铁路专用移动通信场强测量检波方式研究

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2016, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (1): 71-77.

铁路专用移动通信场强测量检波方式研究

丁建文a, b，刘杨c，费丹c，钟章队*c

北京交通大学a. 国家轨道交通安全评估研究中心; b. 电子信息工程学院; c. 轨道交通控制与安全国家重点实验室，北京100044

收稿日期:2015-09-14 修回日期:2015-11-05 出版日期:2016-02-25 发布日期:2016-02-25
作者简介:丁建文（1980-），男，山西太原人，讲师，博士生.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金/National Natural Science Foundation of China(U1334202)；教育部科学技术研究重大项目/Key Project of Ministry of Education of China（313006）；铁道部科技研究开发计划项目/Project of Science and Technology Research and Development Program of Ministry of Railway(J2013C019, 2014X006).

Detection Modes of Field Strength Measurement in Railway Dedicated Mobile Communication Network

DING Jian-wena, b，LIU Yangc，FEI Danc，ZHONG Zhang-duic

a. National Research Center of Railway Safety Assessment; b. School of Electronic and Information Engineering; c. State Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and Safety, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China

Received:2015-09-14 Revised:2015-11-05 Online:2016-02-25 Published:2016-02-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在铁路专用移动通信网场强测量中,检波方式将决定场强测量结果的准确性. 常用检波方式有正峰值检波、均值检波和有效值检波.铁路数字移动通信系统（GSM-R）场强测量标准采用正峰值检波，而在实际运营中，场强测量的结果与通信系统实际应用效果存在一定差异，进而影响了通信系统的实际性能.本文主要研究了场强测量接收机及不同检波器的工作机理，根据数学描述建立了不同检波方式的模型，设计了实验室静态环境和现场动态环境下验证不同检波方式的测量方法，并进行了测量，对不同检波方式测量的数据进行对比分析.分析结果表明，有效值检波更适合GSM-R场强测量.

关键词: 信息技术, 有效值检波, 场强测量, 铁路专用移动通信, 检波方式

Abstract:

In the field strength measurement of railway dedicate mobile communication network, the selection of detection mode determines accuracy of measurement results. The detectors available are the max peak, the average and the RMS detector. The max peak detection is applied in the standards of railway digital mobile communication system (GSM-R) field strength measurement. This paper investigates the difference between the field measurement results and practical application effect of communication system in railway operation which affects the actual performance of the communication system. We mainly study the working mechanism of field strength measurement receiver and different detector, and propose the detection model according to the mathematical description. Then the field strength measurement methodology for the verification of different detection is designed in the laboratory static scenario and railway field dynamic scenario. At last the measurements are carried out and the data of different detection modes are compared and analyzed. The analysis result shows that the RMS detection is more suitable for GSM- R field strength measurement.

Key words: information technology, RMS detection, field strength measurement, railway dedicate mobile communication, detection modes

中图分类号:

丁建文，刘杨，费丹，钟章队. 铁路专用移动通信场强测量检波方式研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2016, 16(1): 71-77.

DING Jian-wena, b，LIU Yangc，FEI Danc，ZHONG Zhang-duic. Detection Modes of Field Strength Measurement in Railway Dedicated Mobile Communication Network[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2016, 16(1): 71-77.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19141.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2016/V16/I1/71

参考文献

[1] Ai B, Cheng X, Kürner T, et al. Challenges toward wireless communications for high-speed railway[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2014, 15(5): 2143-2158. [2] He R S, Ai B, Zhong Z D, et al. Measurement-based stochastic model for high-speed railway channels[J]. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 2014 (99):1-16.

[3] 黄大明，于虹. EMC测试中的峰值、准峰值、平均值、均方根值[J]. 杭州电子科技大学学报，2013，33(3)：9-12. [HUANG D M, YU H. Peak, quasi-peak, average,
RMS in EMC measurement [J]. Journal of Hangzhou Dianzi University, 2013, 33(3): 9-12.]
[4] 陈旻，刘平. 频谱分析仪检波方式的分析与研究[J].现代电子技术，2010(1): 97-99. [CHEN M, LIU P. Analysis and research of the detector types of spectrum
analyzer[J]. Modern Electronics Technique, 2010(1): 97-99.]
[5] 崔强，靳冬. 均方根值—平均值检波器的实测对比与研究[J]. 安全与电磁兼容, 2010(1): 17-19. [CUI Q,JIN D. Comparison and analysis on the test results of
RMS-average detector with others[J]. Safety & Emc,2010(1): 17-19.]
[6] Krug F, Russer P. Quasi-peak detector model for a timedomain measurement system[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2005, 47(2): 320-326.
[7] Krug F, Braun S, Russer P. A novel quasi-peakdetector for time-domain EMI-measurements[J].Advances in Radio Science, 2004(2): 27-32.
[8] Medler Jens. Experience with the RMS-Average detector[C]. 2008 Asia-Pacific Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility and 19th International Zurich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility,2008.
[9] 单秦，闻映红，李滟. 高速铁路专用通信信道电波传播特性[J]. 中国铁道科学，2013，34(2)：125-132. [ SHANQ, WEN Y H, LI Y. Radio wave propagation characteristics of special communication channel for high-speed railway[J]. China Railway Science, 2013, 34(2): 125-132.]
[10] Guan K, Zhong Z D, Ai B. Propagation measurementsand modeling of crossing bridges on highspeed railway at 930 MHz[J]. IEEE Trans Veh. Technol, 2014, 63(2): 502-517.
[11] 林木，张文垚，唐剑群. GSM-R无线网络覆盖和服务质量（QoS）测试方法[S]. 铁道部科学技术司科技运[2008]170 号, 2008：1- 32. [LIN M, ZHANG W Y,TANG J Q. Test specification of field strength and quality of service for GSM-R digital mobile communication network [S]. Department of Science and Technology of the Ministry of Railway, KJY[2008]No.170, 2008: 1-32.]
[12] GSM-R Operators Group. System requirements specification version 15.4.0 [S]. EIRENE, 2014.

[1]	陈鼎, 周水庭, 陈云, 苏敏咸. 拥堵指数自适应调节的交通运行状态识别方法及应用研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 137-144.
[2]	许镇义, 王仁军, 张聪, 王瑞宾, 夏秀山. 基于深度特征聚类的高排放移动污染源自动识别[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 298-309.
[3]	李鑫，史天运，常宝，马小宁，刘军. 基于设备画像的机车标签体系构建方法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(2): 189-195.
[4]	李兴鑫，朱力强，余祖俊. 自适应铁路场景前景目标检测[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(2): 83-90.
[5]	侯涛，伍海萍，牛宏侠. 改进MOG-LRMF 的铁轨动态异物检测[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(2): 91-100.
[6]	杨蕴，李玉，赵泉华. 基于多标记像素匹配的高分辨率遥感图像道路提取[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(1): 68-74.
[7]	牛宏侠，张肇鑫，宁正，陈光武. 铁路轨道异物完整性检测与跟踪算法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(1): 45-54.
[8]	刘海洋，冯仲科，吴云鹏，呼诺，冯泽邦 . 车联网信息技术高速公路预警与应急避险模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18(6): 35-40.
[9]	周洋，杨超. 基于时空聚类算法的轨迹停驻点识别研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18(4): 88-95.
[10]	李浩，张运胜. 基于反馈背景模型的城市道路交叉口前景目标检测[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2017, 17(6): 63-69.
[11]	曾倩琳，孙秋碧. 信息化、空间溢出效应与物流业生产率的提升[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2017, 17(1): 40-46.
[12]	杨国元，史天运，张秋亮. 铁路客运乘务排班计划编制模型及算法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2016, 16(4): 159-164.
[13]	马继辉，余明捷，陈鑫杰，宋翠颖，杨扬. 基于Hama并行蚁群算法模型及TSP应用研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2016, 16(3): 168-173.
[14]	赵琦，朱思聪，于雷,宋国华. 面向生态驾驶的智能手机应用的开发与检验[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2015, 15(6): 54-59.
[15]	张健钦，仇培元，杜明义，. 基于时空轨迹数据的出行特征挖掘方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2014, 14(6): 72-78.