北京新机场站坪滑行道运行模式仿真研究

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2016, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3): 214-220.

北京新机场站坪滑行道运行模式仿真研究

吴浩宁¹，郭雁池²，牧彤¹，李雄*¹

1. 中国民航机场建设集团公司规划设计总院，北京100101；2. 首都机场集团公司北京新机场建设指挥部，北京102600

收稿日期:2015-11-12 修回日期:2015-12-23 出版日期:2016-06-25 发布日期:2016-06-27
作者简介:吴浩宁(1968-)，女，河北人，高级工程师.
基金资助:
国家科技支撑计划项目/The National Key Technologies R&D Program(2014BAJ04B02).

Apron Taxiway Operation Mode and Simulation Evaluation in Beijing New Airport

WU Hao-ning¹, GUO Yan-chi², MU Tong¹, LI Xiong¹

1. Planning and Design Institute, China Airport Construction Group Corporation of CAAC, Beijing 100101, China; 2. Beijing New Airport Construction Headquarters, Capital Airports Holding Company, Beijing 102600, China

Received:2015-11-12 Revised:2015-12-23 Online:2016-06-25 Published:2016-06-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

站坪滑行道是航班进出机位的重要活动区域，其运行顺畅性直接关系到机场的地面运行效率.针对大型机场站坪滑行道的主要运行模式进行了系统分析，以北京新机场“中心放射状”航站楼构型为研究对象，规划了3 种站坪滑行道运行方案，分别为双通道单向运行、设置推出等待机位、三通道两出一进运行方案.应用Simmod 仿真软件对不同站坪滑行道运行方案进行仿真模拟评估.仿真结果表明，3条站坪滑行通道两出一进运行模式的进离港航班地面延误时间最小，较之其他两种运行方案在不同航班量下离港地面延误平均减少约10%~15%.航班地面延误中：离港航班起飞等待延误占比超过50%，夹角区内延误占比约为20%；进港航班跑道穿越导致延误占比约为50%.

关键词: 航空运输, 运行效率, 仿真模拟, 站坪滑行道, Simmod

Abstract:

Apron taxiways are the important active areas for the flight power-in or push-out gate. The smooth operation of the apron is directly related to the ground operation efficiency of the airport. First, the main operating modes of the apron taxiways in large scale airport are systematically analyzed. Then, using Beijing New Airport (BNA) as the research object, three apron taxiway operational patterns are carried out, respectively dual-channel and unidirectional operation pattern (DCU), setting push-out waiting position operation pattern (SPWP), triple-channel with one-in and two-out operation pattern (TC). Finally, Simmod simulation software is operated to construct the computer simulation models for different utilization patterns of apron taxiways. The simulation result shows that the ground delay time of arrival and departure flights in TC operation mode is the least, compared with the other two kinds of operation patterns, the average reduction of the departure ground delay in different flights is about 10%~15%. Departure flights take off waiting delay accounted for more than 50%, the terminal angle area delay accounted for about 20%; arrival flights runway crossing leading to delays accounted for about 50%.

Key words: air transportation, operation efficiency, simulation, apron taxiway, Simmod

中图分类号:

TP391.9
V355

吴浩宁，郭雁池，牧彤，李雄. 北京新机场站坪滑行道运行模式仿真研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2016, 16(3): 214-220.

WU Hao-ning, GUO Yan-chi, MU Tong, LI Xiong. Apron Taxiway Operation Mode and Simulation Evaluation in Beijing New Airport[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2016, 16(3): 214-220.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19211.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2016/V16/I3/214

参考文献

[1] 王晓群. 大型机场航站楼设计要义探究[J]. 建筑创作, 2012 (2): 25-39. [WANG X Q. Essentials for the design of great airport terminal[J]. Archicreation, 2012 (2): 25- 39.]

[2] 张晓全, 刘旭. 机场机坪风险管理研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2011, 7(3): 44-49. [ZHANG X Q, LIU X. Study on risk management of airport apron[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2011, 7(3): 44-49. ]

[3] 刘刚, 朱金福. 机坪安全灰色评价方法[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2008, 43(5): 50-54. [LIU G, ZHU J F. Grey analysis of airport apron safety[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2008, 43(5): 50-54.]

[4] 王洁宁, 王安国, 董健康, 等. 基于Agent的机坪运行服务SPN建模与仿真[J]. 计算机工程, 2013, 39(3): 291- 294. [WANG J N, WANG A G, DONG J K, et al. SPN modeling and simulation for apron operation based on agent[J]. Computer Engineering, 2013, 39(3): 291-294.]

[5] 田晨, 熊桂喜. 基于遗传算法的机场机位分配策略[J]. 计算机工程, 2005, 31(3): 190-192. [TIAN C, XIONG G X. Airport parking-position assignments strategy based on GA[J]. Computer Engineering, 2005, 31(3): 190-192.]

[6] 熊杰, 张晨. 基于飞机滑行油耗的枢纽机场机位分配[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2010, 10(3): 165- 170. [XIONG J, ZHANG C. Airport gate assignment with airplane taxiing cost analysis[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2010, 10(3): 165-170.]

[7] 卫东选, 刘长有, 李雄. 推出冲突避免的机场停机位分配问题[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2012, 42(24): 1-10. [WEI D X, LIU C Y, LI X. Airport gate assign problem with push-out conflict-avoidance[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2012, 42(24): 1-10.]

[8] 王岩华, 朱金福, 朱博, 等. 基于混合集合规划的机位分配约束规划模型[J]. 航空计算技术, 2014, 44(6): 18-21. [WANG Y H, ZHU J F, ZHU B, et al. A constraint programming model of gate assignment based on mixed set programming[J]. Aeronautical Computing Technique, 2014, 44(6): 18-21.]

[9] GILBO E P. Airport capacity: representation, estimation, optimization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 1993, 1(3): 144-154.

[10] NEUFVILLE R D, ODONI A R. Airport systems planning, designs and management[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002.

[11] GAO W, JIANG S Y. Simulation study on closely spaced parallel runway analysis using SIMMOD plus[C]// Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation， Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2010: 344-347.

[12] 郭海琦，朱金福. 近距平行跑道容量及延误水平计算模型[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2008, 8(4): 68-72. [GUO H Q, ZHU J F. Calculation models of capacity and delay for closely spaced parallel runway[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2008, 8(4): 68-72.]

[13] 鱼海洋，胡华清，姚津津. 机场航空容量评估的计算机仿真方法[J]. 空中交通管理, 2009 (2): 21-25. [YU H Y, HU H Q, YAO J J. Computer emulation methods for aviation capacity evaluation of airports[J]. Air Traffic Management, 2009 (2): 21-25.]

[14] HUANG A S, SCHLEICHER D, HUNTER G. Future flight demand generation tool[C]//AIAA 4th Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations (ATIO) Forum, Chicago, IL, USA, 2004-6400.

[1]	张培文, 杜福民, 汪瑜. 基于链路预测的中小机场连接机制研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 298-304.
[2]	王红勇, 郭宇鹏. 基于航空器自主运行的空中交通复杂性建模[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 305-312.
[3]	张洪海, 张连东, 刘皞, 钟罡. 城市低空物流无人机航迹规划模型研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 256-264.
[4]	张魏宁, 胡明华, 杜婧涵, 尹嘉男. 基于条件生成对抗网络的扇区复杂度评估[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 226-233.
[5]	胡荣, 王德芸, 冯慧琳, 刘志昊, 张军峰. 碳达峰视角下的机场航空器碳排放预测[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 257-263.
[6]	李杰, 杨好天, 王兵, 周晓宁, 孙若飞. 民航飞机起飞推力对油耗和排放的影响分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 283-288.
[7]	胡荣, 冯慧琳, 刘博文, 张军峰, 王德芸. 点汇聚系统的航空器污染物减排效应与机理[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(5): 165-173.
[8]	曹炜威，李政，冯项楠. 2000—2018年全国民航网络结构特征及演化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(3): 26-33.
[9]	魏保立，郭成超，邓苗毅. 基于数据驱动的机场水泥混凝土道面性能退化预测[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(3): 247-253.
[10]	谢建平，杨坤，张译颢，张海峰，谢宜斌. 长沙地铁万家丽广场站厅仿真及客流优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(3): 275-281.
[11]	蔡晓禹，吕亮，卢凯明，唐小勇，高志刚. 轨迹数据驱动的单点信号交叉口运行效率评价方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(1): 62-68.
[12]	姜雨，童楚，刘振宇，胡志韬，徐成，张洪海. 基于时间富余度控制的滑行道调度优化模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(1): 207-213.
[13]	张洪海，李翰，刘皞，许卫卫，邹依原. 城市区域物流无人机路径规划[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(6): 22-29.
[14]	盛寅，陈欣，毛亿. 不确定条件下机场群系统均衡配流模型研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(6): 212-218.
[15]	郭野晨风，胡明华，张颖，谢华. 改进的协同航路分配优化模型及算法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(6): 226-232.