公交驾驶员违规类型同交通事故间的关联分析

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.02.033

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (2): 322-329.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.02.033

公交驾驶员违规类型同交通事故间的关联分析

朱彤^*，秦丹，董傲然，杜雨萌，魏雯

长安大学，运输工程学院，西安 710064

收稿日期:2021-09-22 修回日期:2021-12-16 接受日期:2021-12-21 出版日期:2022-04-25 发布日期:2022-04-23
作者简介:朱彤(1977- )，男，浙江诸暨人，副教授，博士。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划；陕西省交通运输厅科研项目

Relational Analysis Between Bus Drivers' Violation Type and Traffic Accident

ZHU Tong^* , QIN Dan, DONG Ao-ran, DU Yu-meng, WEI Wen

College of Transportation Engineering, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China

Received:2021-09-22 Revised:2021-12-16 Accepted:2021-12-21 Online:2022-04-25 Published:2022-04-23
Supported by:
National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFE0108000)；Scientific Research Project of Department of Transport of Shaanxi Province(21-34R)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 公交车驾驶员违规行为是引起交通事故的重要原因之一，以往文献在研究驾驶员违规行为与事故频率之间的关系时，未能深入探究违规行为类型差异及其异质性。为了进一步揭示不同违规行为的差异化影响并为行为管控措施提供依据，利用某市2019—2020年4532起公交违规及事故数据，将驾驶员事故频率作为研究对象，将17类违规行为及人口统计学因素作为解释变量，综合考虑数据特征及异质性分析需求，构建考虑均值与方差异质性的随机参数零膨胀泊松模型。模型分析结果表明：不同类型的违规行为对于驾驶员事故频率影响存在明显区别，当驾驶员同时存在若干特定违规行为时，事故频率明显高于其他驾驶员。具体包括：未走公交专用道等行为次数越多，则该驾驶员事故频率越高；未系安全带、未礼让斑马线次数和及时更换失效驾照等行为的影响具有随机特征，其作用效果具有随机波动的属性；未礼让斑马线行为影响参数的均值和方差受到其他变量的影响，即当驾驶员未礼让斑马线次数和越线行驶次数均较多时，期望事故率愈高。

关键词: 城市交通, 驾驶员事故频率, 公交车驾驶员违规行为, 随机参数零膨胀泊松模型, 均值和方差异质性

Abstract: Bus drivers' violating behavior is one of the important causes of traffic crashes. Previous studies have considered the relationship between driving violations and crash frequency, but failed to distinguish the types of violations and consider the heterogeneity. To reveal the differentiated impact of different violations and then provide a theoretical basis for behavior control measures, using the data of 4532 bus-involved violations and crashes in a city, the bus drivers' crash frequency in the accidents was focused on. Besides, 17 violating behaviors and demography factors were taken as explanatory variables. Based on the data characteristics and heterogeneity analysis, the random parameter zero-inflated Poisson model with heterogeneity in means and variances is established. The results indicated that different types of violating behaviors showed a significant difference in crash frequency. When drivers had several specific violating behaviors, the crash frequency was significantly increased. Specifically, not driving on bus lanes and other behaviors were associated with high crash frequency. The parameters of variables such as not wearing a seat belt, not yielding to pedestrians, and updating the expired license timely have random characteristics, indicating that its effect has the attribute of random fluctuation. In addition, the random parameter of not yielding to pedestrians shows that heterogeneity not observed in the data may appear in the mean and variance of the parameters. When the times of drivers pressing the line and not traveling on the bus lanes increased, the impact on the crash frequency would be more obvious.

Key words: urban traffic, drivers' crash frequency, bus drivers' violating behavior, random parameter zero-inflated Poisson model, heterogeneity in means and variances

中图分类号:

U491.31

朱彤, 秦丹, 董傲然, 杜雨萌, 魏雯. 公交驾驶员违规类型同交通事故间的关联分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 322-329.

ZHU Tong , QIN Dan, DONG Ao-ran, DU Yu-meng, WEI Wen. Relational Analysis Between Bus Drivers' Violation Type and Traffic Accident[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(2): 322-329.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.02.033

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V22/I2/322

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国公安部交通管理局. 2019年道路交通事故统计年报[R]. 公安部交通管理科学研究所, 2020. [Traffic Administration Bureau of the Ministry of Public Security of the People's Republic of China. Annual report on road traffic accidents 2019[R]. Research Institute of Traffic Management, Ministry of Public Security, 2020.]

[2] CHIMBA D, SANDO T, KWIGIZILE V. Effect of bus size and operation to crash occurrences[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2010, 42(6): 2063-2067.

[3] GU X J, YAN X D, MA L, et al. Modeling the serviceroute-based crash frequency by a spatiotemporalrandom-effect zero-inflated negative binomial model: An empirical analysis for bus-involved crashes[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2020, 144: 105674.

[4] AF WÅHLBERG A E, DORN L. Bus drivers who leave; were they more crash-involved?[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, 2019, 60(7): 524-535.

[5] 朱春莹, 王玉花, 刘志宏, 等. 公交车驾驶员人格、交通事故与职业压力的关系研究[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2014, 35(3): 324-326. [ZHU C Y, WANG Y H, LIU Z H, et al. Study on the relationship between bus driver personality, traffic accidents and occupational stress[J]. Journal of Qiqihar Medical College, 2014, 35(3): 324- 326.]

[6] 高红丽, 高丽英, 杨炜程, 等. 基于持续跟踪调查的防御性驾驶行为分析模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(2): 151-156. [GAO H L, GAO L Y, YANG W C, et al. Defensive driving behavior analysis model with follow-up surveys[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2020, 20(2): 151-156.]

[7] MALLIA L, LAZURAS L, VIOLANI C, et al. Crash risk and aberrant driving behaviors among bus drivers: The role of personality and attitudes towards traffic safety[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2015, 79(6): 145-151.

[8] HONG J Y, PARK J Y, LEE G W, et al. Endogenous commercial driver's traffic violations and freight truckinvolved crashes on mainlines of expressway[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2019, 131(10): 327-335.

[9] HAN W L, ZHAO J Y. Driver behaviour and traffic accident involvement among professional urban bus drivers in China[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, 2020, 74(10): 184-197.

[10] GREENE W H. Testing for Overdispersion[M]// Econometric Software Inc, LIMDEP Version 10.0 Reference Guide. New York: Econometric Software Inc, 2007: 940-941.

[11] 任高晓, 常若松. 基于驾驶风格的公交车驾驶员事故率对比研究[J]. 人类工效学, 2020, 26(6): 21-24. [REN G X, CHANG R S. A comparative study of accident rates based on bus driving styles[J]. Chinese Journal of Ergonomics, 2020, 26(6): 21-24.]

[1]	杨亚璪, 唐浩冬, 彭勇. 考虑偏好差异的后疫情时代居民出行方式选择行为研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 15-24.
[2]	陈启香, 吕斌, 陈喜群, 郝斌斌, 何佳曦. 空间异质性建成环境对出租车与地铁竞合关系的影响[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 25-35.
[3]	陈光会, 姬浩, 靳富强, 郭清娥, 贾斌, 苏兵. 考虑能源类型的城市出租车运营效率评价研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 36-44.
[4]	陈垚, 柏赟, 张安英, 毛保华, 陈绍宽. 基于滚动时域优化的共享自动驾驶汽车动态调度方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 45-52.
[5]	许心越, 谢兰诗雨. 诱导信息下城市轨道交通乘客路径选择行为研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 63-73.
[6]	葛显龙, 李婷, 王博, 尹作发. 考虑负效应最小化的电动汽车补能诱导研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 74-83.
[7]	岳昊, 刘建业, 李崇楠. 引入价格窗的定制公交线路优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 93-103.
[8]	宋俪婧, 白同舟, 贺玉龙, 陈艳艳, 刘雪杰, 马腾腾. 基于混合整数非线性规划的接驳公交优化模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 104-111.
[9]	石俊刚, 秦昙, 李响, 杨立兴, 杨晓光. 过饱和地铁线路的列车容量分配策略及优化模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 112-119.
[10]	胡立伟, 赵雪亭. 考虑边界条件不确定性的城市交通拥塞风险分布迁移规律研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 120-131.
[11]	李冰, 杨鸿宇, 郑佐雄, 冯悦, 王正辉. 基于宏观基本图的禁左交通组织评价模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 179-189.
[12]	李常敏, 魏文彬, 张露. 考虑匹配优先级的共享混合停车位租用与分配问题研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 190-197.
[13]	潘义勇, 吴静婷, 施颖, 缪炫烨. 建成环境对老年人交通事故严重程度异质性影响[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 224-230.
[14]	吕伟, 黄广琛, 汪京辉. 基于元胞自动机的高速公路瓶颈交通演化仿真[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 293-302.
[15]	刘晓冰, 李奉孝, 田欣妹, 闫学东. 基于通勤模式的都市圈中心结构判别研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 17-28.

公交驾驶员违规类型同交通事故间的关联分析

Relational Analysis Between Bus Drivers' Violation Type and Traffic Accident

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics