automated driving under distraction conditions[C]. Poland: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2014. [65] BOROJENI S S, BOLL S C J, HEUTEN W, et al. Feel the movement: Real motion influences responses to take-over requests in highly automated vehicles[C]. New York: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2018. [66] LOUW T, MERAT N. Are you in the loop? Using gaze dispersion to understand driver visual attention during vehicle automation[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2017, 76: 35-50. [67] FAVARÒ F, EURICH S, NADER N. Autonomous vehicles' disengagements: Trends, triggers, and regulatory limitations[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2018, 110: 136-148. [68] WIJBENGA A, VREESWIJK J, MINTSIS E, et al. Traffic management of automated vehicles in transition areas[R]. Berlin: German Aerospace Center, 2020 [69] VREESWIJK J, WIJBENGA A, SCHINDLER J. Cooperative automated driving for managing transition areas and the operational design domain (ODD) [C]. Helsinki: Proceedings of 8th Transport Research Arena TRA, 2020. [70] LÜCKEN L, SCHWAMBORN M, MINTSIS E, et al. TransAID deliverable 6.2/2- assessment of traffic management procedures in transition areas[R]. Berlin: German Aerospace Center, 2021. [71] COLL-PERALES B, SCHULTE-TIGGES J, RONDINONE M, et al. Prototyping and evaluation of infrastructure- assisted transition of control for cooperative automated vehicles[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2021, 99: 1-17. [72] MAERIVOET S, AKKERMANS L, CARLIERS K, et al. TransAID deliverable 4.1-overview of existing and enhanced traffic management procedures[R]. Berlin: German Aerospace Center, 2018. [73] WIJBENGA A, VREESWIJK J, SCHINDLER J, et al. 3.3.2 Centralized infrastructure-assisted management for mixed traffic at transition areas[C]. Italy: 2nd Symposium on Management of Future Motorway and Urban Traffic Systems (MFTS 2018), 2018. [74] CORREA A, MAERIVOET S, MINTSIS E, et al. Management of transitions of control in mixed traffic with automated vehicles[C]. Lisboa: 2018 16th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems Telecommunications, 2018. [75] LÜCKEN L, MINTSIS E, KALLIRROI N P, et al. From automated to manual-modeling control transitions with sumo[C]. Berlin: SUMO User Conference, 2019 [76] CASERINI S. Cooperative traffic control solution for vehicle transition from autonomous to manual mode exploiting cellular vehicle-to- everything (C-V2X) technology[D]. Ontario: University of Windsor, 2019. [77] 庞明宝, 柴紫欣, 巩丹阳. 混合交通下智能网联车借道公交专用车道控制[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(4): 118-124. [PANG M B, CHAL Z X, GONG D Y. Control of connected and automated vehicles driving on dedicated bus lane under mixed traffic[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(4): 118-124.] [78] FORSTER Y, NAUJOKS F, NEUKUM A, et al. Driver compliance to take- over requests with different auditory outputs in conditional automation[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2017, 109: 18-28. [79] YOON S H, KIM Y W, JI Y G. The effects of takeover request modalities on highly automated car control transitions[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2019, 123: 150-158. [80] ROCHE F, BRANDENBURG S. Should the urgency of visual-tactile takeover requests match the criticality of takeover situations?[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2019, 5(2): 306-313. [81] LEE J, YUN H, KIM J, et al. Design of single-modal takeover request in SAE level 2 & 3 automated vehicle[J]. Transactions of the Korean Society of Automotive Engineers, 2019, 27(3): 171-183. [82] LEE J, YANG J H. Analysis of driver's EEG given takeover alarm in SAE level 3 automated driving in a simulated environment[J]. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 2020, 21(3): 719-728. [83] LOUW T, KUO J, ROMANO R, et al. Engaging in NDRTs affects drivers' responses and glance patterns after silent automation failures[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2019, 62: 870-882. [84] MESCHTSCHERJAKOV A, DÖTTLINGER C, RÖDEL C, et al. ChaseLight: Ambient LED stripes to control driving speed[C]. New York: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 2015. [85] MUTHUMANI A, DIEDERICHS F, GALLE M, et al. How visual cues on steering wheel improve users' trust, experience, and acceptance in automated vehicles[C]. Cham: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2020. [86] YANG Y, KARAKAYA B, DOMINIONI G C, et al. An HMI concept to improve driver's visual behavior and situation awareness in automated vehicle[C]. Maui: 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2018. [87] HE D, KANAAN D, DONMEZ B. In-vehicle displays to support driver anticipation of traffic conflicts in automated vehicles[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2021, 149: 105842. [88] WICKENS C D. Multiple resources and performance prediction[J]. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2002, 3(2): 159-177. [89] POLITIS I, BREWSTER S, POLLICK F. Language-based multimodal displays for the handover of control in autonomous cars[C]. New York: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 2015. [90] BALDWIN C L. Verbal collision avoidance messages during simulated driving: Perceived urgency, alerting effectiveness and annoyance[J]. Ergonomics, 2011, 54(4): 328-337. [91] BAZILINSKYY P, DE WINTER J C F. Analyzing crowdsourced ratings of speech-based take-over requests for automated driving[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2017, 64: 56-64. [92] LJUNGBERG J K, PARMENTIER F B R, HUGHES R W, et al. Listen out! Behavioural and subjective responses to verbal warnings[J]. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2012, 26(3): 451-461. [93] RICHIE E, OFFER-WESTORT T, SHANKAR R, et al. Auditory displays for take-over in semi-automated vehicles[C]. Cham: International Conference on Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management, 2018. [94] LEE J D, GORE B F, CAMPBELL J L. Display alternatives for in-vehicle warning and sign information: Message style, location, and modality[J]. Transportation Human Factors, 1999, 1(4): 347-375. [95] BAZILINSKYY P, PETERMEIJER S M, PETROVYCH V, et al. Take-over requests in highly automated driving: A crowdsourcing survey on auditory, vibrotactile, and visual displays[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2018, 56: 82-98. [96] BOROJENI S S, WALLBAUM T, HEUTEN W, et al. Comparing shape-changing and vibrotactile steering wheels for take-over requests in highly automated driving [C]. Oldenburg: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 2017. [97] PETERMEIJER S, BAZILINSKYY P, BENGLER K, et al. Take-over again: Investigating multimodal and directional TORs to get the driver back into the loop[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2017, 62: 204-215. [98] PETERMEIJER S M, CIELER S, DE WINTER J C F.Comparing spatially static and dynamic vibrotactile takeover requests in the driver seat[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2017, 99: 218-227. [99] KUNZE A, SUMMERSKILL S J, MARSHALL R, et al. Preliminary evaluation of variables for communicating uncertainties using a haptic seat[C]. Toronto: Adjunct Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 2018. [100] COHEN- LAZRY G, KATZMAN N, BOROWSKY A, et al. Directional tactile alerts for take-over requests in highly-automated driving[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2019, 65: 217- 226. [101] KRÜGER M, DRIESSEN T, WIEBEL- HERBOTH C B, et al. Feeling uncertain-effects of a vibrotactile belt that communicates vehicle sensor uncertainty[J]. Information, 2020, 11(7): 353-377. [102] LIAO S. CYCSIGHT: Designing a haptic wristband with a detachable radar to improve hearing-impaired cyclists' road safety[J]. Georgia Institute of Technology, 2020: 1- 157. [103] TANG Q, GUO G, ZHANG Z, et al. Olfactory facilitation of takeover performance in highly automated driving[J]. Human Factors, 2021, 64(3): 553-564. [104] WINTERSBERGER P, DMITRENKO D, SCHARTMÜLLER C, et al. S(C)ENTINEL: Monitoring automated vehicles with olfactory reliability displays[C]. California: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 2019. [105] BAEK S J, YUN H, YANG J H. How do humans respond when automated vehicles request an immediate vehicle control take- over?[C]. Utrecht: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings, 2019. [106] KIM J W, YANG J H. Understanding metrics of vehicle control take- over requests in simulated automated vehicles[J]. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 2020, 21(3): 757-770. [107] YUN H, YANG J H. Multimodal warning design for takeover request in conditionally automated driving[J]. European Transport Research Review, 2020, 12: 1-11. [108] BARBER D, BEST A. Connected and automated vehicle simulation to enhance vehicle message delivery[C]. Cham: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2017. [109] SHARMA A, ALI Y, SAIFUZZAMAN M, et al. Human factors in modelling mixed traffic of traditional, connected, and automated vehicles[C]. Cham: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2017. [110] OLAVERRI-MONREAL C, JIZBA T. Human factors in the design of human-machine interaction: An overview emphasizing V2X communication[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2016, 1(4): 302-313. [111] JIZBA T. Influence of HMI ergonomy on drivers in cooperative systems area[J]. Acta Polytechnica CTU Proceedings, 2017, 12: 42-49. [112] WEIDNER F, BROLL W. Stereoscopic 3D dashboards an investigation of performance, workload, and gaze behavior during take-overs in semi-autonomous driving [J/OL]. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, (2020-8-25) [2021-10-8]. https://link.springer.com. [113] PARK J, ABDEL-ATY M, WU Y, et al. Enhancing invehicle driving assistance information under connected vehicle environment[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2018, 20(9): 3558-3567. [114] KIM S, VAN EGMOND R, HAPPEE R. Effects of user interfaces on take-over performance: A review of the empirical evidence[J]. Information, 2021, 12(4): 162. [115] WINTERSBERGER P, SCHARTMÜLLER C, RIENER A. Attentive user interfaces to improve multitasking and take-over performance in automated driving: The autonet of things[J]. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction, 2019, 11(3): 40-58. [116] HOLMES L T M, HARWOOD L C, KLAUER S G, et al. Connected vehicle systems: Evaluation of display location and application type on driving performance [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2014, 2424(1): 39- 47. [117] PAYRE W, DIELS C. Designing in- vehicle signs for connected vehicle features: Does appropriateness guarantee comprehension?[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2019, 80: 102-110. [118] 葛慧敏, 郑明强, 吕能超, 等. 驾驶分心综述[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2021, 21(2): 38-55. [GE H M, ZHENG M Q, LV N C, et al. Review on driving distractions[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(2): 38-55.] [119] SINGH H, BHATIA J S, KAUR J. Eye tracking based driver fatigue monitoring and warning system[C]. New Delhi: 2010 India International Conference on Power Electronics, 2011. [120] ZHANG F, SU J, GENG L, et al. Driver fatigue detection based on eye state recognition[C]. Singapore: 2017 International Conference on Machine Vision and Information Technology (CMVIT), 2017. [121] GALARZA E E, EGAS F D, SILVA F M, et al. Real time driver drowsiness detection based on driver's face imagebehavior using a system of human computer interaction implemented in a smartphone[C]. Cham: International Conference on Information Technology & Systems, 2018. [122] KHUNPISUTH O, CHOTCHINASRI T, KOSCHAKOSAI V, et al. Driver drowsiness detection using eye-closeness detection[C]. Naples: 2016 12th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems, 2016. [123] BABAEIAN M, BHARDWAJ N, ESQUIVEL B, et al. Real time driver drowsiness detection using a logistic-regression-based machine learning algorithm[C]. California: 2016 IEEE Green Energy and Systems Conference, 2016. [124] 关伟, 杨柳, 江世雄, 等. 脑电在交通驾驶行为中的应用研究综述[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2016, 16 (3): 35- 44. [GUAN W, YANG L, JIANG S X, et al. Review on the application of EEG in traffic driving behavior study[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2016, 16(3): 35-44.] [125] WANG W, NA X, CAO D, et al. Decision-making in driver-automation shared control: A review and perspectives[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2020, 7(5): 1-19. [126] MARCANO M, DÍAZ S, PÉREZ J, et al. A review of shared control for automated vehicles: Theory and applications[J]. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 2020, 50(6): 475-491. [127] KONDO R, WADA T, SONODA K. Use of haptic shared control in highly automated driving systems[J]. IFACPapersOnLine, 2019, 52(19): 43-48. [128] LI Y, LV C, XUE J. A novel predictive haptic control interface for automation-to-human takeover of automated vehicles[C]. Paris: 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2019. [129] OKADA K, SONODA K, WADA T. Transferring from automated to manual driving when traversing a curve via haptic shared control[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2020, 6(2): 266-275. |
[1] | YANG Feng , CHONG Da-shuang. Emergency Vehicle Dynamic Path Selection Based on Two-stage Objective Optimization Model [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(3): 84-92. |
[2] | LIU Yi-cheng, LI Zhi-peng , LV Chun-pu , ZHANG Tao , LIU Yan. Network-wide Traffic Flow Prediction Research Based on DTW Algorithm Spatial-temporal Graph Convolution [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(3): 147-157. |
[3] | YAO Rong-han , WANG Rong-yun , ZHANG Wen-song , YE Jin-song , SUN Feng. Real-time Traffic Flow Parameters Estimation Model Based on Generative Adversarial Network [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(3): 158-167. |
[4] | XIE Dong-fan , JIA Hui-di, LI Chun-yan, ZHAO Xiao-mei. Mining and Calculating Travel Time Based on Classification of Grid Traffic State [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(3): 168-178. |
[5] | XIE Ji-ming , PENG Bo , QIN Ya-qin. Cellular Automata Model of Multi-lane Weaving Area Based on Lane-changing Probability Distribution [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(3): 276-285. |
[6] | XU Meng , LIU Tao , ZHONG Shao-peng , JIANG Yu. Urban Smart Public Transport Studies: A Review and Prospect [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(2): 91-108. |
[7] | CHENG Jun, ZHANG Li-yan, CHEN Qi-hong. A Map Aided Visual-inertial Fusion Localization Method for Autonomous Vehicles [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(2): 117-126. |
[8] | WANG Guo-dong , LIU Li , MENG Yu , MA Zhi-ping, ZHENG Hao-qing , GU Qing, BAI Guo-xing. Integrated Control of Trajectory Planning and Tracking for Vehicle Collision Avoidance [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(2): 127-136. |
[9] | MA Dong-fang , CHEN Xi , WU Xiao-dong , JIN Sheng. Mixed-coordinated Decision-making Method for Arterial Signals Based on Reinforcement Learning [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(2): 145-153. |
[10] | TIAN Hui-juan, LIU Jia-wei, ZHAI Jia-hao, DENG Lin-lin. Video-based Vehicle Speed Measurement Method Using Multiple Intrusion Lines [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(1): 49-56. |
[11] | JIA Yan-feng, QU Da-yi, ZHAO Zi-xu, WANG Tao, SONG Hui. Car-following Decision-making and Model for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles Based on Safety Potential Field [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(1): 85-97. |
[12] | ZHAO Jian-dong , CHEN Qin , JIAO Yan-li , ZHANG Kai-li , HAN Ming-min. Recognition of Abnormal Driving Behavior of Key Commercial Vehicles [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(1): 282-291. |
[13] | XU Dong-wei , PENG Hang , SHANG Xue-tian , WEI Chen-chen , YANG Yan-fang . Road Network Data Repair Based on Graph Autoencoder-generative Adversarial Network [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(6): 33-41. |
[14] | YOU Feng , LIANG Jian-zhong , CAO Shui-jin, XIAO Zhi-hao, WU Zhen-jiang , WANG Hai-wei. Dense Pedestrian Crowd Trajectory Extraction and Motion Semantic Information Perception Based on Multi-object Tracking [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(6): 42-54. |
[15] | WANG Fu-jian, YU Jia-hao , ZHAO Jin-huan , MEI Zhen-yu. Short-term Public Traffic Passenger Volume Forecasting Method Based on Real-time Relevance of Stations [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(6): 131-144. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||