长大货物多式联运网络风险传播动力学仿真

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.01.002

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (1): 14-23.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.01.002

• 综合交通运输体系论坛 • 上一篇下一篇

长大货物多式联运网络风险传播动力学仿真

张英贵^*，肖杨，雷定猷，陆强

中南大学，交通运输工程学院，长沙 410075

收稿日期:2021-08-18 修回日期:2021-11-05 接受日期:2021-11-09 出版日期:2022-02-25 发布日期:2022-02-22
作者简介:张英贵(1984- )，男，安徽金寨人，教授，博士。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金

Risk Propagation Dynamics Simulation on Multimodal Transport Network for Oversize and Heavyweight Cargo

ZHANG Ying-gui^* , XIAO Yang, LEI Ding-you, LU Qiang

School of Traffic &Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China

Received:2021-08-18 Revised:2021-11-05 Accepted:2021-11-09 Online:2022-02-25 Published:2022-02-22
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 长大货物多式联运组织具有高风险特征，为掌握长大货物多式联运风险网络传播规律，提升联运网络的风险防控能力，统筹考虑长大货物多式联运特征及其风险传播的影响因素，分析长大货物多式联运网络风险传播过程，构造长大货物多式联运网络风险传播函数，分别建立不考虑时滞、考虑时滞和外部因素的长大货物多式联运网络风险传播模型，明晰其动力学传播过程。仿真结果表明：相比路径决策因子，装载加固因子对长大货物多式联运网络风险传播的影响更大，更安全的装载加固方案可有效抑制联运风险初期传播峰值；降低风险传播率，提高风险治愈率可有效控制长大货物多式联运网络风险传播的速率与规模；时滞的延迟程度对长大货物联运网络风险传播影响较为显著，呈非线性、正向相关关系；外部因素的随机干扰可在一定程度上弱化风险传播程度；在长大货物联运网络风险扩散平衡点失稳时滞前，及时采取适当措施能防止因风险失控导致的联运网络崩溃。

关键词: 综合运输, 风险传播, 动力学模型, 长大货物, 多式联运网络, 时滞

Abstract: Multimodal transport organization for oversize and heavyweight cargo has the characteristics of high risk. To uncover master the risk propagation law and improve the ability to prevent and control risks of the multimodal transport network for oversize and heavyweight cargo(MOHC), the overall consideration for the characteristics of MOHC and the influencing factors of risk propagation was used to analyze the risk propagation process. The risk propagation function for MOHC was constructed to establish the risk propagation modal without time delay and with time delay and external factors, respectively, so that its dynamic propagation process is clarified. The simulation results indicated that the loading reinforcement factor had a greater impact on the risk propagation of MOHC in comparison to the path decision factor and a safer loading reinforcement scheme could efficaciously reduce the initial risk propagation peak of MOHC; Reducing the risk propagation rate and increasing the cure rate could effectively control the risk propagation scale in MOHC; The degree of time delay had a significant effect on the risk propagation of MOHC, which is nonlinear and positively correlated; The random interference of external factors can weaken the propagation of risk to a certain extent; Before the risk diffusion equilibrium point in time of MOHC became unstable, appropriate measures could have been taken in time to prevent the MOHC from collapsing due to the uncontrolled risk.

Key words: integrated transportation, risk communication, dynamic model, oversize and heavyweight cargo; multimodal transport network, time delay

中图分类号:

张英贵, 肖杨, 雷定猷, 陆强. 长大货物多式联运网络风险传播动力学仿真[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 14-23.

ZHANG Ying-gui , XIAO Yang, LEI Ding-you, LU Qiang. Risk Propagation Dynamics Simulation on Multimodal Transport Network for Oversize and Heavyweight Cargo[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(1): 14-23.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.01.002

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V22/I1/14

参考文献

[1] 雷定猷, 游伟, 张英贵, 等. 长大货物多式联运路径优化模型与算法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2014, 14(1): 75- 83. [LEI D Y, YOU W, ZHANG Y G, et al. Path optimization model and algorithm of multimodal transport for long and bulky cargo[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2014, 14(1): 75-83.]

[2] CORDEIRO F G, BEZERRA B S, PEIXOTO A, et al. Methodological aspects for modeling the environmental risk of transporting hazardous materials by road[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2016, 44: 105-121.

[3] GUL M, GUNERI A F, NASIRLI S M. A fuzzy based model for risk assessment of routes in oil transportation [J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2019, 16: 4671-4686

[4] HAMAD A, MIN A, SAKDIRAT K. Utilizing an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for overcrowding level risk assessment in railway stations[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10: 5156.

[5] 栾婷婷, 郭湛, 庞磊, 等. 基于组合权重的铁路危险货物运输风险预警模型[J]. 铁道学报, 2017, 39(12): 1-7. [LUAN T T, GUO Z, PANG L, et al. Early warning model for risks in railway transportation of dangerous goods based on combination weight[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2017, 39(12): 1-7.]

[6] ARICI S, AKYUZ E, ARSLAN O. Application of fuzzy bow-tie risk analysis to maritime transportation: The case of ship collision during the STS operation[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2020: 107960.

[7] 朱乐群, 吕靖, 李晶. 基于高维突变模型的海上通道安全预警研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2016, 25(3): 261- 266. [ZHU L Q, LU J, LI J. Pre-warning of sea lines of communication based on higher dimension catastrophe model[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2016, 25(3): 261-266.]

[8] KAEWFAK K, HUYUH V, AMMARAOALA V, et al. A risk analysis based on a two-stage model of fuzzy AHP-DEA for multimodal freight transportation systems[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8(1): 153756-153773.

[9] NITSENKO V, KOTENKO S, HANZHURENKO I. 4th international conference on soft computing and data mining, 2020[C]. Melaka: UTHM, Fac Comp Sci & Informat Technol, 2020.

[10] GUO J N, XU J, DU Q, et al. Risk assessment on multimodal transport network based on quality function deployment[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2021, 36: 1408-1440.

[11] 雷凯, 朱晓宁, 侯键菲. 多式联运网络风险传播建模与仿真[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2016, 16(3): 21- 27. [LEI K, ZHU X N, HOU J F. Modeling and simulation of risk communication in multimodal transportation networks[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2016, 16(3): 21-27.]

[12] GUO J N, XU J, HE Z, et al. Research on risk propagation method of multimodal transport network under uncertainty[J]. Physica A: Statal Mechanics and Its Applications, 2020, 563: 125494.

[13] HE Z G, GUO J N, XU J. Cascade failure model in multimodal transport network risk propagation[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019, 19(1): 1-7.

[14] PETRASKA A, ČIZIUNIENE K, PRENTKOVSKIS O, et al. Methodology of selection of heavy and oversized freight transportation system[J]. Transport & Telecommunication Journal, 2018, 19(1): 45-58.

[15] LUO Y, ZHANG Y, et al. Multi-route planning of multimodal transportation for oversize and heavyweight cargo based on reconstruction[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2021, 128: 105172.

[16] 孙超, 王瑛, 崔利杰, 等. 基于复杂网络的装备系统安全性评估模型 [J]. 计算机应用研究, 2017, 34(10): 3028- 3031. [SUN C, WANG Y, CUI L J, et al. Safety evaluation model of equipment system based on complex network[J]. Application Research of Computers, 2017, 34 (10): 3028-3031.]

[17] ISHTIAQ A, SAMI U K．Analysis of stochastic delayed SIRS model with exponential birth and saturated incidence rate[J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2020, 138 (1): 110008.

长大货物多式联运网络风险传播动力学仿真

Risk Propagation Dynamics Simulation on Multimodal Transport Network for Oversize and Heavyweight Cargo

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张峻屹, 李双金, 马爽. 基于市民生活行为学的交通行为研究综述[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 1-16.
[2]	李杰梅, 高丽, 祁婧洁, 尹琪. 腹地-口岸可达性格局演化及其空间溢出效应分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 29-36.
[3]	冯芬玲, 孙楠佳. 考虑时间价值的中非多式联运路径与出海港选择[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 45-53.
[4]	刘忠波, 王淇娴, 郑红星. 海空协同的远海岛礁战储物资供给优化模型与算法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 268-279.
[5]	诸立超, 甄伟, 刘昭然. 生命周期视角下货运通道能耗测度与节能潜力分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 24-29.
[6]	毛保华, 卢霞, 黄俊生, 何天健, 陈海波. 碳中和目标下氢能源在我国运输业中的发展路径[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 234-243.
[7]	彭宏勤, 张国伍. 新技术对“十四五”及2035年交通运输系统发展的影响 ——“交通7+1论坛”第五十七次会议[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(4): 1-5.
[8]	马继辉, 王瀛帜, 姜秀山, 卫亮. 基于博弈论的空铁联运收益分配模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(4): 23-29.
[9]	陶思然, 叶霞飞. 引入旅游偏好的城际客运出行分布预测模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(4): 140-147.
[10]	张玉召. 快捷货运服务网络设计研究综述[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(3): 1-12.
[11]	张亚男, 席洋, 杨嘉钰, 刘剑锋. 海南自贸港背景下海口市对外客运量预测研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(3): 260-267.
[12]	徐新扬，杨扬. 政府主导下公铁联运系统三方演化博弈研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(2): 7-15.
[13]	胡立伟，范仔健，张苏航，郭治，殷秀芬. 基于复杂网络的城市交通拥塞因子风险传播机理及其应用研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(2): 224-230.
[14]	吴群琪，王佳彬，王睿，孙启鹏. 基于出行剩余理论的运输方式选择研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(1): 2-7.
[15]	可钰，聂磊，袁午阳. 基于空铁联运OD可达性的高铁时刻表优化模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(1): 23-29.