基于方式选择的拥堵收费及返还优化模型

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2016, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (1): 142-147.

基于方式选择的拥堵收费及返还优化模型

姜沂兵，孙会君*，王伟

北京交通大学交通运输学院系统科学研究所，北京100044

收稿日期:2015-09-18 修回日期:2015-11-17 出版日期:2016-02-25 发布日期:2016-02-25
作者简介:姜沂兵（1988-），女，辽宁本溪人，硕士生.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金/National Natural Science Foundation of China（71322102，71271023）.

Congestion Pricing and Refund Optimization Model Based on Mode Choice

JIANG Yi-bing，SUN Hui-jun，WANGWei

Institute of System Science, School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China

Received:2015-09-18 Revised:2015-11-17 Online:2016-02-25 Published:2016-02-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过应用累积前景理论分析用户出行行为，建立拥堵收费及其返还的优化模型，得到了不同需求分布均值下的最优收费和最优票价折扣费率，用算例验证了模型的有效性，并对比了无补贴无收费、有收费无补贴、有补贴无收费及有补贴有收费4 种情况的系统总成本，以及有补贴有收费情况下相对于无补贴无收费情况，政府和用户节省的总成本费用.结果表明，模型与实际现象是吻合的，实施拥堵收费和补贴政策可以有效减少系统总成本，节省政府财政支出和公交车用户的费用成本，而且恰当的设置拥堵收费和票价折扣费率将有效引导人们更多的选择公共交通出行.

关键词: 公路运输, 拥堵收费及其返还, 累积前景理论, 出行方式选择, 参考点

Abstract:

By analyzing travel behavior of users with cumulative prospect theory, a congestion pricing and refund optimization model is proposed. And the optimal fare discount rate and best toll are obtained with it. Then a numerical example is used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the model. There are four situations: without subsidy and without toll, without subsidy and with toll, with subsidy and without toll, with subsidy and with toll. In this paper, the total system costs in the situations above are compared to the situation without subsidy and without toll. Moreover, the cost expense savings of government and passengers in the situation with subsidy and with toll compared with the situation without subsidy and without toll are also got. At last, the results show that the model is in accord with the users’actual choice behavior. The comparisons show that the policies of congestion pricing and subsidy can effectively reduce the total system cost and save the expense cost of government and passengers by bus. And appropriate congestion toll and fare discount rate can effectively make more people choose public transport.

Key words: highway transportation, congestion pricing and refund, cumulative prospect theory, travel mode choice, reference point

中图分类号:

U491

姜沂兵，孙会君，王伟. 基于方式选择的拥堵收费及返还优化模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2016, 16(1): 142-147.

JIANG Yi-bing，SUN Hui-jun，WANGWei. Congestion Pricing and Refund Optimization Model Based on Mode Choice[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2016, 16(1): 142-147.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19137.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2016/V16/I1/142

参考文献

[1] Pigou A C. The economics of welfare[M]. Macmillan， 1920.

[2] Knight F H. Some fallacies in the interpretation of social cost[J]. Quarter Journal of Economics，1924，38(4)：582- 606.

[3] Walters A. The theory and measurement of private and social costs of highway congestion[J]. Economica，1961, 29(4)：676-699.

[4] Button K J. Road pricing[J]. Transportation Research Part A，1986(20A):85-184.

[5] Goodwin P B. The rule of three: a possible solution to the political problem of competing objectives for road pricing[J]. Traffic Engineering and Control，1989,30 (10)：495-497.

[6] Mireabel F，Rrymond M. Bottleneck congestion pricing and modal split: redistribution of toll revenue[J]. Transportation Research Part A，2010，45(1)：18-30.

[7] Kahneman D，Tverky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decisions under risk[J]. Econometrica，1979，47(2)： 263-291.

[8] Tversky A，Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty[J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty，1992，5(4)：297-323.

[9] Gao S，Frejinger E，Ben-Akiva M. Adaptive route choices in risky traffic networks: a prospect theory approach[J]. Transportation Research Part C，2010，18 (5)：727-740.

[10] Tian L J，Huang H J，Gao Z Y. A cumulative perceived value-based dynamic user equilibrium model considering the travelers'risk evaluation on arrival time[J]. Network Spatial Economics，2012,12(4)：589- 608.

[11] Ding L，William H K L. Modeling the effects of population density on prospect theory based travel mode choice equilibrium[J]. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Technology, Planning, and Operations，2013，DOI: 10.1080/1572450.2013.806745.

[12] 罗清玉，吴文静，贾洪飞，等. 基于前景理论的居民方式选择分析[J]. 交通信息与安全，2012，30(2)：37-40. [LUO Q Y, WU W J, JIA H F, et al. Analysis of residents travel mode choice based on Prospect Theory[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2012, 30(2): 37-40.]

[13] Huang H J. Fares and tolls in a competitive system with transit and highway: the case with two groups of commuters[J]. Transportation Research Part E，2000，36 (4)：267-284.

[14] Shao H，Lam W H K，Tam M L. A reliability-based stochastic assignment model for network with multiple user classes under uncertainty in demand[J]. Network and Spatial Economics，2006，6(3)：173-204.

[15] Connors R D，Sumalee A. A network equilibrium model with travelers’perception of stochastic travel times[J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty，2009，43(5)：614-624.

[16] 李志纯，谷强，史峰. 弹性需求下拥挤道路收费的模型与算法研究[J]. 交通运输工程学报，2001, 3(1)： 81-85. [LI Z C, GU Q, SHI F. The model and algorithm of road jammed with traffic based on elastic demand[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2001, 3(1): 81-85.]