基于时间阈值的旅客登机模型及动态登机策略

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1): 206-213.

基于时间阈值的旅客登机模型及动态登机策略

任新惠^*1，焦阳²，徐小冰³

1. 中国民航大学经济与管理学院，天津 300300；2. 天津中科智能技术研究院，天津 300300； 3. 长沙南方职业学院，长沙 410000

收稿日期:2019-06-27 修回日期:2019-08-25 出版日期:2020-02-25 发布日期:2020-03-02
作者简介:任新惠(1971-)，女，陕西西安人，教授.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金/National Natural Science Foundation of China(U1433111).

Passenger Boarding Model and Dynamic Boarding Strategy Based on Time Threshold

REN Xin-hui¹, JIAO Yang², XU Xiao-bing³

1. College of Economics and Management, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China; 2. Tianjin Intelligent Tech. Institute of Casia, Tianjin 300300, China; 3. Changsha Nanfang Professional College, Changsha 410000, China

Received:2019-06-27 Revised:2019-08-25 Online:2020-02-25 Published:2020-03-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

减少登机时间有利于提高旅客体验和航空公司运行效率，故优化基于旅客行为的登机策略尤为重要. 基于旅客登机过程中两个阶段的延时，建立考虑时间阈值的新登机模型；在干扰时间阈值分布的基础上，通过优化算法分配行李，从而使登机时间最小，进一步得到基于不同行李构成的动态旅客登机策略. 通过元胞自动机仿真和现场模拟实验比较动态登机策略的效率. 结果显示：新登机模型能准确反映登机过程，Steffen 次序具有最大的干扰时间阈值和优化空间；本文提出的动态登机策略可以缩短登机时间，使登机效率显著提高.

关键词: 航空运输, 登机模型, 时间阈值, 元胞自动机, 动态登机策略

Abstract:

The reduction in boarding time can improve the passenger experience and airline operating efficiency. Therefore, it is especially important to optimize the boarding strategy based on passenger behavior. Based on the delay time in two-stage of passenger boarding airplane, this paper establishes a new boarding model considering time threshold. On the basis of the distribution of the interference time threshold, the carried baggage is assigned by the optimization algorithm, so that the boarding time is minimized. Further, a dynamic passenger boarding strategy based on different baggage distribution is obtained. The efficiency of dynamic boarding strategy is compared by cellular automaton simulation and field simulation experiments. The results show that the new boarding model can accurately reflect the boarding process; the Steffen order has the largest interference time threshold and optimization space; and dynamic boarding strategy proposed in this paper can reduce boarding time and significantly increase boarding efficiency.

Key words: air transportation, boarding model, time threshold, cellular automaton, dynamic boarding strategy

中图分类号:

任新惠，焦阳，徐小冰. 基于时间阈值的旅客登机模型及动态登机策略[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(1): 206-213.

REN Xin-hui, JIAO Yang, XU Xiao-bing. Passenger Boarding Model and Dynamic Boarding Strategy Based on Time Threshold[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2020, 20(1): 206-213.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19996.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2020/V20/I1/206

参考文献

[1] NYQUIST D C, MCFADDEN K L. A study of the airline boarding problem[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2008, 14(4):197-204.

[2] JAEHN F, NEUMANN S. Airplane boarding[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, 244(2): 339-359.

[3] MIURA A, NISHINARI K. A passenger distribution analysis model for the perceived time of airplane boarding/deboarding, utilizing an ex-Gaussian distribution[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2017(59): 44-49.

[4] STEFFEN J H. Optimal boarding method for airline passengers[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2008, 14(3): 146-150.

[5] QIANG S, JIA B, HUANG Q, et al. Simulation of free boarding process using a cellular automaton model for passenger dynamics[J]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2018, 91 (1): 257-268.

[6] MILNE R J, KELLY A R. A new method for boarding passengers onto an airplane[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2014, 34(1): 93-100.

[7] MILNE R J, SALARI M. Optimization of assigning passengers to seats on airplanes based on their carry-on luggage[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2016 (54): 104-110.

[8] KIERZKOWSKI A, KISIEL T. The human factor in the passenger boarding process at the airport[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2017(187): 348-355.

[9] 任新惠, 唐少勇, 赵嶷飞. 基于干扰转移的登机新策略 [J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2016, 16(2):146-154. [REN X H, TANG S Y, ZHAO Y F. A new boarding strategy based on the interference transfer[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2016, 16(2): 146-154.]

[10] 任新惠, 焦阳, 赵嶷飞. 考虑行李的多格子元胞自动机登机模型[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2017, 17(4): 122- 129. [REN X H, JIAO Y, ZHAO Y F. Multi- grid cellular automata boarding model considering carried baggages[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2017, 17(4): 122-129.]

[11] MILNE R J, SALARI M, KATTAN L. Robust optimization of airplane passenger seating assignments [J]. Aerospace, 2018(5): 80.

[12] REN X H, XU X B. Experimental analyses of airplane boarding based on interference classification[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2018(71): 55-63.

[1]	张培文, 杜福民, 汪瑜. 基于链路预测的中小机场连接机制研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 298-304.
[2]	王红勇, 郭宇鹏. 基于航空器自主运行的空中交通复杂性建模[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 305-312.
[3]	张洪海, 张连东, 刘皞, 钟罡. 城市低空物流无人机航迹规划模型研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 256-264.
[4]	姚志刚, 殷子娟, 傅宇豪, 汪勇杰. 时间阈值对公交不平等评价结果的影响[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 123-130.
[5]	张魏宁, 胡明华, 杜婧涵, 尹嘉男. 基于条件生成对抗网络的扇区复杂度评估[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 226-233.
[6]	胡荣, 王德芸, 冯慧琳, 刘志昊, 张军峰. 碳达峰视角下的机场航空器碳排放预测[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 257-263.
[7]	李杰, 杨好天, 王兵, 周晓宁, 孙若飞. 民航飞机起飞推力对油耗和排放的影响分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 283-288.
[8]	胡荣, 冯慧琳, 刘博文, 张军峰, 王德芸. 点汇聚系统的航空器污染物减排效应与机理[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(5): 165-173.
[9]	曹炜威，李政，冯项楠. 2000—2018年全国民航网络结构特征及演化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(3): 26-33.
[10]	魏保立，郭成超，邓苗毅. 基于数据驱动的机场水泥混凝土道面性能退化预测[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(3): 247-253.
[11]	陈玲娟，张思琦，马东方. 施工区混行车流跟驰及换道模型研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(2): 58-64.
[12]	姜雨，童楚，刘振宇，胡志韬，徐成，张洪海. 基于时间富余度控制的滑行道调度优化模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(1): 207-213.
[13]	张洪海，李翰，刘皞，许卫卫，邹依原. 城市区域物流无人机路径规划[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(6): 22-29.
[14]	盛寅，陈欣，毛亿. 不确定条件下机场群系统均衡配流模型研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(6): 212-218.
[15]	郭野晨风，胡明华，张颖，谢华. 改进的协同航路分配优化模型及算法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(6): 226-232.