物流企业碳排放总量与效率测算方法

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.02.032

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (2): 313-321.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.02.032

所属专题： 2022年英文专栏

物流企业碳排放总量与效率测算方法

姜晓红^*，陈莎，张毅

南京林业大学，汽车与交通工程学院，南京 210037

收稿日期:2021-11-12 修回日期:2021-12-31 接受日期:2022-01-11 出版日期:2022-04-25 发布日期:2022-04-23
作者简介:姜晓红(1985- )，女，江苏常州人，副教授，博士
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年科学基金

Calculation Method of Total Carbon Emission and Efficiency of Logistics Enterprises

JIANG Xiao-hong^* , CHEN Sha, ZHANG Yi

Automotive and Transportation College, Nanjing Forest University, Nanjing 210037, China

Received:2021-11-12 Revised:2021-12-31 Accepted:2022-01-11 Online:2022-04-25 Published:2022-04-23
Supported by:
Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71701099)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用碳排放系数法测算物流企业运输环节移动源燃烧碳排放量，定义消耗电量转换法测算仓储环节固定源燃烧碳排放量；选取资本存量、劳动力、能源消耗作为碳排放效率评价的投入指标，产值作为期望产出，碳排放量作为非期望产出指标；采用Super-SBM模型(Super-efficiency Slack-based Measurement Model)得到技术效率、纯技术效率和规模效率这3个指标值，用以评价物流企业碳排放效率，以顺丰股份有限公司2013—2020年的营运数据为例进行实证分析。结果显示：2013—2016年、2020年的技术效率均大于1，表示资源分配达到最优状态；2017—2019年均小于1，主要是因为规模效率值偏低，2017年起顺丰提升运输业务量，逐渐调整规模效率，2020年的技术效率有了提升，找到了相对合理的平衡点。2013—2020年的纯技术效率值均大于1，近些年顺丰不断寻求技术提升以提高生产效率水平。结果表明，所提物流企业碳排放量测算方法可行，采用的Super-SBM模型能有效评价物流企业碳排放效率。最后提出物流企业需要从创新生产技术、节能减排技术等方面提升碳排放效率的改进措施。

关键词: 物流工程, 碳排放量, 碳排放效率, Super-SBM模型, 物流企业

Abstract: The carbon emission coefficient method is used to measure the carbon emissions of logistics enterprises' transportation and storage. The input and output indicators of carbon emission efficiency are selected, and the Superefficiency Slack-based Measurement Model is adopted to obtain the three index values of technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency, and scale efficiency to evaluate the carbon emission efficiency of logistics enterprises. The empirical analysis is performed using SF Express's operating data from 2013 to 2020. The analysis results show that the technical efficiency from 2013 to 2016 and 2020 are all greater than 1, indicating that resource allocation has reached the optimal state. The technical efficiency values from 2017 to 2019 are all less than 1, mainly because of the low scale efficiency value. SF Express's transportation business volume has soared since 2017, and the scale efficiency has been gradually adjusted to find a relatively reasonable balance point by 2020, and the technical efficiency has been improved in 2020. The pure technical efficiency values from 2013 to 2020 are greater than 1. In recent years, SF has continued to increase its capital investment in technology to seek technological improvements. These results show that the proposed method is feasible, and the super-SBM model can effectively evaluate the carbon emission efficiency of logistics enterprises. Finally, we put forward the improvement measures for logistics enterprises to improve carbon emission efficiency from the aspects of innovative production technology, and energy saving and emission reduction technology.

Key words: logistics engineering, carbon emissions, carbon emission efficiency, Super-SBM model, logistics enterprises

中图分类号:

姜晓红, 陈莎, 张毅. 物流企业碳排放总量与效率测算方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 313-321.

JIANG Xiao-hong, CHEN Sha, ZHANG Yi. Calculation Method of Total Carbon Emission and Efficiency of Logistics Enterprises[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(2): 313-321.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.02.032

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V22/I2/313

参考文献

[1] IEA. Oil products final consumption by sector[EB/OL]. (2020-01-10) [2020-04-02]. https: //iea. blob. core. windows. net/ assets/ fffa1b7d- b0c5- 4e64- 86aa- 5c9421832d73/WORLDBAL_Documentation.pdf.

[2] CAIT. Historical GHG Emissions[EB/OL]. (2020-01-10) [2020-03-20]. http://cait.wri.org.

[3] YANG J, TANG L, MI Z, et al. Carbon emissions performance in logistics at the city level[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 231: 1258-1266.

[4] 李松庆, 裴艳丽. 中国物流业碳排放研究: 文献综述与展望[J]. 物流科技, 2019, 42(2): 12-17. [LI S Q, PEI Y L. Research on carbon emission of logistics industry in China: Literature review and prospect[J]. Logistics Science and Technology, 2019, 42(2): 12-17.]

[5] 黄赶祥, 景崇毅, 王红岩. 碳排放约束下我国航空公司全要素生产率研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18(4): 19-24. [HUANG G X, JING C Y, WANG H Y. Total factor productivity of china airlines under carbon emission constraints[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2018, 18(4): 19-24. ]

[6] 戈艳艳, 王姗姗. 考虑碳排放的港口全要素生产率及影响因素分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(2): 22-29. [GE Y Y, WANG S S. Total factor productivity and influencing factors analysis for ports considering carbon emissions[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(2): 22-29.]

[7] 秦新生. 物流企业碳排放指标计算方法研究[J]. 铁道运输与经济，2014, 36(7): 60-65. [QIN X S. Research on calculation method of carbon emission index of logistics enterprises[J]. Railway Transportation and Economy, 2014, 36(7): 60-65.]

[8] WANG Z, HE W. CO2 emissions efficiency and marginal abatement costs of the regional transportation sectors in China[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2017, 50: 83-97.

[9] 王燕, 刘婷. 碳排放约束下我国区域物流能源效率及影响因素研究[J]. 生态经济，2018, 34(10): 14-18. [WANG Y, LIU T. Research on energy efficiency and influencing factors of regional logistics in China under the constraint of carbon emissions[J]. Ecological Economy, 2018, 34(10): 14-18.]

[10] 宋京妮, 吴群琪, 孙启鹏, 等. 基于SBM-undesirable 模型的综合运输效率评价[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2015, 15(5): 32-38. [SONG J N, WU Q Q, SUN Q P, et al. SBM-undesirable model-based efficiency evaluation for integrated transportation[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2015, 15(5): 32-38.]

[11] TONE K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 130: 498-509.

[12] 欧国立, 许畅然. 京津冀货运碳排放效率分析: 基于超效率SBM模型及ML指数[J]. 北京交通大学学报(社会科学版). 2020, 19(2): 48- 57. [OU G L, XU C R. Analysis of freight transport carbon emission efficiency in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei: A study based on superefficiency SBM model and ML index[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University (Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 19(2): 48-57.]

[13] TONE K. A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 143: 32-41.

[14] TONE K. Dealing with undesirable outputs in DEA: A Slacks-based Measure (SBM) approach[J]. GRIPS Research Report Series, 2004, 2004: 44-45.

[1]	周琪, 梁肖, 黄俊生, 王海鹏, 毛保华. 城市轨道交通碳排放效率与影响因素研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 30-38.
[2]	闫芳, 邓德萍, 柴福良, 马艳芳. 考虑环境负效应的智能垃圾桶动态收运路径优化问题[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 265-274.
[3]	田顺, 郑博文, 孙健, 刘晶郁. 基于实车行驶工况的电动公交运营期碳足迹测算[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 149-157.
[4]	朱顺应, 廖凌云, 吴景安, 常红光, 王红. 城市客运交通工具碳排放效率差异——以襄阳市为例[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 158-166.
[5]	张英贵, 姚璎华, 高全, 雷定猷. 铁路集装箱混合货物平衡装载布局优化模型与算法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 214-222.
[6]	周小祥, 黄承锋. 农村物流末端共配联盟演化博弈及稳定性研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 265-272.
[7]	王清斌, 于江宁, 郑建风. 甩挂运输模式下新增运输任务的干扰管理模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 160-166.
[8]	柳伍生, 李旺, 周清, 迭纤. “无人机-车辆”配送路径优化模型与算法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 176-186.
[9]	珠兰, 马潇, 刘卓凡. 时间依赖型绿色车辆路径问题研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 187-194.
[10]	奇格奇, 张子贤, 卫振林, 李宝文. 基于语义挖掘的快递运输货品风险评价研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(4): 248-255.
[11]	杨森炎，宁连举，商攀. 基于时空状态网络的电动物流车辆路径优化方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(2): 196-204.
[12]	杨华龙，辛禹辰，高浩然. 随机扰动项呈离散分布的库存路径和定价问题的模型与算法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(2): 211-216.
[13]	辛禹辰，施胜男，杨华龙. 基于订单拆分的线上到线下连锁门店配送优化模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(5): 212-217.
[14]	于江霞，杜红亚，罗太波. 基于客户分类的即时配送路径优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(4): 202-208.
[15]	刘杰，黎浩东，张萌. 基于点线能力约束的多层级节点协同布局优化模型及算法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(2): 107-113.

物流企业碳排放总量与效率测算方法

Calculation Method of Total Carbon Emission and Efficiency of Logistics Enterprises

PDF

PDF(English version)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics