基于计划行为理论的竞争驾驶行为建模0

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2016, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (1): 92-98.

基于计划行为理论的竞争驾驶行为建模0

李鹏飞1，石建军*1，刘小明1,2

1．北京工业大学交通工程北京市重点实验室，北京100124；2．中华人民共和国交通运输部，北京100736

收稿日期:2015-07-17 修回日期:2015-12-07 出版日期:2016-02-25 发布日期:2016-02-25
作者简介:李鹏飞（1989-），男，河南济源人，博士
基金资助:
北京市教育委员会重点项目/Key Projects of Beijing Municipal Education Commission（KZ20151005007）.

Modeling of Competitive Driving Behavior Based on Theory of Planned Behavior

LI Peng-fei1，SHI Jian-jun1，LIU Xiao-ming1,2

（1. Key Laboratory of Traffic Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China; 2. Ministry of Transport of the People's Republic of China, Beijing 100736, China）

Received:2015-07-17 Revised:2015-12-07 Online:2016-02-25 Published:2016-02-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为获取竞争驾驶行为的潜变量因子，分析驾驶员竞争驾驶行为的产生动机.对 225 名驾驶员进行了网上问卷调查，通过主成分分析和验证性因子分析提取竞争驾驶行为的4 个潜变量因子：速度领先、空间占用、路权争夺和空间领先争夺.基于计划行为理论，构建了竞争驾驶意图与行为关系结构方程模型.研究表明，驾驶员的竞争驾驶态度、主观标准、知觉行为控制等心理因素和社会环境外界因素，通过行为意向能够很好地对竞争驾驶行为进行预测.社会环境因素对竞争驾驶意图有显著影响，为驾驶员竞争驾驶行为的矫正提供了有效途径.

关键词: 城市交通, 计划行为理论, 结构方程模型, 竞争驾驶行为, 社会环境

Abstract:

This paper aims to investigate the dimensionality of drivers’behaviors and analyze the motives of competitive driving behavior. Data are collected from a self- reported questionnaire completed by 225 drivers on the internet. Principal component analysis (PCA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) are used to analyze the underlying factor structure. Four latent factors are derived, including speed advantage, space occupation, contention over the right- of- way, and space advantage. Structural equation modeling is established to explain the correlation between drivers’attitude and driving behavior based on Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Results indicate that competitive driving behavior could be predicted by the combination of attitudes, subjective norm, control of perceived behavior, and social environment through the medium of behavior intention. A high correlation between the dimensions of social environment and intention is observed. This is an effective way to rectify the competitive driving behavior.

Key words: urban traffic, theory of planned behavior, structural equation modeling, competitive driving behavior, social environment

中图分类号:

U491

李鹏飞，石建军，刘小明. 基于计划行为理论的竞争驾驶行为建模0[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2016, 16(1): 92-98.

LI Peng-fei，SHI Jian-jun，LIU Xiao-ming. Modeling of Competitive Driving Behavior Based on Theory of Planned Behavior[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2016, 16(1): 92-98.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19145.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2016/V16/I1/92

参考文献

[1] Neuman T R, Pfefer R, Slack K L, et al. Guidance for implementation of the AASHTO strategic highway safety plan[R]. Volume 1: A Guide for Addressing Aggressive- Driving Collisions. NCHRP Report 500. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, 2003.

[2] Reason J, Manstead A, Straling S, et al. Errors and violations on the roads: A real distinction?[J].Ergonomics, 1990, 33(10-11): 1315-1332.
[3] Lawton R, Parker D, Stradling S, et al. Predicting road traffic accidents: The role of social deviance and violations[J]. British Journal of Psychology, 1997,88(2):249-262.
[4] Mesken J, Lajunen T, Summala H. Interpersonal violations, speeding violations and their relation to
accident involvement in Finland[J]. Ergonomics, 2002,45(7): 469-483.
[5] Blockey L, Hartley L. Aberrant driving behavior: errors and violations[J]. Ergonomics, 1995, 39(9): 1759-1771.
[6] 骆勇. 道路交通中的攻击性驾驶行为分析与研究[D].西南交通大学，2009. [LUO Y. Analysis and research of aggressive driving behavior at the road traffic[D].Southwest Jiaotong University, 2009.]
[7] Ajzen I. Theory of planned behavior[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2):179-211.
[8] Parker D, Manstead A S R, Stradling S G, et al.Determinants of intentions to commit driving violations[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1992,24(2): 117-131.
[9] Ulleberg P, Rundmo T. Personality, attitudes and risk perception as predictors of risky driving behaviour among young drivers[J]. Safety Science, 2003, 41(5):427-443.
[10] Iversen H, Rundmo T. Attitudes towards traffic safety,driving behavior and accident involvement among the Norwegian public[J]. Ergonomics, 2004, 47(5): 555-572.
[11] 赵晨鹰. 青年攻击性驾驶行为的成因研究[J]. 青年研究, 2003(12): 27-31. [ZHAO C Y. Research factor of youth aggressive driving behavior[J]. Youth Studies,2003(12): 27-31.]
[12] 李凤芝，李昌吉，龙云芳等. 汽车驾驶员攻击性驾驶行为的心理因素分析[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2004,35(4): 568- 570. [LI F Z, LI C J, LONG Y F, et al.Psychological factors analysis aggressive drivingbehavior of the vehicle driver[J]. Journal of SichuanUniversity (Medical Sciences Edition), 2004, 35(4): 568-570.]
[13] McGarva A R, Steiner M. Provoked driver aggression and status: A field study[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2000,3(3):167-179.
[14] 韦华, 张伟. 中美两国汽车驾驶安全影响因素研究[J].中国安全科学学报, 2004, 14(9):24-28. [WEI H,ZHANG W. Study on factors determining driving safety in China and the US[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2004, 14(9): 24-28.]
[15] Shinar D. Aggressive driving: the contribution of the drivers and the situation[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 1998, 1 (2):
137–160.
[16] Shinar D, Compton R. Aggressive driving: An observational study of driver, vehicle, and situational variables[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2004, 36(3), 429–437.

[17] 郑忆石. 论文化素质与人格塑造[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 1998(02): 39-44. [ZHENG Y S. Quality of culture and shaping of character[J]. Journal of Renmin University of China, 1998(02): 39-44.]
[18] 刘靖炜，刘爱书. 大学生竞争态度与大五人格关系的研究[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2008, 16(4): 382-385.[LIU J W, LIU A S. The relationship between competition attitude and big five personality of undergraduates[J]. China Journal of Health Psychology,2008, 16(4): 382-385.]