考虑碳排放政策的港航企业减排策略研究

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2023.01.005

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2023, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 39-47.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2023.01.005

• 综合交通运输体系论坛 • 上一篇下一篇

考虑碳排放政策的港航企业减排策略研究

梁晶^*，张霖，刘禹轩

大连海事大学，交通运输工程学院，辽宁大连 116026

收稿日期:2022-11-28 修回日期:2022-12-20 接受日期:2022-12-26 出版日期:2023-02-25 发布日期:2023-02-16
作者简介:梁晶(1971- )，女，辽宁大连人，副教授，博士。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(71974023)；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(3132019302)；国家社科基金重大研究专项(19VHQ012)。

Emission Reduction Strategy Research of Port and Shipping Enterprises Considering Carbon Emission Policies

LIANG Jing^*, ZHANG Lin, LIU Yu-xuan

Transportation Engineering College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, Liaoning, China

Received:2022-11-28 Revised:2022-12-20 Accepted:2022-12-26 Online:2023-02-25 Published:2023-02-16
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (71974023)； Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Ministry of Education of China (3132019302)；Major Research Program of National Social Science Foundation of China (19VHQ012)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 考虑政府采取碳税或碳排放权交易机制两种碳排放政策，基于供应链视角，构建港口与航运企业减排博弈模型，系统分析港航企业减排策略选择和政府碳排放政策选择问题。结果表明：当航运企业减排成本小于港口协助减排成本时，港航企业选择分散决策减排力度最优；反之，选择集中决策减排力度最优。在集中决策情形下，港航供应链减排力度与航运企业减排成本和港口协助减排成本成反比，和市场容量成正比；在分散决策情形下，港口协助减排成本不会影响港航供应链减排力度。在碳定价较低时，港航企业选择分散决策定价最优，选择集中决策利润最优；在碳定价较高时，则相反。无论政府采取何种碳排放政策，港航企业选择集中决策并且政府对港口减排进行补贴，会使港航供应链整体利润与减排力度同时达到最优。在未来碳定价大幅提升的情况下，政府采取碳排放权交易机制推动港航企业减排效果更好。

关键词: 水路运输, 减排策略, 博弈论, 港航企业, 碳税, 碳排放权交易机制

Abstract: Considering the two carbon emission policies that the government currently adopts: carbon tax or carbon trading scheme, this paper proposes the emission reduction game model based on the perspective of supply chain, and analyzes the emission reduction strategy choice for port and shipping enterprises and the government's carbon emission policy choice. The results show that when the cost of emission reduction for shipping enterprises is less than the cost of port, the port and shipping enterprises would choose decentralized decision-making to make the best intensity of emission reduction; otherwise, they would choose centralized decision-making. In centralized decision-making, the intensity of emission reduction of port and shipping supply chain is inversely proportional to the cost of emission reduction of port and shipping enterprises, and proportional to the market capacity. In decentralized decision-making, the cost of emission reduction of port will not affect the intensity of emission reduction of port and shipping supply chain. In the case of lower carbon pricing, if the port and shipping enterprises choose decentralized decision-making, they will get the optimal pricing. And if they choose centralized decision-making, they will get the optimal profit. But in the case of higher carbon pricing, the opposite result will be obtained. Regardless of what carbon emission policy the government adopts, if port and shipping enterprises choose centralized decision-making and the government subsidizes port emission reduction, the overall profit and the emission reduction intensity of port and shipping supply chain will simultaneously reach the optimal values. In the case of a substantial increase in carbon pricing in the future, it is better to adopt carbon trading scheme for government to promote the effect of emission reduction of port and shipping enterprises.

Key words: waterway transportation, emission reduction strategy, game theory, port and shipping enterprises, carbon tax, carbon trading scheme

中图分类号:

U6-9

梁晶, 张霖, 刘禹轩. 考虑碳排放政策的港航企业减排策略研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 39-47.

LIANG Jing, ZHANG Lin, LIU Yu-xuan. Emission Reduction Strategy Research of Port and Shipping Enterprises Considering Carbon Emission Policies[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2023, 23(1): 39-47.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2023.01.005

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2023/V23/I1/39

参考文献

[1] 张丽. 航海碳税与我国航运业绿色发展道路[J]. 中国航海, 2018, 41(1): 113-116. [ZHANG L. Shipping carbon tax and green road of Chinese shipping industry [J]. Navigation of China, 2018, 41(1): 113-116.]

[2] WANG T, WANG X, MENG Q. Joint berth allocation and quay crane assignment under different carbon taxation policies[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2018, 117: 18-36.

[3] TENG Z, LI X, FANG Y, et al. Will port integration help reduce carbon emissions and improve social welfare?[J]. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2021, 2021: 5208046.

[4] 桑高峰, 孟燕萍. 碳税政策下港口与船舶减排决策的博弈分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2019, 39(21): 227-235. [SANG G F, MENG Y P. Game analysis of port and ship decisions on emission reduction under carbon tax policy [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2019, 39(21): 227-235.]

[5] 徐艳, 孟燕萍. 强制减排下政府与港口企业的演化博弈[J]. 中国科学技术大学学报, 2019, 49(9): 762-772. [XU Y, MENG Y P. Evolution game between government and port enterprises under mandatory emission reduction [J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology of China, 2019, 49(9): 762-772.]

[6] CULLINANE K, CULLINANE S. Atmospheric emissions from shipping: The need for regulation and approaches to compliance[J]. Transport Reviews, 2013, 33(4): 377-401.

[7] 周海英, 李伯棠. 碳税与客户低碳偏好下港航企业减排决策分析[J]. 中国航海, 2022, 45(3): 72-79. [ZHOU H Y, LI B T. The ways for port and shipping enterprises to make decision on emission-reduction in the context of carbon tax and client's low carbon preference[J]. Navigation of China, 2022, 45(3): 72-79.]

[8] 朱墨, 真虹, 甘爱平. 碳排放权交易下的班轮船队配置优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2016, 16(1): 202-208, 236. [ZHU M, ZHEN H, GAN A P. Optimization of liner ship fleet mix strategy under emission trading system[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2016, 16(1): 202-208, 236.]

[9] ZHONG H, HU Z, LEUNG T. Carbon emissions reduction in China's container terminals: Optimal strategy formulation and the influence of carbon emissions trading[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 219: 518-530.

[10] YANG L, CAI Y, WEI Y, et al. Choice of technology for emission control in port areas: A supply chain perspective [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 240: 118105.

[11] 王日金, 孟燕萍. 考虑低碳偏好和碳交易的港口减排策略[J]. 上海海事大学学报, 2020, 41(2): 33-38. [WANG R J, MENG Y P. Port emission reduction strategies considering low carbon preference and carbon trading[J]. Journal of Shanghai Maritime University, 2020, 41(2): 33-38.]

[12] 刘家国, 孔玉丹, 镇璐. 考虑双均衡的港航供应链可持续投资研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(3): 142-153. [LIU J G, KONG Y D, ZHEN L. Research on sustainable investment of maritime supply chain considering double equilibrium[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(3): 142-153.]

[13] MA P, WANG H, SHANG J. Contract design for twostage supply chain coordination: Integrating manufacturer-quality and retailer-marketing efforts[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 146 (2): 745-755.

[1]	徐菱, 徐瞳, 江文辉, 肖骅, 张湘虹. 基于货主偏好的中欧班列定价与补贴机制研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 2-9.
[2]	高天航, 徐杏, 吴宏宇, 毕珊珊, 田佳. 考虑托运人行为决策的集装箱港口腹地划分模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 10-16.
[3]	李晓东, 匡海波, 何鸿宇. 政府环境规制下港航系统减排演化博弈研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 17-29.
[4]	李志平, 赵楠, 殷明, 真虹. 基于生产泊位资源共享的港航物流信息系统构建[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 275-283.
[5]	陈德山, 范腾泽, 元海文, 严新平. 内河航运系统监管技术现状与展望[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(6): 1-14.
[6]	刘畅, 张仕泽, 李倍莹, 李波. 考虑对地航速和航向的船舶典型轨迹提取方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(6): 114-123.
[7]	张昊, 陶宁蓉, 杨男. 考虑时变特性的海上溢油事故应急物资调度[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(6): 269-280.
[8]	高攀, 刘顺, 赵旭, 余浩. 绿色通航视域下过坝船舶预约调度双目标优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(5): 293-299.
[9]	董岗, 管敏. “双碳”目标下我国船舶减排技术创新知识图谱分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 43-52.
[10]	杨华龙, 吴艳华, 孙奕伦. 多品种燃油海运库存路径问题鲁棒优化模型与算法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 238-246.
[11]	吕靖, 齐海迪, 李宝德. 基于扩展置信规则库的海盗袭击事件风险预测[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 247-254.
[12]	廖诗管, 翁金贤, 胡甚平. 液化天然气船通航模式下的航道通过能力评价方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 290-297.
[13]	张晓明, 徐芳, 江文辉, 蒋朝哲. 考虑资金约束的中欧班列运价与运量决策分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 30-36.
[14]	靳志宏, 焉红, 王小寒, 邢磊, 徐奇. 滚装甩挂运输牵引车调度优化及作业模式类比分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 142-151.
[15]	李德昌, 杨华龙, 赵帅奇, 郑建风. 排放控制区下集装箱班轮运输船期设计与燃油补给联合优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 273-281.

考虑碳排放政策的港航企业减排策略研究

Emission Reduction Strategy Research of Port and Shipping Enterprises Considering Carbon Emission Policies

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics