先进出行信息下事故对行程时间可靠性的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

定义路径行程时间可靠性为在交通事故期间内平均路径行驶时间小于事故前路径出行时间乘以可接受拥堵水平的概率，由此导出路网行程时间可靠性.假定事故持续时间服从正态分布并将研究时域划分成相同的时段，在先进出行信息下，利用元胞传输模型进行路段流量加载，给出了每一个时段内路径行程时间的递推式，并在每一个时段内更新1次路径出行时间，出行者根据更新的出行时间运用Logit模型进行路径决策，最后基于Monte-Carlo法模拟求解路网行程时间可靠性.算例结果表明，行程时间可靠性随事故持续时间和方差及需求的增加而减小；可靠性随可接受拥堵水平的增加而增加；在拥堵网络中，包含事故路段的OD间需求越高，可靠性越低.

关键词: 城市交通, 行程时间可靠性, 元胞传输模型, 交通事故, 路径出行时间

Abstract:

The route travel time reliability is defined as the probability that the mean route travel time during incident is less than the pre-accident route travel time multiplied by the acceptable congestion level, and derived road network travel time reliability. Assuming that the duration of the accident obeys the normal distribution and divided the study time domain into several equal sub-packets, under the advanced travel information systems, the traffic flow is carried out by the cell transmission model, and the recursion of the path travel time in each subpacket is given. Route travel time is updated in each sub-packet, traveler uses Logit model to make the path decision based on the updated travel time. Finally, Monte Carlo method is proposed to solve the travel time reliability of the road network. The results show that the reliability of the travel time decreases with the increase of the duration and variance of the accident and the increase of the demand. The reliability increases with the increase of the acceptable congestion level. In the congested network, the demand between the ODs including the accident road is higher, the lower the reliability.

Key words: urban traffic, travel time reliability, cell transmission model, traffic incident, route travel time

中图分类号:

U268.6

刘永红，李进龙，陈欣，罗霞. 先进出行信息下事故对行程时间可靠性的影响[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18(3): 36-41.

LIU Yong-hong, LI Jing-long, CHEN Xin, LUO Xia. Impact of Incident on Travel Time Reliability in Advanced Traveler Information Systems[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2018, 18(3): 36-41.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19622.shtml

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2018/V18/I3/36

参考文献

[1] ASAKURA Y. Reliability measures of an origin and destination pair in a deteriorated road network with variable flows[C]//Proceeding of the Fourth Meeting of the EURO Working Group in Transportation, New York: Amsterdam, 1999: 273-287.

[2] BELL M, CASSIR C IIDA Y, et al. A sensitivity-based approach to network reliability assentment[J]. Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Jerusalem, 1999: 283-300.

[3] CHEN A, YANG H, LO HK, et al. A capacity related reliability for transportation network[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation Network, 1999, 33(2): 183-200.

[4] CHEN A, JI Z, RECKER W. Travel time reliability with risk-sensitive travelers[J]. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2001, 1783(1): 27-33.

[5] DU Z P, NICHOSLON A J. Degradable transportation systems: Sensitivity and reliability analysis[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 1997, 31(3): 225-237.

[6] STEPHEN C, DAVID W. Modeling network travel time reliability under stochastic demand[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2005, 39(3): 119-140.

[7] 陈玲娟，刘海旭，蒲云. 交通事故持续期内行程时间的可靠性研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2013, 48(2): 377- 382. [CHEN L J, Liu H X, PU Y. Travel time reliability during incident duration time[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 48(2): 377-382. ]

[8] 冷军强, 张亚军, 赵兴奎, 等. 基于广义出行费用的城市路网行程时间可靠性[J]. 公路交通科技, 2010, 27 (7): 133-137. [LENG J Q, ZHANG Y J, ZHAO X K, et al. Time reliability of urban road network based on generalized travel cost[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2010, 27(7): 133-137. ]

[9] XU M, GAO Z Y. Behaviors in a dynamic model of traffic assignment with elastic demand[J]. Chinese Physic, 2007, 16(6): 1608-1614.

[10] FIRESZ T L, BERSEIN D H, MEHTA N J, et al. Dayto- day dynamic network disequilibrium and idealized traveler information systems[J]. Operation Research, 1994, 42(6): 1120-1136.

[11] SHAO H, TIAN Q, YUANG X M, et al. Risk-taking path choice behaviors under ATIS in transportation networks with demand uncertainty[J]. Journal of Southeast University, 2008, 24(sup): 43-48.

[12] 郭仁拥, 黄海军. ATIS环境下交通配流的动态演化模型[J]. 管理科学学报, 2008, 11(2): 12-19. [GUO R Y, HUANG H J. The dynamic evolution model of traffic distribution in the ATIS environment[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2008, 11(2): 12-19.]

[13] 尚华艳, 黄海军, 高自友. 基于元胞传输模型的实时交通信息设计[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2008, 34(2): 234-238. [SHANG H Y, HUANG H J, GAO Z Y, et al. Design real-time traffic information by cell transmission model[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2008, 34(2): 234-238.]

[14] 黄忠祥, 况爱武, 范文婷, 等. 出行信息对道路网络出行时间可靠性的影响[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2012, 12(6): 93-99. [HUANG Z X, KUANG A W, FAN W T, et al. Impact of travel information on road network travel time reliability[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2012, 12(6): 93-99.]

[15] 侯立文, 谭家美. 信息条件下路段出行时间可靠性的计算[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2006, 40(6): 968-972. [HOU L W, TAN J M. Computing the link travel time reliability with information provision[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2006, 40(6): 968-972.]

[16] HONG K, LO W, SZETO Y. A cell- based variational inequality formulation of the dynamic user optimal assignment Problem[J]. Journal of Transportation Research Part B, 2006, 36(5): 421-443.

[17] CARLOS F, DAGANZO. The cell transmission model PartⅡ: Network traffic[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 1995, 29(2): 79-93.