不同情境下乘员对车辆运动参数的晕车敏感性研究

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2023.06.028

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2023, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (6): 284-295.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2023.06.028

不同情境下乘员对车辆运动参数的晕车敏感性研究

马利^a，付锐^{a, b}，孙秦豫^a，郭应时^{*a, b}，王畅^{a, b}，袁伟^{a, b}

长安大学，a. 汽车学院；b. 汽车运输安全保障技术交通行业重点实验室，西安 710064

收稿日期:2023-07-13 修回日期:2023-08-15 接受日期:2023-08-28 出版日期:2023-12-25 发布日期:2023-12-23
作者简介:马利(1995- )，男，山东菏泽人，博士生。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金 (52272412, 52102451)；中国博士后科学基金(2021M700531)。

Susceptibility of Passenger Motion Sickness Based on Vehicle Motion Parameters Under Multiple Scenarios

MA Li^a,FU Rui^{a, b},SUN Qin-yu^a,GUO Ying-shi^{*a, b},WANG Chang^{a, b},YUAN Wei^{a, b}

a. School of Automobile; b. Key Laboratory of Automobile Transportation Safety Technology Ministry of Transport, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China

Received:2023-07-13 Revised:2023-08-15 Accepted:2023-08-28 Online:2023-12-25 Published:2023-12-23
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (52272412, 52102451)； China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M700531)。

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 晕车是一种常见的由车辆运动引起的病症，严重影响乘车体验。由于现有车辆控制方法很难做到完全避免晕车，且晕车等级随暴露时间而增加，并受不同情景的影响，故乘员晕车状态变化对应的车辆运动参数阈值(晕车阈值)需要进一步研究。本文聚焦于探究不同情景下晕车阈值的变化规律，即晕车敏感性。首先，设计4类情境下(不同晕车易感性和有无非驾驶任务)的实车乘坐；其次，分析4类情境下晕车等级的变化规律；然后，分别以4种运动工况下的加速度和加加速度作为分析对象，利用单因素方差和统计方法，将相同情景和不同晕车等级下的晕车阈值变化规律(横向敏感性)进行横向对比，将不同情景和相同晕车等级下的晕车阈值变化规律进行纵向对比(纵向敏感性)。结果表明，晕车等级随暴露时间而增加，并且4类情境下的晕车等级存在差异，高晕车易感性被试具有横向敏感性，低晕车易感性被试不具有横向晕车易感性；纵向敏感性一般只在中度晕车等级下成立。研究结论丰富了晕车等级与晕车阈值的关系，可为传统驾驶和自动驾驶减少晕车的控制策略提供参考依据。

关键词: 城市交通, 晕车敏感性, 统计分析, 车辆运动参数, 人因

Abstract: Motion sickness is a common symptom caused by vehicle movement, which significantly affects vehicle passengers' riding experiences. It is difficult to completely avoid motion sickness under existing vehicle control methods, and the level of motion sickness increases with the duration of the riding time in various conditions, it is therefore necessary to study the vehicle motion parameter threshold corresponding to the motion sickness status of vehicle passengers. This paper investigates the changes of motion sickness threshold under different scenarios and the sensitivity of motion sickness related vehicle motion parameters based on different motion sickness ratings (SoMSMP). First, a vehicle ride experiment is designed for four types of scenarios (different susceptibility to motion sickness and with or without non-drive related tasks), and the variation rule of motion sickness ratings is analyzed for the four scenarios. The acceleration and jerk under the four motion conditions are taken as the analysis object. The single factor variance and statistical method are used to make a lateral comparison of the motion sickness threshold change rule (lateral SoMS-MP) under the same scenario and different motion sickness levels, and a longitudinal comparison (longitudinal SoMS-MP) of the motion sickness threshold change rule under different scenarios with the same motion sickness rating. The results show that the motion sickness ratings increased with exposure time, and the differences exist in the motion sickness ratings in the four scenarios. The high motion sickness susceptibility participants have lateral SoMS-MP, while the low susceptibility participants have no lateral susceptibility, and longitudinal SoMS-MP can only be identified at moderate degree of motion sickness. The study results provide references for the motion sickness ratings and motion sickness threshold analysis, which can be used for the human driving or automatic driving control strategies to reduce motion sickness.

Key words: urban traffic, sensitivity to motion sickness, statistical analysis, vehicle motion parameters, human factors

中图分类号:

U121

马利, 付锐, 孙秦豫, 郭应时, 王畅, 袁伟. 不同情境下乘员对车辆运动参数的晕车敏感性研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 284-295.

MA Li, FU Rui, SUN Qin-yu, GUO Ying-shi, WANG Chang, YUAN Wei. Susceptibility of Passenger Motion Sickness Based on Vehicle Motion Parameters Under Multiple Scenarios[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2023, 23(6): 284-295.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2023.06.028

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2023/V23/I6/284

参考文献

[1] REASON J, REASON J T, BRAND J J. Motion sickness [M]. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

[2] 胡笳, 罗书源, 赖金涛, 等. 自动驾驶对交通运输系统规划的影响综述[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(5): 52- 65, 76. [HU J, LUO S Y, LAI J T, et al. A review of the impact of autonomous driving on transportation planning[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(5): 52-65, 76.]

[3] BEURIER G. Analysis of the discomfort feeling of standing bus passengers on the TEOR T1 rouen bus lane [J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 48: 425-34.

[4] NGUYEN T, NGUYENDINH N, LECHNER B, et al. Insight into the lateral ride discomfort thresholds of young-adult bus passengers at multiple postures: Case of Singapore[J]. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 2019, 7 (3): 617-27.

[5] LI Z, FU R, WANG C, et al. Effects of linear acceleration on passenger comfort during physical driving on an urban road[J]. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2019, 18(1): 1-8.

[6] 郭应时, 苏彦奇, 付锐, 等. 换道操作对智能车辆乘客舒适性的影响研究 [J]. 中国公路学报, 2022, 35(5): 221-230. [GUO Y S, SU Y Q, FU R, et al. Influence of lane-changing maneuvers on passenger comfort of intelligent vehicles[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 35(5): 221-230.]

[7] GARCíA-RAMíREZ Y D, AGUILAR-CáRDENAS D. Passengers' comfort in horizontal curves on mountain roads: A field study using lateral accelerations[J]. Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia, 2020, 98(1): 94-103.

[8] SCHMIDTE A, KUIPER O X, WOLTER S, et al. An international survey on the incidence and modulating factors of carsickness[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2020, 71: 76-87.

[9] BOS J E, DAMALA D, LEWIS C, et al. Susceptibility to seasickness[J]. Ergonomics, 2007, 50(6): 890-901.

[1]	周备, 张莹, 张生瑞, 周千喜, 汪琴. 基于生成对抗网络的追尾事故数据填补方法研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(1): 132-137.
[2]	王维莉, 肖雨晴, 周辉, 张为四. 无信控交叉口电动自行车与机动车的冲突博弈研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(1): 149-158.
[3]	胡立伟, 张瑞杰, 赵雪亭, 贺雨, 陈琛, 刘冰, 侯智. 道路环形交叉口机动车冲突风险区识别模型研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(1): 168-178.
[4]	张英贵, 赵明慧, 张云丽. 面向虚拟连挂的城轨列车群组追踪运行仿真研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(1): 199-209.
[5]	郝妍熙, 卫书彤, 胡华, 王润祺, 刘志钢. 地铁车站步行障碍行人避让行为建模与进出站仿真[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(1): 210-220.
[6]	翁剑成, 张云飞, 林鹏飞, 李文杰. 基于就医活动推断的老年人公交就医可达性研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(1): 221-229.
[7]	孙小慧, 黄诚允. 外卖配送电动自行车换电柜选址定容实证研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(1): 230-239.
[8]	葛显龙, 王博, 杨育树, 杨昙月, 尹作发. 考虑出行特征的电动汽车协同充电调度优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(1): 240-252.
[9]	吴静娴, 唐桂孔, 李文翔. 建成环境对共享单车分时骑行量的非线性作用研究：以上海市为例[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(1): 290-298.
[10]	邓毛颖, 邓策方. 基于结构、效率、公平与韧性的路网密度适宜性评价研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 22-32.
[11]	荆彬彬, 林永杰, 阎珠豪, 黄政杰. 非闭合交通路网路径选择与绿波协调同步优化方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 51-62.
[12]	张兵, 陶文康, 刘建荣, 薛运强, 邓明君. 有限理性视域下老年人出行方式选择巢式Logit模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 74-82.
[13]	彭金栓, 袁浩, 宋臻, 范子斌, 杨祥浩, 张磊. 等待阶段使用手机对行人过街风险的影响[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 83-89.
[14]	张文会, 徐海彬, 周舸, 温文. 信控交叉口行人过街冲突严重程度评价模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 89-99.
[15]	王伊凡, 陈学武. 考虑空间效应的公交站点客流量影响因素分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(6): 153-164.

不同情境下乘员对车辆运动参数的晕车敏感性研究

Susceptibility of Passenger Motion Sickness Based on Vehicle Motion Parameters Under Multiple Scenarios

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics