考虑不对称性的地铁旅客支付及受偿意愿研究

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1): 97-103.

考虑不对称性的地铁旅客支付及受偿意愿研究

陈欣^{a, b}，罗霞^{*a, b}，刘春禹^{a, b}，刘永红^{a, b}

西南交通大学a. 交通运输与物流学院; b. 综合交通运输智能化国家地方联合工程实验室, 成都 611756

收稿日期:2019-09-12 修回日期:2019-11-01 出版日期:2020-02-25 发布日期:2020-03-02
作者简介:陈欣（1993-），男，山东菏泽人，博士生.
基金资助:
中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司科研项目/ Technological Research and Development Program of China Eryuan Engineering Group(KYY2018057(18-19)).

Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept Asymmetry of Subway Passengers

CHEN Xin ^{a, b}, LUO Xia ^{a, b}, LIU Chun-yu ^{a, b}, LIU Yong-hong ^{a, b}

a. School of Transportation and Logistics; b. National United Engineering Laboratory of Integrated and Intelligent Transportation, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China

Received:2019-09-12 Revised:2019-11-01 Online:2020-02-25 Published:2020-03-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

支付意愿与受偿意愿是交通评价及服务水平优化的关键输入参数，但现有关于地铁系统的研究及实证多未考虑两者间的不对称性. 针对这一问题，依托成都地铁旅客路径选择SP 数据，基于非集计模型，构建并标定了对称同质偏好、不对称同质偏好、对称异质偏好、不对称异质偏好等异构模型；分别从个体及总体水平求解，对比换乘走行时间、换乘等待时间、换乘次数和拥挤乘车时间的支付意愿与受偿意愿. 结果表明，受偿意愿与支付意愿的不对称性在总体水平大小及个体间异质性方面皆有体现，参数分布假设对不对称异质偏好模型支付意愿与受偿意愿求解结果影响明显.

关键词: 城市交通, 不对称性, 非集计模型, 支付意愿, 受偿意愿, SP调查

Abstract:

Willingness to pay (WTP) and Willingness to accept (WTA) are important input parameters for transit system service optimization and evaluation. However, the existing researches and demonstrations on the subway system have not considered the asymmetry between these two parameters. This paper based on the SP route choice survey data dedicated to Chengdu Metro. Based on discrete choice method, variation models are established and estimated, such as symmetrical non- heterogeneity model, asymmetrical non- heterogeneity model, symmetrical heterogeneity model, asymmetrical heterogeneity model. Individual and overall level WTP and WTA indicators of four attributes derived from above-mentioned models are compared. The results show that the asymmetry between the willingness to pay and the willingness to accept are reflected in both size of overall level and population heterogeneity. The parameter distribution hypothesis of asymmetrical heterogeneity model has an obvious influence on the WTP and the WTA estimation.

Key words: urban traffic, asymmetry preference formation, discrete choice model, willingness to pay, willingness to accept, stated preference experiments

中图分类号:

U293.5

陈欣，罗霞，刘春禹，刘永红. 考虑不对称性的地铁旅客支付及受偿意愿研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(1): 97-103.

CHEN Xin, LUO Xia, LIU Chun-yu, LIU Yong-hong. Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept Asymmetry of Subway Passengers[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2020, 20(1): 97-103.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19981.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2020/V20/I1/97

参考文献

[1] KAHNEMAN D, TVERSKY A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk[M]//Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I, 2013.

[2] HESS S, ROSE J M, HENSHER D A. Asymmetric preference formation in willingness to pay estimates in discrete choice models[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2008, 44(5): 847-863.

[3] DE BORGER B, FOSGERAU M. The trade-off between money and travel time: A test of the theory of referencedependent preferences[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2008, 64(1): 101-115.

[4] MASIERO L, MAGGI R. Accounting for WTP/WTA discrepancy in discrete choice models: Discussion of policy implications based on two freight transport stated choice experiments[M]//Freight Transport Modelling, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2013: 187-203.

[5] LIU K, XU Y. Route choice behavior: Understanding the impact of asymmetric preference on travelers' decision making[J]. Symmetry, 2019, 11(1): 66.

[6] 朱海, 罗霞, 陈欣, 等. 基于异构模型的铁路出发旅客衔接时间价值[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18 (6): 95-101. [ZHU H, LUO X, CHEN X, et al. Value of access travel time for railway departure passengers based on variation structure models[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2018, 18(6): 95-101.]

[7] BATARCE M, MUÑOZ J C, ORTÚZAR J D D. Valuing crowding in public transport: Implications for costbenefit analysis[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2016, 91: 358-378.

[8] 房德威, 何东坡, 王立峰, 等. 城市轨道交通车厢内拥挤成本的估计方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2018, 18 (6): 121-130. [FANG D W, HE D P, WANG L F, et al. Estimation method of crowding cost in urban rail transit carriages[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(6): 121-130.]

[9] 陈治亚, 文邦彦, 晏秀娟, 等. 基于社会福利最大化的 PPP模式下城市轨道交通票价优化[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2018, 15(9): 2423-2431. [CHEN Z Y, WEN B Y, YAN X J, et al. Optimal ticket pricing of urban railway transit with Public- Private Partnership aiming at maximum welfare[J] Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2018, 15(9): 2423-2431.]

[10] DE BORGER B, PROOST S. Reforming transport pricing in the European Union: A modelling approach [M]. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2001.

[11] BJÖRKLUND G, SWÄRDH J- E. Estimating policy values for in-vehicle comfort and crowding reduction in local public transport[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2017, 106: 453-472.

[12] DI X, LIU H X. Boundedly rational route choice behavior: A review of models and methodologies[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2016, 85: 142-179.

[13] TRAIN K E. Discrete choice methods with simulation [M]. Cambridge University Press, 2009.

[14] HAIR J F, BLACK W C, BABIN B J, et al. Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition[M]. Pearson Higher Ed, 2013.

[1]	刘晓冰, 李奉孝, 田欣妹, 闫学东. 基于通勤模式的都市圈中心结构判别研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 17-28.
[2]	许奇, 陈越, 黄靖茹, 高顺祥, 张志健. 考虑出行费用的就业可达性分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 37-44.
[3]	刘春禹, 刘永红, 罗霞, 朱颖. 混合交通流环境下单交叉口自动驾驶车辆轨迹优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 154-162.
[4]	张小雨, 邵春福, 王博彬, 黄士琛. 新冠疫情影响下居民共享出行方式选择行为研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 186-196.
[5]	李欣, 戴章, 李怀悦, 胡笳. 基于连续近似模型的轨道交通与常规公交耦合优化设计[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 206-213.
[6]	郝妍熙, 刘戎阳, 胡华, 方勇, 刘志钢. 单向通道行人-自行车混合流建模及自组织现象研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 223-229.
[7]	赵传林, 贺少松, 孙淑敏, 王钰涵. 基于理性疏忽理论的交通疏散网络双层优化模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 239-246.
[8]	陈小红, 蓝秋雨. 不确定交通需求下交叉口信号配时区间优化模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 247-256.
[9]	李冰, 王正辉, 马铭炜, 杨鸿宇, 冯悦. 信号交叉口行人二次过街下右转车通行能力与延误估计模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 257-267.
[10]	朱彤, 秦丹, 董傲然, 杜雨萌, 魏雯. 公交驾驶员违规类型同交通事故间的关联分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(2): 322-329.
[11]	毛保华, 王敏, 何天健, 陈海波. 城市公共交通服务水平研究回顾和展望[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 2-13.
[12]	王子甲, 贾慧慧, 朱亚迪, 陈峰. 基于智能卡数据的轨道与公交复合网络通勤方式选择行为研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 67-73.
[13]	贾斌, 朱凌, 李树凯, 刘家林. 城市轨道交通小交路计划与客流控制协同优化策略[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 124-132.
[14]	牟振华, 汪寒冰, 林本江, 陈逸群, 金程程, 陈艳艳. 基于演化博弈的违章停车动态罚金策略效用仿真评价[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 152-162.
[15]	贾富强, 李引珍, 杨信丰, 马昌喜, 代存杰. 基于演化博弈的政府鼓励条件下共享停车行为分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 163-170.