出行即服务环境下个体出行链碳足迹监测与评估

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2023.02.003

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2023, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (2): 22-31.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2023.02.003

• 综合交通运输体系论坛 • 上一篇下一篇

出行即服务环境下个体出行链碳足迹监测与评估

李文翔¹，程佳楠¹，刘向龙^*2,3，穆凯^2,3，蔡近近¹，刘魏巍¹

1. 上海理工大学，管理学院，上海 200093；2. 交通运输部科学研究院，北京 100029； 3. 城市公共交通智能化交通运输行业重点实验室，北京 100029

收稿日期:2023-01-27 修回日期:2023-03-01 接受日期:2023-03-10 出版日期:2023-04-25 发布日期:2023-04-18
作者简介:李文翔(1992- )，男，江西赣州人，副教授，博士
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(52002244)；上海市晨光计划(20CG55)；城市公共交通智能化交通运输行业重点实验室开放课题(2021-APTS-01)

Monitoring and Assessing Carbon Footprint of Individual Trip Chain in Environment of Mobility as a Service

LI Wen-xiang¹, CHENG Jia-nan¹, LIU Xiang-long^*2,3, MU Kai^2,3, CAI Jin-jin¹, LIU Wei-wei¹

1. Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China; 2. China Academy of Transportation Sciences, Beijing 100029, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Advanced Public Transportation Science, Beijing 100029, China

Received:2023-01-27 Revised:2023-03-01 Accepted:2023-03-10 Online:2023-04-25 Published:2023-04-18
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (52002244)；Shanghai Chenguang Program (20CG55)；Open Funds for Key Laboratory of Advanced Public Transportation Science (2021-APTS-01)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在我国“碳达峰”“碳中和”战略目标下，科学准确地监测和评估个体出行碳足迹是推动城市交通低碳转型的基础，但同时也面临着巨大的挑战。因此，借助出行即服务(Mobility as a Service, MaaS)平台的数据开放与共享，旨在提出MaaS环境下城市个体出行链碳足迹监测与评估方法。首先，设计基于MaaS平台的城市交通碳源监测指标体系，实现对个体出行链多模式交通特征的提取与融合；然后，分别建立针对机动车和轨道交通出行的碳排放计算模型，计算不同交通方式的出行段碳排放，累加得到个体全链出行碳足迹；最后，以小汽车出行为基准线情景，评估个体出行链碳减排量。对在北京市采集的1865条出行链数据进行实例分析，结果显示：以小汽车、常规公交、轨道交通及非机动车为主导的出行链的平均人公里碳排放量分别为 0.2380，0.0310，0.0390，0.0017 kg · pkm^-1，相对基准线的平均人公里减碳量分别为 0.029，0.220，0.230，0.280 kg·pkm-1；出行链人公里碳减排量与出行链中绿色出行比例正相关；对MaaS平台车辆电动化可使得减碳效益提高52.5%。

关键词: 城市交通, 碳足迹监测, 数据分析, 出行即服务, 出行链

Abstract: Under China's strategic goal of "carbon peaking and carbon neutrality", scientific and accurate monitoring and evaluation of the carbon footprint of individual travel is the basis for promoting the low-carbon transformation of urban transportation, but it also faces great challenges. Therefore, based on the data openness and sharing of the Mobility as a Service (MaaS) platform, a carbon footprint monitoring and evaluation method for urban individual trip chains in the MaaS environment is proposed. Firstly, we designed an urban transportation carbon source monitoring index system based on the MaaS platform and realized the extraction and integration of multi-modal transportation characteristics of users' individual trip chains. Then, we established the carbon emission calculation models for trips by private motor vehicles and rail transit, respectively, and the carbon emissions of different transportation modes are calculated and then added up to obtain the carbon footprint of individual complete trip chains. Finally, the carbon emission reduction of the individual trip chain was evaluated by using the baseline scenario of car trips. The case analysis of 8424 travel sections collected in Beijing shows that the average person-kilometer carbon emissions of the trip chain dominated by motor vehicles, buses, rail, and non-motor vehicles are 0.238 kg · pkm- 1 , 0.031 kg · pkm- 1 ,0.039 kg · pkm-1 , and 0.0017 kg · pkm-1 , respectively, and the average person-kilometer carbon reduction to the baseline is 0.029 kg · pkm-1 , 0.22 kg · pkm-1 , 0.23 kg · pkm-1 , and 0.28 kg · pkm-1 , respectively. The carbon emission reduction of person-kilometers in the trip chain is positively correlated with the proportion of green travel in the trip chain. Electrifying vehicles on MaaS platforms could increase carbon reduction benefits by 52.5%.

Key words: urban traffic, carbon footprint monitoring, data analysis, mobility as a service, trip chain

中图分类号:

U121

李文翔, 程佳楠, 刘向龙, 穆凯, 蔡近近, 刘魏巍. 出行即服务环境下个体出行链碳足迹监测与评估[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(2): 22-31.

LI Wen-xiang, CHENG Jia-nan, LIU Xiang-long, MU Kai, CAI Jin-jin, LIU Wei-wei. Monitoring and Assessing Carbon Footprint of Individual Trip Chain in Environment of Mobility as a Service[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2023, 23(2): 22-31.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2023.02.003

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2023/V23/I2/22

参考文献

[1] BECKER H, BALAC M, CIARI F, et al. Assessing the welfare impacts of shared mobility and Mobility as a Service (MaaS) [J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2020, 131: 228-243.

[2] LI F, CAI B, YE Z, et al. Changing patterns and determinants of transportation carbon emissions in Chinese cities[J]. Energy, 2019, 174: 562-575.

[3] LI W X, BAO L, LI Y, et al. Assessing the transition to low-carbon urban transport: A global comparison[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2022, 180: 106179.

[4] BARLA P, MIRANDA-MORENO L F, LEE-GOSSELIN M. Urban travel CO2 emissions and land use: A case study for Quebec City[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2011, 16(6): 423-428.

[5] FAN J L, WANG J X, LI F Y, et al. Energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions of urban passenger transport in the internet era: A case study of Beijing[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 165: 177-189.

[6] STOKENBERGA A, SCHIPPER L. Trends in transport activity, energy use, and carbon footprint in Mexico city, Mexico[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2012 (2287): 105-112

[7] LI W X, BAO L, WANG L Q, et al. Comparative evaluation of global low-carbon urban transport[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, 143: 14-26.

[8] NYHAN M, SOBOLEVSKY S, KANG C, et al. Predicting vehicular emissions in high spatial resolution using pervasively measured transportation data and microscopic emissions model[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2016, 140: 352-363.

[9] LIU J L, HAN K, CHEN X Q, et al. Spatial-temporal inference of urban traffic emissions based on taxi trajectories and multi-source urban data[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2019, 106: 145-165.

[10] 韩印, 李媛媛, 李文翔, 等. 基于轨迹数据的网约车排放时空特征分析[J].交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 234-242. [HAN Y, LI Y Y, LI W X, et al. Analyzing spatiotemporal characteristics of ridesourcing emissions based on trajectory data[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(1): 234-242.]

[11] 茅佳庆, 吴志周. 面向长三角一体化的MaaS平台构设[J]. 交通科技, 2021, (3): 119-123. [MAO J Q, WU Z Z. MaaS platform for Yangtze River delta integration[J]. Transportation Science & Technology, 2021(3): 119- 123.]

[12] MCGUCKIN N，MURAKAMI E. Examining trip-chaining behavior: Comparison of travel by men and women[J]. Transportation Research Record, 1999, 1693(1): 79-85.

[13] 李荔, 张洁, 赵秋月, 等. 基于 COPERT 模型的江苏省机动车时空排放特征与分担率[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39 (9): 3976-3986. [LI L, ZHANG J, ZHAO Q Y, et al. Vehicle exhaust emission characteristics and their contributions in Jiangsu province[J]. Environmental Science, 2018, 39(9): 3976-3986.]

[14] NTZIACHRISTOS L, SAMARAS Z. Methodology for the calculation of exhaust emissions[R]. Denmark: European Environment Agency, 2018.

[15] 林晓丹, 吕彬, 田良, 等. 基于LCA 的北京市公交车节能及温室气体减排潜力分析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2015, 35(2): 576-584. [LIN X D, LÜ B, TIAN L, et al. Analysis of energy conservation and greenhouse gas emissions reduction potential of buses in Beijing city based on life cycle assessment[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2015, 35(2): 576-584.]

[16] 北京市生态环境局. 百度低碳出行项目设计文件[EB/OL]. (2020-11-30) [2023-03-22]. http: //sthjj.beijing. gov. cn/bjhrb/index/xxgk69/sthjlyzwg/ydqhbh/10904800/ 2020121408540347470.pdf. [Beijing Municipal Ecology and Environment Bureau. Baidu low carbon travel project design document [EB/OL]. (2020-11-30) [2023- 03-22]. http: //sthjj. beijing. gov. cn/bjhrb/index/xxgk69/ sthjlyzwg/ ydqhbh/ 10904800/ 2020121408540347470. pdf.]

[17] European Environment Agency. EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook [EB/OL]. (2020-09-25) [2023-03-22]. https: //www. eea. europa. eu/themes/air/ air-pollution-sources-1/emep-eea-air-pollutant-emission�inventory-guidebook/emep.

出行即服务环境下个体出行链碳足迹监测与评估

Monitoring and Assessing Carbon Footprint of Individual Trip Chain in Environment of Mobility as a Service

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	周雨阳, 王沛钰, 陈艳艳. 考虑自我呈现与环保意识的出行方式选择行为异质性分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(3): 30-38.
[2]	陈坚, 李兆康, 周涛, 刘柯良, 孙琴梅. 基于用户均衡的双模式接驳公交一体化布局优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(3): 56-65.
[3]	谢东繁, 罗钰超, 周广京, 余亚鹏, 王永兴, 赵小梅. 考虑电池退化的单线路电动公交全生命周期运营规划优化策略[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(3): 66-75.
[4]	杜鹏, 何思乐. 基于空间杜宾模型的城市轨道交通车站周边商业地产价格分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(3): 94-100.
[5]	苏跃江, 温惠英, 袁敏贤, 吴德馨, 漆巍巍. 基于集成学习和居民属性数据的出行方式预测模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(3): 153-160.
[6]	贺鹏, 李雯茜, 李妍, 许奇. 建成环境对轨道交通客流非线性影响的空间特征[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(3): 187-194.
[7]	赵雪亭, 胡立伟. 城市交通拥塞因子时空变化特征及源解析研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(3): 300-310.
[8]	陈坚, 张弛, 傅志妍, 刘柯良. 社交网络信息对出行行为的影响研究综述[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(2): 1-10.
[9]	金盛, 苏弘扬, 张静. 融合出行拓扑与序列分析的车辆时空出行模式挖掘[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(2): 40-53.
[10]	赵雪亭, 胡立伟. 基于典型耦合优化算法的城市交通拥塞点源反演识别研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(2): 74-83.
[11]	姚雅慧, 张戎. 基于轨迹数据的货车停车目的识别方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(2): 92-99.
[12]	李想, 晏启鹏, 骆晨. 空间异质性建成环境对地铁与公交换乘客流的影响[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(2): 100-110.
[13]	孙会君, 冯宗旭, 郑汉坤. 考虑地铁运营中断下多站协同的接驳公交优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(2): 111-120.
[14]	刘翔, 陈小鸿, 田茗舒. 成长性视角下建成环境对轨道交通站点客流影响分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(2): 121-127.
[15]	郑乐, 高良鹏, 陈学武. 基于多源数据的地铁公交换乘量影响因素与空间异质性分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(2): 128-138.