通勤者出行链类型与出行方式选择的相互影响

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2014, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (2): 144-149.

通勤者出行链类型与出行方式选择的相互影响

王孝坤^*1，饶秋丽²，唐春艳³，葛颖恩³

1.大连交通大学经济管理学院，辽宁大连116028； 2.江苏省交通科学研究院股份有限公司，南京210017； 3.大连理工大学交通运输学院，辽宁大连116024

收稿日期:2013-08-27 修回日期:2014-01-02 出版日期:2014-04-25 发布日期:2014-07-07
作者简介:王孝坤（1975-），男，辽宁瓦房店人，讲师，博士.
基金资助:
大连市科学技术基金（2012J21DW001）；国家自然科学基金（71171026）

Commuters’Trip-chain and Mode Choice Relationship

WANG Xiao-kun ¹ , RAO Qiu-li² , TANG Chun-yan ³ , GE Ying-en³

1.School of Economics and Management, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian116028, China; 2. Jiangsu Transportation Institute Co., Ltd. , Nanjing,210017, China; 3. School of Transportation and Logistics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian116024, China

Received:2013-08-27 Revised:2014-01-02 Online:2014-04-25 Published:2014-07-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采取分层抽样的方法，对大连市商务中心区通勤者出行选择行为进行问卷调查. 经过对采集数据进行交叉分析，建立联立多元Logit模型. 调查通勤者出行链类型选择和出行方式选择之间是否存在相互影响关系，同时对不同月收入下通勤者的出行方式与出行链类型选择行为进行分析.研究结果表明，大连市商务中心区通勤者出行链类型选择和出行方式之间存在着显著的相互影响关系，且通勤者的个人属性、家庭属性等对其出行方式选择及出行链类型选择行为具有显著的影响.虽然本研究工作是基于大连中心商务区的调查数据，但这些数据展示的通勤者的出行规律对其它城市制定交通政策和实施交通管理同样具有现实指导意义.

关键词: 交通工程, 出行链类型, 联立多元Logit模型, 出行方式, 出行选择行为

Abstract:

A stratified sampling survey is conducted to collect data in Central Business District of Dalian city to analyze the relationships between commuter’s trip- chain types and trip mode choices. With a cross analysis of this set of data, a simultaneous Logit model is used to examine the relationships. In investigating the relationships between trip- chain types and trip mode choices, the impact from monthly- income is also considered in this study. The results indicate that the relationships among collected data set are statistically significant. One crucial finding is that commuters’personal attributes and family attributes have prominent effects on trip mode choice, trip-chain type and their relationships. Due to the limitation of public transportation service level, the commuters who drive cars usually generate complex trip chains, especially those with high-incomes.

Key words: transportation engineering, trip- chain type, simultaneous Logit model, trip mode, travel choice behavior

中图分类号:

U491.1

王孝坤，饶秋丽，唐春艳，葛颖恩. 通勤者出行链类型与出行方式选择的相互影响[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2014, 14(2): 144-149.

WANG Xiao-kun,RAO Qiu-li,TANG Chun-yan,GE Ying-en . Commuters’Trip-chain and Mode Choice Relationship[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2014, 14(2): 144-149.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract18761.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2014/V14/I2/144

参考文献

[1] 马志平.城市中心区交通改善方法研究[D].安徽:合肥工业大学,2005.[MA Z P. Study on countermeasure of transport improvement of city central district[D].Anhui: Hefei University of Technology ,2005.]

[2] 李峥嵘,柴彦威.大连市民通勤特征研究[J].人文地理,2000,15(6):67-72.[LI Z R, CAI Y W. A study on the commuting features of dalian citizens[J].Human Geography,2000,15(6):67-72.]
[3] 陈团生.通勤者出行行为特征与分析方法研究[D].北京:北京交通大学,2007.[CHEN T S. Travel behavior characteristics analysis for commuter[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University,2007.]
[4] Ben-Akiva M,Bowman J L. Activity-based disaggregate travel demand model system with activity schedules [J].Transportation Research A,2000,35(1):1-28.
[5] 文雅,史嘉玮,乔相容.上海世博观展客流出行链分析[J].交通与运输,2007,6(1):19-21.[WEN Y, SHI J W,QIAO X R.Analysis of passenger flow trip-chain of the Shanghai World Expo Exhibition[J]. Traffic and Transportation,2007,6(1):19-21.]
[6] 宗芳,隽志才.基于活动的出行方式选择模型与交通需求管理策略[J].吉林大学学报(工学版), 2007,37(1):48-53.[ZONG F, JUAN Z C. Activity- based travel mode choice model and analysis on traffic demand management [J]. Journal of Jilin University（Engineering and Technology Edition）2007,37(1):48-53.]
[7] 关宏志.非集计模型——交通行为分析的工具[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2004.[GUAN H Z. Disaggregate model—a tool of traffic behavior analysis[M]. Beijing:China Communications Press,2004.]
[8] 石心怡,郭英,王元庆.基于出行链的公共交通走廊探讨[J].城市轨道交通研究,2010(5):59-63.[WANG X Y,GUO Y,WANG Y Q. Public transport corridor based on trip chain[J]. Urban Rail Transit Research, 2010(5)：59-63].
[9] Xin Ye, Ram M P, Giovanni Gottardi. An exploration of the relationship between mode choice and complexity of trip chaining patterns[J]. Science Direct Transportation Research Part B,2007,41(1):96-113.
[10] 杨敏,陈学武,王炜,等.通勤出行链简单链和复杂链的选择行为研究[J].武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版),2008,32(2):191- 194.[YANG M, CHEN X W,WANG W, et al. Behavior analysis of simple/complex trip chaining[J].Journal of Wuhan University of Technology（Transportation Science & Engineering）,2008,32(2):191-194.]
[11] 卢晓姗,黄海军,刘天亮,等.考虑早晚高峰出行链的出行方式选择均衡与定价机制[J].系统工程理论与实践,2013,33(1):167-174.[LU X S, HUANG H J, LIU T L, et al Mode choice equilibrium and pricing mechanisms considering peak trip chain[J]. Systems EngineeringTheory & Practice,2013,33(1):167-174.]
[12] Lu X, Pas E T. Socio- demographics, activity participation and travel behavior[J]. Transportation Research A,1999,33(1):1-18.
[13] Golob T F, A simultaneous model of household activity participation and trip chain generation [J]. Transportation Research B,2000,34(5):355-376.
[14] Frank Primerano, Michael A P, Ladda Pitaksringkarn. Defining and understanding trip chaining behavior [J].Transportation,2008,35(1):55-72.
[15] Peter S, Robert P S. Estimation of models with jointly dependent qualitative variables: a simultaneous logit approach [J]. Econometric,1975,43(4):745-755.
[16] Ouyang Y, Shankar V, Yamamoto T. Modeling the simultaneity in injury causation in multi- vehicle collisions[J]. Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC,2002,1784:143-152.