一种基于联运产品服务效率的运输收益清算方法

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2019, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 34-40.

• 综合交通运输体系论坛 • 上一篇下一篇

一种基于联运产品服务效率的运输收益清算方法

毛保华^*，曾玮，李佳杰

北京交通大学综合交通运输大数据应用技术交通运输行业重点实验室，北京 100044

收稿日期:2018-12-19 修回日期:2019-02-02 出版日期:2019-06-25 发布日期:2019-06-25
作者简介:毛保华(1963-)，男，湖南祁阳人，教授，博士.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金/National Natural Science Foundation of China(71390332，71621001).

A Profit Allocation Model Based on Service Efficiency of Multimodal Transport

MAO Bao-hua, ZENG Wei, LI Jia-jie

Key Laboratory of Transport Industry of Big Data Application Technologies for Comprehensive Transport, Ministry of Transport, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China

Received:2018-12-19 Revised:2019-02-02 Online:2019-06-25 Published:2019-06-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

既有多式联运收益清算一般按照各方式运输距离及费率确定，未充分考虑运输时间效率和外部性(如碳排放)对于联运服务竞争力的影响，导致收益清算与联运服务竞争力的分离，限制了联运服务的发展.本文据此提出了基于各方式运输时间效率及碳排放的收益清算方法，该方法考虑了各方式运输时间及运输时间比例的变化，并通过权重系数来满足不同联运环境下收益清算的需要“. 渝新欧”多式联运的实例结果表明，本文方法可提高运输效率较高、绿色低碳方式的收益占比，如当公路时间不变，铁路运输时间由目前的 14.9 d缩短至 9.0 d时，其收益由 95.0%提升至 98.9%.运输时间及其比例的权重系数案例显示，其他条件一定时，不同的权重系数下铁路的收益占比相差约3%，因此需根据实际联运环境确定合理的权重系数.

关键词: 综合交通运输, 多式联运, 收益清算, 运输时间效率, 碳排放

Abstract:

The profit allocation of multimodal transportation is generally determined according to transportation distance and rate of each mode. However, the impact of transportation time efficiency and externality (such as carbon emission) on the competitiveness of multimodal services is not fully considered. As a result, the profit allocation and service competitiveness are separating, and then limiting the development of multimodal services. Therefore, this paper proposed a profit allocation model based on transportation time efficiency and carbon emission, which considered the effect of transportation time and its ratio on profit allocation simultaneously. Weight coefficient was adopted to meet the needs of profit allocation in different situations. The case study of Yuxinou multimodal transportation shows that the proposed method improves the proportion of profit with high transportation efficiency and green low- carbon mode. For example, when road transportation time remains unchanged and railway transportation time shortens from the current 14.9 days to 9.0 days, the proportion of railway profit increases from 95.0% to 98.9%. The transportation time and its weighting coefficient of proportion shows that when other conditions remain unchanged, the profit ratio of railway differs about 3% under different weight coefficients. Therefore, a reasonable weighting coefficient should be determined according to the actual multimodal situation.

Key words: integrated transportation, multimodal transport, profit allocation, transportation time efficiency, carbon emission

中图分类号:

毛保华，曾玮，李佳杰. 一种基于联运产品服务效率的运输收益清算方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(3): 34-40.

MAO Bao-hua, ZENG Wei, LI Jia-jie. A Profit Allocation Model Based on Service Efficiency of Multimodal Transport[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2019, 19(3): 34-40.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19832.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2019/V19/I3/34

参考文献

[1] 周明华, 李楠. 多式联运协同服务系统的设计与实现 [J]. 交通信息与安全, 2010, 28(2): 65-69, 73. [ZHOU M H, LI N. Design and implementation of multi-model transport cooperated information system[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2010, 28(2): 65- 69, 73.]

[2] 宋炳良. 国际集装箱多式联运与东部港口竞争力分析 [J]. 中国航海, 2003(3): 63-66. [SONG B L. Analysis of international multi- modal transportation and eastern coastal ports competitiveness[J]. Navigation of China, 2003(3): 63-66.]

[3] 唐继孟. 我国集装箱公铁联运争力分析及其提升策略研究 [D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2018. [TANG J M. Competitiveness of rail- road intermodal transport and its improving strategies in China[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2018.]

[4] 汪原也, 郭杨, 吴国强. 基于时间成本分析多式联运在中美洲航线的优势[J]. 水运管理, 2014, 36(11): 16- 19. [WANG Y Y, GUO Y, WU G Q. Analysis of the advantage of multi- modal transportation in central America service based on transport time cost[J]. Shipping Management, 2014, 36(11): 16-19.]

[5] JANIC M. An assessment of the performance of the European long intermodal freight trains (LIFTS) [J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2008, 42(10): 1326-1339.

[6] FAHIMNIA B, REISI M, PAKSOY T, et al. The implications of carbon pricing in Australia: An industrial logistics planning case study[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2013(18): 78-85.

[7] 许奇, 何天健, 毛保华. 我国铁路集装箱多式联运现状与发展[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18(6): 194-200. [XU Q, HO T K, MAO B H. The development and current status of railway container intermodal transport in China[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2018, 18(6): 194-200.]

[8] 张德超. 基于 Shapley值的多式联运收益分配研究[J]. 交通科技与经济, 2015, 17(6): 35-40. [ZHANG D C. The benefit assignment mechanism research on multimodal transport based on Shapley value[J]. Technology & Economy in Areas of Communications, 2015, 17(6): 35-40.]

[9] LIN B, LIU C, WANG H, et al. Modeling the railway network design problem: A novel approach to considering carbon emissions reduction[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2017(56): 95-109.

[10] NORDHAUS WILLIAM D. Revisiting the social cost of carbon[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2017, 114(7): 1518-1523.

[1]	冯芬玲, 孙楠佳. 考虑时间价值的中非多式联运路径与出海港选择[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 45-53.
[2]	姜晓红, 陈莎, 张毅. 物流企业碳排放总量与效率测算方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 313-321.
[3]	张英贵, 肖杨, 雷定猷, 陆强. 长大货物多式联运网络风险传播动力学仿真[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 14-23.
[4]	胡荣, 王德芸, 冯慧琳, 刘志昊, 张军峰. 碳达峰视角下的机场航空器碳排放预测[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 257-263.
[5]	贾术艳, 宋雨童, 杨紫都. 基于生长曲线函数的货车运营环节碳达峰研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 310-318.
[6]	左大杰，肖国胜，王孟云. 产业转移背景下西部运输需求的完全分解模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(5): 15-20.
[7]	冯涛，彭其渊，陶思宇，陈昕梅. 站城融合模式下既有铁路车站城市功能开发体量预测研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(5): 21-28.
[8]	叶菲菲，杨隆浩，王应明，蓝以信. 基于数据包络分析和扩展置信规则库的交通运输业环境治理成本预测[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(3): 20-27.
[9]	周晓晔，崔瑶，何亮，马小云，王思聪. 基于地铁—货车联运的物流配送路径优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(3): 111-117.
[10]	徐龙，王力，刘莹，宋国华，李晨旭，翟志强. 基于多源数据的公交车能耗碳排放测算模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(3): 174-181.
[11]	骆晨，李想，钟林峰，胡姗姗. 基于家庭属性差异的大学生出行方式选择行为研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(3): 227-232.
[12]	李振宇，廖凯，崔占伟，刘洋. 缓解城市交通拥堵的CO2减排效益评估方法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(2): 8-12.
[13]	诸立超，刘昭然. 托运人在不同时空下的选择行为差异揭示[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(1): 27-32.
[14]	项昀，徐铖铖，于维杰，华雪东，王炜. 基于人口迁徙大数据的城市对外交通客运方式优势出行距离研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(1): 241-246.
[15]	申婵，崔洪军. 基于可靠性最短路的实时定制公交线路优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(6): 99-104.

一种基于联运产品服务效率的运输收益清算方法

A Profit Allocation Model Based on Service Efficiency of Multimodal Transport

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics