区域综合交通运输需求与产业结构的协整关系分析

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2012, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (6): 10-16.

• 综合交通运输体系论坛 • 上一篇下一篇

区域综合交通运输需求与产业结构的协整关系分析

冯旭杰^1,2，孙全欣*¹，钱堃^1,2，刘明君³

1.北京交通大学交通运输学院，北京 100044；2. 北京交通大学中国综合交通研究中心，北京 100044； 3. 国家发展和改革委员会综合运输研究所，北京 100038

收稿日期:2012-07-04 修回日期:2012-09-13 出版日期:2012-12-25 发布日期:2012-12-29
作者简介:冯旭杰(1985-)，男，山东平度人，博士生.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(71131001)；国家973计划项目课题(2012CB725406).

Cointegration Relationship of Regional Integrated Transport Demand and Industrial Structure

FENG Xu-jie ^1,2,SUN Quan-xin¹,QIAN Kun^1,2, LIU Ming-jun³

1.School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China;  2. Integrated Transport Research Center of China, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 3. Institute of Comprehensive Transportation, National Development and Reform Commission, Beijing 100038, China

Received:2012-07-04 Revised:2012-09-13 Online:2012-12-25 Published:2012-12-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为揭示区域综合交通运输需求与产业结构间的联系，运用协整理论，研究了客货运量与第一、二、三产业间的相互关系.结果表明：上海市综合交通客货运量分别与第二、三产业产值存在长期均衡关系；第一产业的发展不能用来解释客货运输需求的增长；传统的采用单位GDP (Gross Domestic Product)产生的货运量指标预测货运需求已不能完全适用产业发展方向；在10%置信水平下，认为货运量是第三产业产值的Granger原因，且第三产业产值是客运量的Granger原因，客运量对数关于第三产业产值对数的短期弹性为1.15，长期弹性为0.41，采用单位三产产值产生的客运量来预测客运需求是合理的；在25%置信水平下，客运量和第三产业产值互为因果关系，但客运需求对第三产业的促进作用要强于后者对前者的拉动作用，说明交通基础设施建设适度超前对引导经济发展和产业结构调整有显著作用.

关键词: 综合交通运输, 产业结构, 协整理论, Granger因果关系, 误差修正模型

Abstract:

In order to reveal the relationship between regional integrated transport demand and industrial structure, the cointegration theory is adopted. This theory is based on the interaction between freight and passenger traffic volume and the value of primary, secondary, and tertiary industries in Shanghai. The result proves that a long-term equilibrium relationship exists, respectively, between freight/passenger traffic volume and the value of the secondary/tertiary industry. The development of the primary industry does not account for the increase in either passenger transport demand or freight transport demand. The utilization of freight traffic volume per gross domestic product (GDP) to forecast freight transport demand is no longer entirely suitable for the industry that is developing rapidly these days. The freight traffic volume Granger causes the tertiary industry, and the tertiary industry Granger causes passenger traffic volume at a 10% confidence level. Meanwhile, the short-term elasticity of the passenger volume logarithm due to the tertiary industry logarithm is 1.15; whereas the long-term elasticity is 0.41. Thus, it is reasonable to predict passenger transport demand using passenger traffic volume per tertiary industry value. Passenger traffic volume and the tertiary industry have a bidirectional causal relationship at a 25% confidence level. However, the promotion of the tertiary industry to passenger transport demand is stronger than that of the latter to the former, meaning that the modestly leading construction of transport systems would be helpful for the economic development and the structural adjustment of the industry.

Key words: integrated transportation, industrial structure, cointegration theory, Granger causality, error correction model

中图分类号:

TU982

冯旭杰，孙全欣，钱堃，刘明君. 区域综合交通运输需求与产业结构的协整关系分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2012, 12(6): 10-16.

FENG Xu-jie,SUN Quan-xin,QIAN Kun, LIU Ming-jun. Cointegration Relationship of Regional Integrated Transport Demand and Industrial Structure[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2012, 12(6): 10-16.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract18486.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2012/V12/I6/10

参考文献

[1]Engle R F, Granger C W J. Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing [J]. Econometrica, 1987, 55(2): 251-276.

[2]Ramanathan R. The longtermbehaviour of transport performance in India: a cointegration approach [J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2001, 35(4): 309-320.

[3]Dritsakis N. Cointegration analysis of German and British tourism demand forGreece [J]. Tourism Management, 2004, 25(1): 111-119.

[4]Querfelli C. Cointegration analysis of quarterly European tourism demand inTunisia [J]. Tourism Management, 2008, 29(1): 127-137.

[5]Allen D, Yap G, Shareef R. Modelling interstate tourism demand inAustralia: A cointegration approach[J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2009, 79(9): 2733-2740.

[6]Jou R C, Huang W H, Wu Y C, et al. The asymmetric effect on household vehicle ownership in Taiwan: A threshold cointegration approach [J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2012, 46(4): 696-706.

[7]刘建强, 何景华. 交通运输业与国民经济发展的实证研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2002, 2(1): 82-86. [LIU J Q, HE J H. Empirical analysis on the relationship between transportation industry and the national economy [J]. Journal of Transportation System Engineering and Information Technology, 2002, 2(1): 82-86.]

[8]林航飞, 罗宇龙. 上海市公路货运量与经济增长关系的协整分析[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 36(10): 1378-1883. [LIN H F, LUO Y L. Cointegration on relationship of Shanghai road freight traffic volume and economy growth [J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2008, 36(10): 1378-1883.]

[9]中国统计局. 上海统计年鉴2011[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2011. [China Statistical Bureau. Shanghai statistical yearbook [M]. Beijing: China Statistical Press, 2011.]

[10]Pindyck R S, Rubinfeld D L. Econometric models and economic forecasts [M]. New York: McGrawHill Publishing Co., 2000.

[1]	左大杰，肖国胜，王孟云. 产业转移背景下西部运输需求的完全分解模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(5): 15-20.
[2]	冯涛，彭其渊，陶思宇，陈昕梅. 站城融合模式下既有铁路车站城市功能开发体量预测研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(5): 21-28.
[3]	叶菲菲，杨隆浩，王应明，蓝以信. 基于数据包络分析和扩展置信规则库的交通运输业环境治理成本预测[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(3): 20-27.
[4]	周晓晔，崔瑶，何亮，马小云，王思聪. 基于地铁—货车联运的物流配送路径优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(3): 111-117.
[5]	骆晨，李想，钟林峰，胡姗姗. 基于家庭属性差异的大学生出行方式选择行为研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(3): 227-232.
[6]	诸立超，刘昭然. 托运人在不同时空下的选择行为差异揭示[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(1): 27-32.
[7]	项昀，徐铖铖，于维杰，华雪东，王炜. 基于人口迁徙大数据的城市对外交通客运方式优势出行距离研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(1): 241-246.
[8]	申婵，崔洪军. 基于可靠性最短路的实时定制公交线路优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(6): 99-104.
[9]	莫杨辉，张培林，谢羽盟. 新型城镇化与综合交通发展的互动关系计量研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(5): 13-19.
[10]	李珺，杨斌，朱小林. 混合不确定条件下绿色多式联运路径优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(4): 13-19.
[11]	付晓，顾宇，刘志远. 多模式公交网络中考虑定制公交的活动与出行建模[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(4): 20-27.
[12]	彭宏勤，张国伍. 新型城镇化背景下的新区交通规划理论方法探讨 ——“交通7+1论坛”第五十四次会议[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(3): 1-4.
[13]	郭丽彬，李健，张文. 考虑网络外部性航运商与无车承运人竞合研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(3): 11-18.
[14]	栾鑫，程琳，俞微薇，周洁. 综合运输层次下多交通模式的耦合协调性分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(3): 27-33.
[15]	毛保华，曾玮，李佳杰. 一种基于联运产品服务效率的运输收益清算方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(3): 34-40.

区域综合交通运输需求与产业结构的协整关系分析

Cointegration Relationship of Regional Integrated Transport Demand and Industrial Structure

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics