客观赋权对快捷货运各方式间临界运距影响分析

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2024.02.005

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2024, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 45-52.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2024.02.005

• 综合交通运输体系论坛 • 上一篇下一篇

客观赋权对快捷货运各方式间临界运距影响分析

孙宗胜^a，帅斌^*a,b,c，杨俊杰^a，许旻昊^a

西南交通大学，a.交通运输与物流学院；b.综合交通运输智能化国家地方联合工程实验室； c. 综合交通大数据应用技术国家工程实验室，成都611756

收稿日期:2023-11-21 修回日期:2023-11-28 接受日期:2023-12-05 出版日期:2024-04-25 发布日期:2024-04-25
作者简介:孙宗胜(1995- )，男，辽宁凌源人，博士生。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金 (71173177)。

Impact Analysis of Objective Weighting on Critical Distance for Express Goods Transportation Modes

SUNZongshenga,SHUAI Bin^*a,b,c,YANG Junjiea,XU Minhao^a

a. School of Transportation and Logistics; b. National United Engineering Laboratory of Integrated and Intelligent Transportation; c. National Engineering Laboratory of Integrated Transportation Big Data Application Technology, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China

Received:2023-11-21 Revised:2023-11-28 Accepted:2023-12-05 Online:2024-04-25 Published:2024-04-25
Supported by:
NationalNaturalScienceFoundation of China (71173177)。

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 我国交通运输已由各方式间独立发展向一体化融合发展转变，快捷货物运输是综合交通运输融合发展的新兴关键领域，其各运输方式间临界运距的研究对合理运输结构的确定具有重要意义。针对既有研究对于临界运距问题主观赋权的不足，本文首先基于快捷货运分担率模型建立临界运距与服务属性及权重系数表达式，然后基于CRITIC(Criteria Importance Though Intercriteria Correlation) 法对权重系数进行客观测算，最后通过实例进行模型分析验证及结果对比。实例结果表明：客观赋权法可以使各服务属性权重系数随运距增加而产生异质性；经济性在300~400 km和900~1100 km内波动幅度最大；便捷性与经济性的运距临界点为327km，其重要程度随运距增加会高于经济性；客观赋权对快捷货运各方式间临界运距的影响主要体现在高铁快运绝对优势运距区间的扩大，由主观赋权下700~1500km转变为400~2000km。

关键词: 综合运输, 临界运距, 客观赋权, 快捷货物, CRITIC法

Abstract: The transportation in China has shifted from independent development among various modes to integrated development. Express goods transportation is an emerging key field for the integrated development of integrated transportation. The study of the critical distance for express goods transportation modes is of great significance to determine the reasonable transportation structure. In response to the shortcomings of subjective weighting in existing research on critical distance issues, expression for critical distance and weight coefficients of service attribute is established based on the express goods sharing rate model. Then, the weight coefficients are objectively calculated based on the CRITIC (Criteria Importance Though Intercriteria Correlation) method. The model is analyzed and validated through example analysis, and the results are compared between different scenarios. The results indicate that: the objective assignment method can make the weight coefficients of each service attribute heterogeneous with the increase of transportation distance; economy has the largest fluctuation in 300 to 400 km and 900 to 1100 km; the transportation distance threshold between convenience and economy is 327 km, and its importance will be higher than economy with the increase of transportation distance. The influence of objective weighting on the critical distance between the modes of express goods transportation is mainly reflected in the expansion of the absolute dominant distance range of high-speed rail express transportation, which changes from 700~1500 km to 400~2000 km.

Key words: integrated transportation, critical transportation distance, objective weighting, express goods, CRITIC method

中图分类号:

U116

孙宗胜, 帅斌, 杨俊杰, 许旻昊. 客观赋权对快捷货运各方式间临界运距影响分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(2): 45-52.

SUNZongshenga, SHUAI Bin, YANG Junjiea, XU Minhaoa. Impact Analysis of Objective Weighting on Critical Distance for Express Goods Transportation Modes[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2024, 24(2): 45-52.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2024.02.005

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2024/V24/I2/45

参考文献

[1]荣朝和.从进化视角看人类交通与信息能力的发展[J]. 北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2023,22(2): 33 45. [RONG C H. Viewing the development of transport and information capabilities from an evolutionary perspective[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University (Social Sciences Edition)，2023, 22(2): 33-45.]

[2]荣朝和.对运输化阶段划分进行必要调整的思考[J].北京交通大学学报,2016, 40(4): 122-129. [RONG C H. The adjustment to transportization stages division[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 2016, 40(4): 122 129.]

[3]彭宏勤,张国伍.新时期系统工程与交通运输的理论融合与实践:“交通7+1论坛”第五十八次会议[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2022, 22(5): 1-6. [PENG H Q, ZHANG G W. Theoretical integration and practice of system engineering and transportation in the new era[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(5): 1-6.]

[4]傅志寰,孙永福.交通强国战略研究[M].北京:人民交通出版社股份有限公司, 2019. [FU Z H, SUN Y F. Strategic research on transportation power[M]. Beijing: China Communications Press Co. LTD, 2019.]

[5]王保华,何世伟.综合运输体系下快捷货物运输网络资源配置优化模型及算法[J].铁道学报,2017,39(2): 10-16. [WANG B H, HE S W. Resource planning optimization model and algorithm for multi-modal express shipment network[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2017, 39(2): 10-16.]

[6]金伟,李夏苗,周凌云,等.基于列生成算法的高速铁路快捷货运组织方案优化研究[J].铁道学报,2020,42 (9): 26-32. [JIN W, LI X M, ZHOU L Y, et al. Research on optimization of high-speed railway freight transportation organization scheme based on column generation algorithm[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2020, 42(9): 26-32.]

[7]陈婉茹,张得志,梁一婧,等.快捷货物公路干线运输组织优化研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报,2022,19(8): 2193-2201. [CHEN W R, ZHANG D Z, LIANG Y J, et al. Optimization study on the organization for long haul transportation scheme of express[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2022, 19(8): 2193 2201.]

[8]张玉召.快捷货运服务网络设计研究综述[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2021, 21(3): 1-12. [ZHANG Y Z. Review of service network design for express freight transportation[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(3): 1 12.]

[9] CHEN Z, JIANG H. Impacts of high-speed rail on domestic air cargo traffic in China[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2020, 142: 1-13.

[10] CAI D L, XIAO Y B, JIANG C M. Competition between high-speed rail and airlines: Considering both passenger and cargo[J]. Transport Policy, 2021, 110: 379-393.

[11] 孙宗胜,帅斌,许旻昊.低碳背景下快捷货物各运输方式间临界运距研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 11-21. [SUN Z S, SHUAI B, XU M H. Critical transportation distance analysis for express goods transportation modes considering low carbon emissions [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2023, 23(6): 11-21.]

[12] 许若曦, 聂磊.高速铁路运营参数对客流分担率的影响及灵敏度分析[J]. 铁道运输与经济,2017, 39(11): 21-27. [XU R X, NIE L. The impacts of HSR operation parameters on sharing ratio of passenger flow and their sensitivity analysis[J]. Railway Transport and Economy, 2017, 39(11): 21-27.]

[13] 张发明,刘志平.组合评价方法研究综述[J].系统工程学报, 2017, 32(4): 557-569. [ZHANG F M, LIU Z P. Combined evaluation methods: A literature review[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2017, 32(4): 557-569.]

[14] DIAKOULAKI D, MAVROTAS G, PAPAYANNAKIS L. Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 1995, 22(7): 763-770.

[15] 郭峤枫, 刘君喜,杜敏齐,等.高速铁路调度员应急处置能力评价体系构建及应用[J].铁道学报,2022, 44(4): 1-8. [GUO Q F, LIU J X, DU M Q, et al. Construction and application of evaluation system for emergency response ability of high-speed railway dispatchers[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2022, 44(4): 1-8.]

[16] 邓毛颖, 邓策方.基于结构、效率、公平与韧性的路网密度适宜性评价研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 22-32. [DENG M Y, DENG C F. Evaluation of road network density based on structure, efficiency, fairness and resilience[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2023, 23(6): 22-32.]

客观赋权对快捷货运各方式间临界运距影响分析

Impact Analysis of Objective Weighting on Critical Distance for Express Goods Transportation Modes

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	杨东, 李艳红, 田春林. 交通运输行业碳排放自然达峰特征与峰值预测研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(2): 34-44.
[2]	王爽, 孙翔. 基于车船直取模式的集装箱海铁联运衔接优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(2): 53-62.
[3]	李宁海, 陈硕, 梁肖, 田佩宁. 我国交通运输业碳达峰时间预测[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(1): 2-13.
[4]	汪玲, 王琪, 唐磊. 中国交通枢纽城市生态交通效率时空特征分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(1): 14-23.
[5]	吴云强, 解乔雅, 张戎. 集装箱海铁联运补贴优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(1): 35-45.
[6]	李琦, 魏玉光. 带时间窗的中心站多车程集卡调度优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(1): 272-281.
[7]	孙宗胜, 帅斌, 许旻昊. 低碳背景下快捷货物各运输方式间临界运距研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 11-21.
[8]	曾玮, 贾晋中. 重载线路低负荷方向运力利用率提升策略与效益评估[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(5): 130-135.
[9]	陈丹, 于慧, 汤程, 陈志雄, 汤淼. 城市公共客运交通碳排放及其大气环境影响的实证研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(4): 1-10.
[10]	王超, 怀旭, 伍佳妮. 公铁联运下我国中西部地区低碳运输实证研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(4): 24-33.
[11]	方涵潇, 刘灿, 蒋康, 肖怀宪, 唐运. 湖南省交通运输领域碳排放达峰路径研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(4): 61-69.
[12]	吴鹏, 李泽, 季海涛. 考虑排放控制区的绿色多式联运路径和速度优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(3): 20-29.
[13]	许波桅, 唐灿璇, 李军军. 级联失效下海港一陆港集装箱运输网络鲁棒性分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(3): 265-279.
[14]	黄爱玲, 刘梦寒, 李颖. 考虑网约车竞争的机场出租车供需均衡博弈模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(2): 176-186.
[15]	申皓, 张锦, 孙文杰, 洪治潮, 李国旗. 基于货物时间价值的空铁联运转运枢纽选址优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 48-57.