环境约束下的中国航空企业环境效率研究

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2017, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3): 243-248.

• 案例分析 • 上一篇

环境约束下的中国航空企业环境效率研究

张军峰^a，方虹^*a，方思然^b

北京航空航天大学a. 经济管理学院；b. 实验学校，北京100191

收稿日期:2016-07-28 修回日期:2016-10-18 出版日期:2017-06-25 发布日期:2017-06-26
作者简介:张军峰（1984-），男，山东滨州人，博士生.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金/National Natural Science Foundation of China（71420107025，71273022）；北京市哲学社会科学基金重大项目/Beijing Philosophy and Social Sciences Major Project（15ZDA49，12JGB061）.

Environmental Efficiency of China’s Airlines under Environmental Constrains

ZHANG Jun-feng ^a，FANG Hong ^a，FANG Si-ran ^b

a. School of Economics and Management; b. Experimental School, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China

Received:2016-07-28 Revised:2016-10-18 Online:2017-06-25 Published:2017-06-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

航空运输企业发展带来的环境问题成为人们关注的焦点.本文从环境约束治理视角，运用SBM-DEA非期望产出模型研究中国航空企业2012—2014 年环境效率，并借助Tobit 模型分析了影响环境效率的主要因素.结果表明，2012—2014 年期间，整体上中国航空企业环境效率呈现出递减的趋势，并且航空企业之间的环境效率差距在逐年拉大. 另外，Tobit 回归分析结果得出当期环境规制与航空企业环境效率显著负相关，而研发投入、航班客座率、货邮运载率、净利润率、滞后1 期环境规制与航空企业环境效率显著正相关.最后，我们从挖掘航空企业自身节能减排潜力、研发投入角度给出了中国航空企业环境效率改进的政策建议.

关键词: 航空运输, 环境效率, SBM-DEA模型, Tobit模型, 环境约束

Abstract:

The rapid development of air transportation brings serious environmental concerns. Under environmental constrains, using SBM-DEA model with undesirable outputs researches on the environmental efficiency of China's airlines from 2012 to 2014 and influencing factors of environmental efficiency are then explored using a Tobit mode. The results show that, during 2012 to 2014, the environmental efficiency of China's airlines show a decreasing trend. And the gap of environmental efficiency among airlines is enlarging year by year. In addition, the regression results show that environmental regulation had a passive effect on environmental efficiency of airlines in China. R&D investment/load factor/goods delivery rate and net profit rate / environmental regulation (-1) have a positive effect on environmental efficiency of airlines in China. Finally, combined with the research results of this paper, the author puts forward the suggestions from the points of mining the potential of energy saving and emission reduction in airlines and R&D investment.

Key words: air transportation, environmental efficiency, SBM- DEA mode, Tobit mode, environmental constrains

中图分类号:

张军峰，方虹，方思然. 环境约束下的中国航空企业环境效率研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2017, 17(3): 243-248.

ZHANG Jun-feng，FANG Hong，FANG Si-ran. Environmental Efficiency of China’s Airlines under Environmental Constrains[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2017, 17(3): 243-248.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19439.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2017/V17/I3/243

参考文献

[1] CUI Q, LI Y. Evaluating energy efficiency for airlines: An application of VFB-DEA[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2015(44-45): 34-41.

[2] ARUL S G. Methodologies to monetize the variations in load factor and GHG emissions per passenger-mile of airlines[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2014(32): 411-420.

[3] MORRELL P. The potential for European aviation CO2 emissions reduction through the use of larger jet aircraft[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2009, 15(4): 151-157.

[4] MIYOSHI C, MERKERT R. Changes in carbon efficiency, unit cost of firms over time and the impacts of the fuel price- an empirical analysis of major European airlines[C]. In: Proceedings of the 14th Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) World Conference, Porto, 2010, Portugal.

[5] ZOU B, ELKE M, HANSEN M, et al. Evaluating air carrier fuel efficiency in the US airline industry[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2014, 59(1): 306-330.

[6] WITHERS M R, MALINA R, GILMORE C K, et al. Economic and environmental assessment of liquefied natural gas as a supplemental aircraft fuel[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2014(66): 17-36.

[7] TONE K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 130(3): 498-509.

[8] TOBIN J. Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables[J]. Econometrica, 1958, 26(1): 24- 36.

[9] JAFFE A, PETERSON S R, PORTNEV P, et al. Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing: What does the evidence tell us?[J]. Journal of Economic Literature 1995, 33(1)：132-163.

[10] ANDERSON D. Technical progress and pollution abatement: An economic view of selected technologies and practices[J]. Environment and Development Economics, 2001, 6(3): 283-311.

[11] HONG S, ZHANG A. An efficiency study of airlines and air cargo/passenger divisions: a DEA approach[J]. World Review of International Transportation Research, 2010, 3(3): 137-149.

[1]	张培文, 杜福民, 汪瑜. 基于链路预测的中小机场连接机制研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 298-304.
[2]	王红勇, 郭宇鹏. 基于航空器自主运行的空中交通复杂性建模[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 305-312.
[3]	张洪海, 张连东, 刘皞, 钟罡. 城市低空物流无人机航迹规划模型研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 256-264.
[4]	张魏宁, 胡明华, 杜婧涵, 尹嘉男. 基于条件生成对抗网络的扇区复杂度评估[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 226-233.
[5]	胡荣, 王德芸, 冯慧琳, 刘志昊, 张军峰. 碳达峰视角下的机场航空器碳排放预测[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 257-263.
[6]	李杰, 杨好天, 王兵, 周晓宁, 孙若飞. 民航飞机起飞推力对油耗和排放的影响分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 283-288.
[7]	胡荣, 冯慧琳, 刘博文, 张军峰, 王德芸. 点汇聚系统的航空器污染物减排效应与机理[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(5): 165-173.
[8]	曹炜威，李政，冯项楠. 2000—2018年全国民航网络结构特征及演化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(3): 26-33.
[9]	魏保立，郭成超，邓苗毅. 基于数据驱动的机场水泥混凝土道面性能退化预测[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(3): 247-253.
[10]	姜雨，童楚，刘振宇，胡志韬，徐成，张洪海. 基于时间富余度控制的滑行道调度优化模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(1): 207-213.
[11]	张洪海，李翰，刘皞，许卫卫，邹依原. 城市区域物流无人机路径规划[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(6): 22-29.
[12]	盛寅，陈欣，毛亿. 不确定条件下机场群系统均衡配流模型研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(6): 212-218.
[13]	郭野晨风，胡明华，张颖，谢华. 改进的协同航路分配优化模型及算法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(6): 226-232.
[14]	姜雨，胡志韬，童楚，刘振宇，陈丽丽，张洪海. 面向航班延误的停机位实时指派优化模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(5): 185-190.
[15]	强生杰，黄青霞. 新型客机座舱环境下的旅客登机效率研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(4): 209-215.

环境约束下的中国航空企业环境效率研究

Environmental Efficiency of China’s Airlines under Environmental Constrains

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics