区域综合网络货运交通方式的优势运距研究

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2016, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (6): 33-39.

• 综合交通运输体系论坛 • 上一篇下一篇

区域综合网络货运交通方式的优势运距研究

项昀1,2，王炜*2，郑敦勇3，王宝杰2，华雪东2，魏雪延2

1. 南昌航空大学土木建筑学院，南昌330063; 2. 东南大学城市智能交通江苏省重点实验室，南京210096; 3. 湖南科技大学地理空间信息技术国家地方联合工程实验室，湖南湘潭411201

收稿日期:2016-05-06 修回日期:2016-08-02 出版日期:2016-12-25 发布日期:2016-12-26
作者简介:项昀（1983－），女，江西靖安人，讲师，博士生
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点资助项目/ Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China（51338003）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助和江苏省高校研究生科研创新计划资助项目/Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, the Postgraduate Research and Innovation Plan Project in Jiangsu Province（KYLX15_0154）；江西科技厅省重点研发计划项目/ The Key Research and Development Project of Science and Technology Department in Jiangxi Province （20161BBG70044）；南昌市科技局对外科技合作与成果转化推广计划项目/ Science and Technology Cooperation and Achievement Transformation Program in Nanchang City（2013HZCG023）.

Dominant Transportation Distance for Multi Transportation Modes in Regional Integrated Freight Network

XIANG Yun1,2，WANGWei2，ZHENG Dun-yong3，WANG Bao-jie2， HUA Xue-dong2，WEI Xue-yan2

1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang 330063, China；2. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban ITS, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China；3. National-local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Geospatial Information Technology, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, Hunan, China

Received:2016-05-06 Revised:2016-08-02 Online:2016-12-25 Published:2016-12-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为实现交通运输资源的合理配置，在区域综合运输网络下，研究公路、铁路、水路和航空等4 种货运交通方式的优势运输距离范围(以下简称优势运距)，提出基于分担率函数的优势运距量化分析方法.首先界定了货运方式绝对优势运距和相对优势运距内涵；其次，以货运方式分担率分析为基础，分别构建了各货运方式的绝对运距模型与相对优势运距模型；最后，进行实证分析.结果表明，在50~3 000 km运距范围内，航空货运不具备绝对优势运距，公路、铁路、水路货运方式绝对优势运距分别是50~477、477~1 168、 1 168~3 000 km；而公路、铁路、水路、航空货运方式的相对优势运距分别为50~303、526~ 1 004、2 410~3 000、1 681~2 283 km.

关键词: 综合交通运输, 货运方式, 绝对优势运距, 相对优势运距, 分担率

Abstract:

A new quantitative analysis method of dominant transportation distance based on mode split rate is developed to compute the dominant transportation distance in the integrated transportation system that include the highway, railway, waterway, and airway, which can contribute to the rational allocation of transport resources. First of all, the absolute and relative dominant transportation distance of freight transportation modes are defined. Then, the absolute and relative dominant transportation distance models of each freight transportation mode are established on the base of mode split rate. Finally, a case study of proposed method is carried out, the result of which indicated that the absolute dominant transportation distance ranges of highway, railway and waterway are 50~477 km, 477~1 168 km and 1 168~3 000 km, while the airway did not have an absolute dominant transportation distance in this range. The relative dominant transportation distance range of highway, railway, waterway and airway are 50~303 km, 526~1 004 km, 2 410~3 000 km, and 1 681~2 283 km.

Key words: integrated transportation, freight transportation modes, absolute dominant transportation distance, relative dominant transportation distance, mode split rate

中图分类号:

U116.1

项昀，王炜，郑敦勇，王宝杰，华雪东，魏雪延. 区域综合网络货运交通方式的优势运距研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2016, 16(6): 33-39.

XIANG Yun，WANGWei，ZHENG Dun-yong，WANG Bao-jie，. Dominant Transportation Distance for Multi Transportation Modes in Regional Integrated Freight Network[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2016, 16(6): 33-39.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19312.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2016/V16/I6/33

参考文献

[1] 史佩红. 基于广义费用的道路客运经济运距测量模型研究[D]. 西安：长安大学，2014. [SHI P H. Study on carriage passenger economic haul measurement model based on the generalized cost[D]. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2014.]

[2] 李正浩.与民航竞争下的高速铁路优势运距问题研究[D]. 成都：西南交通大学，2012. [LI Z H. Research about the dominate transport distance of highspeed railway under civil aviation competition[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2012.]

[3] 黄美. 高速公路客运的比较优势和合理使用范围研究[D]. 西安：长安大学，2004. [HUANG M. Research on the comparative advantages and rational utilization of expressway passenger transport[D]. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2004.]

[4] 王博文, 张健, 王远. 公路客运与高速铁路客运竞争中经济运距的探讨[J]. 交通科技与经济, 2011,13(1): 82- 85,89. [WANG B, ZHANG J, WANG Y. Discuss about economic competition in the distance during the competition between the high-speed passenger and railway passenger[J]. Technology & Economy in Areas of Communications, 2011, 13(1): 82-85,89.]

[5] 黄俊源. 海铁联运合理运距及运输组织优化研究[D]. 北京：北京交通大学，2011. [HUANG J Y. Study on reasonable distance and transport organization optimization of sea-rail transport by railway container[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2011.]

[6] GOEVERDEN C D V. Train attractiveness in European long distance travel[C]// The 11th Word Conference on Transport Research (WCTR), 2007. WCTRS, 2007: 1- 22.

[7] LEVINSON D, GILLEN D, KANAFANI A, et al. The Full Cost of Intercity Transportation-A Comparison of High Speed Rail, Air and Highway Transportation in California[R]. Institute of Transportation Studies University of California at Berkeley, 1996.

[8] CHANG L. A network-based model for market share estimation among competing transportation modes in a regional Channel[D]. University of Maryland, 2001.

[9] BEUTHE M, JOURQUIN B，GEERTS J F, et al. Freight transportation demand elasticities: a geographic multimodal transportation network analysis[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2001, 37(4): 253-266.

[10] ALJARAD S N, BLACK W R, Modeling Saudi Arabia- Bahrain corridor mode choice[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 1995, 3(4): 257-268.

[11] BHAT C R. Covariance heterogeneity in nested logit models: Econometric structure and application to intercity travel[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 1997, 31(1): 11-21.

[12] MARTÍN J C, ROMÁN C, GARCÍA-PALOMARES J C, 38 第16卷第6 期区域综合网络货运交通方式的优势运距研究 et al. Spatial analysis of the competitiveness of the high-speed train and air transport: The role of access to terminals in the Madrid-Barcelona corridor[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2014(69): 392-408.

[13] ARENCIBIA A I, FEO-VALERO M, GARCÍAMENÉNDEZ L, et al. Modelling mode choice for freight transport using advanced choice experiments[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2015(75): 252-267.

[14] 项昀, 王炜, 王昊，等. 综合运输体系下的货运方式分担率[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 45(6): 1197-1202. [XIANG Y, WANG W, WANG H, et al. Mode split rate of freight transportation in comprehensive transportation system[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 45 (6):1197-1202.]

[1]	刘浩，张戎，诸立超. 考虑空间特征的货运方式选择行为模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(1): 30-35.
[2]	左大杰，肖国胜，王孟云. 产业转移背景下西部运输需求的完全分解模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(5): 15-20.
[3]	冯涛，彭其渊，陶思宇，陈昕梅. 站城融合模式下既有铁路车站城市功能开发体量预测研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(5): 21-28.
[4]	叶菲菲，杨隆浩，王应明，蓝以信. 基于数据包络分析和扩展置信规则库的交通运输业环境治理成本预测[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(3): 20-27.
[5]	周晓晔，崔瑶，何亮，马小云，王思聪. 基于地铁—货车联运的物流配送路径优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(3): 111-117.
[6]	骆晨，李想，钟林峰，胡姗姗. 基于家庭属性差异的大学生出行方式选择行为研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(3): 227-232.
[7]	诸立超，刘昭然. 托运人在不同时空下的选择行为差异揭示[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(1): 27-32.
[8]	项昀，徐铖铖，于维杰，华雪东，王炜. 基于人口迁徙大数据的城市对外交通客运方式优势出行距离研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(1): 241-246.
[9]	申婵，崔洪军. 基于可靠性最短路的实时定制公交线路优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(6): 99-104.
[10]	莫杨辉，张培林，谢羽盟. 新型城镇化与综合交通发展的互动关系计量研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(5): 13-19.
[11]	李珺，杨斌，朱小林. 混合不确定条件下绿色多式联运路径优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(4): 13-19.
[12]	付晓，顾宇，刘志远. 多模式公交网络中考虑定制公交的活动与出行建模[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(4): 20-27.
[13]	彭宏勤，张国伍. 新型城镇化背景下的新区交通规划理论方法探讨 ——“交通7+1论坛”第五十四次会议[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(3): 1-4.
[14]	郭丽彬，李健，张文. 考虑网络外部性航运商与无车承运人竞合研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(3): 11-18.
[15]	栾鑫，程琳，俞微薇，周洁. 综合运输层次下多交通模式的耦合协调性分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(3): 27-33.

区域综合网络货运交通方式的优势运距研究

Dominant Transportation Distance for Multi Transportation Modes in Regional Integrated Freight Network

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics