A Recognition Model of Driving Anger Based on Belief Rule Base

Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology ›› 2015, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5): 96-102.

Previous Articles Next Articles

A Recognition Model of Driving Anger Based on Belief Rule Base

WAN Ping^1,2, WU Chao-zhong^1,2, LIN Ying-zi³, MAXiao-feng^1,2, HUANG Zhen⁴

1. Intelligent Transportation System Research Center,Wuhan University of Technology,Wuhan 430063, China; 2. Engineering Research Center for Transportation Safety, Ministry of Education,Wuhan 430063, China; 3. Intelligent Human-Machine Systems Laboratory, Northeastern University, Boston 02115, USA; 4. School of Automation,Wuhan University of Technology,Wuhan 430070, China

Received:2015-05-21 Revised:2015-06-25 Online:2015-10-25 Published:2015-10-28

基于置信规则库的驾驶人愤怒情绪识别模型

万平^1,2，吴超仲^1,2，林英姿³，马晓凤^1,2，黄珍^*4

1. 武汉理工大学智能交通系统研究中心，武汉430063；2. 水路公路交通安全控制与装备教育部工程技术研究中心，武汉 430063；3. 东北大学智能人机系统实验室，波士顿02115，美国；4. 武汉理工大学自动化学院，武汉430070

作者简介:万平(1984-)，男，湖北黄冈人，博士生.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(51178364)；国家科技支撑计划课题(2014BAG01B03)；美国国家科学基金（1333524）；国家留学基金管理委员会(201406950045).

Abstract

Abstract:

As“road rage”easily induces aggressive driving behavior that has negative impact on traffic safety, a recognition model of anger emotion based on driver’s physiological and electroencephalogram (EEG) characteristics is proposed in this paper. Fifteen participants were recruited to take part in on-road and timed experiments in Wuhan. Driving anger could be easily induced by specific road events such as jaywalking and weaving vehicles in busy traffic section, which was selected as experiment route. During experiments driver’s anger level was recorded by driving anger scale while physiological and EEG signals were recorded by Biography Infiniti System and Neural Scan System respectively. Then a recognition model of driving anger based on belief rule base (BRB) is proposed with four input variables, which included blood volume purse (BVP), skin conductance (SC), percentages of δ wave (δ%) and β wave (β%) in frequency domain. The model’s validation results show that its accuracy is 82.24%, increasing 7.15% and 5.02% when compared with BPNN and SVM respectively. The results can provide theoretical support for designing driving emotion recognition equipment based on physiology and EEG.

Key words: intelligent transportation, emotion recognition, belief rule base, driving anger, on-road experiment

摘要：

针对“路怒症”诱发的攻击性驾驶行为影响交通安全问题，提出一种基于生理与脑电特征的驾驶人愤怒情绪识别模型.招募15 名被试在武汉市区开展限时实车试验.由于所选实验线路为交通繁忙路段，被试易被行人横穿马路、车辆加塞等道路事件诱发愤怒情绪.实验中采用愤怒量表记录被试的愤怒等级，以及采用生物反馈仪与脑电记录仪记录被试的生理和脑电信号.将血容量脉冲、皮肤电导、δ 波百分比与β 波百分比这四项生理与脑电指标作为模型输入，建立基于置信规则库的愤怒情绪识别模型.验证结果表明，该模型的识别精度(82.24%)较BP神经网络、SVM分别提高7.15%、5.02%.研究结果可为开发基于生理和脑电信号的驾驶情绪识别设备提供理论支持.

关键词: 智能交通, 情绪识别, 置信规则库, 愤怒驾驶, 实车试验

CLC Number:

U491

WAN Ping, WU Chao-zhong, LIN Ying-zi, MAXiao-feng, HUANG Zhen. A Recognition Model of Driving Anger Based on Belief Rule Base[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2015, 15(5): 96-102.

万平，吴超仲，林英姿，马晓凤，黄珍. 基于置信规则库的驾驶人愤怒情绪识别模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2015, 15(5): 96-102.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: http://www.tseit.org.cn/EN/abstract/abstract19068.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/EN/Y2015/V15/I5/96

References

[1] 雷虎. 愤怒情绪下的汽车驾驶行为特征及其对交通安全的影响研究[D]. 武汉：武汉理工大学, 2011. [LEI H. The characteristics of angry driving behaviors and its effects on traffic safety[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2011.]

[2] Deffenbacher J L, Lynch R S, Filetti L B, et al. Anger, aggression, risky behavior, and crash-related outcomes in three groups of drivers[J]. Behavior Research and Therapy, 2003, 41 (3): 333-49.

[3] Nhtsa．Traffic safety facts 2010: A compilation of motor vehicle crash data from the fatality analysis reporting system and the general estimates system[R]． Washington DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2010.

[4] Cai H, Lin Y Z. Modeling of operators' emotion and task performance in a virtual driving environment[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2011, 69(6):571-586.

[5] Kessous L, Castellano G, Caridakis G. Multimodal emotion recognition in speech-based interaction using facial expression, body gesture and acoustic analysis[J]. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 2010, 3(1): 33- 48.

[6] Schaaff K, Schultz T. Towards emotion recognition from electroencephalographic signals[C]//3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and workshops, Amsterdam, 2009:1-6.

[7] 牛晓伟, 刘光远. 基于遗传算法的生理信号情感识别[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版)，2007, 29(9): 134- 138. [NIU X W, LIU G Y. Emotion recognition with philological signals based on genetic algorithm[J]. Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2007, 29(9):134-138.]

[8] Katsis C D, Katertsidis N, Ganiatsas G, et al. Toward emotion recognition in car-racing drivers: A bio signal processing approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part A-systems and Humans, 2008, 38(3): 502-512.

[9] 汪磊，左忠义，傅军豪. 基于SVM 的出行方式特征分析和识别研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息，2014,14 (3):70-75. [WANG L, ZUO Z Y, FU J H. Travel mode character analysis and recognition based on SVM[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2014, 14(3):70-75.]

[10] David Herrero- Fernández. Psychometric adaptation of the driving anger expression inventory in a Spanish sample: differences by age and gender[J]. Transportation Research Part F, 2011, (14):324-329.

[11] 严新平，张晖，吴超仲，等. 道路交通驾驶行为研究进展及其展望[J]. 交通信息与安全，2013, 31(1):45-51. [YAN X P, ZHANG H, WU C Z, et al. Research progress and prospect of road traffic driving behavior[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2013, 31(1): 45-51.]

[12] Yang J B, Liu J, Wang J, et al. Belief- rule- base inference methodology using the evidential reasoning approach-RIMER[J]. IEEE Transaction on System, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 2006, 36(2): 266-285.

[13] 张伟，石菖蒲，等. 基于置信规则库专家系统的发动机故障诊断[J]. 系统仿真技术，2011,7(1):11- 15. [ZHANG W, SHI C P, et al. Fault diagnosis of engine based on RIMER expert system[J]. System Simulation Technology, 2011, 7(1):11-15.]

[1]	GUO Lie , XU Lin-li, QIN Zeng-ke, WANG Xu. Analysis and Overview of Influencing Factors on Autonomous Driving Takeover [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(2): 72-90.
[2]	XU Meng , LIU Tao , ZHONG Shao-peng , JIANG Yu. Urban Smart Public Transport Studies: A Review and Prospect [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(2): 91-108.
[3]	CHENG Jun, ZHANG Li-yan, CHEN Qi-hong. A Map Aided Visual-inertial Fusion Localization Method for Autonomous Vehicles [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(2): 117-126.
[4]	WANG Guo-dong , LIU Li , MENG Yu , MA Zhi-ping, ZHENG Hao-qing , GU Qing, BAI Guo-xing. Integrated Control of Trajectory Planning and Tracking for Vehicle Collision Avoidance [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(2): 127-136.
[5]	MA Dong-fang , CHEN Xi , WU Xiao-dong , JIN Sheng. Mixed-coordinated Decision-making Method for Arterial Signals Based on Reinforcement Learning [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(2): 145-153.
[6]	TIAN Hui-juan, LIU Jia-wei, ZHAI Jia-hao, DENG Lin-lin. Video-based Vehicle Speed Measurement Method Using Multiple Intrusion Lines [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(1): 49-56.
[7]	JIA Yan-feng, QU Da-yi, ZHAO Zi-xu, WANG Tao, SONG Hui. Car-following Decision-making and Model for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles Based on Safety Potential Field [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(1): 85-97.
[8]	ZHAO Jian-dong , CHEN Qin , JIAO Yan-li , ZHANG Kai-li , HAN Ming-min. Recognition of Abnormal Driving Behavior of Key Commercial Vehicles [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(1): 282-291.
[9]	XU Dong-wei , PENG Hang , SHANG Xue-tian , WEI Chen-chen , YANG Yan-fang . Road Network Data Repair Based on Graph Autoencoder-generative Adversarial Network [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(6): 33-41.
[10]	YOU Feng , LIANG Jian-zhong , CAO Shui-jin, XIAO Zhi-hao, WU Zhen-jiang , WANG Hai-wei. Dense Pedestrian Crowd Trajectory Extraction and Motion Semantic Information Perception Based on Multi-object Tracking [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(6): 42-54.
[11]	WANG Fu-jian, YU Jia-hao , ZHAO Jin-huan , MEI Zhen-yu. Short-term Public Traffic Passenger Volume Forecasting Method Based on Real-time Relevance of Stations [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(6): 131-144.
[12]	ZHANG Yi , YAO Dan-ya , LI Li , PEI Hua-xin , YAN Song , GE Jing-wei. Technologies and Applications for Intelligent Vehicle-infrastructure Cooperation Systems [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(5): 40-51.
[13]	LONG Jian-cheng, GUO Jia-qi. Review and Prospect of Dynamic Traffic Assignment Research [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(5): 125-138.
[14]	YU Zu-jun, ZHANG Chen-guang , GUO Bao-qing. Vehicle Simultaneous Localization and Mapping Algorithm with Lidar-camera Fusion [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(4): 72-81.
[15]	ZHANG Wei-bin , ZHANG Pu-lin, SU Zi-yi , SUN Feng. Missing Data Repairs for Road Network Traffic Flow with Self-attention Graph Auto-encoder Networks [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(4): 90-98.

A Recognition Model of Driving Anger Based on Belief Rule Base

基于置信规则库的驾驶人愤怒情绪识别模型

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics