考虑运能利用和碳排放的绿色城轨开行方案研究

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2025.01.013

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1): 122-132.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2025.01.013

考虑运能利用和碳排放的绿色城轨开行方案研究

杨雯雯^1a,2，孟学雷^*1a，高如虎^1a，林立^1b

1. 兰州交通大学，a.交通运输学院，b.机电工程学院，机械工程博士后流动站，兰州730070；2. 兰州石化职业技术大学，国际商务学院，兰州730060

收稿日期:2024-10-14 修回日期:2024-12-02 接受日期:2024-12-11 出版日期:2025-02-25 发布日期:2025-02-21
作者简介:杨雯雯(1993—)，女，甘肃平凉人，博士生。
基金资助:
甘肃省科技计划(24JRRA865)；国家自然科学基金(72361020)。

Train Operation Plan of Green Urban Rail Transit Considering Transportation Capacity Utilization and Carbon Emissions

YANG Wenwen^1a,2, MENG Xuelei^*1a, GAO Ruhu^1a, LIN Li^1b

1a. School of Traffic and Transportation, 1b. Postdoctoral Station of Mechanical Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China; 2. School of International Business, Lanzhou Petrochemical University of Vocational Technology, Lanzhou 730060, China

Received:2024-10-14 Revised:2024-12-02 Accepted:2024-12-11 Online:2025-02-25 Published:2025-02-21
Supported by:
Gansu Provincial Science and Technology Program Funding (24JRRA865)；National Natural Science Foundation of China (72361020)。

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着“双碳”目标上升为国家战略，构建绿色交通体系势在必行。立足于绿色交通“提效降碳”的核心内涵，本文提出一种考虑资源、环境、乘客和企业四方效益，基于大小交路多编组模式的城市轨道交通列车开行方案编制方法。为研究不同交路对客流分布的影响，根据乘客出行特征划分客流，进而分析不同客流的出行成本，建立以列车运输资源利用率最大，列车运行中碳排放量最小，企业运营成本和乘客出行时间成本最低为优化目标，以线路通过能力、发车频率和运用车辆数为约束的多目标优化模型。提出一种改进的麻雀搜索算法用于模型求解，并与单一交路、单一编组方案进行对比分析，同时将其求解结果与传统的麻雀搜索算法及粒子群算法进行比较。结果表明：与单一交路和单一编组的列车开行方案相比，多交路和多编组的方案在运能利用、碳排放、企业运营成本及乘客出行时间成本方面表现更优；此外，改进后的麻雀搜索算法在求解效率和结果质量上也明显优于传统算法。因此，本文提出的方法不仅能够平衡企业和乘客的利益，还有效提高了资源利用率，减少了碳排放，为城轨系统的绿色化运营提供了决策支持。

关键词: 城市交通, 开行方案, 麻雀搜索算法, 绿色城轨, 输送能力利用率, 碳排放

Abstract: As the "dual carbon" goal of Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutrality rises to the national strategic level, the establishment of a green transportation system has become increasingly urgent. This paper proposes a train operation plan for urban rail transit that focuses on the core principle of "efficiency enhancement and carbon reduction" in green transportation. The operation plan is based on a multi-route, multi-type formation configuration, taking into account the benefits of resources, the environment, passengers, and enterprises. To investigate the impact of different routes on passenger flow distribution, passenger flows are classified based on their travel characteristics, and an analysis of the associated travel costs for each passenger group is conducted. A multi-objective optimization model is established with the objectives of maximizing train transportation resource utilization, minimizing carbon emissions during train operations, and reducing both the operational expenditures of enterprises and the time costs associated with passenger travel. The model is subject to various constraints such as line capacity, departure frequency, and the number of vehicles in operation. To solve the model, an improved Sparrow Search Algorithm (SSA) was proposed, with a comparative analysis conducted against a full-length route, single-type formation operation plan. Furthermore, the solution results were compared with those obtained from the traditional SSA and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithms. The results demonstrate that the multi- route, multi-type formation operation plan performs better than full-length route, single-type formation plan in terms of capacity utilization, carbon emissions reduction, enterprise operational costs, and passenger travel time costs. Moreover, the improved SSA shows significant advantages over traditional algorithms in terms of solution efficiency and quality. Therefore, the method proposed effectively balances the interests of enterprises and passengers, and also enhances resource utilization and reduces carbon emissions, providing strong decision-making support for the green operation of urban rail transit systems.

Key words: urban traffic, train operation plan, sparrow search algorithm, green urban rail transit, transportation capacity utilization, carbon emissions

中图分类号:

U231.92

杨雯雯, 孟学雷, 高如虎, 林立. 考虑运能利用和碳排放的绿色城轨开行方案研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(1): 122-132.

YANG Wenwen, MENG Xuelei, GAO Ruhu, LIN Li. Train Operation Plan of Green Urban Rail Transit Considering Transportation Capacity Utilization and Carbon Emissions[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2025, 25(1): 122-132.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2025.01.013

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2025/V25/I1/122

参考文献

[1]袁振洲,袁晓敬,杨洋,等.城市轨道交通低碳效应研究综述[J]. 铁道运输与经济, 2024, 46(8): 8-23, 57. [YUAN Z Z, YUAN X J, YANG Y, et al. Review on research of low-carbon effects in urban rail transit [J]. Railway Transport and Economy, 2024, 46(8): 8-23, 57.]

[2]姚恩建,张金萌,郇宁.效率与公平导向下城轨大小交路开行方案优化[J].华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(5): 41-48, 57. [YAO E J, ZHANG J M, HUAN N. Equality efficiency balance-oriented optimization of long-short[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 48(5): 41 48, 57.]

[3]戴延泽,占曙光.考虑碳排放的城轨开行大小交路方案分析[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报,2022,19(12): 3546-3556. [DAI Y Z, ZHAN S G. Analysis of full-length and short-turn routing of urban rail transit considering carbon emission[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2022, 19(12): 3546-3556.]

[4]林立,孟学雷,程晓卿,等.考虑碳排放效果的城轨列车开行方案编制方法[J].交通信息与安全,2023,41(246): 176-184. [LIN L, MENG X L, CHENG X Q, et al. A method for developing service plan of urban rail train considering carbon emissions impacts[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2023, 41(246): 176 184.]

[5]DELLE SITE P, FILIPPI F. Service optimization for bus corridors with short-turn strategies and variable vehicle size[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 1998, 32(1): 19-38.

[6]许得杰,毛保华,雷莲桂.城市轨道交通大小交路列车开行方案优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息,2017, 17(1): 120-126. [XU D J, MAO B H, LEI L G. Optimization for train plan of full-length and short-turn routing in urban rail transit [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2017, 17(1): 120-126.]

[7]张海,吕苗苗,倪少权.基于非均匀发车间隔的大小交路时刻表优化模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息,2022, 22(6): 224-233. [ZHANG H, LV M M, NI S Q. Train timetable optimization model for full-length and short-turn routing with irregular departure intervals[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(6): 224-233.]

[8]杨洋,王雪纯,袁振洲,等.基于碳回收期理论的城市轨道交通碳减排效应测算[J].交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(5): 1-11, 23. [YANG Y, WANG X C,YUAN Z Z, et al. Calculation for carbon emission reduction effect of urban rail transit based on carbon recovery period theory[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2023, 23(5): 1-11, 23.]

[9]林立,孟学雷,程晓卿,等.疫情常态化防控条件下城轨列车开行方案研究[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2022, 19(12): 3515-3525. [LIN L, MENG X L, CHENG X Q, et al. Research on train operation plan of urban rail transit under the condition of normalized epidemic prevention and control[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2022, 19(12): 3515-3525.]

[10]石红国,彭其渊,郭寒英.城市轨道交通牵引计算算法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2024, 4(3): 30-33. [SHI H G, PENG Q Y, GUO H Y. Traction calculation of urban mass transit[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2024, 4(3): 30-33.]

[11]YANG R X, HAN B M, ZHANG Q, et al. Integrated optimization of train route plan and timetable with dynamic demand for the urban rail transit line[J]. Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics, 2023, 11(1): 93-126.]

[12]XUE J, SHEN B. A novel swarm intelligence optimization approach: Sparrow search algorithm[J]. Systems Science &Control Engineering, 2020, 8(1): 22-34.

[13]李雅丽, 王淑琴,陈倩茹,等.若干新型群智能优化算法的对比研究[J].计算机工程与应用,2020,56(22):112. [LI Y L, WANG S Q, CHEN Q R, et al. Comparative study of several new swarm intelligence optimization algorithms[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2020, 56(22): 1-12.]

[14]顾清华, 姜秉佼,常朝朝,等.求解大规模优化问题的改进麻雀搜索算法[J].控制与决策,2023,38(7):1960 1968. [GU Q H, JIANG B J, CHANG Z Z, et al. An improved sparrow search algorithm for solving large scale optimization problems[J]. Control and Decision, 2023, 38(7): 1960-1968.]

[15]李雅楠. 城市轨道交通列车开行方案的优化研究[D].兰州: 兰州交通大学, 2023. [LI Y N. Research on optimization of urban rail transit train operation scheme [D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2023.]

考虑运能利用和碳排放的绿色城轨开行方案研究

Train Operation Plan of Green Urban Rail Transit Considering Transportation Capacity Utilization and Carbon Emissions

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	晋泽倩, 俞诚成, 叶昕. 混合效用和后悔规则下的洪涝交通疏散决策行为研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(2): 16-25.
[2]	周雨阳, 赵聪颖, 李京昆, 陈艳艳, 柳堤, 王书灵. 多类城市职住及通勤状态对出行方式选择影响比较[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(2): 26-35.
[3]	彭其渊, 刘思源, 江山, 冯涛, 陈垚, 张永祥. 贯通运营下市域铁路与地铁列车开行方案协同优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(2): 36-47.
[4]	蒋阳升, 叶肖甫, 徐尉耀, 刘洪汛, 胡路. 考虑转运与拼车的共享自动驾驶电动汽车动态运营[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(2): 58-68.
[5]	赵雪亭, 胡立伟, 周君. 城市交通拥塞风险场级联失效及韧性评估研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(2): 146-156.
[6]	武慧荣, 王玉莹, 盛椿婷. 考虑动态需求的城市货运公交线路规划模型研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(2): 214-226.
[7]	徐伟汉, 李欣, 王天奇. 基于生态驾驶的常规和需求响应公交混合调度方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(2): 227-240.
[8]	李昊, 陈绍宽, 徐彬, 石梦彤, 肖迪, 陈梓琦. 考虑值乘能力差异的地铁跨线乘务轮班计划优化方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(2): 253-260.
[9]	薛锋, 肖恩, 杨颖, 金成, 罗建. 基于多旅行商问题建模的地铁乘务排班计划优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(2): 261-272.
[10]	龚帅宇, 徐行方, 鲁玉. 省域铁路成网条件下列车开行方案优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(2): 282-292.
[11]	张鹏, 吴照杰, 孙超, 李文权. 路口混合放行下的干线红波带宽最小优化模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(2): 293-303.
[12]	王孝坤, 董泽锦, 王雨薇, 肖红. 分时电价下泊位-岸桥-岸电联合分配优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(2): 314-327.
[13]	许奇, 秦贝宁, 任澎, 陈越, 赖瑾璇. 建成环境对公交接驳地铁客流的异质性影响[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(2): 352-363.
[14]	姚明, 王宇航, 曹淑超, 马露涵. 手机分心条件下行人运动特性研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(2): 364-372.
[15]	翁剑成, 周慧缘, 张梦媛, 于江波. 考虑城市与群体异质的新能源车激励策略有效性研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(1): 2-14.