运营突发事件下城市轨道交通诱导信息发布策略研究

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2023.05.024

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2023, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 227-237.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2023.05.024

• 运输组织优化理论与方法 • 上一篇下一篇

运营突发事件下城市轨道交通诱导信息发布策略研究

于丁原¹，姚恩建^*1，刘莎莎¹，李思慧²，郭东博¹，刘唯伊¹

1. 北京交通大学，综合交通运输大数据应用技术交通运输行业重点实验室，北京 100044； 2. 中国邮政集团有限公司浙江省分公司，杭州 310000

收稿日期:2023-04-21 修回日期:2023-09-05 接受日期:2023-09-08 出版日期:2023-10-25 发布日期:2023-10-23
作者简介:于丁原(1997- )，男，山东烟台人，博士生
基金资助:
北京市自然科学基金(L211025)；国家自然科学基金(52302382)

Guidance Information Release Strategy During Operation Emergencies in Urban Rail Transit

YU Ding-yuan¹, YAO En-jian^*1, LIU Sha-sha¹, LI Si-hui², GUO Dong-bo¹, LIU Wei-yi¹

1. Key Laboratory of Transport Industry of Big Data Application Technologies for Comprehensive Transport, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 2. Zhejiang Branch of China Post Group Co. Ltd, Hangzhou 310000, China

Received:2023-04-21 Revised:2023-09-05 Accepted:2023-09-08 Online:2023-10-25 Published:2023-10-23
Supported by:
Natural Science Foundation of Beijing, China (L211025)；National Natural Science Foundation of China (52302382)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 运营突发事件下，向城市轨道交通(城轨)乘客有针对性地发布诱导信息，是实现高效疏导、确保城轨运营安全的重要举措。本文考虑乘客异质性，开展突发事件下城轨诱导信息发布策略研究。首先，基于潜在分类模型(Latent Class Model, LCM)构建城轨乘客在突发事件和诱导信息双重作用下的路径选择行为模型，分析乘客对诱导信息接受程度及路径选择偏好的差异。其次，以线网乘客总出行时间和线网客流分布均衡性基尼系数为优化目标，构建基于路径选择行为分析的信息诱导优化模型，并应用非支配排序遗传算法(Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm Ⅱ, NSGA-Ⅱ)求解，以获得突发事件下受影响起讫点(Origin and Destination, OD)间各有效路径的最优推荐指数。最后，以北京市工作日早高峰城轨区域线网进行案例分析。结果表明：城轨乘客在突发事件下对诱导信息存在“诱导服从型”“诱导中立型”“诱导无视型”这3类不同接受程度的群体。提供诱导信息后，线网乘客总出行时间减少3.906%，线网客流分布均衡性基尼系数下降 4.063%，同时减少了高满载率区间数量。事件结束后，诱导信息的继续发布可降低突发事件受影响区间7.08%的满载率，并避免乘客在刚恢复正常运营区间上的再次聚集。

关键词: 城市交通, 诱导信息发布, 多目标优化, 运营突发事件, 异质性, 路径选择行为

Abstract: During operation emergencies in urban rail transit, providing targeted guidance information to passengers is essential for efficient evacuation and ensuring safety. This study considers the heterogeneity of passengers and investigates the strategy of issuing guidance information during operation emergencies. A route choice model is constructed using the Latent Class Model (LCM), taking into account both operational emergencies and guidance information. Passenger acceptance of guidance information and route preferences are analyzed. An information-induced optimization model based on route choice behavior is formulated. The optimization objective is to minimize total travel time and the Gini coefficient of passenger flow distribution. The Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA- II) is used to solve the mode for the optimized recommendations for effective routes between Origin and Destination (OD) pairs. A case study is conducted on the regional line network of Beijing's urban rail transit during weekday morning peak hours. The results reveal three groups of passengers with different levels of acceptance of guidance information: "induced obedience", "induced neutrality", and "induced ignorance". Providing guidance information reduces the total travel time by 3.906%, the Gini coefficient by 4.063%, and the number of high fullness intervals. Continuing the release of guidance information after the emergency reduces the full load rate of affected sections by 7.08% and prevents the re-gathering of passengers as sections resume normal operation.

Key words: urban traffic, release of guidance information, multi-objective optimization, operation emergencies; heterogeneity, route choice behavior

中图分类号:

U491

于丁原, 姚恩建, 刘莎莎, 李思慧, 郭东博, 刘唯伊. 运营突发事件下城市轨道交通诱导信息发布策略研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(5): 227-237.

YU Ding-yuan, YAO En-jian, LIU Sha-sha, LI Si-hui, GUO Dong-bo, LIU Wei-yi. Guidance Information Release Strategy During Operation Emergencies in Urban Rail Transit[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2023, 23(5): 227-237.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2023.05.024

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2023/V23/I5/227

参考文献

[1] 范博松, 邵春福. 城市轨道交通系统动态风险模态分析建模[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 203-209. [FAN B S, SHAO C F. Dynamic risk analysis and modeling of urban rail transit system[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(6): 203-209.]

[2] YIN H D, WU J J, LIU Z Y, et al. Optimizing the release of passenger flow guidance information in urban rail transit network via agent-based simulation[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2019, 72(8): 337-355.

[3] MO B C, KOUTSOPOULOS H K, SHEN Z J M, et al. Robust path recommendations during public transit disruptions under demand uncertainty[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2023, 169(3): 82-107.

[4] WANG Y, ZHOU Y, YANG H, et al. Integrated optimization of bus bridging service design and passenger assignment in response to urban rail transit disruptions[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2023, 150 (5): 104098.

[5] 王洋, 贾利民, 徐杰, 等. 城市轨道交通突发事件客流诱导系统设计[J]. 铁路计算机应用, 2013, 21(10): 55- 58. [WANG Y, JIA L M, XU J, et al. Design of emergency passenger flow guidance system for urban transit[J]. Railway Computer Application, 2013, 21(10): 55-58.]

[6] JOU R C. Modeling the impact of pre-trip information on commuter departure time and route choice[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2001, 35(10): 887-902.

[7] CHORUS C G, WALKER J L, BEN-AKIVA M. A joint model of travel information acquisition and response to received messages[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2013, 26(1): 61-77.

[8] VAN ESSEN M, THOMAS T, VAN BERKUM E, et al. Travelers' compliance with social routing advice: Evidence from SP and RP experiments[J]. Transportation, 2020, 47(3): 1047-1070.

[9] ZHANG C, LIU T L, HUANG H J, et al. A cumulative prospect theory approach to commuters' day-to-day route-choice modeling with friends' travel information[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2018, 86(1): 527-548.

[10] LENG N N, CORMAN F. Communicating delays and adjusted disposition timetables: Modelling and evaluating the impact of incomplete information to passengers[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2022, 191(6): 116265.

[11] CHORUS C G, ARENTZE T A, TIMMERMANS H J P. A random regret-minimization model of travel choice[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2008, 42(1): 1-18.

[12] BOUMAN P, SCHMIDT M, KROON L, et al. Passenger route choice in case of disruptions[C]// IEEE. 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013). New York: IEEE, 2013: 1047-1052.

[13] LI B B, YAO E J, YAMAMOTO T, et al. Exploring behavioral heterogeneities of metro passenger's travel plan choice under unplanned service disruption with uncertainty[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2020, 141(11): 294-306.

[14] PNEVMATIKOU A M, KARLAFTIS M G, KEPAPTSOGLOU K. Metro service disruptions: How do people choose to travel? [J]. Transportation, 2015, 42(6): 933-949.

[1]	邓毛颖, 邓策方. 基于结构、效率、公平与韧性的路网密度适宜性评价研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 22-32.
[2]	荆彬彬, 林永杰, 阎珠豪, 黄政杰. 非闭合交通路网路径选择与绿波协调同步优化方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 51-62.
[3]	张兵, 陶文康, 刘建荣, 薛运强, 邓明君. 有限理性视域下老年人出行方式选择巢式Logit模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 74-82.
[4]	彭金栓, 袁浩, 宋臻, 范子斌, 杨祥浩, 张磊. 等待阶段使用手机对行人过街风险的影响[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 83-89.
[5]	张文会, 徐海彬, 周舸, 温文. 信控交叉口行人过街冲突严重程度评价模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 89-99.
[6]	王伊凡, 陈学武. 考虑空间效应的公交站点客流量影响因素分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 153-164.
[7]	高良鹏, 郑乐, 简文良, 马新卫, 季彦婕. 弹性激励下多停车场共享泊位竞价有效权分配算法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 176-184.
[8]	肖雅玲, 柏赟, 陈垚, 李竹君, 温芳. 考虑车底运用的城轨货运专列运行图与载货方案协同优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 185-195.
[9]	王培恒, 杨立兴, 李树凯, 高自友. 考虑换乘站客流疏解的地铁列车跳站与客流控制协同优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 196-205.
[10]	庞磊, 任利剑, 运迎霞. 建成环境对轨道交通站点客流量与通勤乘车率影响的差异化分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 206-214.
[11]	户佐安, 邓锦程, 杨江浩, 赵妍. 轨道交通站点聚类及其对客流预测的影响分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 227-238.
[12]	张燕, 李子鑫, 刘进平. 考虑工作量平衡的餐饮垃圾多行程收运路线优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 239-249.
[13]	马利, 付锐, 孙秦豫, 郭应时, 王畅, 袁伟. 不同情境下乘员对车辆运动参数的晕车敏感性研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 284-295.
[14]	胡宝雨, 刘学. 基于手机信令数据的城市区域居民出行OD预测模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 296-306.
[15]	高万晨, 路世昌, 李丹. 基于智能刷卡数据的乘客上车站点估计研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 307-318.

运营突发事件下城市轨道交通诱导信息发布策略研究

Guidance Information Release Strategy During Operation Emergencies in Urban Rail Transit

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics