交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2016, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4): 39-45.

• 综合交通运输体系论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

环境约束下中国交通运输业能源效率研究

宋震1,丛林*2   

  1. 1. 福州大学经济与管理学院,福州350108;2. 福建省人大法制委,福州350001
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-24 修回日期:2016-04-11 出版日期:2016-08-25 发布日期:2016-08-26
  • 作者简介:宋震(1988-),男,山东兖州人,博士生.

Energy Efficiency of Chinese Transportation Industry under Environmental Constraints

SONG Zhen1, CONG Lin2   

  1. 1. Economics and Management School of Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China; 2. The Legal Committee of Fujian Province People's Congress, Fuzhou 350001, China
  • Received:2016-03-24 Revised:2016-04-11 Online:2016-08-25 Published:2016-08-26

摘要:

交通运输业能耗强度、碳排放强度的上升趋势,与其他行业稳步下降的趋势相 悖,使得交通运输业逐步成为节能环保的短板之一.本文在考虑CO2排放约束的前提下, 构建超效率非期望MinDS模型,评价1995—2013 年中国30 省份交通运输业能源效率,并 利用Global Malmquist-Luenberger 指数,动态分析效率的变化情况.研究表明,各地区交通 运输业能源效率总体呈反N型波动下降;东部、西部地区各省表现出较大差异性;中部、 东北地区内各省表现出一致性,但整体水平较低;超效率非期望MinDS模型有效克服了 非期望SBM模型无法完全排序和低估效率结果的问题;造成交通运输业能源效率下降 的主要因素是技术效率的下降,但这一状况将在未来得到改善.

关键词: 综合交通运输, 能源效率, MinDS模型, 交通运输业, GML指数, 环境约束

Abstract:

With a steady decline in other industries contrary, transportation energy intensity and carbon intensity are shown an upward trend, so that transportation is becoming one of the energy saving short board. Considering CO2 emission constraint, a super- efficient undesirable MinDS model is built to evaluate the transportation energy efficiency of Chinese provinces from 1995 to 2013. The Global Malmquist-Luenberger Index is used to dynamic analysis the efficiency changes. The result shows that: the energy efficiency of Chinese transportation industry is in an overall downward trend with anti- N type; there are significant differences between provinces in eastern and western area; provinces in central and northeast region shows consistency, although the overall low level; super- efficient undesirable MinDS model effectively overcome the flaw of undesirable SBM model, and it can absolutely ranking and objectively estimate the efficiency score; the main factors that cause a decline in transportation energy efficiency is the decline of technical efficiency, but the situation will be improved in the future.

Key words: integrated transportation, energy efficiency, MinDS model, transportation industry, global malmquist-luenberger index, environmental constraints

中图分类号: