东北海陆大通道运输网络关键节点识别与抗毁性分析

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2026.01.001

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2026, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 2-10.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2026.01.001

东北海陆大通道运输网络关键节点识别与抗毁性分析

吴暖^*，林婷，王晚香

大连交通大学，交通工程学院，辽宁大连116028

收稿日期:2025-10-14 修回日期:2025-12-14 接受日期:2025-12-18 出版日期:2026-02-25 发布日期:2026-02-13
作者简介:吴暖（1991—），男，浙江金华人，讲师，博士。
基金资助:
辽宁省属本科高校基本科研业务费专项资金；2025年度辽宁省交通运输行业科技项目。

Identification of Key Nodes and Invulnerability Analysis of Northeast Sea-Land Corridor Transportation Network

WU Nuan^*, LIN Ting, WANG Wanxiang

School of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, Liaoning, China

Received:2025-10-14 Revised:2025-12-14 Accepted:2025-12-18 Online:2026-02-25 Published:2026-02-13
Supported by:
Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Liaoning(LJ212410150001)；2025 Annual Science and Technology Project of Liaoning Provincial Transportation Industry (202507)。

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 东北海陆大通道涉及众多运输节点，各类风险事件不仅会直接影响节点的正常运转，还会通过货流在节点间转移引发网络级联失效，影响通道的高效运行。因此，本文基于复杂网络理论，研究东北海陆大通道运输网络的抗毁性。首先，基于东北海陆大通道多种运输方式的实际，构建多层复合网络，分析网络拓扑结构；其次，选取度中心性、接近中心性、介数中心性、特征向量中心性、聚集系数等指标，构建节点重要度评价体系，设计融入信息熵的改进相关性赋权法——优劣解距离法（CRITIC-TOPSIS），量化节点重要度；最后，基于节点重要度等因素，构建了负载-容量级联失效模型，仿真分析不同参数和攻击模式对网络抗毁性的影响。研究结果表明：当节点重要度排名前10节点失效时，东北海陆大通道运输网络全局效率下降58%，网络连通性下降30%；当节点负载参数α=2、节点容量系数 β=1.4，γ=1.6时，网络应对不同攻击的抗毁性较强。

关键词: 综合交通运输, 抗毁性分析, 复合网络模型, 东北海陆大通道, 级联失效

Abstract: The Northeast Sea-Land Corridor involves a large number of transportation nodes. Various risk events will not only directly affect the normal operation of these nodes, but also trigger cascading failures in the network through the transfer of freights flow between nodes, which undermine the efficient operation of the corridor. Therefore, the invulnerability of the Northeast Sea Land Corridor transportation network was studied based on a complex network theory. First, a multi-layer composite network was constructed based on the diverse transportation modes of the Northeast Sea-Land Corridor transportation network, and its topological structure was analyzed. Second, metrics, such as degree centrality, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality, eigenvector centrality, and clustering coefficient were selected to establish a node importance evaluation system. The improved correlation CRITIC-TOPSIS, incorporating information entropy, was used to quantify the node importance. Finally, a load-capacity cascading failure model was constructed based on node importance. The impact of different parameters and attack modes on network invulnerability was simulated and analyzed. The findings indicate that when the top 10 nodes by node importance fail, the global efficiency of the Northeast Sea-Land Corridor transportation network decreases by 58%, and the network connectivity drops by 30%. When the node load parameter α=2, node capacity coefficient β=1.4, and γ=1.6, the network exhibits strong resilience against various attack modes.

Key words: integrated transportation, invulnerability analysis, composite network model, Northeast Sea-Land Corridor, cascading failure

中图分类号:

U113

吴暖, 林婷, 王晚香. 东北海陆大通道运输网络关键节点识别与抗毁性分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2026, 26(1): 2-10.

WU Nuan, LIN Ting, WANG Wanxiang. Identification of Key Nodes and Invulnerability Analysis of Northeast Sea-Land Corridor Transportation Network[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2026, 26(1): 2-10.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2026.01.001

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2026/V26/I1/2

参考文献

[1]周宝刚,邹珊珊.东北陆海新通道物流体系建设问题与路径研究[J]. 东北亚经济研究,2024, 8(4): 66-82. [ZHOU B G, ZOU S S. Research on the problems and paths of logistics system construction of New Land-Sea Corridor in China's Northeast Direction[J]. Northeast Asia Economic Research, 2024, 8(4): 66-82.]

[2]郭姝娟,许骁,刘智,等.考虑东北海陆大通道的中欧多式联运路径选择研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(3): 32-43. [GUO S J, XU X, LIU Z, et al. Route choice of China-Europe intermodal transport considering Northeast China Sea-Land Transport Corridor [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2025, 25(3): 32-43.]

[3]汪军,夏永跃,王运明,等.基于贪心介数的地铁-公交复合网络关键车站识别算法[J].铁道标准设计,2022, 66(7): 132-137. [WANG J, XIA Y Y, WANG Y M, et al. Key station recognition algorithm of metro-bus composite network based on greedy betweenness[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2022, 66(7): 132-137.]

[4]张玉召,康欢欢,邓雨露.多层网络视角下的中欧海铁运输网络级联失效脆弱性分析[J].计算机工程与应用, 2025, 61(5): 298-308. [ZHANG Y Z, KANG H H, DENG Y L. Vulnerability analysis of cascading failure of Sino-Europe sea-rail transport network from perspective of multi-layer network[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2025, 61(5): 298-308.]

[5]MUKHTAR M F, ABAS Z A, BAHARUDDIN A S, et al. Integrating local and global information to identify influential nodes in complex networks[J]. Scientific Reports, 2023(13): 11411.

[6]ALBERT R, JEONG H, BARABÁSI A L. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks[J]. Nature, 2000, 406(6794): 378-382.

[7]牛路明,马壮林,邵逸恒,等.级联失效下多层地铁网络抗毁性分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2025, 35(6): 181-190. [NIU L M, MA Z L, SHAO Y H, et al. Invulnerability analysis of multi-layer metro network under cascading failure[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(6): 181-190.]

[8] MA J, JU Z. Cascading failure model of scale-free networks for avoiding edge failure[J]. Peer-to-peer Networking and Applications, 2019, 12(6): 1627-1637.

[9]马壮林,邵逸恒,舒兰,等.多层网络视角下地铁网络脆弱性分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2023,33(8): 164 172. [MA Z L, SHAO Y H, SHU L, et al. Vulnerability analysis of metro network from perspective of multi-layer network[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(8): 164-172.]

[10] 郑乐, 高良鹏,陈学武,等.地铁-公交加权复合网络关键站点识别及鲁棒性研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(5): 120-129. [ZHENG L, GAO L P, CHEN X W, et al. Critical stations identification and robustness analysis of weighted metro-bus composite network[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2023, 23(5): 120-129.]

[11] 王昆, 宋海洲.三种客观权重赋权法的比较分析[J].技术经济与管理研究,2003(6): 48-49. [WANG K, SONG H Z. Comparative analysis of three objective weight assignment methods[J]. Journal of Technical Economics &Management, 2003(6): 48-49.]

[12] HE D Y, XU J Q, CHEN X L.Information-theoretic entropy based weight aggregation method in multiple attribute group decision-making[J]. Entropy, 2016, 2016, 18(6): 171.

[13] GONG M, MA L, CAI Q, et al. Enhancing robustness of coupled networks under targeted recoveries[J]. Scientific reports, 2015, 5(1): 8439.

[14] 冯芬玲, 董开云,张泽,等.基于级联失效的西部陆海新通道网络脆弱性分析[J].交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(6): 15-29. [FENG F L, DONG K Y, ZHANG Z, et al. Analysis of vulnerability for New Western Land-sea Corridor network based on cascading failures[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2024, 24(6): 15-29.]

[15] LIU J, XIONG Q Y, SHI X, et al. Load-redistribution strategy based on time-varying load against cascading failure of complex network[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2015, 24(7): 076401.

东北海陆大通道运输网络关键节点识别与抗毁性分析

Identification of Key Nodes and Invulnerability Analysis of Northeast Sea-Land Corridor Transportation Network

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李小静, 袁静, 秦怡豪. 定制客运动态乘降点与车辆路线联合优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2026, 26(1): 228-238.
[2]	李贵阳, 谢秉磊, 李晓丹. 考虑公交替代效应的城市轨道交通网络级联失效分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(6): 185-196.
[3]	郭姝娟, 许骁, 刘智, 董彦鹭, 华梦颖, 彭康真. 考虑东北海陆大通道的中欧多式联运路径选择研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(3): 32-43.
[4]	赵雪亭, 胡立伟, 周君. 城市交通拥塞风险场级联失效及韧性评估研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025, 25(2): 146-156.
[5]	冯芬玲, 董开云, 张泽, 方源. 基于级联失效的西部陆海新通道网络脆弱性分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(6): 15-29.
[6]	许波桅, 唐灿璇, 李军军. 级联失效下海港一陆港集装箱运输网络鲁棒性分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(3): 265-279.
[7]	马奇飞, 贾鹏, 匡海波. 中国综合交通运输绿色效率的空间特征研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(6): 300-308.
[8]	左大杰，肖国胜，王孟云. 产业转移背景下西部运输需求的完全分解模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(5): 15-20.
[9]	冯涛，彭其渊，陶思宇，陈昕梅. 站城融合模式下既有铁路车站城市功能开发体量预测研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(5): 21-28.
[10]	叶菲菲，杨隆浩，王应明，蓝以信. 基于数据包络分析和扩展置信规则库的交通运输业环境治理成本预测[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(3): 20-27.
[11]	周晓晔，崔瑶，何亮，马小云，王思聪. 基于地铁—货车联运的物流配送路径优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(3): 111-117.
[12]	骆晨，李想，钟林峰，胡姗姗. 基于家庭属性差异的大学生出行方式选择行为研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(3): 227-232.
[13]	诸立超，刘昭然. 托运人在不同时空下的选择行为差异揭示[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(1): 27-32.
[14]	项昀，徐铖铖，于维杰，华雪东，王炜. 基于人口迁徙大数据的城市对外交通客运方式优势出行距离研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(1): 241-246.
[15]	申婵，崔洪军. 基于可靠性最短路的实时定制公交线路优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(6): 99-104.