|
[1]叶玉玲,韩明初,陈俊晶.基于出行链的城际旅客出行方式选择行为[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版),2018,
46(9): 1234-1240. [YE Y L, HAN M C, CHEN J J, et al.
Intercity passenger travel mode choice behavior based on
trip chain[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural
Science) , 2018, 46(9): 1234-1240.]
[2]
程国柱,朱品安,冯天军.考虑潜变量的城市定制公交需求转移模型[J].大连交通大学学报,2025,46(3):19
26. [CHENG G Z, ZHU P A, FENG T J. Customized
public transport demand transfer model considering
latent variables[J]. Journal of Dalian Jiaotong University,
2025, 46(3): 19-26.]
[3]刘锴,王静,王江波,等.考虑个体偏好异质性的定制公交选择行为[J]. 中国公路学报, 2024, 37(6): 279
287. [LIU K, WANG J, WANG J B, et al. Study on
customized bus choice behavior considering individual
preference heterogeneity[J]. China Journal of Highway
and Transport, 2024, 37(6): 279-287.]
[4]CHEN F, LU Y, LIU L, et al. Route optimization of
customized buses based on optimistic and pessimistic
values[J]. IEEE Access, 2023, 11: 11016-11023.
[5]LI D, YE X, MA J. Empirical analysis of factors
influencing potential demand of customized buses in
Shanghai, China[J]. Journal of Urban Planning and
Development, 2019, 145(2): 05019006.
[6]朱兴林, 姚亮,刘泓君,等.基于乘客感知的多模式公交服务质量差异性研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 84-95. [ZHU X L, YAO L, LIU H J,
et al. Research on the difference of multi-modal public
transport service quality based on passenger perception
[J]. Transportation Systems Engineering and Information,
2021, 21(6): 84-95.]
[7]杜太升,彭正鍾,张源凯,等.考虑乘客偏好的需求响应定制公交线路优化[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,
2026, 26(1): 217-227. [DU T S, PENG Z Z, ZHANG Y
K, et al. Optimization of customized bus routes
considering
passengers preference[J]. Journal of
Transportation Systems Engineering and Information
Technology, 2026, 26(1): 217-227.]
[8]唐春艳,代馨怡,张积昱.适老化定制公交线路服务优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(5):
271-279. [TANG C Y, DAI X Y, ZHANG J Y. Research
on optimization of adaptive aging-friendly customized
bus line services[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems
Engineering and Information Technology, 2025, 25(5):
271-279.]
[9]
ACHARYA S, MEKKER M. Public acceptance of
connected vehicles: An extension of the technology
acceptance model[J]. Transportation Research Part F:
Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2022, 88: 54-68.
[10] DIRGAHAYANI P, SUTANTO H. The effect of transport
demand management policy on the intention to use
public transport: A case in Bandung, Indonesia[J]. Case
Studies on Transport Policy, 2020, 8(3): 1062-1072.
[11] MADIGAN R, LOUW T, WILBRINK M, et al. What
influences the decision to use automated public
transport? Using UTAUT to understand public
acceptance of automated road transport systems[J].
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and
Behaviour, 2017, 50: 55-64.
[12] YAO S, XIE L, CHEN Y, et al. Influence of perceived
safety
in
the
technology
acceptance model[J].
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and
Behaviour, 2023, 99: 36-51.
[13] Transportation Research Board. Transit capacity and
quality of service manual (3rd ed) [M]. Washington, D.C.:
National Academies Press, 2013.
[14] PARASURAMAN A, ZEITHAML V A, BERRY L.
SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring
consumer perceptions of service quality[J]. Journal of
Retailing, 1988, 64(1): 12-40.
[15] VAN DE SCHOOT R, DEPAOLI S, KING R, et al.
Bayesian statistics and modelling[J]. Nature Reviews
Methods Primers, 2021, 1(1): 1.
[16] EDEH E, LIANG X, CAO C. Probing beyond: The impact
of model size and prior informativeness on Bayesian SEM
fit indices[J]. Behavior Research Methods, 2025, 57(4):
1-25.
[17] VAMVOURELLIS K, KALOGEROPOULOS K,
MOUSTAKI I. Assessment of Generalized Bayesian
structural equation models for continuous and binary data
[J]. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical
Psychology, 2023, 76(3): 559-584.
[18] CHEN M, CHOW S M, ORAVECZ Z, et al. Fitting
Bayesian stochastic differential equation models with
mixed effects through a filtering approach[J].
Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2023, 58(5): 1014
1038.
[19] KOENIG C, BECKER B, ULITZSCH E. Bayesian
hierarchical response time modelling: A tutorial[J].
British
Journal of Mathematical and Statistical
Psychology, 2023, 76(3): 623-645.
|