小净距“隧道—互通”路段车辆行驶轨迹特征研究

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2024.06.029

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2024, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 326-338.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2024.06.029

• 工程应用与案例分析 • 上一篇

小净距“隧道—互通”路段车辆行驶轨迹特征研究

罗霜^*a,b，杨书群^b，徐进^b

重庆交通大学，a.智能综合立体交通重庆市重点试验室；b.交通运输学院，重庆400074

收稿日期:2024-04-26 修回日期:2024-06-30 接受日期:2024-07-08 出版日期:2024-12-25 发布日期:2024-12-18
作者简介:罗霜(1990- )，男，重庆北碚人，讲师，博士。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金 (52302431)；重庆市研究生联合培养基地建设项目/(JDLHPYJD2021006)；重庆交通大学研究生科研创新项目(2023S0057)。

Vehicle Trajectory Characteristics on Tunnel-interchange Section with Short Connection

LUOShuang^*a,b,YANG Shuqun^b, XU Jin^b

a. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Intelligent Integrated and Multidimensional Transportation System; b. College of Traffic and Transportation, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China

Received:2024-04-26 Revised:2024-06-30 Accepted:2024-07-08 Online:2024-12-25 Published:2024-12-18
Supported by:
NationalNaturalScienceFoundation of China (52302431)；Joint Training Base Construction Project for Graduate Students in Chongqing (JDLHPYJD2021006)；ResearchandInnovation Program for Graduate Students in Chongqing Jiaotong University (2023S0057)。

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为明确下匝道车辆在小净距“隧道—互通”的轨迹特征，通过实车驾驶试验采集包茂高速黄草互通至保家互通的行驶数据，研究小净距“隧道—互通”的驾驶人车道选择行为，揭示下匝道驶出点位置、驶出纵/横向位移和平均横移率分布规律，探明净距和驾驶人因素对驶出特征的影响，构建轨迹特征关系模型。结果表明：驾驶人在小净距“隧道—互通”无明显车道偏好性，容易错过主线出口；随着净距降低，隧道入口段换道占比增加，隧道出口开放段换道占比减少，靠近分流点下匝道的车辆增多，驶出纵向位移呈减小趋势，驶出横向位移和平均横移率呈增大趋势；当净距不超过170m时，小净距“隧道—互通”的驶出特征与常规互通出口存在显著差异，说明净距减小，车辆换道和下匝道难度增加，运行风险增大；在小净距连接段上，女性和不熟悉路线的驾驶人换道较晚，驶出纵向位移小，经验不足的驾驶人下匝道时容易一次连续变更两条车道，驶出横向位移大，下匝道过程风险高。

关键词: 交通工程, 轨迹特征, 实车试验, 小净距“隧道—互通”, 运行风险, 个体差异

Abstract: To investigate the trajectory characteristics of diverging vehicles on the tunnel-interchange section with short connection, this paper collected driving data from driving experiment conducted from Huangcao Interchange to Baojia Interchange of Baomao Expressway. Drivers' lane choice along the tunnel-interchange section with short connection were analyzed. Distributions were evaluated for the diverging sites, longitudinal and lateral distances of diversion, and average sideway rates. The study also analyzed the effects of the connection length between the tunnel and the interchange, driver factors, and developed the trajectory characteristics model. The results show that drivers have no obvious lane preference and are more likely to miss the mainline exit in the tunnel-interchange section with short connection. With a reduction in length of the connection, the proportion of lane change increases in the tunnel entrance while decreases in the tunnel exit, the number of vehicles approaching the diversion point increases, the longitudinal diverging length exhibits a decreasing trend while the lateral displacement and the average traverse rate show an increasing trend. When the length of the connection is no more than 170 meters, there is a significant difference in the diverging characteristics between the tunnel-interchange section with short connection and the common interchange exit. These indicate with a reduction in length of the connection, the difficulty of vehicle lane change and diversion increase, and operation risk increase. On the short connection, the female drivers and the drivers who are not familiar with the route tend to change lane late, and the longitudinal diverging length is short. The inexperienced drivers are prone to changing directly from the left lane to the taper of the interchange, resulting in large lateral displacement, which might associate with high risk in diverging.

Key words: traffic engineering, trajectory characteristics, field test, tunnel-interchange section with short connection; driving risk, individual difference

中图分类号:

U491.255

罗霜, 杨书群, 徐进. 小净距“隧道—互通”路段车辆行驶轨迹特征研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(6): 326-338.

LUOShuang, YANG Shuqun, XU Jin. Vehicle Trajectory Characteristics on Tunnel-interchange Section with Short Connection[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2024, 24(6): 326-338.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2024.06.029

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2024/V24/I6/326

参考文献

[1]中交第一公路勘察设计研究院有限公司. JTGD20 2017, 公路路线设计规范[S].北京:人民交通出版社股份有限公司, 2017. [CCCC First Highway Consultants Co Ltd. JTG D20-2017, design specification for highway alignment[S]. Beijing: China Communication Press, 2017.]

[2] 徐进,曾粤.高速条件下隧道出入口行驶速度特性[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2021, 21(4): 197-209. [XU J. ZENG Y. Characteristics of driving speed at tunnel entrance and exit at high speed[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(4): 197-209.]

[3] ZHOU Z, GUO Z, FANG Y. Analysis of vehicle trajectory on the tunnel entrance and exit in the large longitudinal slope based on driving simulation[C]. 17th COTA International Conference of Transportation Professionals, United States: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2017.

[4] 曾粤.高/快速路隧道出入口车辆运行特征研究[D].重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2021. [ZENG Y. Research on vehicle operation characteristics at the entrance and exit of high/ express road tunnel[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2021.]

[5] LYU N C, CAO Y, WU C Z, et al. The effect of gender, occupation and experience on behavior while driving on a freeway deceleration lane based on field operational test data[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2018, 121 (2018): 82-93.

[6] CALVI A, BENDETTO A, BLASIIS M R D. A driving simulator study of driver performance on deceleration lanes[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2012, 45(1): 195-203.

[7] CALVI A, DAMICO F, FERRANTE C, et al. A driving simulator validation study for evaluating the driving performance on deceleration and acceleration lanes[J]. Advances in Transportation Studies, 2020, 50: 67-80.

[8]CALVI A, FRANCESCO B, FABRIZIO D. Diverging driver performance along deceleration lanes driving simulator study[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2015, 2518(1): 95-103.

[9] 安欣,孙毅,李涛,等.高速公路隧道出口与互通出口最小净距研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2021, 38(9): 132 140. [AN X, SUN Y, LI T, et al. Study on minimum clear distance between expressway tunnel exit and interchange exit[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2021, 38(9): 132-140.]

[10] SHANG T, GUAN L, ZHAO Y C, et al. Off-ramp vehicle mandatory lane-changing duration in small spacing section of tunnel-interchange section based on survival analysis[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2022, 2022: 9427052.

[11] 张驰, 王博, 杨坤,等.高速公路隧道与互通出入口小净距路段行车风险评价方法[J].安全与环境学报, 2023, 23(6): 1739-1751. [ZHANG C, WANG B, YANG K, et al. Driving risk evaluation method on the short distance section between the tunnel and interchange on freeways[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2023, 23 (6): 1739-1751.]

[12] 陈荔, 张驰, 王博,等.隧道与互通出口小净距路段换道可靠性研究[J]. 中国公路学报,2022, 35(9): 51-65. [CHENG L, ZHANG C, WANG B, et al. Research of lane changing reliability on short distance section between tunnel and interchange exit[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 35(9): 51-65.]

[13] 白婧荣, 唐伯明,孙宗元,等.毗邻互通立交特长隧道驾驶负荷研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2022,22 (1): 301-310. [BAI J R, TANG B M, SUN Z Y, et al. On driving load of super-long tunnel adjacent to interchanges [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(1): 301-310.]

[14] 何晖宇, 丁瑞,徐进,等.苜蓿叶立交交织区冲突特征及严重程度影响因素分析[J/OL].交通运输系统工程与信息, (2024-05-23) [2024-06-05]. http:// kns.cnki. net/kcms/detail/11.4520.u.20240521.1700.002. [HE H Y, DING R, XU J et al. Conflict features and influencing factors of severity in the weaving area of cloverleaf interchange[J/OL]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, (2024-05-23) [2024-06-05]. http:// kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.4520. u.20240521.1700.002.]

[15] LUO S, SHU H Y, CHEN X B. Experiment and modeling of seated human body exposed to large magnitude vibration in six single directions[J]. Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology, 2019, 19(5): 217 227.

小净距“隧道—互通”路段车辆行驶轨迹特征研究

Vehicle Trajectory Characteristics on Tunnel-interchange Section with Short Connection

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	宋现敏, 刘博, 李海涛, 湛天舒, 李世豪, 张云翔. 考虑综合效益的周期型停车预约分配模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(1): 24-35.
[2]	曹丹妮, 王涛, 杨松坡, 屈云超, 吴建军. 混合流环境下瓶颈区域车道定制化速度调控研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(1): 76-85.
[3]	韩烽凡, 刘爽, 朱亚迪, 杨烨, 王曦. 数据驱动的城轨车站行人仿真方法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(1): 86-91.
[4]	覃文文, 白碧璇, 韩春阳, 戢晓峰, 谷金晶, 田毕江. 山区双车道公路弯道路段小客车跟驰状态转移预测[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(1): 92-101.
[5]	彭金栓, 张淋俊, 周磊, 袁浩, 任超宇, 徐磊. 高速公路跟车情景下认知分心影响机制与识别方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(1): 221-230.
[6]	邬岚, 周佳雨, 李根. 技术标准更新视角下电动自行车事故严重程度影响因素演化分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(1): 231-240.
[7]	林译峰, 温惠英. 高速公路隧道不同车辆实时跟驰风险影响因素分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(1): 298-310.
[8]	尚婷, 胥浩, 梁叶, 周翱. 基于博弈论云物元的地下环道出入口视觉负荷研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(1): 345-354.
[9]	卢凯, 陈志学, 林永杰, 郭海锋. 考虑跨相位冲突的环形交叉口信号周期计算方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(6): 86-101.
[10]	郑建明, 华一丁, 张宇飞, 路文豪, 石佩鑫, 覃斌, 赵目龙. 考虑风险场景的驾驶员紧急制动模型研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(6): 219-231.
[11]	戢晓峰, 王健, 徐迎豪, 卢梦媛, 覃文文. 基于驾驶风格的山区公路穿村镇段行车风险场灵敏度分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(6): 316-325.
[12]	赵红专, 张继康, 潘佳雯, 袁泉, 许恩永, 魏金占, 周旦, 刘承堃. 基于改进视觉算法的自动驾驶风险预判模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(5): 79-90.
[13]	何晖宇, 丁瑞, 应聃, 张宇豪, 张河山, 徐进. 苜蓿叶立交交织区冲突特征及严重程度影响因素分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(5): 246-258.
[14]	唐铁桥, 钟静燃, 袁小婷, 覃梦欣. 基于扩展决策场的机场落客区车辆－旅客行为建模分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(5): 309-317.
[15]	黄岩, 李海军, 闫学东, 段克. 雾天网联车辆跟驰模型构建及行为影响分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(4): 41-49.