收费及奖励策略对通勤出行方式选择的影响分析

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2024.02.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究收费及奖励两种交通需求管理策略对居民通勤出行方式选择的调控作用，以杭州市主城区为例，通过SP(StatedPreference)和RP(Revealed Preference)调查私家车通勤出行者在停车收费及非小汽车出行奖励情景下的方式选择意向，利用非集计理论分别建立停车收费和出行奖励单独实施和共同实施下通勤出行方式选择的巢式Logit(NL)模型，研究停车收费及出行奖励对私家车通勤出行者出行方式选择的单独影响及共同影响效果，并分析两类策略的弹性。研究结果表明：停车收费和非小汽车出行奖励均能减少私家车出行比例，增加公交和地铁等公共交通出行比例；当停车收费达到一定费率时，才能有效减少私家车出行，适当的奖励能有效激励出行者转向其他出行方式，若同时实施收费和奖励策略，将表现为收费为主和奖励为辅的联合作用；在3类场景中，收入均是影响出行方式选择的重要因素，收入越高，继续选择私家车出行的可能性越大；单独收费场景下，停车收费弹性随费率增加而增大，且费率较低时缺乏弹性，出行奖励弹性随奖励金额增加而先增大后减小，小额奖励即有弹性。

关键词: 城市交通, 出行方式选择, 巢式Logit, 停车收费, 出行奖励

Abstract: This paper investigates the regulatory impact of two traffic demand management strategies, tolls and rewards, on travel mode choices, using the main urban area of Hangzhou as a case study. The stated preference (SP) and revealed preference (RP) surveys were performed to understand the intention of private car commuters' mode choice under parking charge and travel reward scenarios. The disaggregate theory was used to establish Nested Logit (NL) models for commuting mode selection under separate and joint implementation of parking fees and travel rewards. The results indicate that both parking fees and travel incentives can reduce private car travel demand and promote public transportation. Only when the parking price reaches a certain level can private car trips be effectively reduced, and appropriate incentives can actively encourage travelers to switch to other modes of travel. If charging and incentive strategies are implemented simultaneously, it will manifest a joint effect of charging as the main approach and incentive as a supplement. In all three scenarios, income is a significant factor influencing travel mode choices. The higher the income, the more likely the continuation of private car usage. In the scenario with only a parking fee, the elasticity of parking fees increases with the rate; there are limited elasticity when the rate is low. The elasticity of travel rewards initially raises and then drops with the increase in the reward amount; Small rewards also show elasticity.

Key words: urban traffic, travel mode choice, Nested Logit, parking charge, travel reward

中图分类号:

U121

王殿海, 李逸文, 蔡正义. 收费及奖励策略对通勤出行方式选择的影响分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(2): 1-12.

WANGDianhai, LIYiwen, CAI Zhengyi. Impact of Charging and Incentive Strategies on Commuting Mode Choice[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2024, 24(2): 1-12.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2024.02.001

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2024/V24/I2/1

参考文献

[1]VIKREY W. Statement to the joint committee on washington, DC, Metropolitan problems (with a foreword by Richard Arnott and Marvin Kraus) [J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 1994, 36(1): 42-65.

[2]HESS D B. Effect of free parking on commuter mode choice: Evidence from travel diary data[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2001, 1753(1): 35-42.

[3]秦焕美,关宏志,殷焕焕.停车收费价格对居民出行方式选择行为的影响研究:以北京市居民小汽车、公交、出租车选择行为为例[J].土木工程学报,2008(8):93-98. [QIN H M, GUAN H Z, YIN H H. A study of the effect of parking price on the mode of inhabitant trip behavior: With the cars, public transit and taxi in Beijing as an example[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering, 2008(8): 93-98.]

[4]包丹文,邓卫,顾仕珲.停车收费对居民出行方式选择的影响分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息,2010,10 (3): 80-85. [BAO D W, DENG W, GU S H. Impact of parking rates on resident travel behavior[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2010, 10(3): 80-85.]

[5]周伊冰.停车收费费率影响下的私家车拥有者出行方式选择行为研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2022. [ZHOU Y B. Study on the behavior of private car owner's travel mode under the influence of parking fee rate[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022.]

[6]GUZMAN L A, ARELLANA J, ALVAREZ V. Confronting congestion in urban areas: Developing sustainable mobility plans for public and private organizations in Bogotá[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2020, 134: 321-335.

[7]VIDOVIC N, SIMICEVIC J. The impact of parking pricing on mode choice[J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 2023, 69: 297-304.

[8] FUJII S, KITAMURA R. What does a one-month free bus ticket do to habitual drivers? An experimental analysis of habit and attitude change[J]. Transportation, 2003, 30(1): 81-95.

[9]BEN-ELIA E, ETTEMA D. Changing commuters' behavior using rewards: A study of rush-hour avoidance [J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2011, 14(5): 354-368.

[10] BEN-ELIA E, ETTEMA D. Rewarding rush-hour avoidance: A study of commuters' travel behavior[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2011, 45(7): 567-582.

[11] KUMAR V, BHAT C R, PENDYALA R M, et al. Impacts of incentive-based intervention on peak period traffic: Experience from the Netherlands[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2016, 2543: 166-175.

[12] SUN J, WU J, XIAO F, et al. Managing bottleneck congestion with incentives[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2020, 134: 143-166.

[13] 姚恩建,闫峥,郇宁.考虑老年人出行行为的公交票价补贴政策研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2019,19 (6): 13-19. [YAO E J, YAN Z, HUAN N. Evaluation on subsidy policy of public transport ticket considering elderly travel behavior[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2019, 19(6): 13-19.]

[14] 吴文静, 熊康贝,杨丽丽,等.基于心理账户的客运走廊公交换乘优惠策略[J].吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(11): 3113-3121. [WU W J, XIONG K B, YANG L L, et al. Optimization of bus transfer preferential strategy in passenger corridor based on mental account theory[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(11): 3113-3121.]

[15] 李亚平, 孙帅.奖励策略对大学生交通方式选择行为的影响[J]. 交通科技与管理,2023, 4(24): 182-184, 161. [LI Y P, SUN S. Effect of reward strategy on travel mode choice behavior of college students[J]. The Technology and Management of Transportation System, 2023, 4(24): 182-184, 161.]

[16] KANDOLATH U S. Regulating travel demand for sustainable transport: Road pricing versus incentive schemes[C]//DRÜCK H, PILLAI R G, THARIAN M G, et al. Green Buildings and Sustainable Engineering. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019: 259-264.

[17] COHEN-BLANKSHTAIN G, BAR-GERA H, SHIFTAN Y. Congestion pricing and positive incentives: conceptual analysis and empirical findings from Israel[J]. Transportation, 2023, 50(2): 607-633.

[18] TIAN Y, LI Y, SUN J. Stick or carrot for traffic demand management? Evidence from experimental economics[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2022, 160: 235-254.

[19] 秦焕美, 高建强,和士辉,等.基于奖罚措施的小汽车通勤者出行行为研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18(1): 115-120. [QIN H M, GAO J Q, HE S H, et al. Car commuters' travel behavior based on rewarding and punishments strategies[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2018, 18(1): 115-120.]

[20] 关宏志. 非集计模型:交通行为分析的工具[M].北京:人民交通出版社, 2004. [GUAN H Z. Disaggregate model: A tool of traffic behavior analysis[M]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2004.]

[21] ROSARIO M，LIES G．Methodology for the calculation of vehicle-associated costs in urban areas[J]．Urban Transport and the Environment for the 21st Century, 2000, 3: 481-490.

[22] 中华人民共和国国家市场监督管理总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T36980-2018 电动汽车能量消耗率限值[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2018. [State Administration for Market Regulation, China National Standardizing Committee. GB/T 36980-2018 Energy consumption limits for electric vehicles[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2018.]

[23] 中华人民共和国国家市场监督管理总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB17761-2018电动自行车安全技术规范[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2018. [State Administration for Market Regulation, China National Standardizing Committee. GB 17761-2018 Safety technical specification for electric bicycle[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2018.]

[24] BIERLAIRE M. A short introduction to Pandas Biogeme [R]. Switzerland: Report TRANSP-OR 200605 Transport and Mobility Laboratory School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering Ecole Polytechnique F´ed´erale de Lausanne, 2020.