考虑收益的航空升舱服务产品动态定价方法

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2023.03.009

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2023, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (3): 76-84.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2023.03.009

• 交通运输业高质量发展策略 • 上一篇下一篇

考虑收益的航空升舱服务产品动态定价方法

赵桂红^*1a, 马晨傲^1a, 赵巧同², 李建伏^1b

1.中国民航大学，a.经济与管理学院，b.计算机科学与技术学院，天津300300；2.维克森林大学，商学院，温斯顿-塞勒姆NC27109,美国

收稿日期:2023-03-06 修回日期:2023-04-11 接受日期:2023-04-14 出版日期:2023-06-25 发布日期:2023-06-22
作者简介:赵桂红(1968-)，女，黑龙江鸡西人，教授
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目 (61103005)

Dynamic Pricing of Airline Upgrade Service Considering Revenue Management

ZHAO Gui-hong^*1a, MA Chen-ao^1a, ZHAO Qiao-tong², LI Jian-fu1^b

1a. School of Economics & Management, 1b. College of Computer Science and Technology, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China; 2. Business College, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem NC 27109, USA

Received:2023-03-06 Revised:2023-04-11 Accepted:2023-04-14 Online:2023-06-25 Published:2023-06-22
Supported by:
Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61103005)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为使升舱服务产品实现旅客和航空公司利益共赢，本文构建旅客与航空公司均衡效用模型，采用Veibull分布函数刻画旅客对特定价格接受概率，并将其嵌入均衡效用模型，得出旅客在不同选择概率下的升舱服务产品价格；同时，为使模型更符合实际，在模型中加入升舱服务产品的价格约束以及座位数约束，并证明在收益最大情况下，升舱服务最优价格一定在其价格约束区间内；最后，通过算例分别分析单一等级舱位升舱和多等级舱位升舱问题，得出两种情况下对不同舱位提供升舱服务产品的最优价格，以及对应动态定价策略下航空公司的收益。研究结果表明：与传统静态定价相比，若航空公司在升舱服务产品定价时考虑旅客需求效用，既能减少航空公司高端舱位的空置率，提高收益，又能使旅客以较低的价格享受升舱服务。此外，相比于单一等级升舱服务产品，多等级升舱服务产品可给航空公司带来更多收益，算例分析表明，航空公司销售两等级升舱服务产品比仅销售单一等级升舱服务产品带来的收益增加39.12%。

关键词: 航空运输, 动态定价, 均衡效用, 升舱服务, 航班收益, Weibull分布

Abstract: In order to achieve a win-win situation for passengers and airlines with upgraded services, a utility model of equilibrium between passengers and airlines is constructed based on the utility equilibrium theory. The Weibull distribution function is used to describe the probability of passengers accepting a specific price. And it is embedded into the equilibrium utility model to obtain the dynamic pricing model of upgrade services. To make the model more realistic, price constraints and seat number constraints are added. And it is proved that the optimal price of upgrade service must be within the price constraint range for profit maximization. Finally, this paper conducts a numerical study on the upgrading of a single class and multiple classes and obtains the optimal price of upgrade services for different classes under the two conditions. The benefits of dynamic pricing strategies for airlines are also calculated. The results show that, compared with the traditional static pricing, if airlines take passenger demand utility into account, it can reduce the vacancy rate of airlines' high-end class seats and improve their revenue, but also enable passengers to enjoy the upgrade service at a lower price. In addition, compared with single-class upgrade services, multi-class upgrade services can bring more benefits to airlines. The example analysis shows that the revenue of airlines selling two-class upgrade services is 39.12% higher than that of selling single-class upgrade services.

Key words: air transportation, dynamic pricing, utility equilibrium, upgrading, flight revenue, Weibull distribution

中图分类号:

F562.6

赵桂红, 马晨傲, 赵巧同, 李建伏. 考虑收益的航空升舱服务产品动态定价方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(3): 76-84.

ZHAO Gui-hong, MA Chen-ao, ZHAO Qiao-tong, LI Jian-fu. Dynamic Pricing of Airline Upgrade Service Considering Revenue Management[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2023, 23(3): 76-84.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2023.03.009

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2023/V23/I3/76

参考文献

[1] Hu R, Xia H, Jiang Y. Complex Dynamics for Airlines’ Price Competition with Differentiation Strategy[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2013, 13(1): 11–16.

[2] Liu C, He R C, Zhou W, et al. Dynamic analysis of airline bidding game based on nonlinear cost[J]. Physica a-Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2021, 565: 125547.

[3] 胡荣, 陈琳, 张菲菲, 等. 考虑碳排放权交易的航空公司动态价格竞争复杂性[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18(1): 6–12. [Hu R, Chen L, Zhang F F, et al. Complexity of airlines’ dynamic price competition with carbon emission trading[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2018, 18(1): 6–12.]

[4] Wittman M D, Belobaba P P. Customized dynamic pricing of airline fare products[J]. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 2018, 17(2): 78–90.

[5] 陈梦曦,田澎,李相勇.考虑旅客选择行为的多舱位等级动态定价研究[J/OL].中国管理科学, (2019-12-12)[2023-02-27], https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.1200. [CHEN M X, TIAN P, LI X Y. A Study on dynamic pricing of multiple class classes considering passenger choice behavior[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Management Science (2019-12-12)[2023-02-27], https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.1200.]

[6] 赵桂红, 王典, 邓珺怡. 航空客票退票费动态定价方法研究——基于效用均衡理论的阐释[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2020(01): 139-142. [ZHAO G H, WANG D, ZHENG J Y. Research on the dynamic Pricing Method of Air Passenger Refund Fee -- Based on the explanation of utility equilibrium theory[J]. Price: Theory & Practice, 2020(01): 139-142.]

[7] Gallego G, Stefanescu C. Upgrades, Upsells and Pricing in Revenue Management[J]. Ssrn Electronic Journal,2009,10.

[8] Li Y, Mahmoudzadeh A, Wang X B. Airlines Seat Pricing with Seat Upgrading[J]. Multimodal Transportation, 2022, 1(4): 100054.

[9] 李豪,彭庆等. 基于需求分类和乘客升级购买行为的航空公司收益管理模型[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2012, 42(23): 32-44. [LI H, PENG Q. An airline revenue management model based on demand classification and upgrade purchase behavior of passengers[J]. Journal of Mathematics in Practice and Theory 2012, 42(23): 32-44.]

[10] 江红,崔悦,冯迪, 等. 基于旅客选择行为的升舱定价研究[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2022(05): 168-171+208. [JIANG H, CUI Y, Feng D, et al. Research on upgrade pricing based on passenger choice behavior[J]. Price: Theory & Practice, 2022(05): 168-171+208.]

[11] 官振中, 史本山. 基于顾客选择模型易逝性产品收益管理订购和定价策略[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2007(9): 47-53. [Guan Z Z, Shi B S. Ordering and pricing policy for perishable commodities revenue management based on consumer choice model[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2007(9): 47-53.]

[12] Nechval N, Purgailis M, Nechval K. Weibull model for dynamic pricing in e-business[C]// Springer/ Conference on e-Business, e-Services, and e-Society . Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2011: 292-304.

[1]	吴维, 林芷伊, 陈旭梅. 基于双层博弈模型的机场间航线网络协同演化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(4): 237-250.
[2]	胡小兵, 杨常澍, 周隽. 复杂城市环境下无人机路网模型研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(4): 251-261.
[3]	彭宏勤, 张国伍. “双碳”目标下高铁与民航高质量发展策略——“交通7+1论坛”第五十九次会议[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(3): 1-5.
[4]	胡小兵, 赵宇勃, 王瑞昕, 吴志冬, 曾志鸿. 基于组合优化的飞机定检任务调度优化方法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(3): 214-222.
[5]	王红勇, 张加豪, 许平. 基于复杂性的多扇区移交策略优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 284-294.
[6]	张勰, 肖恩媛, 刘宏志, 赵嶷飞, 王梦琦. 基于有限穿越可视图的进场航班流量波动特性研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(6): 244-257.
[7]	闫振英, 王宇, 韩宝明, 李晓娟. 基于偏好序的高铁票价与售票时间窗联合优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(5): 164-173.
[8]	温瑞英, 刘文瀚, 王红勇. 编队飞行中基于危险区域的后机最优位置研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(5): 300-308.
[9]	唐小卫, 陈祯, 张生润, 丁叶. 繁忙机场机坪空间构型对航班离港滑行时间的影响[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(5): 309-317.
[10]	韩博, 邓志强, 于敬磊, 石依琳, 于剑. 碳达峰目标下中国民航CO₂与NO_x减排协同效益分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 53-62.
[11]	蒋丽, 杨露, 梁昌勇, 董骏峰. 基于无人机的高层住宅最后“一百米”配送优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 236-245.
[12]	钟罡, 励瑾, 张晓玮, 张洪海. 物流无人机对地风险评估方法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 246-254.
[13]	马剑, 廖伟屹, 陈娟, 王巧, 唐铁桥, 原志路. 基于乘客超越行为建模的航空登机效率分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 255-267.
[14]	张洪海, 冯棣坤, 张晓玮, 刘皞, 钟罡, 张连东. 城市物流无人机起降点布局规划研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 207-214.
[15]	张培文, 杜福民, 汪瑜. 基于链路预测的中小机场连接机制研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 298-304.

考虑收益的航空升舱服务产品动态定价方法

Dynamic Pricing of Airline Upgrade Service Considering Revenue Management

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics