交通出行中个体学习能力的影响分析及其实证

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2009, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2): 75-80 .

交通出行中个体学习能力的影响分析及其实证

贺正冰;马寿峰^*;唐夕庭

天津大学管理学院系统工程研究所，天津 300072

收稿日期:2008-08-06 修回日期:2008-10-09 出版日期:2009-04-25 发布日期:2009-04-25
通讯作者: 马寿峰
作者简介:贺正冰（1982-），男，辽宁省锦州人，博士生.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（70671073）；国家“863”计划项目（2006AA11Z210）.

Empirical Study on the Influence of Learning Ability to Individual Travel Behavior

HE Zheng-bing; MA Shou-feng; TANG Xi-ting

Institute of Systems Engineering, School of Management, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Received:2008-08-06 Revised:2008-10-09 Online:2009-04-25 Published:2009-04-25
Contact: MA Shou-feng

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 学习能力，作为人类区别于其他生命体的重要标志，在出行决策中发挥着重要的作用。为发现学习能力对个体出行规律的重要影响，本文首先根据影响个体出行的各个因素在出行决策中起到的不同作用，将其划分为静态因素与动态因素两类，并着重分析了静态因素中的学习能力对个体出行特征的影响。随后在定性分析的基础上，建立了个体社会经济特征、学习能力、出行行为间三者的结构方程模型(SEM)，并以天津滨海新区城市居民出行调查数据为基础，对模型进行了拟合、评价和修正，最后对模型结果进行了解释, 在一定程度上揭示了个体的社会经济特征及学习能力对个体出行特征的重要影响。

关键词: 学习能力, 出行行为, 结构方程模型, 实证研究

Abstract: Learning ability is a primary symbol, which distinguishes humanity from other creatures and plays an important role in travel decision-making. To explore the major effects of learning ability on travelers’ characteristics, the paper first divides the influence on travel decision-making into static and dynamic factors based on the functions of individual travel behavior factors and analyses the effects on travelers’ characteristics from the aspects of learning ability. Subsequently, qualitative analysis of travel behaviors is conducted. Then, the paper proposes structural equation model (SEM) of individuals’ travel behavior analysis .With the daily travel data derived from Binhai New Area, Tianjin, model estimation, evaluation, and modification are demonstrated. Finally, explanations of the results are presented, which indicates that there is a strong effect of learning ability on travel behavior.

Key words: learning ability, travel behavior, SEM (structural equation model), empirical study

中图分类号:

U491.1

贺正冰,马寿峰,唐夕庭. 交通出行中个体学习能力的影响分析及其实证[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2009, 9(2): 75-80 .

HE Zheng-bing, MA Shou-feng, TANG Xi-ting. Empirical Study on the Influence of Learning Ability to Individual Travel Behavior[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2009, 9(2): 75-80 .

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract17789.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2009/V9/I2/75

参考文献

[1] Kitamura R. Applications of models of activity behavior for activity based demand forecasting[C]. Activity-Based Travel Forecasting Conference: Summary, Recommendations, and Compendium of Papers. Washington, D C: Environmental Protection Agency, 1996: 119-150.

[2] Bowman J L. Activity based travel demand model system with daily activity schedules[D]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA, 1995.

[3] Ben-Akiva M, Bowman J L. Activity-based disaggregate travel demand model system with activity schedules [J]. Transportation Research A, 2001, 35(1); 1-28.

[4] 隽志才, 李志瑶，宗芳. 基于活动链的出行需求预测方法综述 [J]. 公路交通科技, 2005,22(6): 108-113. [JUAN Zhi-cai, LI Zhi-yao, ZONG Fang. A review of activity-based travel demand forecasting method [J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2005,22(6): 108-113]

[5] Golob T.F. Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research[J]. Transportation Research B, 2003, 37(1):1-25.

[6] LU X, PAS E I. A structural equations model of the relationships among socio-demographics, activity participation and travel behavior[J]. Transportation Research A, 1999, 33(1):1-18.

[7] Hu L,Bender P M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification[J]. Psychological Methods, 1998, 3(4): 424-453.

[8] Hu L,Bender P M. Cutof criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives[J]. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, 6(1):1-55.

[9] Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and ggoodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88(3): 588-606

[10] 侯杰泰, 温忠麟, 成子娟. 结构方程模型及其应用[M]. 北京:教育科学出版社, 2004. [HOU Jie-tai, WEN Zhong-lin, CHENG Zi-juan. Structural Equation Model and Its Applications[M]. Beijing Education Science Publishing House,2004.]

[11] Byrne, B. M. A primer of LISREL: Basic Applications and Programming for Confirmatory Factor Analytic Models[M]. New York: Springer-Verlag. 1989.

[12] Kuppam A R., Pendyala R M.. A structural equation analysis of commuters’ activity and travel patterns [J]. Transportation, 2001, 28(1):33-54.

[1]	陈喜群. 网约共享出行研究综述[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(5): 77-90.
[2]	李军，郭育炜，叶威. 基于路段间转移概率的最优路径预测方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(1): 36-40.
[3]	曹奇，任刚，李大韦，朱茂莹，马景峰，宋建华，朱玉霖，何煜洪. 基于出行行为模型的出行感染风险评估 ——以新冠肺炎疫情期间江苏省地区为例[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(6): 63-70.
[4]	刘建荣，郝小妮，石文瀚. 新冠疫情对老年人公交出行行为的影响[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(6): 71-76.
[5]	何保红，李静，王雨佳. 时间社会学视角下老年人对家庭出行行为的影响研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(6): 77-83.
[6]	杨飞，侯宗廷，周涛. 考虑异质性的经典随机后悔最小化模型改进研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(6): 191-196.
[7]	钟异莹，陈坚，邵毅明，李睿. 考虑居住区位的公共交通出行行为分析模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(6): 219-225.
[8]	何保红，梁丽婷，何明卫，何彦. 基于时间地理学的居民活动空间测度方法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(4): 113-118.
[9]	胡松，翁剑成，周伟，林鹏飞，孔宁. 基于关联分析的乘客公共交通依赖度识别方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(4): 136-142.
[10]	孙世超. 考虑乘客情感价值影响的公交忠诚度评价方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(4): 158-165.
[11]	钟异莹，邵毅明，陈坚. 考虑出行环境的居住满意度结构方程模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(1): 130-136.
[12]	陈坚，李睿，傅志妍. 基于UTAUT 的无人驾驶公交乘客接受度模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(6): 38-44.
[13]	王晟由，王倩，邵春福，董春娇，袁毓杰. 都市圈通勤出行行为特性分析与建模[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(5): 35-41.
[14]	傅志妍，陈坚，陈林. 智能手机使用行为对驾驶可靠性的影响模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(5): 114-119.
[15]	朱海燕，关宏志，韩艳，李婉莹，赵磊. 心理因素影响下游客节假日错峰旅游出行行为研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(5): 225-230.