治理发展模式与城市轨道交通项目运营效率的关系研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在“集约、智能、绿色、低碳”的新型城镇化道路快速发展的影响下，中国很多城市都在大力发展城市轨道交通(以下简称城轨)系统.至关重要的是，城轨系统涉及其运营效率和治理开发模式，其中，治理开发模式对其运营过程将产生深远影响.本文概述了中国很多城轨项目发展所采用的公司化模式及政府和社会资本合作(PPP)模式.在运营效率分析中考虑了城轨项目运营所产生的社会效益，构建了城轨项目社会效益测算模型.应用数据包络分析(DEA)方法分析城轨各条线路治理发展模式和运营效率之间的关系.通过对北京市城轨各条线路运营效率的比较分析，结果表明，社会效益是评价城轨项目运营效率的一个重要产出指标，相比于在中国占主导地位的公司化模式，PPP模式对提高城轨运营效率有积极影响.

关键词: 城市交通, 运营效率, 数据包络分析(DEA), 城市轨道交通, 公司化, 政府和社会资本合作(PPP), 社会效益

Abstract:

Influenced by the rapid development of a new type urbanization path which is intensive, smart, green and low-carbon, many cities in China are striving to develop urban rail transit systems (URTS). It is critical that URTS are concerned with their operational efficiency and the governance development models within which they are developed have a profound impact upon their process of operation. This paper outlines the corporatization model and the Public- Private Partnership (PPP) within which URTS in many cities in China are developed. In the analysis of operational efficiency, the social benefits of URTS are involved, the calculation models of URTS social benefits are presented. The relationship between governance development models and operational efficiency of several urban rail transit lines is analyzed through the application of data envelopment analysis (DEA). By the comparative analysis of operational efficiency of several urban rail transit lines in Beijing, it indicates that, the social benefit is an important indicator to evaluate the operational efficiency of URTS; comparing with the corporatization model which has been predominant in China, PPP has a positive impact upon the improvement of operational efficiency.

Key words: urban traffic, operational efficiency, data envelopment analysis (DEA), urban rail transit, corporatization, Public-Private Partnership (PPP), social benefit

中图分类号:

F572.88

张剑寒. 治理发展模式与城市轨道交通项目运营效率的关系研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2017, 17(5): 16-21.

ZHANG Jian-han. Relationship between Governance Development Models and Operational Efficiency of Urban Rail Transit[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2017, 17(5): 16-21.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19479.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2017/V17/I5/16

参考文献

[1] JAIN P, CULLINANE S, CULLINANE K. The impact of governance development models on urban rail efficiency[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2008, 42(9): 1238-1250.

[2] 刘志钢, 吴强, 何静, 等. 基于DEA方法的城市轨道交通综合效率研究[J]. 铁道运输与经济, 2008, 30(4): 61- 64. [LIU Z G, WU Q, HE J, et al. Study on efficiency of urban rail transit based on DEA[J]. Railway Transport and Economy, 2008, 30(4): 61-64.]

[3] SONG Y, LV C. An empirical study of evaluation of urban rail transit operation efficiency in China[C]// JIA L, LIU Z, QIN Y, ZHAO M, DIAO L, eds. Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Electrical and Information Technologies for Rail Transportation (EITRT2013)- Volume I. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2014: 535- 543.

[4] 周强, 秦菲菲, 吴戈. 基于DEA方法的城市轨道交通系统效率评价研究[J]. 铁道运输与经济, 2014, 36(2): 79-83. [ZHOU Q, QIN F F, WU G. Study on efficiency evaluation of urban rail transit system based on DEA[J]. Railway Transport and Economy, 2014, 36(2): 79-83.]

[5] SCHRANK D, LOMAX T, EISELE B. 2011 Annual urban mobility report[R]. College Station, Texas: Texas Transportation Institute, The Texas A&M University System, 2011.

[6] APTA. Commuter rail: serving America’s emerging suburban/urban economy[R]. Washington, D.C.: American Public Transit Association, 1997.

[7] 陈世勋, 陶小马. 上海城市轨道交通体系社会经济效益估算分析[J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2004, 7(1): 1-5. [CHEN S X, TAO X M. Estimative analysis of the social benefit of Shanghai UMT system[J]. Urban Mass Transit, 2004, 7(1): 1-5.]

[8] 张庆娟. 城市轨道交通成本构成分析——以北京地铁四号线为例[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2010. [ZHANG Q J. The analysis on cost of urban rail transit-with example of Beijing Subway Line 4[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2010.]

[9] 张铁映. 城市不同交通方式能源消耗比较研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2010. [ZHANG T Y. Study on different urban transport modes’ energy consumption[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2010.]

[10] 佟琼, 张晶. 基于外部效应的北京城市轨道交通补贴额度研究[J]. 北京交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 10(2): 40- 46. [TONG Q, ZHANG J. A study on the subsidy amount of Beijing urban rail transit based on the externalities[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University (Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 10(2): 40- 46.]

[11] 张晶. 北京城市轨道交通补贴机制研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2010. [ZHANG J. Study on subsidy mechanism of Beijing urban rail transit[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2010.]

[12] 陆明. 城市轨道交通系统综合效益研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2012. [LU M. Research on comprehensive benefits of urban rail transit system[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2012.]

[13] FARRELL M J. The measurement of productive efficiency[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1957, 120(3): 253-290.

[14] CHARNES A, COOPER W W, RHODES E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6): 429-444.

[15] BANKER R D, CHARNES A, COOPER W W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis[J]. Management Science, 1984, 30(9): 1078-1092.

[16] WANKE P F, BARROS C P. Public- private partnerships and scale efficiency in Brazilian ports: Evidence from two-stage DEA analysis[J]. Socio- Economic Planning Sciences, 2015(51): 13-22.

[17] THANASSOULIS E, DYSON R G, FOSTER M J. Relative efficiency assessments using data envelopment analysis: an application to data on rates departments[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1987, 38 (5): 397-411.