交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2016, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (5): 27-32.

• 决策论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

多运输方式竞争下的铁路快捷货运定价方法

张小强*,刘丹,王斌   

  1. 西南交通大学交通运输与物流学院,成都610031
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-15 修回日期:2016-05-17 出版日期:2016-10-25 发布日期:2016-10-25
  • 作者简介:张小强(1975-),男,江西石城人,副教授,博士.
  • 基金资助:

    国家社会科学基金/ National Social Science of China(14BGL060);四川省科技厅应用基础项目基金/ Application Infrastructure Projects of Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Department(2012JY0024);铁路总公司科技发展基金/ Science and Technology Development Fund of China Railway Corporation(2014X009-L)

The Pricing Method of Railway Express Freight in Multi Transportation Modes Environment

ZHANG Xiao-qiang, LIU Dan,WANG Bin   

  1. School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
  • Received:2016-03-15 Revised:2016-05-17 Online:2016-10-25 Published:2016-10-25

摘要:

不同运输方式存在运输价格、安全性、时效性和便捷性等方面的差异,这几个 因素决定了货物运输的广义费用.客户总是选择对自身来说广义费用最小的运输方式.快 捷货物运输是铁路近几年开发的货运新品种,在定价方面主要依赖个人经验,缺乏理论 依据.为此,本文研究了多种运输方式竞争下铁路快捷货物运输的动态定价方法,提出用 户广义费用最小化模型和双层规划模型,并通过呼和浩特至北京的货运数据比较了这两 种定价模型对定价及总利润的影响.结果表明,双层规划模型优于广义费用最小化模型.

关键词: 铁路运输, 动态定价, 双层规划, 快捷货物运输, 广义费用

Abstract:

The main differences among the modes of transport are prices, safety, timeliness and convenience, etc. Those factors determine the generalized cost. And the customers will always choose a transportation mode of which the generalized cost is minimum. In this paper, a kind of dynamic pricing method for the express rail freight transportation is provided. At the same time, a model based on the generalized cost and a bi-level model are proposed. Finally, a comparison analyze of the influence on pricing strategies for railway enterprise is studied based on the data of Huhehaote to Beijing freight. The results show that the bi-level model does better than the another model in increasing profit for railway enterprise.

Key words: railway transportation, dynamic pricing, bi-level programming, express freight transportation, generalized cost

中图分类号: