城市内涝灾害下交通路网效率评估与修复决策

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2026.02.030

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2026, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2): 318-327.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2026.02.030

城市内涝灾害下交通路网效率评估与修复决策

张学全^1,2，郭钰莹¹，黄震¹，张抒扬^*1,2 ，杜志刚^1,2

1. 武汉理工大学，交通与物流工程学院，武汉430063；2.交通信息与安全教育部工程研究中心，武汉430063

收稿日期:2025-12-16 修回日期:2026-01-25 接受日期:2026-03-19 出版日期:2026-04-25 发布日期:2026-04-21
作者简介:张学全（1989—），男，湖北黄冈人，讲师，博士。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(72001162)；湖北省自然科学基金(2025AFD764)。

Efficiency Assessment and Repair Decision-Making of Traffic Road Networks Under Urban Waterlogging Disasters

ZHANG Xuequan^1,2, GUO Yuying¹, HUANG Zhen¹, ZHANG Shuyang^*1,2, DU Zhigang^1,2

1. School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China; 2. Engineering Research Center of Transportation Information and Safety, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430063, China

Received:2025-12-16 Revised:2026-01-25 Accepted:2026-03-19 Online:2026-04-25 Published:2026-04-21
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (72001162)；Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province, China (2025AFD764)。

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 城市内涝灾害突发性强、覆盖范围广，严重影响道路交通安全。灾后及时评估交通路网性能并制定修复策略，对于交通网络快速恢复具有重要意义。本文综合考虑城市内涝积水下的路径通行时间和使用频率，基于路径介数中心性和人口加权改进网络效率评估模型。在此基础上，构建路网性能恢复目标函数，分析不同偏好策略下的阻断点修复次序。以郑州“7·20”特大暴雨洪涝灾害下四环路网为例，实验结果表明：城市内涝导致部分路段和交叉口出现交通中断或减速，改进网络效率模型可以量化积水环境对于路网交通性能的整体影响；内涝积水对道路网络效率影响最大的是全阻断高介数类型的路段，半阻断高介数的路段在一定程度上比全阻断低介数的路段影响更大；根据网络效率恢复曲线可以看出，效率优先策略优于类型优先和位置优先策略；交叉口修复不一定优于路段修复，但全阻断破坏相较于半阻断在一定程度上具有更高的修复优先级。

关键词: 城市交通, 交通韧性, 网络效率, 内涝灾害, 修复策略

Abstract: Urban waterlogging disasters are sudden highly and extensive spatially, which severely threaten the road traffic safety. The rapid post-disaster assessment of road network performance and formulation of effective repair strategies is essential for restoring the traffic functionality. Considering both the travel time and usage frequency under inundated conditions, this study develops an improved evaluation model of network efficiency by incorporating the betweenness centrality of path and weighted population. On this basis, a road network objective function for performance recovery is constructed to analyze the optimal repair sequence of the disrupted nodes and links under different preference strategies. Using the Zhengzhou Fourth Ring Road network during the catastrophic“7·20”rainstorm and flooding event as a case study, the experimental results indicate that urban waterlogging causes the traffic interruptions or speed reductions on certain road segments and intersections, and the improved model of network efficiency effectively quantifies the overall impact of the inundation on road network performance. The fully blocked segments with high-betweenness impose the greatest reduction in network efficiency; moreover, the partially blocked segments with high-betweenness can, to some extent, exert a greater impact than which in fully blocked segments with low betweenness. The recovery curves of network efficiency further show that the efficiency-first strategy outperforms the type-first and location-first strategies. The repair at intersection is not necessarily superior to that along the road segments, but the fully blocked disruptions generally warrant a higher repair priority compared with the partially blocked ones.

Key words: urban transportation, transportation resilience, network efficiency, waterlogging disaster, repair strategy

中图分类号:

U491

张学全, 郭钰莹, 黄震, 张抒扬, 杜志刚. 城市内涝灾害下交通路网效率评估与修复决策[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2026, 26(2): 318-327.

ZHANG Xuequan, GUO Yuying, HUANG Zhen, ZHANG Shuyang, DU Zhigang. Efficiency Assessment and Repair Decision-Making of Traffic Road Networks Under Urban Waterlogging Disasters[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2026, 26(2): 318-327.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2026.02.030

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2026/V26/I2/318

参考文献

[1]国务院灾害调查组.河南郑州“7·20”特大暴雨灾害调查报告[R]. 北京: 国务院灾害调查组, 2022. [State Council Disaster Investigation Team. Investigation report on the "July 20" extreme rainstorm disaster in Zhengzhou, Henan Province[R]. Beijing: State Council Disaster Investigation Team, 2022.]

[2]WAN C, YANG Z, ZHANG D, et al. Resilience in transportation systems: A systematic review and future directions[J]. Transport Reviews, 2018, 38(4): 479-498.

[3]杨琦,张雅妮,周雨晴,等.复杂网络理论及其在公共交通韧性领域的应用综述[J].中国公路学报,2022,35 (4): 215-229. [YANG Q, ZHANG Y N, ZHOU Y Q, et al. A review of complex network theory and its application in the resilience of public transportation systems[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 35(4): 215-229.]

[4]张洁斐,任刚,马景峰,等.基于韧性评估的地铁网络修复时序决策方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(4): 14-20. [ZHANG J F, REN G, MA J F, et al. Decision-making method of repair sequence for metro network based on resilience evaluation[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2020, 20(4): 14-20.]

[5] 郑乐,高良鹏,陈学武,等.地铁-公交加权复合网络关键站点识别及鲁棒性研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(5): 120-129. [ZHENG L, GAO L P, CHEN X W, et al. Critical stations identification and robustness analysis of weighted metro-bus composite network[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2023, 23(5): 120-129.]

[6] 吕彪,管心怡,高自强.地铁网络服务韧性评估与最优恢复策略[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息,2021,21(5): 198-205, 221. [LV B, GUAN X Y, GAO Z Q. Evaluation and optimal recovery strategy of metro network service resilience[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(5): 198-205, 221.]

[7] 金溪,穆延.暴雨内涝下城市路网抗涝韧性评估[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2024,24(5):226-236. [JIN X, MU Y. Resilience assessment of urban road networks to flooding under heavy rainfall and flooding[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2024, 24(5): 226-236.]

[8]GOKALP C, PATIL P N, BOYLES S D. Post-disaster recovery sequencing strategy for road networks[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2021, 153: 228-245.

[9] GUO J, DU Q, HE Z. A method to improve the resilience of multimodal transport network: Location selection strategy of emergency rescue facilities[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2021, 161: 107678.

[10] AHMED M A, SADRI A M, MEHRABI A, et al. Identifying topological credentials of physical infrastructure components to enhance transportation network resilience: Case of Florida bridges[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 2022, 148 (9): 04022055.

[11] 张宸铭, 范钦栋,李延锋,等.暴雨内涝情景下城市路网通行效率变化与修复策略:以郑州7·20暴雨灾害为例[J]. 经济地理, 2022, 42(7): 62-72. [ZHANG C M, FAN Q D, LI Y F, et al. The traffic efficiency evaluation of urban road network before and after the rainstorm disaster and its repairing strategy: A Case study of the 7 · 20 rainstorm disaster in Zhengzhou[J]. Economic Geography, 2022, 42(7): 62-72.]

[12] XING P, DU Y H, WANG H X, et al. Resilience model and recovery strategy of transportation network based on travel OD-grid analysis[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2022, 223: 108483.

[13] FEI M, AN Y Y, WANG X J, et al. Assessing and enhancing urban road network resilience under rainstorm waterlogging disasters[J]. Transportation Research Part D, 2023, 123: 103928.

[14] 黄震, 张学全,张庭瑞,等.暴雨内涝环境下城市交通脆弱路段预测方法[J].武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版), 2025, 49(5): 980-986. [HUANG Z, ZHANG X Q, ZHANG T R, et al. Prediction method of urban traffic vulnerable sections in rainstorm waterlogging environment[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Transportation Science & Engineering), 2025, 49(5): 980-986.]

[15] CHEN Y, XU C, GE Y, et al. A 100-m gridded population dataset of China's seventh census using ensemble learning and geospatial big data[J]. Earth System Science Data Discussions, 2024, 2024: 1-19.

城市内涝灾害下交通路网效率评估与修复决策

Efficiency Assessment and Repair Decision-Making of Traffic Road Networks Under Urban Waterlogging Disasters

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	阎桑慧宇, 马瑞, 李健. 城市暴雨内涝下考虑地铁联合疏散的公交应急路线优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2026, 26(2): 72-80.
[2]	田琼, 王铭阳. 考虑区域内可变车道与公交接驳的大型活动疏散优化模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2026, 26(2): 159-168.
[3]	于江霞, 祝思岳, 王欣彤, 罗太波. 天气影响心理感知时间的出行选择行为研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2026, 26(2): 180-191.
[4]	何洁, 郭建媛, 王子瑜, 秦勇, 王若愚, 贾利民. 列车延误下城市轨道交通路网客流动态诱导研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2026, 26(2): 192-202.
[5]	张文会, 吕家乐, 陈德启, 孟凤威. 城市道路交叉口人车冲突极值模型与风险评估[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2026, 26(2): 203-211.
[6]	鲍薪宇, 张琦 , 肖雅玲, 李涛. 考虑车场条件的城轨灵活编组多交路列车运行图优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2026, 26(2): 212-220.
[7]	王鑫伟, 许琰, 孙立山. 基于灵活编组策略的列车时刻表与车厢分配协同优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2026, 26(2): 221-231.
[8]	彭博, 辛子怡, 蔡晓禹, 雷财林, 潘旭萌. 基于冲突预测的混驾环境快速路合流区安全评价方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2026, 26(2): 232-243.
[9]	左静, 蒲璇, 许旻昊, 张能娥, 帅斌. 灵活编组条件下考虑再生制动能量利用的列车时刻表优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2026, 26(2): 244-255.
[10]	王子吉安, 黄爱玲, 杨柳. 兼顾准时性的动态不确定道路网络可靠路径优化模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2026, 26(2): 280-288.
[11]	吴焕, 曹成涛, 林晓辉, 吴璠. 基于改进人口合成方法的居民出行调查数据扩样[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2026, 26(2): 342-353.
[12]	郭瑞军, 盛诣皓, 姜凯宁, 郝梓彤. 基于约束卡尔曼滤波的信控干线动态OD估计[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2026, 26(1): 55-64.
[13]	苑少伟, 高维, 徐一康. 降雨扰动下外卖配送系统韧性度量方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2026, 26(1): 239-251.
[14]	蔡晓禹, 聂成, 雷财林, 彭博, 谢青雨. 人机混驾环境下山地城市交织区交通安全评价方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2026, 26(1): 270-282.
[15]	谷远利, 武志磊, 宇泓儒, 杨澄璐. 社区-客流耦合视角下城市轨道交通网络脆弱性评估[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2026, 26(1): 340-350.