Allowing for Exogenous Policy Adjustment in Urban Low-carbon Travel Decision Model

Abstract

Abstract:

To make transportation policy effective, decision makers should consider the travel decisionmaking process of urban travelers. In order to understand the travel decision- making process, the characteristics of existing travel behavior influence factors and their influence mechanisms are analyzed based on social psychology. In this study, the relationships among context dependency, learning capacity and travel decision are explored, and the moderating effect of exogenous policy are incorporated into the research framework on the relationship among context dependency, learning capacity and travel decision. Based on a review of relevant researches, research propositions are proposed, and the theoretical model of the travel decision-making process is developed.

Key words: urban traffic, travel decision model, integrated model, travel behavior, transportation policy

摘要：

交通治理政策生效的关键是能够影响个体出行者的行为决策.为提升城市低碳交通治理政策的有效性，有必要研究城市出行个体的决策过程、影响因素及其影响机理.本研究从社会心理学角度出发，研究情境依赖、学习能力与个体出行行为决策之间的相互影响，并将外生政策纳入个体出行行为决策过程研究框架，分析外生政策对出行行为决策与情境依赖和学习能力之间关系的调节作用.在对相关研究进行系统梳理和总结的基础上，构建了城市低碳出行决策过程的逻辑模型，该模型可为出行行为决策实证研究提供系统的分析框架.

关键词: 城市交通, 出行决策模型, 整合模型, 出行行为, 交通政策

CLC Number:

U121

WEI Qing-qi, XIAOWei. Allowing for Exogenous Policy Adjustment in Urban Low-carbon Travel Decision Model[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2017, 17(1): 8-13.

魏庆琦，肖伟. 考虑外生政策调节的城市低碳出行决策模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2017, 17(1): 8-13.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: http://www.tseit.org.cn/EN/abstract/abstract19336.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/EN/Y2017/V17/I1/8

References

[1] SASAKI T. Estimation of person trip patterns through Markov chains[J]. Traffic Flow and Transportation, 1971, 4(11): 119-130． [2] LERMAN S R. The use of disaggregate choice models in semi-Markov process models of trip chaining behavior[J]. Transportation Science, 1979(13): 213-291. [3] BOWMAN J L, BEN-AKIVA M E. Activity based disaggregate travel demand model system with daily activity schedules[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2000(35): 1-28． [4] RAZO M, GAO S. A rank-dependent expected utility model for strategic route choice with stated preference data[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2013(27): 117-130. [5] LOVREGLIO R, FONZONE A, DELL’OLIO L. A study of herding behaviour in exit choice during emergencies based on random utility theory[J]. Safety Science, 2016 (28)：421-431. [6] HESS S, STATHOPOULOSY A, DALY A, et al. Allowing for heterogeneous decision rules in discrete choice models: an approach and four case studies[J]. Transportation, 2011, 39(3): 565-591. [7] 徐红利，周晶，陈星光. 基于前景理论的路径选择行为规则分析与实证[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2007, 7(6): 95-101. [XU H L, ZHOU J, CHEN X G. Analysis and demonstration of the traveler’s route choice behavior rule based on the prospect theory[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2007, 7(6): 95-101.] [8] 刘玉印，刘伟铭，吴建伟. 基于累积前景理论的出行者路径选择模型[J]. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2010(7): 84-89. [LIU Y Y, LIU W M, WU J W. Route choice model of traveler based on cumulative prospect theory[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2010(7): 84-89.] [9] 陈坚. 出行行为与公交定价理论及应用研究[D]. 成都：西南交通大学, 2012. [CHEN J. Research on theory and application of travel behavior and urban public transit pricing[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2012.] [10] 郭仁拥，黄海军. ATIS环境下交通配流的动态演化模型[J]. 管理科学学报, 2008, 11(2): 12-19. [GUO R Y, HUANG H J. Dynamical evolutionary model of traffic assignment under ATIS[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2008, 11(2): 12-19.] [11] 丁建勋，黄海军. 考虑停靠站影响的公交运输系统模型[J]. 物理学报, 2010(5): 3093-3098. [DING J X, HUANG H J. A public transport system model with consideration of bus stop[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010 (5): 3093-3098.] [12] 贾顺平，周洋帆，张思佳. 交通拥堵收费的经济意义与社会条件分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2014, 14(1): 14-19. [JIA S P, ZHOU Y F, ZHANG S J. The economic value and social condition analysis of congestion pricing[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2014, 14(1): 14-19. ] [13] 刘天亮，张冲，王天歌，等. 朋友圈信息交互对出行决策行为的影响研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2013, 13(6): 86-93. [LIU T L, ZHANG C, WANG T G, et al. Effects of friends’ information interaction on travel decisions[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2013, 13(6): 86-93 [14] 韩秀竹. 关于SEM 的出行择路准则异质性的实证研究[D]. 南京：南京大学, 2015. [HAN X Z. Study on heterogeneity or travelers’route choice rules based on structural equation modeling[D]. Nanjing： Nanjing University, 2015.] [15] AJZEN I. The theory of planned behavior[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991(50): 179-211. [16] HONG TAN VAN, KASEM CHOOCHARUKUL, SATOSHI FUJII. The effect of attitudes toward cars and public transportation on behavioral intention in commuting mode choice—A comparison across six Asian countries[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2014, 69(69): 36-44. [17] JOHANSSON M VREDIN, HELDT T, JOHANSSON P. The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2006, 40(6): 507-525. [18] KUPPAM A R, PENDYALA R M, RAHMAN S. Analysis of the role of traveler attitudes and perceptions in explaining mode- choice behavior[J]. Transportation Research Record, 1999(1676): 69-76. [19] SCHWANEN T, MOKHTARIAN P L. What affects commute mode choice: neighborhood physical structure or preferences toward neighborhoods?[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2005, 13 (1): 83-99. [20] 金楠. 大城市居民低碳出行方式选择影响因素研究[D]. 重庆：重庆交通大学, 2013. [JIN N. Research on influencing factors of choosing the low- carbon trip mode of urban residents[D]. Chongqing：Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2013.] [21] 黄晓燕，李沛权，曹小曙. 广州社区居民通勤碳排放特征及其影响机理[J]. 城市环境与城市生态, 2014, 27 (5): 32- 38. [HUANG X Y, LI P Q, CAO X S. Characteristics and mechanism of CO2 emissions from urban commuting in Guangzhou[J]. Urban Environment and Urban Ecology, 2014, 27(5): 32-38.] [22] DIJK M, HAES J, MONTALVO C. Park- and- Ride motivations and air quality norms in Europe[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2013(30): 149-160. [23] 赵雪汝，何先友，赵婷婷，等. 情境模型的更新：事件框架依赖假设的进一步证据[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(7): 901-911. [ZHAO R X, HE X Y, ZHAO T T, et al. The updating of situation model: further evidence of event frame- dependent hypothesis[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(7): 901-911.] [24] KINTSCH W, VAN-DIJK T A. Toward a model of text comprehension and production[J]. Psychological Review, 1978, 85(5)：363-394. [25] ZWAAN R A, LANGSTON M C, GRAESSER A C. The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model[J]. Psychological Science, 1995(6): 292-297. [26] OPPEWAL H, TIMMERMANS H J P. Context effects and decompositional choice mode[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 1991, 70(2): 113-131. [27] ZHANG J，TIMMERMANS H，BORGERS A，et al. Modeling traveler choice behavior using the concepts of relative utility and relative interest[J]. Transportation Research Part B Methodological, 2004, 38(3): 215-234. [28] KHATTAK A J，SCHOFER J L，KOPPELMAN F S. Commuters' enroute diversion and return decisions: Analysis and implications for advanced traveler information systems[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 1993, 27(2): 101-111. [29] ORY D T, MOKHTARIAN P L. Modeling the structural relationships among short- distance travel amounts, perceptions, affections, and desires[J]. Transportation Research Part A Policy & Practice, 2009, 43(1): 26-43. [30] ETTEMA D, TAMNIINGA G, TIMMERMANSH, et al. A micro-simulation model system of departure time using a perception updating model under travel time uncertainty[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2005, 39 (4): 325-344． [31] 陈国权. 复杂变化环境下人的学习能力：概念、模型、测量及影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2008, 16(1): 147-157. [CHEN G Q. Individual learning capability in complex and dynamic business environment: concept, capability model, measurement and impact on individual performance[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2008, 16(1): 147-157.] [32] 葛芳. 大城市地面公交优先技术策略模型与实证研究[D]. 北京：北京交通大学, 2010. [GE F. Study on model and demonstration of public transit priority technology strategy in megalopolis[D]. Beijing：Beijing Jiaotong University, 2010.] [33] 张卫华，陆化普，石琴，等. 公交优先的信号交叉口配时优化方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2004, 4(3): 49-53. [ZHANG W H, LU H P, SHI Q, et al. Optimal signalplanning method of intersections based on bus priority[J]. Journal of Trafficand Transportation Engineering, 2004, 4(3): 49-53.] [34] 吴娇蓉，郑宇. 设定服务水平的公交专用道通行能力研究[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版). 2008, 36(2): 197-201. [WU J R, ZHENG Y. Capacity research of bus lane of given level of service[J]. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science), 2008, 36(2): 197- 201.] [35] 陆化普，文国玮. BRT系统成功的关键：带形城市土地利用形态[J]. 城市交通, 2006, 4(3): 11-15. [LU H P, WEN G W. Key to the success of BRT: the linear urban land use pattern[J]. Urban Transport of China, 2006, 4(3): 11-15.] [36] GENNARO N BIFULCO, GIULIO E CANTARELLA, FULVIO SIMONELLI, et al. Advanced traveler information systems under recurrent traffic conditions: Network equilibrium and stability[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2016, 7, in press. [37] RYU B Y, JUNG H J, BAE S H, et al. Estimation of carbon dioxide emissions per urban center link unit using data collected by the advanced traffic information system in Daejeon, Korea[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2013(81): 433-442.