中国—东盟综合交通优势度与区域经济耦合协调

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2018, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (5): 26-31.

• 综合交通运输体系论坛 • 上一篇下一篇

中国—东盟综合交通优势度与区域经济耦合协调

陈小红^{* 1, 2a}，张协奎 ^{1, 2a, 2b}，陈诗淼³，张练^2b

1. 中国—东盟区域发展协同创新中心，南宁 530004；2. 广西大学 a. 土木建筑工程学院， b. 商学院，南宁 530004；3. 武汉大学经济与管理学院，武汉 430072

收稿日期:2018-06-11 修回日期:2018-08-06 出版日期:2018-10-25 发布日期:2018-10-26
作者简介:陈小红(1982-)，女，湖南常德人，博士后.
基金资助:
中国—东盟区域发展协同创新中心科研专项和教育部长江学者和创新团队发展计划联合资助/ Special Research Fund of China-ASEAN Collaborative Innovation Center for Regional Development and Development Program of Ministry of Education for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Teams (CWZD201510).

The Coupling Relationship between Integrated Transport Superiority and Regional Economic Performance in China-ASEAN

CHEN Xiao-hong^{1, 2a}, ZHANG Xie-kui^{1, 2a, 2b}, CHEN Shi-miao³, ZHANG Lian^2b

1. China-ASEAN Collaborative Innovation Center for Regional Development, Nanning 530004, China; 2a. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2b. Business School, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China; 3. Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China

Received:2018-06-11 Revised:2018-08-06 Online:2018-10-25 Published:2018-10-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

综合交通优势度与区域经济发展之间存在耦合关系，以中国—东盟为研究区域，选取综合交通网络密度、基础设施质量水平、综合交通可达性等指标，构建综合交通优势度多属性决策模型.运用ArcGIS网络分析技术，定量分析综合交通网络的地域空间特征；进一步解析综合交通优势度与经济发展的耦合协调机制，分析两者的空间发展格局.结果显示：综合交通优势度区域差异明显，但与区域经济耦合度较高，且呈正相关关系；综合交通优势度与区域经济的协调发展度差异显著，且大部分国家综合交通基础设施建设质量水平相对落后，综合交通优势度普遍处于较低发展水平，对区域经济发展的支撑力不足.

关键词: 交通运输经济；综合交通优势度；耦合协调度；多属性决策；区域经济；中国&mdash, 东盟

Abstract:

There is a coupling between integrated transport superiority and regional economic. Based on provincial-level panel data, this study takes China-ASEAN as a case and its 11 counties as basic unit for analysis. Choosing 3 indexes, including integrated transport network density, infrastructure construction quality level, integrated transport accessibility, constitute the multiple attribute decision making model to evaluate integrated transport superiority degree firstly. Then, by utilizing GIS technology, this paper studies spatial characteristic of integrated transport network in China-ASEAN. The results show that: the spatial distribution patterns of transport superiority and regional economic performance are coherent, and there are positive relations between them in China-ASEAN; the level of coordinated development between integrated transport and regional economic is obviously different. Moreover, the quality level of comprehensive transportation infrastructure in most countries is relatively backward, and the comprehensive traffic superiority is generally in a low development level and its supporting effect for economic development is not yet fully.

Key words: transportation economy, integrated transport superiority, spatial coupling coordination, multiple attribute decision making, regional economic performance, China-ASEAN

中图分类号:

U113

陈小红，张协奎，陈诗淼，张练. 中国—东盟综合交通优势度与区域经济耦合协调[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18(5): 26-31.

CHEN Xiao-hong, ZHANG Xie-kui, CHEN Shi-miao, ZHANG Lian. The Coupling Relationship between Integrated Transport Superiority and Regional Economic Performance in China-ASEAN[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2018, 18(5): 26-31.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19691.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2018/V18/I5/26

参考文献

[1] 陆建人. 当前中国—东盟合作面临的新挑战与对策 [J]. 广西大学学报(哲学社会版), 2013, 35(4): 1-4, 10. [LU J R. China-ASEAN cooperation's new challenges and countermeasures of China-ASEAN cooperation[J]. Journal of Guangxi University (Philosophy and Social Science), 2013, 35(4): 1-4, 10.]

[2] 金凤君, 王成金, 刘秀伟. 中国区域交通优势的甄别方法及应用分析[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(8): 787-798. [JIN F J, WANG C J, LIU X W. Discrimination method and its application analysis of regional transport superiority[J]. ACTA Geographical Sinica, 2008, 63(8): 787-798.]

[3] 黄晓燕, 曹小曙, 李涛. 海南省区域交通优势度与经济发展关系 [J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(6): 985-999. [HUANG X Y, CAO X S, LI T. The relationship between regional transport superiority and regional economic performance on Hainan[J]. Geographical Research, 2011, 30(6): 985-999.]

[4] GUTIERREZ J, URBANO P. Accessibility in the European Union: Theimpact of the trans-European road network[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 1996, 4(1): 15-25.

[5] GUTIERREZ J, GONZALEZ R, GOMEZ G. The European high speed train network：predicted effects on accessibility patterns[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 1996, 4(4): 227-238.

[6] 曹小曙, 薛德升, 闫小培. 中国干线公路网络连接的城市通达性[J]. 地理学报, 2005, 60(6): 903-910. [CAO X S, XUE D S, YAN X P. A study on the urban accessibility of national trunk highway system in China[J]. ACTA Geographical Sinica, 2005, 60(6): 903-910.]

[7] 金凤君, 王姣娥. 20世纪中国铁路网扩展及其空间通达性 [J]. 地理学报, 2004, 59(2): 293-302. [JIN F J, WANG J E. Railway network expansion and spatial accessibility analysis in China:1906-2000[J]. ACTA Geographical Sinica, 2004, 59(2): 293-302.]

[8] 蒋海兵, 徐建刚, 祁毅. 京沪高铁对区域中心城市陆路可达性影响[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(10): 1287-1298. [JIANG H B, XU J G, QI Y. Functional division research of railway network system along the BeijingShanghai railway[J]. ACTA Geographical Sinica, 2010, 65(10): 1287-1298.]

[9] 孟德友, 陆玉麒. 高速铁路对河南沿线城市可达性及经济联系的影响[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(5): 537-543. [MENG D Y, LU Y Q. Impact of high-speed railway on accessibility and economic linkage of cities along the railway in Henan province, China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2011, 31(5): 537-543.]

[10] 杨忍, 徐茜, 余昌达. 中国县域交通优势度与农村发展空间协同性及影响机制解析[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36 (7): 1017-1025. [YANG R, XU Q, YU C D. Spatial coupling cooperative analysis of transport superiority and rural development in China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016, 36(7): 1017-1025.]

[11] 孟德友, 沈惊宏, 陆玉麒. 中原经济区县域交通优势度与区域经济空间耦合[J]. 经济地理, 2012, 32(6): 7-14. [MENG D Y, SHEN J H, LU Y Q. Spatial coupling between transportation superiority and economy in central plain economic zone[J]. Economic Geography, 2012, 32(6): 7-14.]

[12] 陈博文, 陆玉麒, 柯文前, 等. 江苏交通可达性与区域经济发展水平关系测色——基于空间计量视角[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(12): 2283-2294. [CHEN B W, LU Y Q, KE W Q, et al. Analysis on the measuring of the relationship between transportation accessibility and level of regional economic growth in Jiangsu: Based on spatial econometric perspective[J]. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(12): 2283-2294.]

[13] 辑晓峰, 郝京京, 陈方. 综合运输可达性与物流经济的空间分异及耦合[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2015, 15(5): 24- 31. [JI X F, HAO J J, CHEN F. Spatial differentiation and coupling between integrated transport accessibility and logistics economy[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2015, 15(5): 24-31.]

[14] 何敏, 郭宏宇, 竺彩华. 基础设施互联互通对中国东盟贸易的影响——基于引力模型和边界效应模型的研究[J]. 国际经济合作, 2015(9): 56-63. [HE M, GUO H Y, ZHU C H. The impact of infrastructure interconnection on China-ASEAN trade—Based on gravity model and boundary effect model[J]. International Economic Cooperation, 2015(9): 56-63.]

[15] 徐泽水. 不确定多属性决策方法及应用[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2004. [XU Z S. Uncertain multiple attribute decision making methods and applications[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2004. ]

中国—东盟综合交通优势度与区域经济耦合协调

The Coupling Relationship between Integrated Transport Superiority and Regional Economic Performance in China-ASEAN

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李杰梅, 高丽, 祁婧洁, 尹琪. 腹地-口岸可达性格局演化及其空间溢出效应分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 29-36.
[2]	关伟，吴建军，高自友. 交通运输网络系统工程[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(6): 9-21.
[3]	戈佳威，王学锋，万征，黄天荣. 世界集装箱海运网络社团结构研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(6): 231-236.
[4]	王莹，刘岭，王家康. 高速铁路网络化客流分配方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(1): 111-117.
[5]	王莹，韩宝明，张琦，卢恺. 基于复杂网络的高速铁路运输服务网络重构模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2017, 17(1): 136-142.
[6]	孙杨，刘星材，景春光，宋瑞，聂婷婷. 不确定需求下轨道交通网络的鲁棒性优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2015, 15(4): 181-186.
[7]	王国明，李夏苗，邹华鹏. 城市群道路网络上交通流的演化分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2014, 14(2): 7-12.
[8]	刘承良，段德忠. 武汉城市圈城乡路网空间生长的分形研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2013, 13(5): 185-193.