L3级自动驾驶车辆两阶段预警对接管绩效影响研究

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2025.05.003

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (5): 40-49.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2025.05.003

L3级自动驾驶车辆两阶段预警对接管绩效影响研究

吴付威^1a,1b，杨慧^1a，马勇^*1b，崔同川^1a，闫晟煜^1a，张智²

1. 长安大学，a.汽车学院，b.汽车运输安全保障技术交通运输行业重点实验室，西安710018；2. 空军工程大学，航空工程学院，西安710086

收稿日期:2025-06-30 修回日期:2025-08-20 接受日期:2025-09-01 出版日期:2025-10-25 发布日期:2025-10-25
作者简介:吴付威(1986—)，男，山东临沂人，高级工程师，博士。
基金资助:
陕西省重点研发计划项目(2025CY-YBXM-064)；长安大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(300102225501)。

Impact of Two-stage Warning on Takeover Performance of L3 Autonomous Vehicles

WU Fuwei^1a,1b, YANG Hui^1a, MA Yong^*1b, CUI Tongchuan^1a, YAN Shengyu^1a, ZHANG Zhi²

1a. School of Automobile, 1b. Key Laboratory of Transportation Industry of Automotive Transportation Safety Enhancement Technology, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710018, China; 2. Aviation Engineering School, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an 710086, China

Received:2025-06-30 Revised:2025-08-20 Accepted:2025-09-01 Online:2025-10-25 Published:2025-10-25
Supported by:
Key R&D Project in Shaanxi Province(2025CY-YBXM-064)；Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, CHD (300102225501)。

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究L3级自动驾驶车辆两阶段预警方式对接管绩效的影响，本文基于三自由度驾驶模拟器开展高速公路接管场景下的自动驾驶接管试验。首先，招募并采集25名被试的接管行为数据；其次，分析不同接管方式（单阶段和两阶段）和预警时间间隔(2，3，4s)对接管时间、换道完成时间、方向盘最大转角、最大纵向减速度以及越线时刻时距的影响；最后，基于以上指标建立基于熵权法的模糊综合评价模型，对不同接管模式的接管绩效进行量化分析。结果表明：与单阶段接管模式相比，两阶段接管预警方式下驾驶人接管车辆的时间显著缩短，换道完成时间显著降低，越线时刻时距显著增大。在接管请求时间为5s的前提下，两阶段预警中2s的预警时间间隔可以使驾驶人获取情景意识并接管，3s的预警时间间隔已能有效改善车辆的横向稳定性。与2s和3s预警时间间隔相比，预警时间间隔为4s时，换道完成时间缩短6.7%和9.6%，最大纵向减速度降低64.1%和56.4%，差异显著。模糊综合评价中，预警时间间隔为4s的两阶段接管模式得分最高，接管绩效更优。研究结论能够为两阶段预警在L3级自动驾驶车辆接管过程的应用提供一定的理论参考。

关键词: 智能交通, 接管绩效, 驾驶模拟试验, 两阶段接管, 预警时间间隔, 接管行为

Abstract: To investigate the impact of two-stage warning method on takeover performance in Level 3 autonomous vehicles, the takeover experiments of autonomous driving were conducted on a highway takeover scenario by using a three-degree-of-freedom driving simulator. First, the data on takeover behavior was collected from 25 participants. Second, the impacts from different takeover methods (single-stage and two-stage) and warning time intervals (2, 3, 4 s) were analyzed on takeover time, lane change completion time, maximum steering wheel angle, maximum longitudinal deceleration, and time-to-crossing distance in this study. Finally, based on these metrics, a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model using the entropy weight method was established to quantitatively assess the takeover performance of different takeover modes. The results indicate that compared to the single-stage takeover mode, the two-stage takeover warning method significantly reduces the time for a driver to take over his/her vehicle, the lane change completion time, and significantly increases the time-distance at the moment of lane crossing. On the premise that the takeover request time is 5 seconds, a 2-second warning time interval in the two-stage warning allows a driver to gain situational awareness and take over, while a 3-second warning time interval is already sufficient to effectively improve the lateral stability of vehicles. Compared to 2-second and 3-second warning intervals, the 4-second warning interval reduced lane change completion time by 6.7% and 9.6%, respectively, and decreased maximum longitudinal deceleration by 64.1% and 56.4%, respectively, with significant differences. In the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, the two-stage takeover mode with a 4-second warning time interval scored the highest, demonstrating superior takeover performance. The research conclusions provide theoretical references for the application of two-stage warning in the takeover process of Level 3 autonomous vehicles.

Key words: intelligent transportation, takeover performance, driving simulation testing, two-stage takeover, warning time interval; takeover behavior

中图分类号:

U491.25

吴付威, 杨慧, 马勇, 崔同川, 闫晟煜, 张智. L3级自动驾驶车辆两阶段预警对接管绩效影响研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(5): 40-49.

WU Fuwei, YANG Hui, MA Yong, CUI Tongchuan, YAN Shengyu, ZHANG Zhi. Impact of Two-stage Warning on Takeover Performance of L3 Autonomous Vehicles[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2025, 25(5): 40-49.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2025.05.003

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2025/V25/I5/40

参考文献

[1] 赵晓华,陈浩林,李振龙,等.不同情景下自动驾驶接管行为的影响特征[J]. 中国公路学报,2022,35(9): 195-214. [ZHAO X H, CHEN H L, LI Z L, et al. Influence characteristics of automated driving takeover behavior in different scenarios[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 35(9): 195-214.]

[2] 马小翔,陈丰,张霖.预期接管场景下接管绩效及接管风险研究[J].中国公路学报,2022, 35(1): 159-168. [MA X X, CHEN F, ZHANG L. Research on takeover performance and takeover risk under the expected takeover scenario[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 35(1): 159-168.]

[3] 吴超仲,吴浩然,吕能超.人机共驾智能汽车的控制权切换与安全性综述[J].交通运输工程学报,2018,18(6): 131-141. [WU C Z, WU H R, LV N C. A review of control transfer and safety in human-machine co-piloted intelligent vehicles[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(6): 131-141.]

[4] HUNGUND A P, PRADHAN A K. Impact of non-driving related tasks while operating automated driving systems (ADS): A systematic review[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2023, 188: 107076.

[5] WANDTNER B, SCHÖMIG N, SCHMIDT G. Effects of non-driving related task modalities on takeover performance in highly automated driving[J]. Human Factors, 2018, 60(6): 870-881.

[6] 王丹,林业.警告刺激对驾驶员接管性能的影响机理研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2024,24(1):106-114. [WANG D, LIN Y. A study on the mechanism of warning stimuli affecting driver takeover performance[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2024, 24(1): 106-114.]

[7] 王文军,李清坤,曾超,等.自动驾驶接管绩效的影响因素、模型与评价方法综述[J].中国公路学报,2023, 36(9): 202-224. [WANG W J, LI Q K, ZENG C, et al. A review of factors, models, and evaluation methods affecting the performance of autonomous driving takeover[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2023, 36(9): 202-224.]

[8] LEE S, HONG J, JEON G, et al. Investigating effects of multimodal explanations using multiple in-vehicle displays for takeover request in conditionally automated driving[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 96: 1-22.

[9] PETERMEIJER S, DOUBEK F, DE W J. IEEE international conference on systems man and cybernetics conference proceedings[C]. Canada: IEEE, 2017: 1505-1510.

[10] GEITNER C, BIONDI F, SKRYPCHUK L, et al. The comparison of auditory, tactile, and multimodal warnings for the effective communication of unexpected events during an automated driving scenario[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 65: 23-33.

[11] YUN H, YANG J H. Multimodal warning design for take-over request in conditionally automated driving[J]. European Transport Research Review, 2020, 12: 1-11.

[12] YANG W, WU Z, TANG J, et al. Assessing the effects of modalities of takeover request, lead time of takeover request, and traffic conditions on takeover performance in conditionally automated driving[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(9): 7270.

[13] 林庆峰,王兆杰,鲁光泉.城市道路环境下自动驾驶车辆接管绩效分析[J]. 中国公路学报,2019,32(6):240-247. [LIN Q F, WANG Z J, LU G Q. Performance analysis of autonomous vehicle takeover in urban road environments[J]. Journal of Chinese Highway Engineering, 2019, 32(6): 240-247.]

[14] ROCHE F, BRANDENBURG S. Should the urgency of visual-tactile takeover requests match the criticality of takeover situations?[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2019, 5(2): 306-313.

[15] WU H, WU C, LYU N, et al. Does a faster takeover necessarily mean it is better? A study on the influence of urgency and takeover-request lead time on takeover performance and safety[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2022, 171: 106647.

[16] CHEN H, ZHAO X, LI Z, et al. Study on the influence factors of takeover behavior in automated driving based on survival analysis[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 95: 281-296.

[17] GONG J, GUO X, QI C, et al. Measuring takeover performance in different driving scenarios: considering the influence of non-driving-related tasks and takeover request lead time[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 97: 411-421.

[18] TAN X, ZHANG Y. The effects of takeover request lead time on drivers' situation awareness for manually exiting from freeways: A web-based study on level 3 automated vehicles[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2022, 168: 106593.

[19] MA S, ZHANG W, YANG Z, et al. Takeover gradually in conditional automated driving: The effect of two-stage warning systems on situation awareness, driving stress, takeover performance, and acceptance[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2021, 37 (4), 352-362.

[20] HASEGAWA K, WU Y B, KIHARA K. Two-stage transition procedure reduces potential hazards on planned transitions in automated driving[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 107: 924-936.

[21] ZHANG W, ZENG Y L, YANG Z, et al. Optimal time intervals in two-stage takeover warning systems with insight into the drivers' neuroticism personality[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, 12: 601536.

[22] 郭烈,胥林立,秦增科,等.自动驾驶接管影响因素分析与研究进展[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2022, 22(2): 72-90. [GUO L, XU L L, QIN Z K, et al. Analysis and overview of influencing factors on autonomous driving takeover[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(2): 72-90.]

[23] PFLEGING B, RANG M, BROY N. Proceedings of the 15th international conference on mobile and ubiquitous multimedia[C]. Rovaniemi: University of Oulu, 2016: 91-99.

[24] ZHANG J, ZHANG Z, ZHANG T R, et al. Effects of time interval and request modality on driver takeover responses: Identifying the optimal time interval for two-stage warning system[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2025, 215: 108008.

[25] ZHANG Y, MA Q, QU J, et al. Effects of driving style on takeover performance during automated driving: Under the influence of warning system factors[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2024, 117: 104229.

[26] 章薇.L3自动驾驶接管过程中两阶段预警的有效性验证及优化探究[D]. 杭州:浙江理工大学,2021. [ZANG W. Validation and optimization of two-stage warning in L3 autonomous driving takeover process[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, 2021.]

L3级自动驾驶车辆两阶段预警对接管绩效影响研究

Impact of Two-stage Warning on Takeover Performance of L3 Autonomous Vehicles

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	田大新, 肖啸, 周建山. AI驱动的自动驾驶汽车轨迹预测方法综述[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(5): 1-24.
[2]	程国柱, 王文志, 杨子涵, 汪国鹏, 陈永胜, 顾爽. 网联自动驾驶车辆专用车道设置研究综述[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(5): 25-39.
[3]	窦雪萍, 杨明慧, 熊杰. 考虑自适应控制点的自动驾驶公交运行优化方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(5): 50-58.
[4]	宋浪, 胡晓伟, 俞山川, 安实. 网联自动驾驶环境下交叉口车道分配与车辆轨迹协同优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(5): 59-71.
[5]	王殿海, 王奕飞, 黄宇浪, 刘泳, 曾佳棋. 车牌识别设备稀疏布局下的路段行程时间估计方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(5): 83-90.
[6]	林培群, 黄超铄, 周楚昊, 庞崇浩, 邓锴宇. 数据驱动的高速公路自学习元胞传输模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(5): 103-113.
[7]	李传耀, 章孟丹, 唐铁桥. 考虑模块化公交供应限制的双模式早通勤均衡分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(5): 205-214.
[8]	沈鹏举, 宋丽英, 林川倩. 高铁列车晚点数据的异常检测与增量聚类方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(5): 236-247.
[9]	杨静, 侯宇晴, 谢余晨, 杨安安. 城市轨道交通网络短时OD客流多任务协同预测[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(5): 261-270.
[10]	姚振兴, 刘贤, 赵一飞, 王亮, 王彦琛. 手机信令不均匀定位下出行端点自适应识别方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(4): 44-52.
[11]	张鹏, 李兴旺, 姬炳豪, 孙超, 李文权. 路口重复放行的公交与社会车辆协同绿波优化模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(4): 53-62.
[12]	代亮, 杜鹏飞, 黄自彬, 杨朋博. 基于深度强化学习的城市交通信号分层协同控制方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(4): 63-72.
[13]	王庞伟, 王思淼, 雷方舒, 徐京辉, 王子鹏, 王力. 混合动作表示强化学习下的城市交叉口智慧信控方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(4): 73-83.
[14]	王连震, 沈超文, 王宇萍, 薛淑祺. 网联高速公路合流区基于间隙优化的车辆协同控制方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(4): 84-95.
[15]	王维锋, 黄建鑫, 王晓全, 吴昕韩, 卞子馨. 基于无锚旋转框的航拍图像车辆全向检测方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(4): 104-115.