城市不同空间通勤行为可转移性研究

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2017, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3): 205-212.

城市不同空间通勤行为可转移性研究

刘灿齐¹，史楠楠¹，诸立超^*2

1. 同济大学交通运输工程学院道路与交通工程教育部重点实验室，上海201804； 2. 浙江财经大学工商管理学院，杭州310018

收稿日期:2016-11-10 修回日期:2016-12-22 出版日期:2017-06-25 发布日期:2017-06-26
作者简介:刘灿齐（1964-），男，湖南浏阳人，副教授，博士.

Transferability of Commute Behavior across Different Spaces within Metropolis

LIU Can-qi ¹, SHI Nan-nan ¹, ZHU Li-chao ²

1. Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, College of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China; 2. School of Business Administration, Zhejing University of Finace & Econoomics, Hangzhou 310018, China

Received:2016-11-10 Revised:2016-12-22 Online:2017-06-25 Published:2017-06-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通勤者因地域及个体特征差异造成选择行为显著不同，本文旨在识别这一差异并揭示城市不同空间通勤行为的可转移性.在分析上海市通勤出行行为影响因素基础上，建立融入OD(Origin and Destination)变量的全空间及分OD空间的通勤方式选择模型，依据转移度量指标研究通勤出行模型空间可转移性.结果表明：全空间模型不能准确揭示不同出行空间通勤行为差异，除全空间模型可转移至内环外—内环内出行空间外，其他空间模型均不可转移；此外，各空间通勤者更偏好常规公交、地铁，且不同出行空间通勤者偏好存在显著差异.

关键词: 综合交通运输, 通勤出行, 离散选择, 空间可转移性

Abstract:

Commuters have significantly different behaviors due to differences in geographical and individual characteristics. This paper aims to identify this discrepancy and to reveal commuter behavior transferability between difference spaces. Based on the influence factor analysis of Shanghai commute travel behavior, WS (Whole Space) model incorporating OD (Origin and Destination) variable, different OD models are established to study commute travel model space transfer applicability according to transferability measurement indicators. Results show that WS model cannot reveal the commute travel behavior differences across ODs. Except that WS model can be applied to the OD originating from outside and ending within the inner ring area, other OD models are not transferable. Besides, commuters from different ODs prefer bus and subway with significant differences.

Key words: integrated transportation, commute travel, discrete choice, spatial transferability

中图分类号:

刘灿齐，史楠楠，诸立超. 城市不同空间通勤行为可转移性研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2017, 17(3): 205-212.

LIU Can-qi, SHI Nan-nan, ZHU Li-chao. Transferability of Commute Behavior across Different Spaces within Metropolis[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2017, 17(3): 205-212.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19434.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2017/V17/I3/205

参考文献

[1] FORSEY D, HABIB K N, MILLER E J, et al. Temporal transferability of work trip mode choice models in an expanding suburban area: The case of York Region, Ontario[J]. Transportmetrica A Transport Science, 2014, 10(6): 469-482.

[2] ATHERTON T J, BENAKIVA M E. Transferability and updating of disaggregate travel demand and models[J]. Transportation Research Record, 1976(610): 12-18.

[3] KARASMAA N. The transferability of travel demand models. An analysis of transfer methods, data quality and model estimation[D]. Helsinki: Helsinki University of Technology, 2003.

[4] MAMUN M S, SABBIR M A. Spatial transferability of mode choice model[J]. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 2012, 2(2): 65- 71.

[5] 高良鹏, 何保红, 樊冬, 等. 城市居民职住分布与通勤出行链关联性建模分析[J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2013(S1): 115-119. [GAO L P, HE B H, FAN D, et al. Modeling correlation of residence- workplace distribution and commuter trip chain[J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2013(S1): 115-119.]

[6] 张艳, 柴彦威. 基于居住区比较的北京城市通勤研究[J]. 地理研究, 2009, 28(5): 1327-1340. [ZHANG Y, CHAI Y W. Characteristics of commuting pattern in Beijing: Based on the comparison of different urban residential areas[J]. Geographical Research, 2009, 28 (5): 1327-1340.]

[7] HONG T V, CHOOCHARUKUL K, FUJII S. The effect of attitudes toward cars and public transportation on behavioral intention in commuting mode choice—A comparison across six Asian countries[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2014(69): 36-44.

[8] HENSHER D A, ROSE J M, GREENE W H. Applied choice analysis: A primer[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

[9] TRAIN K E. Discrete choice methods with simulation[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

[10] SIKDER S, PINJARI A R, SRINIVASAN S, et al. Spatial transferability of travel forecasting models: A review and synthesis[J]. International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences & Applied Mathematics, 2013, 5(2-3): 104-128.

[11] KOPPELMAN F S, WILMOT C G. Transferability analysis of disaggregate choice models[J]. Transportation Research Board, 1982(895): 18-24. 212

[1]	彭飞，宋国华，朱珊. 城市公共交通常乘客通勤出行提取方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(2): 158-165.
[2]	左大杰，肖国胜，王孟云. 产业转移背景下西部运输需求的完全分解模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(5): 15-20.
[3]	冯涛，彭其渊，陶思宇，陈昕梅. 站城融合模式下既有铁路车站城市功能开发体量预测研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(5): 21-28.
[4]	叶菲菲，杨隆浩，王应明，蓝以信. 基于数据包络分析和扩展置信规则库的交通运输业环境治理成本预测[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(3): 20-27.
[5]	周晓晔，崔瑶，何亮，马小云，王思聪. 基于地铁—货车联运的物流配送路径优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(3): 111-117.
[6]	骆晨，李想，钟林峰，胡姗姗. 基于家庭属性差异的大学生出行方式选择行为研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(3): 227-232.
[7]	诸立超，刘昭然. 托运人在不同时空下的选择行为差异揭示[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(1): 27-32.
[8]	项昀，徐铖铖，于维杰，华雪东，王炜. 基于人口迁徙大数据的城市对外交通客运方式优势出行距离研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(1): 241-246.
[9]	申婵，崔洪军. 基于可靠性最短路的实时定制公交线路优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(6): 99-104.
[10]	莫杨辉，张培林，谢羽盟. 新型城镇化与综合交通发展的互动关系计量研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(5): 13-19.
[11]	李珺，杨斌，朱小林. 混合不确定条件下绿色多式联运路径优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(4): 13-19.
[12]	付晓，顾宇，刘志远. 多模式公交网络中考虑定制公交的活动与出行建模[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(4): 20-27.
[13]	彭宏勤，张国伍. 新型城镇化背景下的新区交通规划理论方法探讨 ——“交通7+1论坛”第五十四次会议[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(3): 1-4.
[14]	郭丽彬，李健，张文. 考虑网络外部性航运商与无车承运人竞合研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(3): 11-18.
[15]	栾鑫，程琳，俞微薇，周洁. 综合运输层次下多交通模式的耦合协调性分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(3): 27-33.