基于Fluent仿真的铁路货车驼峰溜放风阻力系数研究

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2018, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (3): 168-174.

基于Fluent仿真的铁路货车驼峰溜放风阻力系数研究

杨静¹，张红亮^{* 2}，周家杰²，段乐毅²

1. 北京建筑大学土木与交通工程学院，北京 100044；2. 北京交通大学交通运输学院，北京 100044

收稿日期:2018-02-05 修回日期:2018-04-12 出版日期:2018-06-25 发布日期:2018-06-25
作者简介:杨静(1980-)，女，河北张家口人，讲师，博士.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金/Nation Natural Science Foundation of China(51308029)；中央高校基本科研业务费/ Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(2017JBM036)；北京市教育委员会科技计划一般项目/ Science and Technology Program of Beijing Education Committee (SQKM201810016006).

Air Resistance Coefficient of Hump Rolling Wagon Based on Fluent Simulation

YANG Jing¹, ZHANG Hong-liang², ZHOU Jia-jie², DUAN Yue-yi²

1. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China; 2. School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China

Received:2018-02-05 Revised:2018-04-12 Online:2018-06-25 Published:2018-06-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对铁路货车车体尺寸变化及装载状态对驼峰溜放风阻力系数的影响进行研究. 首先，基于空气动力学，建立了27t轴重通用C80、P80及23t轴重C70、P70等车型的Fluent仿真模型，并以满载C65货车标定模型参数.然后，计算风速和车速的合速度与车辆纵轴方向夹角α在0~80°区间内不同车型、不同装载状态货车溜放时的风阻力系数.仿真结果显示，不同车型、不同装载状态货车的风阻力系数在夹角α一致的情形下较标定车型具有较大差异：P80、 P70在α为20°时较标定车型P50风阻力系数分别增加28.5%、28.0%，满载C80、满载C70在α为25°时较标定车型满载C65分别增加30.5%、29.0%，空载C80、空载C70分别较对应车型满载状态增加47.1%、59.8%.最后，基于曲线拟合，回归出风阻力系数计算模型.本文研究解决了驼峰设计及调速控制中长期存在的铁路货车风阻力系数标定不全及轻载车辆风阻力值偏小的问题，具有重要的理论及实际意义.

关键词: 铁路运输, 风阻力系数, 空气动力学, 铁路货车, Fluent仿真, 驼峰溜放

Abstract:

The influences of rail wagon body parameters and loading status on Air Resistance Coefficient(ARC) during the hump rolling process are studied. Based on aerodynamics, fluent simulation models of 27 t-axle load general freight wagon, as C80、P80, and 23 t-axle load freight wagon, as C70、P70, are established. Considering different angles between the wind & wagon combined speed and the longitudinal axis of wagon during 0~80° range, the ARCs of different wagon types with different loading status are calculated. The simulation results show that, ARCs have changed a lot with different wagon types and loading status: the ARCs of P80、P70 increase significantly with growth rates 28.5%、28.0% compared with those of standardized wagon P50, the ARCs of full load C80、full load C70 increase with rates 30.5%、29.0% compared with those of standardized wagon C65, the ARCs of empty C80、empty C70 increase with rates 47.1%、59.8% compared with full load C70 status. Then based on the curve fitting method, the ARC calculation model is detained. This paper solves the problem that the ARC was calculated inaccurately for different wagon type and loading status in the past hump design and speed control. Therefore, this paper has important theoretical and practical significance.

Key words: railway transportation, air resistance coefficient, aerodynamics, rail wagon, Fluent simulation, hump rolling

中图分类号:

U291.4+3

杨静，张红亮，周家杰，段乐毅. 基于Fluent仿真的铁路货车驼峰溜放风阻力系数研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18(3): 168-174.

YANG Jing, ZHANG Hong-liang, ZHOU Jia-jie, DUAN Yue-yi. Air Resistance Coefficient of Hump Rolling Wagon Based on Fluent Simulation[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2018, 18(3): 168-174.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19642.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2018/V18/I3/168

参考文献

[1] ZHANG H L, YANG J, YANG T Y. Multiobjective optimization model for profile design of hump distributing zone[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2017(2017): 9318025.

[2] 张红亮, 李荣华, 刘博. 27 t 轴重通用货车对驼峰设计及作业控制的影响与对策[J]. 铁道货运, 2016, 34 (11): 24-27. [ZHANG H L, LI R H, LIU B. The influences and countermeasures of 27t axle-load general service freight car to hump design and operating control[J]. Railway Freight Transport, 2016, 34(11): 24-27.]

[3] 张红亮, 杨浩, 夏胜利, 等. 重载货车应用下调车场连挂区纵断面设计优化方法研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2016, 38 (10): 14-19. [ZHANG H L, YANG H, XIA S L, et al. Research on profile optimization design method for coupling area in marshalling yard under application of heavy haul freight car[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2016, 38(10): 14-19.]

[4] 王俊彪, 张岳松, 田长海, 等. 既有线开行27t轴重货物列车对线路通过能力的影响[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2014, 35(2): 91-97. [WANG J B, ZHANG Y S, TIAN C H, et al. Influence of freight train with 27t axle load on the carrying capacity of existing lines[J]. China Railway Science, 2014, 35(2): 91-97.]

[5] 张红亮, 杨浩, 赵鹏, 等. 驼峰间隔制动减速器对大轴重通用货车的制动适应性研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2013, 35 (10): 33-37. [ZHANG H L, YANG H, ZHAO P, et al. Study on braking adaptability of hump spacing-braking retarder to large axle load general service freight car[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2013, 35(10): 33-37.]

[6] 向劲松, 李金海. 铁路货车溜放风阻力探讨[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 1990(1): 119-125. [XIANG J S, LI J H. Discussion on the wind resistance of rolling waggons[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 1990(1): 119-125.]

[7] 张超, 李海鹰, 刘彦邦. 点连式驼峰峰高设计中风阻力计算公式及车辆溜放速度的选择[J]. 北方交通大学学报, 1995, 19 (增刊 1): 81-83. [ZHANG C, LI H Y, LIU Y B. Choice of wind resistance calculation method and rolling speed in point-continued hump height design[J]. Journal of Northern Jiaotong University, 1995, 19(Sup1): 81-83.]

[8] 铁道第四勘察设计院. 站场及枢纽[M]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2004. [China Railway SIYUAN survey and Design Institute. Railway Station and Terminal[M]. Beijing: China Railway Publishing House, 2004.]

[9] 陶德高. 调车场内车辆溜放基本阻力与风阻力分布规律研究[J]. 减速顶与调速技术, 1987(4): 17-22. [TAO D G. Research on the distribution of basic resistance and wind resistance in marshalling yard[J]. Retarders and Speed Control Technology, 1987(4): 17-22.]

[10] 丁昆. 车辆溜放风阻力探讨[J]. 铁道运输与经济, 1984 (11): 17-20. [DING K. Discussion on wind resistance of rolling car[J]. Railway Transport and Economy, 1984 (11): 17-20.]

[11] 费天翔. 侧风作用下列车行驶的安全性研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2014. [FEI T X. Study on the train's operational safety under cross wind actions[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2014.]

[12] 张国耕. 车身仿生非光滑表面气动减阻特性研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2010. [ZHANG G G. Mechanism research on aerodynamic drag reduction of vehicle body with bionic non-smooth surfaces[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2010.]

[13] 陈燕荣, 肖友刚. 高速列车空气动力学性能计算[J]. 铁道车辆, 2009, 47(1): 14-16, 48. [CHEN Y R, XIAO Y G. Calculation in aerodynamics performance of high speed trains[J]. Rolling Stock, 2009, 47(1): 14-16, 48.]

[14] 何华, 田红旗, 熊小慧, 等. 横风作用下敞车的气动性能研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2006, 27(3): 73-78. [HE H, TIAN H Q, XIONG X H, et al. Study on the aerodynamics performance of gondola car under cross wind[J]. China Railway Science, 2006, 27(3): 73-78.]

[15] 李佳圣. 列车侧风效应的数值模拟研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2004. [LI J S. Study on side wind effect of train by numerical simulation[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2004.]

[16] 梁习锋, 熊小慧, 易仕和. 强侧风作用下棚车气动外形优化 [J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2006, 38(2): 26- 30. [LIANG X F, XIONG X H, YI S H. Optimization research on aerodynamic figure of the box car under crosswinds[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2006, 38(2): 26-30.]