基于绩效评价的出租汽车经营模式比较

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2017, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3): 1-6.

• 决策论坛 • 下一篇

基于绩效评价的出租汽车经营模式比较

姚志刚*，耿曙光，王伯卿

长安大学经济与管理学院，西安710061

收稿日期:2016-11-21 修回日期:2017-02-15 出版日期:2017-06-25 发布日期:2017-06-26
作者简介:姚志刚（1974-），男，陕西澄城人，副教授，博士.
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金/National Social Science Foundation of China（16BJY117）；陕西省社会科学基金/ Social Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province（2016D014）；中央高校基本科研业务经费专项资金项目/Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(CHDW2011ZD010, 0009-2014G6235053, 310823170649).

Comparison of Operational Models in Taxi Industry Based on Performance Assessment

YAO Zhi-gang, GENG Shu-guang,WANG Bo-qing

School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710061, China

Received:2016-11-21 Revised:2017-02-15 Online:2017-06-25 Published:2017-06-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

鉴于“公车公营”和“个体挂靠”两种经营模式存在较大争议，采用数据包络分析法(DEA)进行出租汽车企业经营绩效评价，以车辆数、能耗和从业人员数为投入指标，以运营里程和客运量为产出指标，根据投入导向的BCC模型计算陕西省140 家出租汽车企业的规模效率和纯技术效率；以企业绩效值为因变量，经营模式为自变量进行Tobit 回归，发现经营模式对规模效率和纯技术效率均有显著影响；Kruskal-Wallis 检验结果显示，两种经营模式的规模效率差异显著，纯技术效率差异不显著，在既定产出指标下“个体挂靠”企业的规模效率比“公车公营”高4.46%.结果表明，有必要根据不同的政府管制目标分类选择出租汽车经营模式.

关键词: 公路运输, 经营模式, 出租汽车, 数据包络分析, Tobit回归

Abstract:

It is controversial that taxi companies with employment relationship are more efficiency than those with contracting relationship in China. Based on three inputs(vehicle, fuel and staff) and two outputs (mileage, passenger volume) of 140 taxi companies in Shaanxi Province, China, authors compared scale efficiencies and pure technical efficiencies of the two operational models with an input-oriented BCC model of Data Envelopment Analysis. A Tobit regression is implemented to explore that operational model is effect on both scale efficiency and pure technical efficiency of taxi companies significantly. The Kruskal-Wallis test shows that scale efficiency of contracting relationship is 4.46% higher than that of employment relationship. It indicates that contracting relationship is better to pursue scale efficiency than employment relationship for taxi industry in Shaanxi Province, China. There has no better but suitable operational model of taxi industry in each local jurisdiction.

Key words: highway transportation, operational model, taxi, Data Envelopment Analysis, Tobit

中图分类号:

F572

姚志刚，耿曙光，王伯卿. 基于绩效评价的出租汽车经营模式比较[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2017, 17(3): 1-6.

YAO Zhi-gang, GENG Shu-guang,WANG Bo-qing. Comparison of Operational Models in Taxi Industry Based on Performance Assessment[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2017, 17(3): 1-6.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19405.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2017/V17/I3/1

参考文献

[1] YAO Z G, CHENG G. Clustering taxi quantity regulatory degree of capital cities in China[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2012, 12(5)：1-6.

[2] RAWLEY E, SIMCOE T S. Diversification, diseconomies of scope, and vertical contracting[J]. Management Science, 2010, 56 (9)：1534-1550.

[3] SCHNEIDER H. Moral hazard in leasing contracts： Evidence from the New York City taxi industry[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 2010, 53(4)：783-805.

[4] LIANG L, ANDRIS C, RATTI C. Uncovering cabdrivers’behavior patterns from their digital traces[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2010, 34(6)：541-548.

[5] SHERER P D, ROGOVSKY N, WRIGHT N. What drives employment relationships in taxi organizations[J]. Organization Science, 1998, 9(1)：34-48.

[6] SAPPINGTON D E M. Incentives in principal- agent relationships[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1991, 5(2)：45-66.

[7] LAZEAR E P. The new economics of personnel[J]. Labour, 1993, 7(1)：3-24.

[8] BADIN L, DARAIO C, SIMARL. Explaining inefficiency in nonparametric production models： The state of the art[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2014, 214(1)：5- 30.

[9] GEORGIADIS G, POLITIS I, PAPAIOANNOU P. Measuring and improving the efficiency and effectiveness of bus public transport systems[J].91.

[10] LI X, LIU Y, WANG Y, et al. Evaluating transit operator efficiency： An enhanced DEA model with constrained fuzzy-AHP cones[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 2016, 3 (3)：215-225.

[11] SUN DANIEL, CHEN S, ZHANG C. A bus route evaluation model based on GIS and super- efficient data envelopment analysis[J]. Transportation Planning and Technology, 2016, 39(4)：407-423.

[12] CHARNES A, COOPER W W, RHODES E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6)：429-444.

[13] BANKER R D, CHARNESA, COOPER W W, et al. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis[J]. Management Science, 1984, 30(9)：1078-1092.

[14] ODECK J, ALKADI A. The performance of subsidized urban and rural public bus operators： Empirical evidence from Norway[J]. The Annals of Regional Science, 2004, 38(3)：413-431.

[15] 严亚丹, 过秀成, 叶茂. 基于BCC 模型的常规公交线路绩效评估方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2010, 10(4)：143-147. [YAN Y D, GUO X C, YE M. Performance evaluation method of public transit routes based on BCC model[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2010, 10(4)：143-147.].

[16] ODECK J. The effect of mergers on efficiency and productivity of public transport services[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2008, 42(4)：696-708.

[17] COWIE J, ASENOVA D. Organization form, scale effects and efficiency in the British bus industry[J]. Transportation, 1999, 26(26)：231-248.

[18] KARLAFTIS M G. A DEA approach for evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of urban transit systems[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 152 (2)：354-364. [19] GETACHEW A. A growth mixture Tobit model： application to AIDS studies[J]. Journal of Applied Statistics, 2016, 43(7)：1174-1185.

[20] TOBIN J. Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables[J]. Econometrica, 1958, 26 (1)： 24-36.

[21] ASHIM D, ROSS B. A tobit model for analyzing speed limit compliance in work zones[J]. Safety Science, 2014 (70)：367-377. 6

基于绩效评价的出租汽车经营模式比较

Comparison of Operational Models in Taxi Industry Based on Performance Assessment

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王宁, 张佳蕊, 赵姣. 城际零担货运平台车辆路径问题研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 163-177.
[2]	谭二龙, 李宏海, 钟厚岳, 霍恩泽, 马晓磊. 基于轨迹数据的货车自发编队节油潜力估计[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 74-84.
[3]	贾术艳, 宋雨童, 杨紫都. 基于生长曲线函数的货车运营环节碳达峰研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 310-318.
[4]	甘蜜, 卿三东, 刘晓波, 李丹丹. 货车轨迹数据在公路货运系统中应用研究综述[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(5): 91-101.
[5]	李根, 翟伟, 朱兴贝, 杨晟, 邬岚. 侧向碰撞风险对交织区汇合行为的影响[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(4): 204-210.
[6]	李桃迎，王婷，张羽琪. 考虑多特征的高速公路交通流预测模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(3): 101-111.
[7]	袁方，杨轸，周雄峰. 双车道公路弯道半径及回旋线长度对转向行为的影响[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(1): 116-123.
[8]	胡立伟，何越人，李耀平，孟玲，殷秀芬. 基于人工免疫机制的营运货车运行风险评价研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(1): 149-155.
[9]	戢晓峰，吴亚欣，郝京京，房锐，胡澄宇. 平纵组合路段事故严重程度致因辨识模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(6): 197-204.
[10]	程颖，张佳乐，张少君，郭继孚，张达. 大型货运车辆生态驾驶及节油潜力评估[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(6): 253-258.
[11]	段莉珍，栾庆熊，赵鑫. 区域路网货物运输量统计方法改进[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(4): 28-33.
[12]	叶菲菲，杨隆浩，王应明，蓝以信. 基于数据包络分析和扩展置信规则库的交通运输业环境治理成本预测[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(3): 20-27.
[13]	刘昱，吴志新，李孟良，于晗正男，汪洋，贺可勋，安晓盼. 中国乘用车工况构建[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(3): 233-240.
[14]	何永明，裴玉龙，冉斌. 基于智能路钮的超高速公路虚拟轨道系统研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(2): 55-60.
[15]	王海星，王翔宇，王招贤，李学东. 基于数据挖掘的危险货物运输风险驾驶行为聚类分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(1): 183-189.