数字鸿沟背景下老年人对自动驾驶汽车接受度

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2023.02.018

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2023, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (2): 168-175.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2023.02.018

数字鸿沟背景下老年人对自动驾驶汽车接受度

刘志伟¹，刘建荣^*2

1. 武汉轻工大学，土木工程与建筑学院，武汉430023；2. 华南理工大学，土木与交通学院，广州510640

收稿日期:2023-01-04 修回日期:2023-02-26 接受日期:2023-03-06 出版日期:2023-04-25 发布日期:2023-04-19
作者简介:刘志伟(1987- )，男，湖北黄石人，讲师，博士
基金资助:
湖北省教育厅科研计划项目(Q20201603)

Elderly's Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles in Context of Digital Divide

LIU Zhi-wei¹, LIU Jian-rong^*2

1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China

Received:2023-01-04 Revised:2023-02-26 Accepted:2023-03-06 Online:2023-04-25 Published:2023-04-19
Supported by:
Scientific Research Project of Education Department of Hubei Province (Q20201603)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 自动驾驶汽车可以提高老年人的机动性，改善老年人的生活质量，故研究老年人对自动驾驶汽车的接受度具有重要意义。首先基于潜在类别模型将样本整体分为数字能力弱势老年人群体和数字能力强势老年人群体。然后分别以全体样本、弱势和强势数字能力老年人作为研究对象，建立技术接受模型和计划行为理论的综合模型研究不同数字能力的老年人群体对自动驾驶汽车的接受度。研究结果表明：数字能力弱势老年人群体和数字能力强势老年人群体占比分别为27.93%和72.07%。老年人群体对自动驾驶汽车的接受度存在显著异质性。对于全体老年人，感知行为控制是影响其对自动驾驶汽车接受度最重要的因素；对于数字能力弱势的老年人群体，主观规范是影响其对自动驾驶汽车接受度最重要的因素；对于数字能力强势老年人群体，态度是影响其对自动驾驶汽车接受度最重要的因素。

关键词: 交通工程, 接受度, 自动驾驶汽车, 潜在类别模型, 结构方程模型

Abstract: Autonomous vehicles can increase mobility and improve the quality of life of the elderly, and it is important to study the acceptance of autonomous vehicles by the elderly. Firstly, a latent class analysis was established to divide the sample into two latent classes: the elderly with a weak digital ability and the elderly with a strong digital ability. Then, with all the samples, three comprehensive models with the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior were established to study the acceptance of autonomous vehicles by the elderly with different digital abilities. The results show that the elderly with a weak digital ability and the elderly with a strong digital ability account for 27.93% and 72.07% , respectively. Significant heterogeneity exists in the acceptance of autonomous vehicles among the elderly population. For all elderly people, perceived behavioral control is the most important factor influencing the acceptance of autonomous vehicles. For the elderly with weak digital ability, the subjective norm is the most important factor affecting the acceptance of autonomous vehicles, while for the elderly with strong digital ability, attitude is the most important factor affecting the acceptance of autonomous vehicles.

Key words: traffic engineering, adoption, autonomous vehicles, latent class analysis, structural equation modeling

中图分类号:

U121

刘志伟, 刘建荣. 数字鸿沟背景下老年人对自动驾驶汽车接受度[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(2): 168-175.

LIU Zhi-wei, LIU Jian-rong. Elderly's Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles in Context of Digital Divide[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2023, 23(2): 168-175.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2023.02.018

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2023/V23/I2/168

参考文献

[1] 徐芳, 马丽. 国外数字鸿沟研究综述[J]. 情报学报. 2020, 39(11): 1232-1244. [XU F, MA L. A review of digital divide research abroad [J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2020, 39 (11): 1232-1244.]

[2] ANANIA E C, RICE S, WINTER S R, et al. Why people are not willing to let their children ride in driverless school buses: A gender and nationality comparison[J]. Social Sciences, 2018, 7(3): 34.

[3] 景鹏, 王伟, 吴麟麟. 老年人对自动驾驶汽车接受度研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2021, 34(6): 158-171. [JING P, WANG W, WU L L. Acceptance of autonomous vehicles for the elderly[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2021, 34(6): 158-171.]

[4] SENER I N, ZMUD J, WILLIAMS T. Measures of baseline intent to use automated vehicles: A case study of texas cities[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2019, 62(2): 66-77.

[5] XU Z, ZHANG K, MIN H, et al. What drives people to accept automated vehicles? Findings from a field experiment[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2018, 95(5): 320-334.

[6] SCHOETTLE B, SIVAK M. A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the US, the UK, and Australia[Z]. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute, 2014.

[7] BANSAL P, KOCKELMAN K M. Forecasting Americans' long-term adoption of connected and autonomous vehicle technologies[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2017, 95(1): 49-63.

[8] BUCKLEY L, KAYE S, PRADHAN A K. Psychosocial factors associated with intended use of automated vehicles: A simulated driving study[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2018, 115(3): 202-208.

[9] MADIGAN R, LOUW T, WILBRINK M, et al. What influences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of automated road transport systems[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2017, 50(3): 55-64.

[10] RIBEIRO M A, GURSOY D, CHI O H. Customer acceptance of autonomous vehicles in travel and tourism [J]. Journal of Travel Research, 2022, 61(3): 620-636.

[11] 鞠鹏, 周晶, 徐红利, 等. 基于混合选择模型的汽车共享选择行为研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2017, 17(2): 7-13. [JU P, ZHOU J, XU H L, et al. Travelers' choice behavior of car sharing based on hybrid choice model[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering & Information Technology, 2017, 17(2): 7-13.]

[12] SINHA P, CALFEE C S, DELUCCHI K L. Practitioner's guide to latent class analysis: Methodological considerations and common pitfalls[J]. Critical Care Medicine, 2021, 49(1): e63.

[13] GONCALVES G, OLIVEIRA T, CRUZ-JESUS F. Understanding individual-level digital divide: Evidence of an african country[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2018, 87(3): 276-291.

[14] CHOI J K, JI Y G. Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2015, 31(10): 692-702.

[15] PANAGIOTOPOULOS I, DIMITRAKOPOULOS G. An empirical investigation on consumers' intentions towards autonomous driving[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2018, 95(5): 773-784.

[16] AJZEN I. The theory of planned behavior[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2): 179-211.

[17] DONALD I J, COOPER S R, CONCHIE S M. An extended theory of planned behaviour model of the psychological factors affecting commuters' transport mode use[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2014, 40(6): 39-48.

数字鸿沟背景下老年人对自动驾驶汽车接受度

Elderly's Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles in Context of Digital Divide

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	周雨阳, 王沛钰, 陈艳艳. 考虑自我呈现与环保意识的出行方式选择行为异质性分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(3): 30-38.
[2]	秦严严, 肖腾飞, 贺正冰. 雾天场景下高速公路通行能力分析及提升策略[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(3): 39-47.
[3]	王殿海, 黄莉莎, 曾佳棋, 蔡正义. 降雨对城市路网交通状态的影响机理[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(3): 48-55.
[4]	葛慧敏, 臧文铠, 董磊, 周礼军. 大型多环道涡轮环交车道级信号控制方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(3): 123-132.
[5]	付锐, 许清津, 葛振振, 陈桃, 吴付威, 袁伟. 弯道路侧标志梯度提示策略研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(3): 133-144.
[6]	李思贤, 邢增勇, 钱大琳, 李鹏程, 袁梦. 危险货物道路运输车辆驾驶人风险倾向性分类研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(3): 161-173.
[7]	杨洋, 贺昆, 王云鹏, 陈垚, 袁振洲. 面向动态交通流的高速公路事故风险模型空间移植研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(3): 174-186.
[8]	康柳江, 李浩, 孙会君, 吴建军. 复杂山区工程建设物资运输无人机巡航模型构建与实证研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(3): 290-299.
[9]	钱国敏, 任璐, 季青原, 冯远静, 章立辉, 王殿海. 考虑车流通行效率的混行交叉口时空资源配置[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(2): 67-73.
[10]	唐铁桥, 钟静燃, 袁小婷. 考虑社交距离的火车站检票过程建模研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(2): 225-232.
[11]	刘唐志, 毕辉云, 杨卓思, 夏号杰, 尚婷. 基于操纵量指标的合流区危险驾驶行为谱研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(2): 242-251.
[12]	赵雪婷, 贾鹏, 杨彦博, 匡海波. 韧性与公平双视角下公路网灾后修复决策优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(2): 262-274.
[13]	黄意然, 宋国华, 彭飞. 基于实际车重的重型货车比功率分布及排放模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(2): 326-334.
[14]	卢凯, 赵一鸣, 叶志宏, 首艳芳. 适于不等双周期的干道双向绿波协调控制数解法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 86-96.
[15]	丁小兵, 史淦, 洪晨, 刘志钢. 地铁安检客流智能引导及组织优化方法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 123-130.